‘I was not arrested': Malaysian comedian Saiful Apek comments on viral photo
PETALING JAYA – Malaysian comedian and actor Saiful Apek has commented on a photo that showed him with the police, which went viral on April 29.
An entertainment portal reported earlier that a comedian dressed in a pink baju Melayu resembling Saiful was allegedly detained by two police officers. The actual location and cause of the incident could not be confirmed.
Saiful , whose real name is Saiful Azam Mohamed Yusoff, told Malaysian newspaper Sinar Harian he was not detained by the authorities. What happened was that two police officers broke up a dispute between him and an unknown individual.
The 55-year-old said the incident occurred while he was at an event hosted by Malaysia's Inspector-General of Police, Tan Sri Razarudin Husain, in Cheras on April 28.
'After performing and promoting the film 6 Jilake, an unknown person suddenly appeared and provoked me about the film,' Saiful said. 'I thought he was joking initially, but I lost patience after a while.'
Saiful, one of the stars of the movie, said he stood up and left to prevent the situation from escalating.
'I thought it was over then, but when I went to the carpark, the individual continued to provoke me until the police intervened to break up our dispute,' he said.
Saiful added that what upset him most was that the man was insulting 6 Jilake (2025) director Aziz M. Osman.
'What really bothered me was when he mentioned abang Aziz and called the film rubbish,' Saiful said. 'If it was just my name, I could control my emotions, but this involved someone I consider a mentor.'
The member of comedy group Senario also apologised to his family and friends who may have been affected by the situation.
'I hope everyone is clear with this statement and I ask everyone to stay calm, especially family and close friends who were shocked by what happened,' he said.
'What worried me most was when many contacted the members of Senario, especially Azlee, whom we know has a heart condition,' he said, referring to comedian Azlee Jaafar. THE STAR/ASIA NEWS NETWORK
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
Sorry, not sorry: How China's nationalistic netizens played into Malaysian rapper Namewee's hands
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Namewee is boycotted on the mainland for his 'anti-China stance', after his songs mocked the country's leader and nationalistic netizens. HONG KONG – If a picture speaks a thousand words, a removed picture shouts out even more. Controversial Malaysian rapper Namewee on July 21 took down photos he had earlier posted on Facebook of himself with actor Eric Tsang and singer Kenny Bee. This came after the two veteran Hong Kong celebrities issued formal apologies for their appearance alongside the rapper, for which they caught flak from Chinese netizens. Namewee is boycotted on the mainland for his 'anti-China stance', after his songs mocked the country's leader and nationalistic netizens. In a fresh Facebook post on the same day the pictures were taken down, Namewee shared his latest song, Letter of Apology . He cited the lyrics: 'I'm now ready to admit my mistakes/ Although it's just a small issue/ I'm willing to bow down and admit that I'm weak/ And reflect on all my foolish mistakes.' It was a master stroke: In an instant, he generated free, large-scale publicity for his most recent work, simultaneously putting on display the absurdity of the nationalistic outcry over the photos and the motivation for the artistes' apologies as implied in his new song. Namewee's initial post on July 19 had seemed innocuous enough. It was just pictures of the celebrities smiling for the camera, with his message in Chinese stating merely 'wishing you a successful performance tonight', ahead of a concert taking place that night in Genting, Malaysia. It looked and read like an innocent post from any other delighted supporter of Tsang and Bee who had been lucky enough to meet their idols in person. But it was the Chinese netizens' outrage over the post, and the pandering apologies it immediately elicited from the Hong Kong artistes who quickly sought to distance themselves from the rapper, that made it news. And Namewee cleverly capitalised on that to draw attention to his latest song, which – coincidentally or not – touches on a similar topic and had until now gone largely unnoticed elsewhere, especially on the mainland where his works are banned. With one innocuous post, and then its removal, the singer channelled outcry against him into publicity for his latest satire. The official music video for Letter of Apology shows the rapper at a press conference –speaking in mainland-accented Chinese – stating his desire to 'clarify matters' before breaking down in mock tears, bowing in apparent repentance, and crooning his 'apology' to his audience. A description – in Chinese – of the song on his official YouTube channel reads: 'After (issuing) the letter of apology, you will be propelled to fame and riches, arriving at the zenith of your lifetime… Only after writing my letter of apology, will I achieve prosperity! ' The song satirises the self-criticism and self-censorship demanded by China's hypersensitive, ultranationalistic keyboard warriors from those public figures who inadvertently offend the lucrative mainland market they cater to. Its lyrics also hint at the sense of self that some celebrities sacrifice to stay on the right side of their Chinese audiences, with one stanza stating: 'Can you accept/ That I can now only voicelessly await my fate/ No more need to wonder/ If I can still call this life my own.' Taiwan-based Hong Kong political commentator Sang Pu said he found Namewee's self-censorship of the photos and his subsequent post sharing his music video a 'brilliant' move. 'Namewee's deletion of the pictures caused them to be more widely circulated,' Mr Sang told The Straits Times. 'The photos resulted in the apologies from Eric Tsang and Kenny Bee, which then allowed Namewee to publicly juxtapose the two artistes' letters of repentance against the scenario depicted in his song.' 'From this, we can see how sharp-witted and humorous Namewee is,' he added. Muar-born Namewee, 42, also known as Wee Meng Chee or Huang Mingzhi, made his name producing songs that poke fun at sensitive political issues . He has been blacklisted in China since 2021, after the release of his ballad single Fragile, which contains barbed references to President Xi Jinping and issues including the country's tight censorship . In 2023, Namewee revealed that he was banned from performing in Hong Kong as well. Tsang's July 21 apology on Weibo, while not directly naming Namewee, expressed regret over the 'unintentional mistake' of having taken a photo with 'a certain person' whose background he had been 'unaware of'. 