What keeps Trump active? fast food, Diet Coke, and golf fuel his unconventional routine
US President Donald Trump's daily habits defy traditional expectations for a President. Rather than following a structured exercise regimen or dietary plan, Trump's routine includes frequent golf outings and a diet dominated by fast food and carbonated beverages.
Trump consumes 12 cans of Diet Coke per day and regularly eats McDonald's Big Macs, KFC, and pizza. He prefers well-done steak, often topped with ketchup, complementing his longstanding aversion to vegetables. According to reports and accounts from aides, Trump skips breakfast, favors high-calorie meals, and avoids structured workouts, relying instead on what he calls the energy from campaign rallies and frequent golf games.
Also read:
How Presidential is Donald Trump's diet? Fast food, no greens and cans of diet coke a button press away
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
His primary form of physical activity is golf, often played at his own resorts. Trump reportedly logged over 250 rounds during his first four years in office and has continued the practice in the years since.
Biden and Obama prioritized health-conscious eating and moderate fitness
In contrast, former President Joe Biden, followed a simpler, more balanced diet. His routine included Special K cereal and Gatorade for breakfast, peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, apples, protein bars, and pasta. His food choices were modest in calories and low in saturated fats. While not being a regular gym-goer, Biden incorporated physical activity into his day, such as biking and walking with his dogs.
Former President Barack Obama, maintained a health-focused approach while in office and beyond. He exercised daily, played basketball, and followed a vegetable-rich diet. Obama's meals often included broccoli, salads, lean proteins, and the occasional indulgence, such as a cheeseburger or beer, while supporting Michelle Obama's national 'Let's Move' campaign to promote healthy eating and exercise among children.
Live Events
Also read:
Warren Buffett's lifestyle at 94 will surprise you: Five cans of coke, Mcdonald's meal and no gym
Medical views on Trump's lifestyle: high-calorie risks and low fiber intake
Medical professionals have long warned that a diet consisting largely of processed foods, red meat, and sugary beverages can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes. Trump's lack of vegetables and reliance on Diet Coke for hydration raise further concerns about nutrient deficiency and elevated sodium intake.
A 2018 analysis by nutritionists, based on a recreation of Trump's reported daily meals, cited symptoms such as fatigue, headaches, and digestive issues. In contrast, Biden's and Obama's diets aligned more closely with federal dietary guidelines, offering a mix of carbohydrates, lean protein, and fiber, with fewer added sugars and trans fats.
Trump's former White House physician until March, 2025, Dr. Bruce Aronwald, had released a statement last year (2024), which asserted that the President was in 'excellent health,' though independent experts have questioned whether this reflected a long-term prognosis rather than short-term outcomes.
Relatability vs responsibility
Trump's eating habits have become part of his personal brand, resonating with supporters who see his food choices as relatable and emblematic of middle-American tastes. Appearances at McDonald's, including a 2024 campaign stop at a Pennsylvania drive-thru, underscore this populist appeal.
Also read:
Donald Trump brings back Diet Coke button What's on the US President's plate?
Meanwhile, Biden and Obama projected images of discipline and health awareness. Their eating and fitness habits, while less spotlighted, aligned more with public health campaigns and contemporary wellness standards. Their diets reflected moderation and intention, particularly appealing to health-conscious voters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
From Pather Panchali to Zohran Mamdani: Why brown people eating with their hands gives the West nightmares - decoding the culture war
The Mamdani Controversy: Rice, Rituals, and MAGA Outcry This summer, a viral video showed New York politician Zohran Mamdani eating biryani with his hands during an interview. In response, Texas Congressman Brandon Gill fumed that 'civilised people in America don't eat like this. If you refuse to adopt Western customs, go back to the Third World. ' His wife Danielle D'Souza Gill – an India-born MAGA pundit – piled on, declaring she 'never grew up eating rice with [her] hands' and 'always used a fork,' insisting her Indian Christian relatives did the same. The outburst ignited a social media firestorm. Critics noted the hypocrisy: Americans routinely devour burgers, tacos, fries, and pizza by hand, yet Gill condemned hand-eating as 'uncivilised.' Many pointed out that billions eat with their hands daily, labelling his comments as pure racism. Images of President Trump eating pizza with his bare hands swiftly made the rounds, mocking the idea that hand-eating is somehow barbaric. In the end, people across Asia stood up for the common practice of eating with one's hands, underlining that dining customs run deep in culture and are not to be dictated by Western lawmakers with fragile sensibilities. