logo
Michigan State Police director defends leadership amid calls for his resignation

Michigan State Police director defends leadership amid calls for his resignation

Yahoo3 days ago
Michigan State Police Director Col. James Grady speaks to reporters following a joint meeting of the Michigan House Oversight Committee and the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Michigan State Police. July 1, 2025 | Photo by Ben Solis/Michigan Advance
Michigan State Police Director Col. James Grady said Tuesday that a no confidence vote from troopers and command officers didn't represent the full scope of his department, and that he was working to address issues of low morale that began before his time as the head of the agency.
Grady's comments came during a joint hearing of the Michigan House Oversight Committee and the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Michigan State Police. Some members of the Republican-led House of Representatives and the GOP members of the Senate have called for Grady's resignation due to complaints from troopers and command officers who have claimed they are fearful of speaking up about department policies under Grady and have faced retaliation when they have.
Grady said that the vote of no confidence from the Michigan State Police Troopers Association and the Michigan State Police Command Officers Association in June was not an MSP-sanctioned survey nor was it reflective of employee surveys issued by the department. Overall, Grady highlighted his years of service to the department and the discretion that comes with his position to make leadership and command changes if needed.
'I'm doing the work, representative,' Grady said in response to questions from Republican state Reps. Mike Mueller and Jay DeBoyer, the respective chairs of the joint committees. 'I'm doing everything that I can to ensure that the morale increases, because I, again, respect all of the members of our agency, and I want them to be well. I want them to be in a good place. I want them to want to come to work, because when they're in a good place, they can come and do the work effectively and efficiently every day. And that's something that I support as a leader of this department.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
That was how Grady responded to most of the questions lobbed at him from Republicans and Democrats alike on the joint panel, much of which were fastballs and somewhat critical of Grady and his handling of the department. Grady further noted multiple worksite visits, feedback missions and an open door policy as ways he was trying hard to boost morale.
Grady was appointed in Sept. 2023 as director of the department by Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat, following the departure of former director Joseph Gasper.
Over the last few years, troopers and command officers have complained that Grady was out of line when he came out with a statement that did not initially support former trooper Brian Keely when he was charged in May 2024 in the death of Samuel Sterling. The charges against Keely have since been dropped by a U.S. District Court judge, but the Michigan Department of Attorney General has said it would appeal the dismissal.
Troopers and command officers also took issue with Grady promoting Chief Deputy Director Aimee Brimacombe as his second-in-command because of her alleged lack of experience and multiple complaints made against her before she was elevated several ranks.
Other grievances include Grady's decision to not keep existing command or leadership staff and replacing them with a new team, which Grady said Tuesday was a means to better serve the department and bring commanders on board with unique strengths.
Troopers filed an ethics complaint against Grady and Brimacombe in January. A handful of troopers also filed lawsuits against Brimacombe questioning her leadership, and questioned performance bonuses Grady and Brimacombe received after only a short time in their roles.
The morass culminated in the vote of no confidence, which Grady said was a first, but later noted that similar questions have been posed to trooper and command officer unions in the past questioning the leadership of previous directors, dating back to 2018.
Some have questioned whether the complaints have an undertone of racial or gender bias, seeing as troopers have in the past complained or sued over the department's diversity recruitment policies that emerged under Gasper, but before Grady's ascension to his current role. Although Grady is not the first Black officer to be promoted to colonel, some have called into question the deluge of complaints against the combo of Grady and Brimacombe as the department's leaders.
That said, DeBoyer, Mueller and others noted that although they have great respect for the department and Grady's years of service in law enforcement, maybe he wasn't the right leader for the agency despite his commitment to the department and its troopers.
