logo
Ken Griffin says young grads who are not interested in reading books about their field have 'picked the wrong career'

Ken Griffin says young grads who are not interested in reading books about their field have 'picked the wrong career'

If you don't like reading books about your career, you should choose another one, according to Ken Griffin.
In an interview with S&P Global released on Tuesday, Citadel's founder and CEO said that young graduates need to read about the domains they are in and change careers if they don't find those books interesting.
"Stay current in the body of knowledge that represents the career you've chosen," Griffin said. "And by the way, if it's not interesting to you, you picked the wrong career. It's that simple."
Griffin, who founded Citadel in 1990 — a year after graduating from college — added that it's OK to experiment with your career early on.
"In America in particular, that's totally fine," he said. "No one will judge you for going from one career to a radically different field throughout your 20s."
Not everyone at his own investment firm enters with this mindset, Griffin said.
"We hire endless numbers of really bright undergraduates. Some of them have this belief that when you graduate from college, you're done reading textbooks, and nothing can be further from the truth," he said.
Citadel has $66 billion in assets under management and is among the world's largest and most successful hedge funds. The firm did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.
The CEO said that his book recommendation for anyone starting their career is Jim Collins' "Good to Great" because it outlines the keys to running a business, such as how to build a good team.
Business leaders across the industry have been vocal about the importance of reading intensely and have recommended several books, many specifically for those early in their careers.
Bill Gates and Warren Buffett suggest reading " Business Adventures" by John Brooks, a collection of 12 essays about financial and corporate life in the US.
Meta's CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, and LinkedIn's founder, Reid Hoffman, recommend Eric Ries' "The Lean Startup," a book about entrepreneurship and iterating quickly.
Bumble's CEO, Whitney Wolfe Herd, has suggested reading Adam Grant's "Originals: How Non-Conformists Move the World," a book about how people can drive change without conforming to the status quo.
Airbnb's Brian Chesky has spoken about "High Output Management" by Andy Grove, a handbook where the former CEO of Intel shares his take on how to build and run a company.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Netflix Stock Skyrocketed 50% in the First Half of 2025 and Why There Might Be More to Come
Why Netflix Stock Skyrocketed 50% in the First Half of 2025 and Why There Might Be More to Come

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why Netflix Stock Skyrocketed 50% in the First Half of 2025 and Why There Might Be More to Come

Netflix has outperformed the S&P 500 by more than 8X for the first half of 2025. The company laid out ambitious plans for growth over the coming five years. Netflix carries a premium valuation but has the results to back it up. 10 stocks we like better than Netflix › Shares of Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) charged sharply during the first six months of 2025, with shares surging 50%, according to data provided by S&P Global Market Intelligence. That runs circles around the roughly 5% gains of the S&P 500. The catalyst that sent the streaming pioneer higher was impressive financial results that far outpaced expectations. Furthermore, the company unveiled ambitious plans for the future, fueling investors' enthusiasm. As impressive as Netflix's run has been, there could be more to come. While artificial intelligence stocks (AI) have been all the rage over the past few years, Netflix has continued to focus on expanding its audience and improving its financial performance -- and those efforts are bearing fruit. In the first quarter, the streaming leader generated revenue of $10.5 billion, up 13% year over year, resulting in earnings per share (EPS) of $6.61, an increase of 25%. This was fueled by Netflix's expanding operating margin, which climbed to 31.7%, up 360 basis points compared to the prior-year quarter. These results came on the heels of 16% revenue growth and 102% EPS growth in Q4. In both quarters, results easily outpaced investor expectations. However, it was the company's plans for the future that helped fuel the stock's blistering run. Reports emerged in April that Netflix has ambitious plans to join the $1 trillion club by 2030, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal. For context, at the time the story broke, Netflix had a market cap of roughly $396 million, so the story raised eyebrows. To reach this lofty benchmark, executives at the streamer have outlined the following goals: Double total revenue from $39 billion in 2024 to roughly $78 billion by 2030. More than quadruple global ad sales from $2.15 billion to $9 billion. Triple operating income from $10 billion to $30 billion by 2030. Grow its global audience to 410 million subscribers, up from 302 million at the end of 2024. Investors were excited by the extent of Netflix's long-term goals. That, combined with the company's impressive growth, lit a fire under the stock and helped fuel its impressive rise in the first half of the year. Netflix is scheduled to report its Q2 results after the market close on July 17, and management expects the company's robust growth to accelerate. Netflix is guiding for revenue of $11.04 billion or year-over-year growth of 15% and EPS of $7.03, and an increase of 44%. For context, analysts' consensus estimates are calling for revenue of $11.04 billion and EPS of $7.06. Netflix isn't cheap, selling for 59 times earnings and 14 times sales. That said, given the company's robust growth, expanding profit margins, and rapid earnings growth, I would argue that Netflix stock is still a buy. Before you buy stock in Netflix, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Netflix wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $671,477!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,010,880!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,047% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 14, 2025 Danny Vena has positions in Netflix. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Netflix. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Netflix Stock Skyrocketed 50% in the First Half of 2025 and Why There Might Be More to Come was originally published by The Motley Fool

