logo
How US Cities Are Preparing for Potential Iran Retaliation

How US Cities Are Preparing for Potential Iran Retaliation

Newsweek23-06-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Cities in the United States are implementing new security measures to reflect growing tensions between America and Iran.
After the U.S. launched air strikes on Iranian three nuclear facilities over the weekend, some cities have bolstered its police presence, though they have maintained that these measures are cautious and not a statement of perceived threat.
Why It Matters
President Donald Trump on Saturday evening announced what he described as a "very successful attack" against three Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.
The president's decision to strike those facilities came after Israel and Iran have exchanged consistent strikes since June 13. Israel had urged the U.S. to target Iran's nuclear facilities, saying that Tehran was moving close to creating a nuclear weapon. Iran maintains that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes—not for weapons.
With the U.S. now embroiling itself in the conflict, Iran has vowed to retaliate, accusing the U.S. of crossing "a very big line."
Iran could pursue nuclear talks or use diplomacy as a next step. However, it could also launch attacks on military targets in the Middle East or use economic or cyberattacks to disrupt the U.S.
What To Know
In New York City, the New York Police Department (NYPD) announced on X, formerly Twitter, that it was "deploying additional resources to religious, cultural and diplomatic sites" in the city "out of an abundance of caution."
On Sunday, New York City Mayor Eric Adams wrote on X that he and NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch "convened our international liaisons for a briefing to discuss the situation in the Middle East and how it affects us here at home."
"Out of an abundance of caution, we have increased police presence at religious, cultural, and diplomatic sites throughout the five boroughs," he wrote. "We also continue to work with our state and federal partners to keep New Yorkers safe. I'm thinking of all the New York City families who may be affected by these developments, especially our large Persian community."
In Washington, D.C., the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) issued a similar statement, saying it was "actively coordinating with our local, state, and federal law enforcement partners to share information and monitor intelligence in order to help safeguard residents, businesses, and visitors in the District of Columbia."
The MPD added: "At this time, there are no known threats to the District. However, MPD has maintained an increased presence at religious institutions across the city. We continue to urge the public to remain vigilant and help keep our community safe. If you See Something, Say Something."
The department said for emergencies or immediate threats, people should call 911. To report suspicious activity, it added that people should contact MPD's Real Time Crime Center at 202-727-9099, text 50411, or submit a report online at iwatch.dc.gov.
In Los Angeles, Mayor Karen Bass wrote on X that while there are "no known credible threats" the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) was "stepping up patrols near places of worship, community gathering spaces and other sensitive sites."
She added: "We will remain vigilant in protecting our communities."
A B-2 bomber arrives at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri on June 22.
A B-2 bomber arrives at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri on June 22.
AP Photo/David Smith
What People Are Saying
Julian Zelizer, a professor of political history at Princeton University, told Newsweek: "Given that one tool of Iranian warfare has been state sponsored terrorism, it makes sense to ramp up security as a precaution as this conflict unfolds."
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said in a statement, per BBC News: "The Americans must receive a response to their aggression."
He added: "We have always stated that we are ready to engage and negotiate within the framework of international law, but instead of accepting logic, the other side has demanded the surrender of the Iranian nation."
President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Sunday: "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!
In a Sunday morning press conference, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said: "The operation President Trump planned was bold and it was brilliant, showing the world that American deterrence is back when this president speaks, the world should listen and the U.S. military, we can back it up. The most powerful military the world has ever known. No other country on planet Earth could have conducted the operation that the chairman is going to outline this morning."
What Happens Next?
Whether Iran responds to the U.S. strikes remains to be seen. If the country does response, Trump said on Saturday that this would provoke fresh attacks from the U.S.
Meanwhile, the State Department has issued a "worldwide caution" alert for Americans traveling abroad, citing concerns about potential "demonstrations against U.S. citizens and interests abroad."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Baha'i faith is small, far-flung, and faced with repression in parts of the Middle East
The Baha'i faith is small, far-flung, and faced with repression in parts of the Middle East

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Baha'i faith is small, far-flung, and faced with repression in parts of the Middle East

