Former Nenggiri assemblyman withdraws lawsuit over Bersatu expulsion
Mohd Azizi's lawyer, Nur Irdina Syahirah Mohammad Wardi, informed Judge Roz Mawar Rozain that the suit was withdrawn as it had become academic, given that the Nenggiri by-election had already taken place, resulting in the election of a new state assemblyman.
Meanwhile, the defendants, including Kelantan State Assembly speaker Datuk Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah, who was represented by counsel Awang Armadajaya Awang Mahmud, applied for RM250,000 in costs.
They argued that the case was of public interest and had required significant legal work due to its complexity, particularly with the involvement of the speaker's position, which has wider implications for the country's legislative body.
Counsel Chetan Jethwani, representing Bersatu president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin and Bersatu secretary-general Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin, who were also named as defendants, sought RM250,000 in costs for both his clients.
'This lawsuit has no merit and would ultimately fail. This is evidenced by the withdrawal of the suit,' said Chetan.
Judge Roz Mawar subsequently struck out the suit and ordered Mohd Azizi to pay costs of RM50,000 to Mohd Amar and RM50,000 to Muhyiddin and Hamzah.
Mohd Azizi had originally filed the lawsuit on June 24 of last year, challenging his expulsion from Bersatu. He sought a declaration that his termination, communicated via a notice dated June 12, 2024, was unlawful and void, claiming the notice was issued with malice.
Mohd Azizi argued that an amendment to Article 10 of Bersatu's constitution, which allows revocation of membership if a member supports a political rival, was unconstitutional.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
9 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Joining united front not the same as signing up with PN, says Ramasamy
Urimai chairman P Ramasamy said his party supports Bersatu's call for a united opposition but has no intention of becoming part of PN. PETALING JAYA : Joining a united opposition front comprising various parties outside the ruling bloc is not the same as entering a formal coalition like Perikatan Nasional (PN), Urimai chairman P Ramasamy said following the views of two political analysts on the matter. Ramasamy said it was misleading to suggest that political parties like Muda or Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) avoid the initiative solely due to the perception that it is an extension of PN. In a statement, he said such a view 'conflates two very different political realities'. He gave the example of his party, which he said supports Bersatu's call for a united opposition but has no intention of becoming part of PN. 'There is a fundamental misunderstanding in equating participation in the united front with formal membership in Bersatu, PAS, or the PN coalition. 'This distinction is critical. Supporting a broader political platform to challenge the government does not imply ideological alignment with all parties involved.' Earlier today, two political analysts told FMT that Muda risked eroding its modest support base by aligning with Bersatu on its proposed united opposition front. Universiti Sains Malaysia's Azmil Tayeb said joining the pact would tarnish Muda's image as a moderate party, while Oh Ei Sun of the Singapore Institute of International Affairs said the party could lose its core supporters. Bersatu agreed last week that its president Muhyiddin Yassin would spearhead efforts to build a united opposition front in preparation for the 16th general election. Subsequently, on July 18, the former prime minister met with the heads of various parties opposed to the government, including Muda, PSM, Pejuang, Putra, the Malaysian Advancement Party, and Urimai. Ramasamy said equating the united opposition front with a formal coalition 'oversimplified' the political landscape and unfairly discredited efforts to build a more inclusive opposition. 'Analysts and detractors alike would do well to acknowledge this complexity rather than indulge in lazy political shorthand,' he added.
