Emergency imposed to protect monarchy of one family: Union minister
Addressing a seminar on Emergency at the state BJP headquarters on Wednesday, Union minister for Jal Shakti, CR Patil, said that Congress's Nehru-Gandhi family wanted to rule as a monarchy, so they strangled democracy. He also claimed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi awakened the people by taking the truth about the Congress to the villages during the Emergency.
Union minister CR Patil said that Emergency Day reminds the people of the country how to fight the forces strangling the Constitution. "Indira Gandhi and the
Congress party
made many amendments to the Constitution for their personal interests.
There are certain conditions for imposing an emergency, but when Indira Gandhi imposed an emergency in the country, neither was the country fighting a war nor was there any internal problem," CR Patil argued.
"This emergency was imposed only because the Allahabad High Court declared Indira Gandhi's election illegal. Congress and Indira Gandhi saw power slipping from their hands, so the emergency was imposed. The Nehru-Gandhi family wanted to rule as a monarchy, so the emergency was imposed in the country, so that the Nehru-Gandhi family of Congress could continue to rule," the Union minister alleged.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn
IC Markets
Tìm hiểu thêm
Undo
He further said that during the emergency, the Constitution was suspended and all those who were working to save the Constitution and keep the democracy of the country alive were put in jail. "Apart from the Jan Sangh and all the organisations promoting nationalist ideas, those journalists were also put in jail who wanted to bring the truth of Emergency before the people. Prime Minister Narendra Modi was underground during the Emergency and went from village to village to help families of democracy fighters and to tell the public the truth about Congress," he said.
"Today the people of the country have understood the truth and Congress is heading towards its decline," CR Patil said. For political appeasement, Congress has tried to put one family above the Constitution. Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi pretend to be the protectors of the Constitution by holding copies of the Constitution in their hands while taking oath in Parliament. But the Constitution that they hold in their hands does not contain any document," he said.
The Union minister alleged that Congress betrays the people, and therefore, the country no longer trusts the Congress and the Nehru-Gandhi family. "Shah Commission was formed after the Emergency. It was clearly written in the Shah Commission report that there was no constitutional need to impose Emergency. At that time, those who opposed the Congress party and its policies were shot. After 1980, when the Congress govt was formed at the Centre, this report itself was destroyed under a political conspiracy," CR Patil said.
He also claimed that Congress imposed its intentions on the country by adding the words secular and socialist in the preamble of the Constitution. "Indira Gandhi also destroyed the tradition of collective responsibility of the cabinet to impose emergency. As many as 8,555 people from Madhya Pradesh alone were put in jail. The democracy fighters faced torture inside the jail, they were not medically treated when they fell ill.
Many nationalist organisations were banned," CR Patil said.
The Union minister added, "In 2014, Prime Minister Narendra Modi bowed his head to the Constitution and started the work to protect the Constitution, which is going on continuously. Under the leadership of the Prime Minister, work is being done to make the Constitution stronger."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Show proof of 'vote chori': Rajnath Singh to Rahul Gandhi
PATNA/NEW DELHI: Defence minister on Saturday slammed Congress neta for claiming to have an "atom bomb of evidence of vote theft" against , and dared him to detonate the explosive. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now At an event organised by a media house in Patna, Singh also likened the upcoming state polls to a crossroad, with one path (under ) leading to further progress and another (under the INDIA bloc) taking Bihar back to its old era of lawlessness and caste strife. "Rahul Gandhi says he is in possession of an atom bomb. If it is so, he should detonate it at once. He should just ensure that he is himself out of harm's way," Singh said. Gandhi had Friday said that his party has an "atom bomb" of evidence to prove "vote chori" by EC for BJP, remarks that evoked a sharp response from the poll panel. The commission termed Gandhi's remarks as "baseless and wild allegations". Singh also said the nation remembers his past rhetoric. "Rahul had threatened Parliament of an earthquake, but when he spoke, it turned out to be a damp squib." Singh said EC is an institution that enjoys a reputation for unquestionable integrity. "It is pulling out all the stops to ensure that the upcoming assembly polls in the state are held in a free and fair manner. It does not behove the leader of the opposition to make frivolous statements about a constitutional body," the BJP MP from Lucknow said. The defence minister reminded the LoP that his own party has blood on its hands, having tried to murder democracy in 1975 with the imposition of the Emergency. The defence minister also criticised the Congress-led opposition for raising questions about Operation Sindoor instead of paying tributes to the valour displayed by the Indian armed forces. The former BJP president alleged that the Congress had been soft on insurgency while in office, and tried to frame innocent people by spinning the theory of saffron terror because of vote bank considerations.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Lives at Risk in Bingidoddi: Residents Demand Action Over Dangling Power Lines and Official Negligence
Gadwal: Residents of Ward No. 12 in Bingidoddi village, Aija Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal district, are living under a life-threatening situation due to the absence of proper electricity poles, resulting in dangerous electric wires hanging directly over residential homes. Locals, along with BJP Mandal President Gopalakrishna, raised serious concerns and demanded immediate intervention from the authorities. 'It has been over 25 years since this colony came into existence with over 200 houses, yet not a single concrete road or electricity pole has been installed,' said Gopalakrishna while addressing the villagers. Due to the lack of official infrastructure, residents are reportedly using wooden poles as makeshift electricity supports, a practice that has already led to shocks and close calls. In a recent incident, a homeowner had to personally replace a wire support after experiencing a shock from a low-hanging live wire. The colony, locals say, is completely neglected while sarpanches and officials have ensured road construction only around their own houses. In contrast, this area lacks even basic amenities like CC roads, proper drainage, or soil roads. 