'I appreciate that, and I don't have any reason to believe that that is not who you are, but the results of the survey, unfortunately, and with all due respect, says otherwise,' DeBoyer said. 'You made the statement that the Michigan State Police is one of the most respected agencies in the entire country, frankly, and it has been for decades. So, when you see that level of lack of confidence, that's very concerning to us as legislators.'
Mueller, a former law enforcement officer, also said that it appeared to him Grady wasn't a bad person, but sometimes good people aren't great leaders.
'It's not anything about your character at all. It's about the men and women, 98% of the men and women, that drive around those police cars [who] fear retaliation,' Mueller said.
The gloves were off, however, after that first bit of cordial opening statements.
DeBoyer noted that the House Oversight Committee, which he chairs, has deposed several members of Michigan State Police in the matter of his leadership and had several say that there was a culture of fear in the department for either saying the wrong things, sharing their opinions or speaking up on leadership matters. The depositions, which were not shared in full during the committee nor made public elsewhere, also showed troopers and command officers experienced retaliation for doing so, resulting in work assignment loss or other reprimands.
State Rep. Jamie Greene (R-Richmond) read some of the commentary from MSP's 2024 employment engagement survey. One response noted that it was allegedly well known within the department that Grady and Brimacombe didn't take kindly to criticism on their leadership decisions, and if they do, they pay the price.
'This is incredibly disturbing,' Greene added. 'This department seems to be fostering a culture of fear and isolation, which is extremely harmful in such a high stress career.'
Greene asked Grady why retaliation was the running theme in some of the responses if he was working to mend bridges and communicating with his troopers about their concerns.
Grady again leaned on his commitment to hearing officers out and said again that he believed those comments did not represent that majority of the department. The director also defended Brimacombe and his decision to elevate her, noting that she has 25 years of experience with the department and a law degree.
Greene asked him if she thought the results of the surveys were fabricated. Grady did not directly respond, but did say there appeared to be copycat or repeated similar responses.
State Rep. Will Snyder (D-Muskegon) said it was his understanding that there were approximately 700 vacant positions within the department and that 500 of them are at the trooper level. Snyder worked that out to be a 20% vacancy rate, which he said was exceedingly high.
Grady said the department had over the last 10 years hired nearly 1,000 troopers, leading the nation in hiring among state police organizations. He also noted that the department has an aggressive recruiting plan.
But DeBoyer later countered by saying that morale continues to dip and then turned to question Grady about reports of doxing within the department. The names of some of the troopers and command officers who were deposed during recent closed-door hearings of the House Oversight Committee were reported by the Detroit Free Press ahead of Tuesday's hearing.
DeBoyer said that revelation was appalling, and grilled Grady about how and why someone within the department who was familiar with those discussions leaked that information to the press. The chair as
'That is doxing people within your organization, people who we have asked to communicate with us in private … in fairness and openness and transparency with others members of our committee,' DeBoyer said. 'And this morning, in the media, we read three names that only your agency had. That's inexcusable. … The fact that someone in your agency would dox their own members, Colonel, that is a clear demonstration of why there's a lack of confidence in leadership at Michigan State Police, because at all costs, they will protect themselves and they will sacrifice their members.'
While DeBoyer called for an investigation, Grady said he wasn't aware of that leak and would look into it.
Following testimony, Grady spoke to reporters and said he thought the committee hearing was generally unfair and that he was proud of the job that he was doing.
'I'm not the type of Colonel that doesn't make himself available or accessible. I'll talk to anybody, and so I have those conversations, and they're positive,' Grady said of his outreach to troopers. 'People enjoy working for the State Police. That's why, when we do have vacancies, they don't last long. They don't remain vacant, because people apply to the positions they want to work here in this department. People want to be state troopers.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No tax on tips and overtime: Here's how your taxes may shrink
No tax on tips and overtime: Here's how your taxes may shrink