Asian shares are mixed after Nvidia nudges Nasdaq to a record, while other US stocks slump

time35 minutes ago

Asian shares are mixed after Nvidia nudges Nasdaq to a record, while other US stocks slump

BANGKOK -- Shares in Asia traded mixed on Wednesday after an update on U.S. inflation pulled most Wall Street stocks lower, though gains for Nvidia pushed the Nasdaq to another record. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 edged less than 0.1% lower, to 39,663.40. Investors are focusing on the potential impact of an election for the Upper House of Parliament on Sunday that is expected to lead to tax cuts and higher spending as lawmakers try to restore the waning popularity of the ruling Liberal Democrats. Worries over a deterioration in Japan's fiscal health have pushed yields of long-term Japanese government bonds to their highest levels in years. 'What's at stake isn't simply which party hands out the biggest bundle of goodies. It's whether the walls holding up Japan's house of debt can withstand another round of fiscal fireworks…' Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management said in a commentary. Elsewhere in Asia, Hong Kong's Hang Seng added 0.1% to 24,618.23 while the Shanghai Composite index slipped 0.1% to 3,503.78. South Korea's Kospi lost 0.9% to 3,186.38 and in Australia, the S&P/ASX 200 declined 0.8% to 8,561.80. Taiwan's Taiex jumped 0.9% and India's Sensex was flat. Thailand's SET also was little changed. In Jakarta, shares rose 0.4% after President Donald Trump said on Truth Social that he plans to tariff imports from Indonesia at 19%, while American goods sent to the Southeast Asian country will face no tariffs. Trump also said Indonesia committed to buying U.S. energy, agricultural products and aircraft. On Tuesday, the S&P 500 fell 0.4% to 6,243.76, but stayed near its all-time high set last week, as 90% of the stocks within the index fell. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 1% to 44,023.29. The Nasdaq composite rose 0.2% to a record 20,677.80 thanks to Nvidia, the market's most influential stock. Nvidia said the U.S. government has assured it that licenses will be granted for its H20 chip, used for artificial intelligence, again and that deliveries will hopefully begin soon. Its 4% gain was by far the strongest force pushing upward on the S&P 500. Stocks of big U.S. banks were mixed following their latest profit reports. JPMorgan Chase slipped 0.7% despite reporting a stronger profit than analysts expected, as CEO Jamie Dimon warned of risks to the economy because of tariffs and other concerns. Citigroup rose 3.7% following its better-than-expected profit report. But Wells Fargo fell 5.5% following its own, as it trimmed its forecast for an important way that it makes money. A report showed inflation in the United States accelerated to 2.7% last month from 2.4% in May as prices rose for clothes, toys and other goods that usually are imported. Economists say prices may be rising because of stiff tariffs that President Donald Trump has proposed on other countries. Treasury yields yo-yoed after the report and then began rising. The yield on the 10-year Treasury climbed to 4.48% from 4.43% late Monday. The yield on the two-year Treasury, which more closely tracks expectations for what the Federal Reserve will do with short-term interest rates, rose to 3.95% from 3.90%. Higher inflation could inhibit interest rate cuts by the Fed. It has been keeping rates on hold this year after cutting them at the end of last year. That's because lower rates can give inflation more fuel, along with a boost for the economy. Wall Street loves lower rates because they goose prices higher for stocks and other investments, and Trump himself has been clamoring for the Fed to cut more quickly. Fed Chair Jerome Powell, though, has been adamant that he wants to wait for more data about how tariffs affect the economy and inflation. Following Tuesday's inflation report, traders are still overwhelmingly betting that the Fed will cut its main interest rate by the end of the year. But they pulled back their bets on the number of potential cuts, according to data from CME Group. In other dealings early Wednesday, U.S. benchmark crude oil picked up 42 cents to $66.94 per barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, was up 30 cents at $69.01 per barrel. The dollar fell to 148.66 Japanese yen from 148.87 yen. The euro was at $1.1627, up from $1.1602.