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like One of the Most Successful Investors of All Time, Warren Buffett, Recommends: 5 Books for Turning... Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Click Here Undo Ray's Pather Panchali and Western Snobbery This isn't the first time Western audiences have bristled at seeing Asians eat authentically. When Satyajit Ray 's Pather Panchali debuted in 1955, some Western critics recoiled at its realism. The story begins with a rural Bengali family eating rice with their hands, and French filmmaker François Truffaut quipped he 'did not want to see a movie of peasants eating with their hands.' The New York Times reviewer similarly sniffed that the film was too loose and listless, despite its understated poetry. Even in India, some officials feared the film was 'exporting poverty,' with former actress-turned-politician Nargis Dutt famously making that charge. Ray's work later became a world classic, but the initial response reflects an old bias: Western gatekeepers found an honest portrayal of humble, hand-to-mouth life unacceptable. Poor brown people eating with their hands was not what the Cannes set wanted with their champagne. Why Eating with Hands Feels Better For millions of Indians, eating with one's hands is not just tradition but pleasure. The act engages all five senses. You feel the warmth of the rice and dal as your fingers mix them together. You mould a perfect bite-sized morsel, adding curry or pickle to balance the flavours. The touch tells you if the roti is still soft, if the rice has cooled enough, if the fish bones have been removed. In Ayurveda, eating with your hands is said to activate energy centres connected to digestion. Even without mysticism, there is practicality. Indian food – with its gravies, rice, rotis, and layered textures – is designed to be mixed and balanced bite by bite. Forks and spoons reduce it to awkward scooping, like trying to paint watercolours with a ballpoint pen. Fingers are the original cutlery, tailored to your own grip, temperature tolerance, and tactile sense. The food becomes an extension of you rather than an object to be speared and lifted. Evolution of Etiquette: From Fingers to Forks In truth, using hands to eat is an ancient, global tradition. In Asia – and many parts of the Middle East and Africa – meals are still commonly eaten with the right hand. Indians traditionally wash their hands thoroughly before dining, then use fingertips to feel the temperature of the food and combine flavours. Rice and curry are picked up between the fingers and thumb and brought to the mouth. The left hand is kept clean and used only for serving or passing dishes. This is not unsanitary by local standards; careful handwashing and using only fingers (not whole hands) is part of the practice. By contrast, formal cutlery arrived in Europe relatively late. Forks spread westward through Byzantium to Italy, and only by the 1500s were forks seen among European elites. Catherine de' Medici famously brought forks to France in 1533, but even then they were a novelty. In Britain, medieval diners ate with fingers and knives until forks became fashionable in the 1700–1800s. Grand dinners with silver knives and forks became the standard only then. Before that, finger-eating was universal. But with the fork's adoption, by the 19th century, finger-eating in polite society was denounced as 'cannibal' behaviour. Western table manners, therefore, are a recent invention, codified after centuries of changing habits. Colonial Attitudes and Modern Double Standards These new Western norms carried moral overtones in the colonial era. British colonialists often disparaged Indian dining customs as primitive. By the mid-1800s, finger-eating was so taboo in polite society that etiquette guides labelled it savage. This historic snobbery resurfaced in the 1950s with Pather Panchali: showing peasants eating rice by hand was literally too unrefined for some Western eyes. Today, the Mamdani case highlights the absurdity of these attitudes. Critics who call hand-eating 'uncivilised' conveniently ignore that Americans and Europeans themselves handle many foods bare-handed. Westerners may scoff, yet most Americans eat pizza, burgers, sandwiches, fries, and chicken wings – with their hands. It is pure hypocrisy. The backlash to Mamdani shows that many people now recognise this: labelling hand-eating as unsanitary or uncivilised is little more than prejudice dressed up in etiquette. The Bottom Line: Etiquette is Cultural In the end, dining manners are deeply cultural and ever-changing. Whether one uses a fork or fingers is a matter of upbringing, not of inherent civilisation. To millions of Asians, using hands is as natural and polite as using cutlery is in the West. Judging one another's table habits misunderstands history. Forks are only a few centuries old, whereas eating by hand dates back to prehistory. Perhaps true civilisation is less about utensils and more about respect – keeping hands clean, sharing food generously, and eating with dignity. In a globalised world, demanding everyone conform to Western-style dining is an anachronism. Rather than policing plates, a more gracious etiquette is recognising that many cultures have perfectly respectable, time-honoured ways of eating – forks or hands included. Because at the end of the day, if you're offended by someone else's fingers touching their rice, it says more about you than it does about them.