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

No tax on tips and overtime: Here's how your taxes may shrink

In a sweeping shift poised to reshape the tax landscape for millions of American workers, Republicans on Thursday passed the massive tax bill, fulfilling one of President Donald Trump's major campaign promises to eliminate federal income taxes on some tips and overtime pay. The bill now heads to Trump, for him to sign into law on July 4. Trump first pledged to end taxes on tips during a campaign rally in Las Vegas in 2024, aiming to win support of voters in the swing state. The megabill, which cleared the Senate and House this week, marks one of the most significant federal tax policy changes in recent years. Learn more: Trump's tax law: What the megabill means for you and your money Under the new law, workers who rely on tips or work extra hours will be able to keep more of their earnings — a move the White House claims will boost pay for working-class Americans. But not everyone agrees. A study by the Tax Policy Center found that while some taxpayers may see an increase of a few hundred dollars in after-tax income, many low-income earners could see little to no benefit at all. Here's how the new law works — and what it could mean for your taxes. Type of tax break Tax deduction Value of tax break Up to $25,000 Income limits Tax break decreases by $100 for every $1,000 of modified adjusted gross income above:$300,000 (married filing jointly); $150,000 (all other filers) Type of tax break Tax deduction Value of tax break $25,000 (married filing jointly); $12,500 (all other filers) Income limits Tax break decreases by $100 for every $1,000 of modified adjusted gross income above:$300,000 (married filing jointly); $150,000 (all other filers) Workers must pay federal income tax and payroll taxes on tip income, just as they do on regular wages. Employees are required to report monthly tips exceeding $20 to their employers, who must then withhold income and FICA taxes and report the amount to the IRS. The new tax law creates a deduction for qualified tip income, eliminating federal income taxes on up to $25,000 in tips for workers for tax years 2025 through 2028. The tax break starts to phase out for taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) of $150,000, or $300,000 if married filing jointly. (The value of the deduction will drop by $100 for every $1,000 of income above those amounts.) '​​An estimated four million individuals receive tip income. So those people could see a significant tax benefit,' says Mark Luscombe, principal tax analyst with Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting. 'The deductions for tips are available to non-itemizers, so they can be claimed even if the taxpayer claims the standard deduction.' Workers will still need to report tip income and pay payroll taxes. While federal income tax will be withheld from paychecks, those amounts will be refunded when filing their income tax return. The tax break won't apply only to employees. Some independent contractors and business owners could also qualify, provided their business gross receipts exceed business deductions, losses and costs, including the cost of goods sold. Get started: Match with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals While this provision will eliminate taxes on tip income for millions of Americans, only a fraction of taxpayers may see a meaningful benefit. A study by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center found that households earning $33,000 or less wouldn't benefit much, as they typically owe little to no federal income tax. Fully 40 percent of U.S. households that report tip income would not see any tax break from the proposal, according to the Tax Policy Center report. That means 60 percent of households that report having tip income would benefit (that translates to about 2 percent of all U.S. households enjoying this tax break), and their tax bills would drop by an average of $1,800 a year, according to the report. An average of $1,800 a year is not nothing. But that reward wouldn't go to the lowest-earning households. Of those households making less than $33,000 a year, just 1.4 percent of households would benefit, and for those households, their after-tax income would rise by $450 a year on average. Learn more: New 'bonus' tax deduction up to $6,000 could be on the way for those age 65 or older Employees must receive overtime pay — at least time and a half — for any hours worked beyond 40 in a workweek. Under the new law, employees who earn overtime may get a break on their federal taxes. 'There has been a trend toward less use of overtime pay; however, under the Biden administration, the salary threshold for employees eligible for overtime pay was significantly raised, currently at $58,656 and adjusted for inflation every three years,' Luscombe says. The overtime tax break will function similarly to the tip income deduction. Overtime wages will still be subject to withholding, but workers could deduct federal income taxes paid on those wages when filing their returns, even if they don't itemize. The deduction will apply to tax years 2025 through 2028. The White House estimates that the average overtime worker will receive a tax cut of between $1,400 and $1,750 annually. But experts argue that the tax benefits won't benefit those who earn lower levels of income. While some experts say workers who earn overtime and tip income will pay less taxes under the new law, others warn the measure will increase the federal deficit and result in a significant loss of revenue. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that the tip provision would reduce federal revenues by $40 billion from fiscal years 2025 to 2034, with most of the impact concentrated between 2026 to 2029, when the deduction would be in effect. The Congressional Budget Office estimated exempting overtime pay would cost $124 billion through 2028. Some analysts also warn that eliminating taxes on overtime pay could disrupt the labor market. The Tax Foundation, a nonprofit tax policy group, said removing income taxes on overtime could 'distort' the labor market by encouraging more workers to take overtime shifts, potentially making hourly roles more attractive than salaried positions that are exempt from overtime rules. 'Although the bill tries to restrict businesses not currently relying on tip income and overtime pay from seeking to take advantage of these proposed changes, it is still possible that there could be shifts toward tip income and more overtime pay to try to take advantage of the deductions,' Luscombe says. Learn more: These 9 states have no income tax — that doesn't always mean you'll save money Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store