A millennial made $300,000 secretly working multiple jobs — while tasked with catching others doing the same
A millennial made $300,000 secretly working multiple jobs — while tasked with catching others doing the same

Business Insider

time2 hours ago

  • Business Insider

A millennial made $300,000 secretly working multiple jobs — while tasked with catching others doing the same

A millennial's IT role involved catching people who were secretly working multiple jobs. He learned it was possible to go undetected, so he took a second job in secret, earning $300K annually. Job juggling helped him detect other overemployed workers, but nerves, tech, and ethics complicated it for him. Eric was paid to catch employees secretly working multiple jobs. Then he became one of them. A few years ago, Eric was working in an IT role at a large company. His job responsibilities included investigating three types of "illicit employment" within the organization: workers who outsourced their job responsibilities to overseas contractors, foreign actors who infiltrated companies by posing as legitimate hires, and employees secretly juggling multiple jobs without the company's approval. But Eric said there wasn't much suspicious activity to investigate, and that he was working as little as one hour each day. Then he had an idea: What if he took on a second job to boost his income? While Eric considered it, he initially held back because he was worried about getting caught. But that changed the following year, when his employer asked him to focus more on detecting job jugglers, and he realized just how difficult they were to identify. After weighing the risks, Eric applied for and landed a remote role, bringing his combined annual income to roughly $300,000. He said he only worked a couple of hours a day across the jobs. In addition to the financial benefits, Eric said he took the second job to gain an inside look at the " overemployed" world, one that might help him identify job jugglers. He said the firsthand experience helped him catch several employees who were ultimately fired. But this success came with a growing problem for Eric, one that ultimately cut his job-juggling journey short. He feared the very system he was building to catch others would end up catching him, and jeopardize his career. "It was like being the lead investigator on your own murder," said Eric, whose identity, employment, and income were verified by Business Insider, but who asked to use a pseudonym, citing fears of professional repercussions. "It was a wild time in my life." Eric, a millennial based in the US, is among the Americans who have secretly juggled multiple jobs to increase their incomes. Over the past three years, BI has interviewed more than two dozen "overemployed" workers who've used their extra cash to travel the world, buy expensive weight-loss drugs, and pay down student debt. To be sure, holding multiple jobs without employer approval could have professional repercussions and lead to burnout. Additionally, tech layoffs and return-to-office mandates have created obstacles for current and aspiring job jugglers. However, many overemployed workers have told BI that the financial benefits have generally outweighed the downsides and risks. ​​Do you have a story to share about secretly working multiple jobs or discovering an employee is doing so? Contact this reporter via email at jzinkula@ or Signal at jzinkula.29. Use a personal email address, a nonwork WiFi network, and a nonwork device; here's our guide to sharing information securely. A spending spree and improved detection methods Eric never planned for his job juggling to last forever. While his initial concerns about getting caught eased enough for him to accept the second role, he still worried that he'd eventually be exposed. "I thought I could make some money real quick and get out," he said. But if his savings started ballooning due to his two incomes, Eric feared he'd get "emotionally attached" to the extra earnings, making it harder to walk away. His solution was to spend freely on things he'd normally avoid. He said he viewed job juggling like renting a luxurious car: fun while it lasts, but not something you do forever. "I was ordering stuff off Amazon all the time," he said. "It was like expendable income." In addition to unlocking this spending spree, working multiple jobs gave Eric firsthand insight into how people with multiple roles operated — knowledge that helped him sharpen his detection skills and catch job jugglers. "It really wasn't until after I had my second job that I started getting actionable outcomes from my investigations because I just knew exactly what to look for," he said. Eric said he used internal company activity data to look for behavioral patterns that could suggest someone was juggling multiple jobs, such as sudden swings in productivity during specific parts of the day. Some workers were highly active in the morning and quiet all afternoon, or vice versa. His thinking, based partly on his personal experience, was that job jugglers would split time between their two roles. "I'd go back historically and see that at one point they were working all day and now they're not," he said. "So it just came down to behaviors." When an employee's activity seemed suspicious, Eric said he'd contact their manager and ask how often the worker appeared on camera during meetings, whether they'd missed any lately, and whether their work quality had declined over time. If concerns persisted, he'd suggest the manager schedule a one-on-one video call during the worker's usual inactive hours. If the employee repeatedly asked to delay or reschedule the call, that would raise red flags, and the case could eventually be handed off to HR. The risk became too big to stomach Even as Eric's detection capabilities improved, he said he wasn't too concerned about his own work behaviors being flagged. But that changed when he discovered that a security software program used by both of his employers could detect when multiple devices were running the software on the same home network — an indicator someone could be juggling multiple jobs. While he wasn't certain it would expose him, the realization made him nervous. At the same time, he was having mixed feelings about the ethics of overemployment. So, after less than a year of working two jobs, Eric decided to drop one of his roles. "As I went further and further along, I realized I couldn't keep this up because I was building detections that were going to catch me," he said. While overemployment has become more common due to the rise of remote work, Eric said he doesn't think most companies are particularly concerned about it. His detection work occasionally comes up during job interviews, and from what he's gathered, employers generally believe job jugglers will either drop a job after burning out or reaching a financial goal, or be let go for underperformance. If catching overemployed workers isn't a big priority for most companies, many job jugglers might be able to avoid detection, at least in the short term. Looking back, Eric said he sometimes wonders whether he could have kept going a little longer. "I just felt like I was going to get caught, and I didn't want to lose my entire career, so I had to stop," he said. "But man, I kind of regret it sometimes. It was really good money."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store