'As a Chinese citizen, I've always been committed to safeguarding our country's dignity and national sentiment,' Tsang wrote in Chinese. 'If I had known (his background), I would never have had any contact with him.' Bee issued an almost-identical apology on his own Weibo account. Tsang, 72, who has been in the show business since the 1980s, is general manager of Hong Kong's biggest television broadcaster TVB, which is expanding significantly in mainland China. Bee, also 72, was lead vocalist of Hong Kong 1970s pop group The Wynners and has in recent years taken on several minor acting gigs produced in mainland China. The two artistes' grovelling apologies are just the latest illustration of the pressures that celebrities can face even when they are not major players in the mainland market. But their eagerness to clarify the matter could also be linked in part to the additional spectre of a national security law over Hong Kong society. Beijing imposed a national security law on Hong Kong in 2020 after mass anti-government protests in 2019 and early 2020. Hong Kong subsequently introduced its own such legislation in 2024. The emphasis on national security in the city since then has resulted in its people increasingly policing their opinions made in public. Under Hong Kong law, sedition can also cover anything that incites 'hatred, contempt, dissatisfaction or disaffection' with the authorities. While it is clear that Tsang and Bee have not contravened any law, appearing to be aligned with Namewee whose work mocks China – however tenuous the link – could still potentially cause a rift not just with their mainland business partners and supporters, but also among those in Hong Kong. Ultimately, though, the artistes' main motivation for their apology is essentially 'greed', according to Mr Sang. 'The reason (Tsang and Bee) allowed themselves to be controlled by their entertainment companies and to publish the formal apologies scripted for them, is because of the money they still hope to make off their mainland audiences,' he said. 'This is a choice they must make: Would they prefer to eat standing (by their own principles), or do they want to eat on their knees (at the mercy of others).'
Business Times
2 days ago
- Business Times
Is Michelin losing the plot?
YOU know something's not quite right when you get invited to a party and the host doesn't even show up. On Thursday evening, the cream of Singapore's F&B industry gathered at the Marina Bay Sands' Sands Ballroom, where the best restaurants as decided by the Michelin Guide were rewarded with stars and a standup buffet after the ceremony. Notably missing was the guide's international director Gwendal Poullennec, who nonetheless had prepared a prerecorded video lauding the culinary excellence of Singapore's restaurant scene, while also making the right noises about the challenges the industry is facing. While it's not the first time he didn't make a personal appearance in Singapore, there was an air of 'Sorry, I couldn't make it, but enjoy yourselves anyway' blaseness about his absence. It was a vibe that continued throughout the evening, which could go down as the guide's laziest, phone-it-in performance since it made its grand debut in 2016. It feels particularly pertinent this year, what with record closures and economic uncertainty making pretty much everyone in the industry miserable. And without taking away any of the glory of the night's two winners – one star for Omakase@Stevens and a second star for Sushi Sakuta – a guide which sees the highest number of dropouts with barely any replacements does not bode well for Singapore's reputation as a culinary destination. Were there really no worthy restaurants to recognise this year? Even last year, when the stars were released via e-mail instead of a physical ceremony – as if Michelin had discovered a new strain of Covid-19 we didn't know about – there were four new stars and one promotion. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 2 pm Lifestyle Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself. Sign Up Sign Up Given its long-held vow of secrecy, there is no way of knowing how Michelin thinks, much less its processes in awarding its stars. You can only guess. Maybe Peach Blossoms' tendency to innovate rankles Michelin's definition of Chinese food as dim sum and Peking duck. Maybe the modern Korean Na Oh isn't fine-dining enough. Perhaps too much red tape is involved in converting Malaysian-inspired Fiz's sustainable green star to a proper one. It's also possible that the lack of a direct bus service to ASU kept the inspectors away from sampling its progressive Asian cuisine. And who knows, maybe the Noma-esque rumblings about Somma prejudiced them against its refreshingly daring menus. Maybe it's just within its comfort zone to reward what they know – fail-safe Japanese food. Taste is subjective, we know. Whatever Michelin's reasons, what's worrying is the optics for Singapore. This year's results simply cement the impression that we are lagging behind other Asian cities and that our strong dollar makes it more attractive to travel overseas to eat. That even Michelin doesn't feel that there are any new and interesting restaurants worth making a detour to Singapore for, is not good. While chefs may rationalise that they work to make their guests happy and make a decent living while at it, it doesn't change the fact that they all want – for better or worse – the tyre-maker's stamp of approval. Never mind that its credibility and relevance have been waning in the wake of alternative guides. For restaurants, not knowing why they're not good enough, because of the guide's lack of transparency, is what hits the hardest. Talk to people in the industry, and it sounds like trying to reach out to Michelin is like writing a letter to Santa Claus. Except that with Santa, you have the luxury of wondering if he even exists. With Michelin, you know you're just being ignored. For many, Thursday's ceremony was a bit of a non-event, although it was a welcome excuse for chefs in the industry to party and savour the relief of maintaining their stars. After the ignominy of last year's e-mail presentation (followed up by a belated gathering much later on), MBS gets kudos for trying to bring back some of the glamour of Michelin ceremonies past. Still, Michelin has to decide – does it want to be an active player in the dining destination it's in, engaging and shaping the narrative of a city that it has a vested interest in seeing flourish, or simply be a passive observer merely reflecting the surrounding situation? For a guide with so much influence, let's hope it goes back to being more of the former.