The Baha'i faith — a small but global religion with an interfaith credo — fits comfortably into the religious spectrum of most countries. In several Middle East nations, however, Baha'i followers face repression that is drawing criticism from human rights groups. The abuse is most evident in Iran, which bans the faith and has been widely accused of persecuting its adherents, human rights advocates say. They also report systemic discrimination in Yemen, Qatar and Egypt. Iran has been a driving force in the spread of anti-Baha'i repression in countries where it holds influence, advocates say — a plan first made public in a leaked 1991 government document. These include Yemen, where Iran backs Houthi rebels who control much of the country, and Qatar, where links include co-ownership of the world's largest natural gas field. 'The sheer arsenal the Iranian government has expended to crush the Baha'is in every avenue of life has been astronomical,' said Nazila Ghanea, an Oxford University law professor and U.N. Special Rapporteur on religious freedom. 'It has also extended its reach, time and again, beyond the border of Iran,' she said. Anti-Baha'i discrimination includes forced deportations and family separations, as well as denial of marriage licenses, public school enrollment and access to burial grounds. In Qatar, the leader of the small Baha'i community has been detained since April. Remy Rowhani, 71, went on trial last month, charged with 'promoting the ideology of a deviant sect' on the country's Baha'i social media account. A far-flung faith The Baha'i faith was founded in the 1860s by Baha'u'llah, a Persian nobleman considered a prophet by his followers. He taught that all religions represent progressive stages in the revelation of God's will, leading to the unity of all people and faiths. There are no Baha'i clergy. Communities are organized through elected local spiritual assemblies. From the faith's earliest days, it was denounced by Shiite Muslim clerics in what is now Iran; they considered followers apostates. That repression continued after Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution, when many Baha'i followers were executed or went missing. There are less than 8 million believers worldwide, with the largest number in India. The faith is present in most countries. Michael Page of Human Rights Watch described Iran as 'a guiding animus against Baha'is because it perceived them as antithetical to the regime's own interpretation of Shia Islam.' 'This is an authoritarian government that brutally cracks down on people who don't agree with it,' Page told The Associated Press. 'The hate speech directed at them is so at odds with the Baha'i faith tradition, it would feel laughable if the consequences weren't so serious.' Not all Muslim countries are hostile. Saba Haddad, the Baha'i International Community's representative to the U.N. in Geneva, cited Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Tunisia as welcoming. 'We are the measure of tolerance — for any government, any country,' she said. 'We don't have any political stance, we don't interfere with politics, we don't have a Baha'i country. It's truly about ... tolerance and acceptance.' Baha'i leader faces Qatar trial Rowhani has been detained since April 28 in what Human Rights Watch denounces as a violation of religious freedom reflecting long-running discrimination against Baha'i believers. He faces up to three years in prison. His trial is recessed until Aug. 6. Rowhani's daughter, Noora Rowhani, who lives in Australia with her husband and 9-year-old daughter, said she hasn't been able to speak to her father since a brief call before his arrest. 'As for why Qatar is doing this, I ask myself that every day,' she told AP. 'A country that brands itself as a leader on the world stage, hosting global conferences and sporting events, cannot justify the quiet targeting of its citizens … just because they belong to a different faith.' Qatar's International Media Office didn't respond to an AP email seeking comment about Rowhani's case or accusations of systemic abuse of Baha'i followers. Rowhani — former head of Qatar's Chamber of Commerce — was jailed twice before, accused of offenses like routine fundraising related to his leadership of Qatar's Baha'i National Assembly. The latest charge involves the sect's X account, which contains posts about Qatari holidays and Baha'i writings. 'These new charges highlight the lengths to which the authorities in Qatar are prepared to go to erase the Baha'is from their country,' said lawyers Helena Kennedy and Steven Powles of Doughty Street Chambers law firm — founded by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer — which is assisting in Rowhani's defense. Bias in Egypt and Yemen Since 1960, Egypt's government has denied legal recognition to its small Baha'i community. This includes denying marriage licenses and birth certificates, barring children from public schools and restricting where Baha'i families can bury their dead. The Baha'i International Community issued a statement in November decrying 'intensification of the persecution.' Egypt's Foreign Ministry didn't respond to AP queries about the accusations. In Yemen, 100-plus Baha'i followers have been detained by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels, according to Amnesty International. Keyvan Ghaderi, 52, was imprisoned for four years on charges including spying for the U.S. and Israel. He was released in 2020 and deported without being allowed to see his wife and children. Eventually, Ghaderi was granted a humanitarian visa to the U.S. He lives with his family in Salt Lake City. Ghaderi attributed the Houthis' animosity to fear of change. 'They had this fear that we'd change ideas in Yemen, in the middle of civil war ... that we might change the narrative of young generations going to war,' he said. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.