'If something happens to any of these families, who will take responsibility?' Gopalakrishna questioned. 'Despite informing the Assistant Engineer (AE) of the electricity department, no action has been taken so far.' He warned that if the situation is not rectified, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) will organize a massive protest and dharna in the coming weeks. The event saw the participation of other community leaders like Anjaneyulu, Narasimhulu, and a large number of concerned villagers. What the Law Says: Legal Consequences for Government Negligence Endangering Public Life Legal experts have highlighted that negligence by government officials—especially when it threatens public safety—can lead to serious criminal and civil liabilities under Indian law, including the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, which replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in July 2024. Criminal Provisions: Section 106(1) BNS (formerly IPC 304A): If negligence causes death, the official may face up to 5 years of imprisonment, fine, or both. Section 123 BNS (formerly IPC 336-338): Any act endangering life or causing harm due to carelessness can result in 2 years' imprisonment or fine. Section 108 BNS (formerly IPC 166): If a public servant intentionally disobeys the law, they can be punished with up to 1 year imprisonment, fine, or both. Civil and Administrative Action: Negligent officers can also face: Departmental inquiries, suspension, or dismissal Loss of pension or seniority Civil lawsuits for damages Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed by affected citizens or NGOs 'If a life is lost or seriously harmed due to an official's inaction, they could face both criminal prosecution and departmental removal,' said a senior retired IAS officer on condition of anonymity. What Citizens Can Do: Residents of Bingidoddi and similar villages can: File a formal complaint to the District Collector or Electricity Department Submit an RTI to trace accountability Approach the State Human Rights Commission or Lokayukta File a PIL in the High Court if officials continue to ignore their duty. Public Voice Growing Louder With the state government, led by the Congress party, promising people-centric development, locals expressed disappointment that these promises remain "only in words". The incident in Bingidoddi serves as a grim reminder of the gap between policy and implementation. As the public pressure mounts and legal frameworks back citizens' rights, authorities are now under intense scrutiny to take immediate corrective measures before a preventable tragedy occurs.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Dmitry Medvedev: Defender of the Kremlin
On August 1, U.S. President Donald Trump wrote on the social media that he had ordered two 'nuclear submarines' to be positioned in 'the appropriate regions', in a direct threat to Russia. Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of Defence, reposted Mr. Trump's post. The reason for Mr. Trump's escalatory move: back-to-back social media posts by Dmitry Medvedev, a former Russian President and Prime Minister. Mr. Trump also slammed the 'foolish, inflammatory and provocative' statements by Mr. Medvedev. Mr. Medvedev had evoked the fabled Dead Hand mechanism (also known as 'Perimeter'), a secretive semi-automated Russian command system that could launch a nuclear strike if its leaders were killed in enemy attacks. Born on September 14, 1965 in Leningrad (now St. Petersburg), Dmitry Medvedev is the son of professors Yulia and Anatoly Medvedev. He earned a degree in law and then completed post-graduate studies at Leningrad State University, graduating in 1990. In 1989, he married Svetlana; their son Ilya, now 29, joined the United Russia Party of Vladimir Putin in 2022. A PhD in law, Mr. Medvedev taught for nine years at the St. Petersburg State University. During this time, he also worked as an adviser to the city council, and in 1991, he joined the legal team working for the then Mayor of St. Petersburg, Anatoly Sobchak. It was here that he met Mr. Putin. Mr. Putin became the acting President of Russia in December 1999, and Mr. Medvedev was tapped to become a member of his team. In 2000, he led Mr. Putin's presidential campaign, and was appointed the Deputy Chief of Staff to the Presidential Executive Office. In November 2005, he became the first Deputy Prime Minister, and was named by Mr. Putin as his successor in 2007. On May 7, 2008, Mr. Medvedev became the President of Russia, for a one-term stint since Mr. Putin was barred under the then Constitution from occupying the post for a third consecutive term. Soon after his inauguration, he nominated Mr. Putin as his Prime Minister. Mr. Medvedev had campaigned with the slogan 'Freedom is better than no freedom,' and during his stint as President, he undertook several reforms, such as the decriminalisation of defamation. He negotiated with the then U.S. President, Barack Obama, to reduce the number of nuclear warheads in the two nations, and presided over Russia's accession to the WTO. He also announced an end to counterinsurgency operations in Chechnya. He was at the helm when war broke out in Georgia in 2008. New role Mr. Putin returned as President in March 2012, and Mr. Medvedev became the head of the United Russia party and the Prime Minister of Russia, occupying this position from May 8, 2012 to 2020. He slowly faded into the background and eventually resigned as Prime Minister in 2020. Post this, Mr. Medvedev was appointed as the deputy of the newly created National Security Council, an advisory body with Mr. Putin at its head. Since the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Mr. Medvedev has been a strong supporter of Mr. Putin's actions. He started a Telegram channel soon after the invasion, becoming Russia's most popular blogger by the end of 2022. This also turned around his image in the eyes of the public: from a public trust rating of 23% in 2021 from pollster VTsIOM, he notched a rating of 45.7% in June 2025. While Mr. Trump and Mr. Medvedev have sparred before, the current exchange was sparked by Mr. Trump's post on July 29, warning that the U.S. would sanction Russia in 10 days if it did not take measures to end the war with Ukraine. Mr. Medvedev called this a 'theatrical ultimatum', and said 'each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war'. He also warned that Russia was not 'Israel or even Iran', and warned Mr. Trump to not 'go down the Sleepy Joe road.' In response, Mr. Trump called him 'the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President'. Mr. Medvedev responded via a message on Telegram, 'If some words from the former president of Russia trigger such a nervous reaction from the high-and-mighty president of the U.S., then Russia is doing everything right and will continue to proceed along its own path.'