New Straits Times
9 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Najib's bankruptcy case adjourned to Sept 8 over disorganised submissions
KUALA LUMPUR: Datuk Seri Najib Razak's bid to stay bankruptcy proceedings was postponed after the High Court raised concerns over disorganised and incomplete submissions by his legal team. Judicial commissioner Suhendran Sockanathan @ Saheran Abdullah also instructed Najib's lawyer Muhammad Farhan Shafee to refile a consolidated set of submissions after finding that key issues were either missing or scattered across documents. Farhan had earlier argued that the Inland Revenue Board's (IRB) RM1.69 billion tax claim against Najib was tied to funds allegedly received from 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB), which were still the subject of ongoing criminal and civil proceedings. He submitted that there were unresolved legal issues surrounding whether the alleged proceeds of criminal activity could be taxed under Section 4 of the Income Tax Act 1967. "The IRB has treated the sums received through the appellant's personal accounts, alleged to have originated from 1MDB, as income. "These amounts do not fall within the scope of Section 4 of the Income Tax Act. Furthermore, provisions under the Anti-Money Laundering Act are also involved," he said during the proceeding today. Farhan also told the court that these matters were pending before the Special Commissioners of Income Tax, and a final ruling had yet to be made. He also raised the issue of potential double recovery by the government, saying there were attempts to penalise his client under both criminal and tax laws using the same facts. However, the court pressed Farhan repeatedly for clarity, pointing out that these central arguments were either not included in the written submissions or only briefly referenced in affidavits. "None of this is (arguments) in your submissions, you know? "At the moment, you are all over the place. "I do not want to have bits here and bits there... it is too cumbersome," Saheran said. Farhan then suggested that the court grant a short date to allow his team to update and streamline their submissions. He acknowledged that their arguments had not been presented in a structured manner and expressed his willingness to return to court with a more comprehensive and organised set of submissions. Saheran: I think yes... Farhan, I think you need to focus a bit more. Farhan: Sure. Saheran: Update the submissions and get it to us... I do not want this to be sitting on my docket. For a long period of time. How long will it take? Farhan: We can file it within the week. Saheran: Take two weeks... but do it properly. Senior federal counsel Norhisham Ahmad, who appeared for IRB, also supported the call for clearer submissions, adding that many of the appellant's arguments had not been raised in their original filings. The court then fixed Sept 8 to hear the case. Najib is appealing against two bankruptcy notices stemming from additional tax assessments amounting to RM1.46 billion, which have now ballooned with penalties and interest to RM1.69 billion. The former prime minister maintains that the tax assessments are flawed and should not proceed while related matters are being litigated in other courts. On June 25, 2019, the government, through IRB, filed the suit against Najib asking him to settle the unpaid tax with interest at five per cent, a year from the date of judgment, as well as costs and other relief deemed fit by the court. The government claimed that Najib had failed to pay his income tax from 2011 to 2017 within the stipulated 30-day period after assessment notices were issued by the IRB.
The Sun
9 hours ago
- The Sun
Hong Kong trans man wins landmark public toilet rights case
HONG KONG: A transgender man in Hong Kong has won a legal challenge against parts of the city's law that criminalised entering public toilets designated for the opposite sex. The High Court ruled in favour of the man, referred to as 'K', who argued that the restrictions violated his rights to equality, privacy, and freedom from discrimination. The case centred on K's gender dysphoria treatment, where doctors advised him to use men's public restrooms as part of his transition. However, his Hong Kong ID card still listed him as female, meaning he risked a HK$2,000 ($255) fine under existing regulations. Justice Russell Coleman ruled that two provisions in the law were unconstitutional, giving the government one year to amend the regulations. The decision follows a series of legal victories for transgender rights in Hong Kong, including a 2023 ruling that struck down the requirement for full gender-affirming surgery before changing the sex marker on ID cards. Coleman noted that the government had effectively conceded the public toilet case after the 2023 ruling. K did not challenge the concept of sex-segregated toilets but argued that denying him access based on his ID card was discriminatory. The court also highlighted the broader struggles faced by transgender individuals. 'Many trans people choose not to use public conveniences at all, due to fear, the threat of harassment, and to avoid having their gender identity invalidated or undermined,' Coleman wrote. K was undergoing hormone therapy in preparation for surgery when he filed the case. His treatment required 'real life experience,' including using facilities matching his gender identity. - AFP