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘We had just 30 seconds': Pakistan PM's aide recalls near-nuclear panic after India's BrahMos strike, credits Trump for de-escalation
A top Pakistani politician and close aide to prime minister Shehbaz Sharif has acknowledged that during Operation Sindoor , Pakistan's military had just 30 to 45 seconds to assess whether a BrahMos cruise missile launched by India carried a nuclear warhead. 'When India fired BrahMos at Nur Khan airbase, Pakistan's military had only seconds to determine if it was nuclear. That's a dangerous situation,' Rana Sanaullah, special assistant to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, said in an interview. The missile struck Nur Khan airbase, a high-value Pakistan Air Force (PAF) facility in Chaklala, Rawalpindi. Sanaullah admitted the incident threw Pakistan into panic mode, raising fears of a full-scale nuclear conflict. A flashpoint moment The BrahMos strike came in the backdrop of a major India-Pakistan conflict following a terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, where 26 tourists were killed by Pakistan-linked militants. In retaliation, India launched Operation Sindoor, targeting multiple terror camps and military installations across Pakistan. Sanaullah claimed that while India's strike didn't carry a nuclear payload, the sheer ambiguity of the incoming missile risked triggering a nuclear response. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo 'I'm not saying India did good by not using a nuclear warhead. But such confusion could have sparked a global war,' he warned. Trump's role - fact or fiction? The PML-N leader credited US President Donald Trump for 'saving the world' by allegedly mediating during the crisis. 'There needs to be an independent evaluation of Trump's role,' he said. India, however, has consistently rejected any third-party intervention and maintains that it was Pakistan's DGMO who reached out first to initiate de-escalation. Operation Sindoor: India's precision offensive Satellite imagery released by India revealed extensive damage to Pakistan's military infrastructure. The Nur Khan base sustained hits on hangars, runways, and radar sites, impacting critical operations involving VIP fleets and Turkish Bayraktar TB2 drones. Other airbases, Sargodha, Bholari, Jacobabad, Sukkur, and Rahim Yar Khan, were also targeted. Indian forces claimed to have killed over 100 terrorists and destroyed major Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM), and Hizbul Mujahideen camps. Pakistan retaliated with drones and missile strikes on western India, all of which were intercepted, before both sides agreed to a ceasefire after four days of intense exchanges. This wasn't the first time India struck Nur Khan. The IAF's 20 Squadron had also targeted the base in the 1971 war, marking the base as a historically strategic site.
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
How Ukraine can cope with the US pause on crucial battlefield weapons
The U.S. pause in weapons shipments to Ukraine coincides with intensified Russian attacks, creating vulnerabilities in Ukrainian cities due to the shortage of Patriot air defense missiles. While Ukraine is scaling up its domestic defense production, particularly in drones and artillery shells, European countries are increasing their military aid to compensate for the U.S. pause. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The decision by the United States to pause some weapons shipments to Ukraine has come at a tough time for Kyiv: Russia's bigger army is making a concerted push on parts of the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line and is intensifying long-range drone and missile attacks that increasingly hammer civilians in Ukrainian has been Ukraine's biggest military backer since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of its neighbor on Feb. 24, 2022. But the Trump administration has been disengaging from the war, and no end to the fighting is in sight, despite recent direct peace a look at Ukraine's options following the U.S. pause of some arms deliveries:Specific weapons needed from U.S. Amid recurring concerns in Kyiv about how much military support its allies can supply and how quickly, Ukraine has raced to build up its domestic defense country's output has gradually grown, especially in the production of more and increasingly sophisticated drones, but Ukraine needs to speedily scale up some high-tech U.S. weapons are irreplaceable. They include Patriot air defense missiles , which are needed to fend off Russia's frequent ballistic missile attacks, but which cost $4 million each. That vital system is included in the pause, and many cities in Ukraine, including Kyiv, could become increasingly vulnerable.A senior Ukrainian official said Thursday that Patriot systems are "critically necessary" for Ukraine, but U.S.-made HIMARS precision-guided missiles, also paused, are in less urgent need as other countries produce similar assets."Other countries that have these (Patriot) systems can only transfer them with U.S. approval. The real question now is how far the United States is willing to go in its reluctance to support Ukraine," he told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because of sensitivity of the official said that Patriot missiles exist in sufficient numbers globally, and he said that accessing them requires political resolve."There are enough missiles out there," he said, without providing also stated that Ukraine has already scaled up its domestic production of 155 mm artillery shells, which were once critically short, and is now capable of producing more than is currently contracted. "Supplies from abroad have also become more available than before," he plan Amid at times fraught relations with U.S. President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been enlisting greater European help for his country's arms manufacturing countries don't have the production levels, military stockpiles or the technology to pick up all the slack left by the U.S. pause, but Zelenskyy is recruiting their help for ambitious joint investment legislation to help Ukrainian defense manufacturers scale up and modernize production, including building new facilities at home and abroad, will be put to a vote in the Ukrainian parliament later this month, Defense Minister Rustem Umerov announced this said last month that major investments will go to the production of drones and artillery shells."The volume of support this year is the largest since the start of the full-scale war," he said about commitments from foreign Trump, there have been no new announcements of U.S. military or weapons aid to Ukraine. Between March and April, the United States allocated no new help at all, according to Germany's Kiel Institute, which tracks such the first time since June 2022, four months after Russia's full-scale invasion, European countries have surpassed the U.S. in total military aid, totaling 72 billion euros ($85 billion) compared with 65 billion euros ($77 billion) from the U.S., the institute said last battlefield problem Without Patriot missiles, as well as the AIM-7 Sparrow air-to-air missile and shorter-range Stinger missiles that are also included in the pause, Ukrainian cities likely will take a bashing as more Russian missiles pierce air the front line, Ukrainian troops haven't recently voiced complaints about ammunition shortages, as they have in the past. They have always said that during the war, they have never had as much ammunition to as their disposal as Russian army faces a different problem: It's desperately short-handed. It's turning to drones to compensate for its manpower shortage, and analysts say the front isn't about to about the timing of the U.S. pause, the Ukrainian official emphasized the need for stable, reliable supply lines."This is war - and in war, steady deliveries are always crucial," he said.