The House gives final approval to Trump's big tax bill in a milestone for his second-term agenda
The House gives final approval to Trump's big tax bill in a milestone for his second-term agenda

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The House gives final approval to Trump's big tax bill in a milestone for his second-term agenda

WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans propelled President Donald Trump's big multitrillion-dollar tax breaks and spending cuts bill to final passage Thursday in Congress, overcoming multiple setbacks to approve his signature second-term policy package before a Fourth of July deadline. The tight roll call, 218-214, came at a potentially high political cost, with two Republicans joining all Democrats opposed. GOP leaders worked overnight and the president himself leaned on a handful of skeptics to drop their opposition. Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York delayed voting for more than eight hours by seizing control of the floor with a record-breaking speech against the bill. Trump celebrated his political victory in Iowa, where he attended the kickoff for a year of events marking the country's upcoming 250th anniversary. 'I want to thank Republican congressmen and women, because what they did is incredible,' he said. The president complained that Democrats voted against the bill because 'they hate Trump — but I hate them too.' Trump said he plans to sign the legislation on Friday at the White House. The outcome delivers a milestone for the president and for his party. It was a long-shot effort to compile a lengthy list of GOP priorities into what they called his 'one big beautiful bill,' at nearly 900 pages. With Democrats unified in opposition, the bill will become a defining measure of Trump's return to the White House, aided by Republican control of Congress. 'You get tired of winning yet?' said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., invoking Trump as he called the vote. 'With one big beautiful bill we are going to make this country stronger, safer and more prosperous than ever before,' he said. Republicans celebrated with a rendition of the Village People's 'Y.M.C.A.,' a song the president often plays at his rallies, during a ceremony afterward. Tax breaks and safety net cuts At its core, the package's priority is $4.5 trillion in tax breaks enacted in 2017 during Trump's first term that would expire if Congress failed to act, along with new ones. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. There's also a hefty investment, some $350 billion, in national security and Trump's deportation agenda and to help develop the 'Golden Dome' defensive system over the U.S. To help offset the lost tax revenue, the package includes $1.2 trillion in cutbacks to the Medicaid health care and food stamps, largely by imposing new work requirements, including for some parents and older people, and a major rollback of green energy tax credits. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage. 'This was a generational opportunity to deliver the most comprehensive and consequential set of conservative reforms in modern history, and that's exactly what we're doing,' said Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, the House Budget Committee chairman. Democrats united against the big 'ugly bill' Democrats unified against the bill as a tax giveaway to the rich paid for on the backs of the working class and most vulnerable in society, what they called 'trickle down cruelty.' Jeffries began the speech at 4:53 a.m. EDT and finished at 1:37 p.m. EDT, 8 hours, 44 minutes later, a record, as he argued against what he called Trump's 'big ugly bill.' 'We're better than this,' said Jeffries, who used a leader's prerogative for unlimited debate, and read letter after letter from Americans writing about their reliance of the health care programs. 'I never thought that I'd be on the House floor saying that this is a crime scene,' Jeffries said. 'It's a crime scene, going after the health, and the safety, and the well-being of the American people.' And as Democrats, he said, 'We want no part of it.' Tensions ran high. As fellow Democrats chanted Jeffries' name, a top Republican, Rep. Jason Smith of Missouri, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, called his speech 'a bunch of hogwash.' Hauling the package through the Congress has been difficult from the start. Republicans have struggled mightily with the bill nearly every step of the way, quarreling in the House and Senate, and often succeeding only by the narrowest of margins: just one vote. The Senate passed the package days earlier with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie vote. The slim majority in the House left Republicans little room for defections. 'It wasn't beautiful enough for me to vote for it,' said Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky. Also voting no was Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, who said he was concerned about cuts to Medicaid. Once Johnson gaveled the tally, Republicans cheered 'USA!' and flashed Trump-style thumbs-up to the cameras. Political costs of saying no Despite their discomfort with various aspects of the sprawling package, in some ways it became too big to fail — in part because Republicans found it difficult to buck Trump. As Wednesday's stalled floor action dragged overnight, Trump railed against the delays. 'What are the Republicans waiting for???' the president said in a midnight-hour post. Johnson relied heavily on White House Cabinet secretaries, lawyers and others to satisfy skeptical GOP holdouts. Moderate Republicans worried about the severity of cuts while conservatives pressed for steeper reductions. Lawmakers said they were being told the administration could provide executive actions, projects or other provisions in their districts back home. The alternative was clear. Republicans who staked out opposition to the bill, including Massie of Kentucky and Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, were being warned by Trump's well-funded political operation. Tillis soon after announced he would not seek reelection. Rollback of past presidential agendas In many ways, the package is a repudiation of the agendas of the last two Democratic presidents, a chiseling away at the Medicaid expansion from Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act, and a pullback of Joe Biden's climate change strategies in the Inflation Reduction Act. Democrats have described the bill in dire terms, warning that cuts to Medicaid, which some 80 million Americans rely on, would result in lives lost. Food stamps that help feed more than 40 million people would 'rip food from the mouths of hungry children, hungry veterans and hungry seniors,' Jeffries said. Republicans say the tax breaks will prevent a tax hike on households and grow the economy. They maintain they are trying to rightsize the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The Tax Policy Center, which provides nonpartisan analysis of tax and budget policy, projected the bill would result next year in a $150 tax break for the lowest quintile of Americans, a $1,750 tax cut for the middle quintile and a $10,950 tax cut for the top quintile. That's compared with what they would face if the 2017 tax cuts expired. ___ Associated Press writers Kevin Freking, Joey Cappelletti and Chris Megerian contributed to this report.

