SC refuses to entertain plea to apply POSH Act to political parties
'The prayer made in the petition is exclusively within the competence of the legislature or within the domain of policy of the executive. As such, we are not inclined to entertain,' Chief Justice of India (CJI) B R Gavai, presiding over a two-judge bench, told senior advocate Rekha Gupta, who pressed for the court's intervention.
The counsel told the bench, also comprising Justice K Vinod Chandran, that 'an important issue like this, they (legislators) are not acting upon, the vacuum is still continuing'.
CJI Gavai suggested, 'There must be not less than 25-30 MPs who are women. Ask them to present a private bill.'
The counsel said that she was not seeking a direction to Parliament to legislate but only interpretation as to what constitutes 'workplace, employer and employee' under the Act because a Kerala High Court judgment says it will not apply to political parties.
The court said, in that case, she should challenge the high court order. The counsel said she would do so and sought permission to withdraw her petition.
The court allowed this and gave her 'further liberty to take such steps as are advisable in law'.
The POSH Act requires both public and private workplaces to set up an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) to hear complaints of sexual harassment. The plea contended that when it comes to political parties, 'the presence of Internal Complaints Committees (ICCs) to address sexual harassment is inconsistent'.
The petition said that despite the expansive definitions of 'employee' and 'workplace' in the Act, women engaged in political work, particularly at the grassroots, continue to face rampant sexual harassment with no structured mechanism in place to address this.
Citing UN Women (2013) and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (2016) studies, it said psychological and sexual harassment in political spaces is not isolated but systemic. It added that political work is a form of employment or engagement and must be recognised as such under the Act to ensure protection and accountability.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
HC orders crackdown on illegal bungalows, encroachments in Yeoor Hills
THANE: The Bombay High Court has directed the Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC) and the Thane Collector to initiate strict action against encroachments and unauthorised constructions in Yeoor Hills — a forested stretch within the Sanjay Gandhi National Park — including bungalows and commercial establishments allegedly built by local politicians and private entities. Yeoor Hills, located on the fringes of Thane and Borivali, has seen a surge in illegal developments in recent years — including upscale bungalows, bars, and restaurants — sparking concerns about forest degradation and displacement of tribal communities. (Hindustan Times) The order was passed by a division bench of chief justice Alok Aradhe and justice Sandeep Marne while hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by tribal rights activists. The petition alleged large-scale illegal transfers of tribal land, unauthorised construction of bungalows, and encroachments on public land within the protected forest zone. The petitioners also sought restoration of tribal lands to their original owners, invoking the provisions of the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974. During the hearing, the TMC informed the court that a 2009 survey had identified 219 unauthorised structures in Yeoor Hills, and that notices had been issued. However, the civic body was unable to provide details on the action taken since then. Taking note of the submissions, the court observed, 'No person has a right to encroach on public land or indulge in unauthorised construction.' While noting that the question of whether a particular structure is legal or not cannot be decided under writ jurisdiction, the court emphasised that it was the duty of the competent authorities to enforce the law. The bench directed the Thane municipal commissioner and the collector to issue fresh notices to all encroachers and parties responsible for unauthorised constructions. After granting them an opportunity to be heard, the officials must take appropriate action, including demolition of structures found to be illegal. Regarding the restoration of tribal land, the court held that affected individuals are free to pursue legal remedies under the 1974 Act to reclaim their ancestral land. Yeoor Hills, located on the fringes of Thane and Borivali, has seen a surge in illegal developments in recent years — including upscale bungalows, bars, and restaurants — sparking concerns about forest degradation and displacement of tribal communities.
Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Kolhapur residents hold 45-km silent march for elephant's return
MUMBAI: After the transfer of Mahadevi, an elephant belonging to a Jain shrine in Kolhapur, to Vantara, an animal rescue and rehabilitation initiative by the Reliance Foundation in Jamnagar, those who were unwilling to let go staged a march on Sunday. Thousands of locals and leaders from the ruling Mahayuti alliance in Kolhapur marched for 45 km from the shrine to the collector's office, demanding that Mahadevi be brought back, following which CM Devendra Fadnavis said he would hold a meeting on this on Tuesday. Starting from the Jain Shrine where the elephant, Mahadevi, was kept for the last 30 years, thousands walked together to the collector's office. Mahadevi, 36, was transferred from the Swastishri Jinsen Bhattarak Pattacharya Mahaswamy Sanstha to Vantara, following a Bombay high court order on July 16. The court's decision came after hearing a petition by the People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), which had earlier raised concerns about the elephant's health and psychological condition with the Maharashtra forest department and the High-Powered Committee (HPC) appointed by the Supreme Court to look after the transfer and welfare of captive elephants. PETA had pointed out that the elephant had painful arthritis and foot rot and was kept in solitary confinement. The Supreme Court upheld the HC order on July 22. After initial resistance, Mahadevi was given a tearful farewell at the temple and shifted to Vantara on July 28, but plans by politicians and the people were afoot. Kolhapur residents reportedly began to boycott the Reliance Group's JIO mobile service and launched a signature campaign signed by 200,400 people to be sent to the President of India. After the outcry, Vantara's CEO Vivaan Karani met guardian minister Prakash Abitkar on Friday, following which the latter announced that the state government would move the Supreme Court to hand Mahadevi back to the Jain shrine. The march on Sunday began under the leadership of former MP Raju Shetti, which people joined en route. Other politicians who participated were BJP MLA Rahul Aawade, his father, former minister Prakash Awade, Shirol MLA Rajendra Patil-Yadravkar, Congress leader Satej Patil, Sangli MP Vishal Patil, MLA Vishwajit Kadam and local leaders. A memorandum was submitted to the authorities, urging them to bring the elephant back to the Jain math, where she was kept for over three decades. Addressing the crowd, Raju Shetti called the 'chronology of events leading to the transfer' of Mahadevi to Jamnagar a 'conspiracy'. He also alleged that fake health reports were submitted to the court by PETA and other concerned authorities to obtain an order for Mahadevi's transfer, and called for action against those responsible for submitting the reports. He also demanded that the President cancel the Supreme Court ruling and ensure the elephant's return to Kolhapur. Meanwhile, Vantara also issued an official statement on Sunday and said that it had played no role in seeking Mahadev's transfer. Rueing the 'considerable misinformation' that was being spread about this, the trust pointed out that it was named as a recipient by the HPC, based on its track record in elephant welfare. 'If the math feels it is entitled to the custody of the elephant despite enough proof and the final decision of the court, it should ask the Supreme Court to give it the elephant,' said the statement. 'What is the point of blaming Vantara? The promoter family, which supports Vantara philanthropically… were not party to the proceedings at any stage. Vantara reiterates its commitment to lawful, ethical animal care and has only acted in accordance with judicial and regulatory directives.' The Vantara statement also pointed out that the elephant had been transported 13 times from Maharashtra to Telangana between 2012 and 2023, often without proper forest department permissions. Reports and photographs documented that the elephant was being used commercially. 'She was sent for public processions, including Muharram, used for begging, and publicly paraded,' added the official statement. Using elephants for begging is unlawful and there are many conditions that have to be met before they can be paraded. Congress politician Satej Patil said that although Vantara had agreed to cooperate in transferring the elephant back to the Jain shrine, the state government should also intervene in the matter. Fadnavis, on his part, pointed out that the elephant was transferred to Vantara on a Supreme Court order and announced that he would hold a meeting on the issue on Tuesday. 'I will look into the legal aspects related to bringing Mahadevi back,' he said.
News18
24 minutes ago
- News18
Monsoon Session LIVE: Parliament Likely To See Uproar Over SIR Issue; Key Government Agenda On Table
The parliament monsoon session has witnessed many adjournments as Opposition continues to demand a discussion on the SIR underway in Bihar. Leaders of INDIA bloc have protested over the issue, criticising the government for not holding discussions. On Sunday Trinamool Congress leader Derek O'Brien said that the BJP is 'scared' of discussing the SIR. 'The SIR (Silent Invisible Rigging) vote chori is a subject that can easily be discussed in both Houses. BJP scared & are disrupting,' the TMC leader said on X. 'From Monday, August 4, we will give the shaky Modi coalition free tutorials in Parliament rules & procedure to teach them how it can be discussed,' he added. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju on Friday cited a ruling by former Lok Sabha speaker Balram Jakhar that Parliament cannot discuss the functioning of the Election Commission. The Monsoon Session of Parliament has seen little progress so far, largely disrupted by protests from the INDIA bloc, which continues to demand a debate on the issue. As part of their ongoing agitation, the Opposition is set to stage a march to the Election Commission's office in Delhi on the morning of August 8.