AsiaOne
3 days ago
- AsiaOne
'How dare you': YouTubers call out London stall for selling 'fake Malaysian food', Lifestyle News
Manchurian chicken, sweet and sour tofu? These two dishes definitely do not come to mind when one thinks of Malaysian food, and one British YouTuber named Pat was none too pleased when he came across these items being sold under the guise of "Malaysian street food" at a London market. For some context, Pat is one half of the duo behind Pat & Giulia, a British-Italian couple who spent six months locked down in Malaysia during the Covid-19 pandemic. It is understandable then that they developed an appreciation for Malaysian food, as well as a basic grasp of Bahasa Melayu. In the video published on Tuesday (July 22), the couple appear to be on a mission to seek out both authentic and inauthentic Malaysian cuisine in London. Sharing that London is home to a large number of Malaysians, they wrote: "There exists some very good Malaysian food, but we also uncovered some of those selling fake Malaysian food." "Now we're back in London, we're craving a bit of Malaysian food, so we thought we'd come out here to get some," said Pat. Their first stop? An eatery in northeast London known for offering "the cheapest roti canai (roti prata) in London". "British people love a roti canai, let me tell you," said Pat. Their order of two roti canais cost £4.95 (S$8.60), along with two curry puffs for £1.80. Their review of the curry puffs? "Very nice," said both. "It actually tastes like Malaysian ones, doesn't it?" Pat remarked. The freshly made "not frozen" rotis also received good reviews. The dish came with a dhal curry as well as sambal. "Very, very delicious," said Pat, adding that it might be the best roti canai he's had in London. "It's like being back in Malaysia," Giulia concurred. However, their next stop in their Malaysian food hunt left more to be desired, with Pat proclaiming that they'd "found fake Malaysian food in London". They do not identify the stall's location, but the camera pans to a shot of Camden Lock, suggesting that it could be at Camden Market, a place known for its many food stalls. When asked what's classic Malaysian food, a man behind the Malaysian food stall replies, "beef rendang" and "chilli chicken Manchurian", even adding that it's a "traditional curry from Malaysia". "Interesting," Pat responds. The hawker then recommends "sweet and sour tofu", as well as a soupy item he introduces as "laksa". "Can you speak Bahasa Melayu?" Pat quizzes the pair in Malay, also asking "Dari mana (where are you from)?" But it is evident that they don't speak the language. "You guys aren't Malaysian," Pat adds, to which the duo behind the counter state that their boss is from Malaysia, more specifically, Penang. Needless to say, Pat and Giulia leave empty handed. 'How dare you say this is Malaysian?' "How funny was that?" Pat remarked to the camera following the encounter. "It wasn't Malaysian food at all... we called them all out." Sharing that he was "getting a bit annoyed", he added: "How dare you say this is Malaysian [food]?" Pat also indicated that the items sold were all "typical Chinese-British food". "There we go, fake Malaysian food here in London," he quipped. Many in the comments praised the couple for their effort in calling out such stalls and also for appreciating Malaysian culture. "You guys are so Malaysianised... For non-Malaysians to be able to spot that fake stall is crazy, respect!" one commenter stated. Wrote another: "I hope this brings awareness and vendors should stop misrepresenting and mis-labelling food as an easy way out. Good on ya for pointing it out. I'd be hangry too." One netizen appeared to notice another small sign that the stall wasn't authentic. "The guy didn't call you 'boss', which suggests he isn't Malaysian selling authentic Malaysian food," joked another, to which several others agreed. [[nid:678898]] candicecai@