Gen Z's declining patriotism worries me. Partisanship shouldn't define us.
Gen Z's declining patriotism worries me. Partisanship shouldn't define us.

USA Today

time38 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Gen Z's declining patriotism worries me. Partisanship shouldn't define us.

There is now a massive generational and partisan divide in how much pride people have in being American. I don't know how to solve it, but I know why those who are losing faith in America are wrong. Every year, Gallup conducts a poll on the patriotic leanings of Americans across all sorts of demographics. In recent years, this poll has produced worrying results. There is now a massive generational and partisan divide in how much pride people have in being American. I don't know how to solve it, but I know why those who are losing faith in America are wrong. In the 2025 iteration of this poll, a staggering 92% of Republicans were 'extremely' or 'very' proud to be American, whereas just 53% of independents and 36% of Democrats reported feeling the same. Until 2016, Democrats and Republicans remained rather similar in their patriotism, with both reaching values above 80% before the election of President Donald Trump. However, modern patriotism among Democrats is dependent on who is in the White House, rather than any genuine love of America. During the time that Joe Biden was in the White House, Republican pride in being American bottomed out at 84%. Over the same period, Democrats rose to a peak of just 62%. One significant driver of this decline is Generation Z, born between 1997 to 2012, whose patriotism lags far behind previous generations. Just 41% of Gen Z is extremely or very proud to be American, and among young Democrats, that falls to just 24%. Partisanship is getting in the way of patriotism for Democrats Being proud to be American has absolutely nothing to do with being proud of our current leaders. In their fluctuations in pride depending on who is in the White House, Democrats have lost sight of this. I am one of the most critical people of our government out there, and I think of that as being borne out of my patriotism. Criticizing the government when it does not strengthen America's foundational principles is a patriotic act. My fellow columnist Rex Huppke has the right idea. 'We can love this country and loathe the people in charge,' he wrote in a recent column. 'We can be simultaneously proud of this country and embarrassed of the things being done in its name.' Tell us: This Fourth of July, are you proud to be an American? | Opinion Forum Now, obviously, I am no Democrat, but it saddens me that this same principle apparently does not hold for many of them. To many Democrats in modern times, it seems as if their love for this country is contingent on their preferred candidates being in power. Interestingly, this seems to be a problem unique to Democrats. While some Republicans seemingly faltered in their patriotism over the previous four years, they did not see the massive swing between the Biden and Trump presidencies that Democrats saw over the same period. This is all evidence of the fact that Democrats have attached their pride to a political movement, rather than to a love of America's founding principles. For some, this is a problem of them simply being blinded by partisanship. For others, however, it marks a much deeper problem. America's failures to live up to her founding principles at times are not evidence of those principles being bad; they are evidence of human nature being imperfect. Gen Z doesn't know how good we have it Much of Gen Z has been captured by the progressive left, many of whom do genuinely believe that America's institutions and system of government need to be torn down completely. These revolutionaries are responsible for the complete lack of patriotism among Gen Z. Opinion: Senate just passed Trump's Big Beautiful Bill – and made it even uglier Gen Z doesn't realize how lucky we are. We live in the greatest country and in the greatest time in history. There is no collective group that has it better at any point in history than we do right now. Many will disagree with me on this point, but they are mistaken. There is no place better constructed to safeguard your individual liberties than here. While we are very obviously imperfect in that goal, no other nation on earth is better equipped to pursue liberty through the freedoms that our Constitution protects. Tearing down the system that has led to such a wonderful place would be a mistake. Within a framework designed to preserve liberty is the best place to enact whatever political change it is that you want, unless your goal is not liberty. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Those who advocate against America's foundation might feel entitled ‒ in the sense that they believe it is the job of government to provide for them ‒ have taken the freedoms that we have for granted or are delusional about how good others have it. I do not know how to solve the problem of restoring patriotism to those who have lost it. I am sympathetic to the frustrations young Americans have with the state of our politics, and I am hopeful that Gen Z will learn that they are better off trying to change this country, rather than destroy it. America is a wonderful place, and you would do best to fight for your political causes within her structure of liberty, rather than attempting to tear it down. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store