
Karnataka Minister rejects EWS housing scheme graft charges, seeks probe
The minister was responding to claims made by ruling Congress MLA from Aland, B R Patil, who alleged that bribes were being collected from poor families in exchange for houses.
Bengaluru, Jun 24 (PTI) Karnataka Housing Minister B Z Zameer Ahmed Khan on Tuesday dismissed allegations of corruption in the allotment of houses under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) scheme and called for a thorough probe into the matter.
He urged Patil to write to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and formally seek an inquiry into the alleged irregularities.
Clarifying his stance, Khan said he had already ordered a departmental probe.
'As the minister, I've directed senior officials to investigate whether such incidents have occurred. So far, no such instance has come to my notice,' he said.
Refuting allegations that he personally benefited, Khan said, 'I am not in such penury that I need to collect money from the poor. If I have taken money for allotting houses, I deserve to be cursed. Will my family or I gain anything by exploiting the poor? We will perish.' He added that only Panchayats are authorised to select beneficiaries, not MLAs.
'If Panchayat members have taken money, let them be exposed. I haven't come across any complaint of Panchayat officials collecting money from beneficiaries.' According to Khan, all MLAs cutting across party lines had submitted recommendations for house allotments, but the state lacked enough stock to meet every request.
'We're allotting houses in phases. Patil had asked for around 2,000 houses, but we also have to reallocate homes that were cancelled earlier. We've given 950 houses to separate Panchayats.' Addressing Patil's complaint that none of the people he recommended were allotted houses while the Aland Panchayat president allegedly secured 950 homes for his people, Khan reiterated that he had no role in the selection.
The minister criticised the Centre for levying 12 per cent GST on the Rs 1.5 lakh grant provided under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) for EWS families.
'I requested BJP leaders in Karnataka to get the GST removed on central housing funds, but nothing has happened,' he said.
He explained that the total cost of a house under the scheme is Rs 7.5 lakh, with Rs 1.5 lakh each from the Centre and the state. For SC/ST beneficiaries, the central contribution is Rs 2.5 lakh, and the rest is borne by the beneficiary.
Khan further alleged that while the Slum Development Board was supposed to receive Rs 9,500 crore from the Centre — Rs 7,400 crore under various housing schemes and Rs 2,100 crore under the Rajiv Gandhi Awas Yojana — only Rs 310 crore was released in the last eight years.
'When I brought this to the Chief Minister's notice, the cabinet approved Rs 500 crore in 2024, enabling us to construct and allocate 36,789 houses,' he said.
Khan clarified that Patil had not directly accused him of taking bribes.
'He never said I collected money. His grievance seems to be with the process at the local level,' the minister said.
The controversy gave ammunition to the opposition BJP and JD(S), who demanded Khan's resignation and a high-level inquiry.
Adding to the Congress's discomfort, party MLA Belur Gopal Krishna also joined the chorus demanding Khan's resignation. PTI GMS GMS ROH
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Nearly 200 arrested in Assam's massive crackdown on Cattle Preservation Act violation
GUWAHATI: Nearly 200 people were arrested and a large quantity of suspected beef was seized over the past two days in Assam during a statewide drive against alleged violation of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021. The drive was launched to verify reports about illegal cattle slaughter and unauthorised sale of beef in restaurants and eateries, the police said. Altogether, 196 people were arrested from different parts of the state. The police further stated that the drive will continue in the coming days. Two days ago, Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma had expressed deep concerns over incidents of cow slaughter. He stated that 1,400 cows were killed during Eid in the name of 'qurbani' in lower Assam's Dhubri town. The consumption of beef is not illegal in Assam, but the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021 prohibits the sale and consumption of beef in public places, in areas with a large population of Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, and other non-beef-eating communities, and within a radius of 5 km from any temple or similar institutions. '…No person shall transport or offer for transport or cause to be transported any cattle without valid permit from any place of other state through Assam to any place outside the state of Assam, or from any place within the state of Assam to any place outside the state of Assam where slaughter of cattle is not regulated by law,' the law says. It adds that the competent authority may issue a permit for transport of cattle for agricultural or animal husbandry purposes. The drive comes amid a controversy surrounding the alleged sale of 90 Gir cows to individuals, including a minister's wife and some elected members of the BJP. The state government had procured 300 Gir cows earlier for the Gorukhuti dairy project. The Congress on Wednesday demanded a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation into alleged corruption in the project.


Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
After Ramanagara became Bengaluru South, Bengaluru Rural district renamed Bengaluru North
Over a month after renaming Ramanagara district as Bengaluru South district, Karnataka's cabinet on Wednesday cleared a proposal to rename Bengaluru Rural district as Bengaluru North district. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah announced the decision while addressing a news conference following a special cabinet meeting at Nandi Hills in Chikkaballapura district. This was among the two name change proposals approved by the cabinet; the other was to rename Bagepalli in Chikkaballapura district as Chikkaballapur. In May, the state government renamed Ramanagara district, located southwest of Bengaluru district, 'to benefit from the international reputation enjoyed by Bengaluru'. This was after the Ministry of Home Affairs refused a no-objection certificate for the name change, for which the state government submitted a proposal in July 2024. The proposal to rename Bengaluru Rural district was based on petitions from legislators representing the district, including Food and Civil Supplies Minister K H Muniyappa. The change was sought to attract more investors, as Bengaluru International Airport, Foxconn's iPhone assembly plant, and several business parks are located in the district. The cabinet also decided to rename Bengaluru University after former prime minister Manmohan Singh. During the cabinet meeting, projects worth Rs 3,000 crore were cleared. The cabinet meeting at Nandi Hills dealt primarily with the Bengaluru division. In the last two months, cabinet meetings were held at Kalaburagi (Kalaburagi division) and MM Hills (Mysuru division). A special cabinet meeting is also scheduled at Vijayapura, to clear proposals related to the Belagavi division.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
16 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Sonia, Rahul Gandhi wanted to usurp ₹2,000 cr AJL company: ED to court
The Enforcement Directorate on Wednesday alleged Sonia and Rahul Gandhi wanted to usurp the assets of Associated Journals Limited (AJL), a ₹2,000 crore company, the publisher of National Herald newspaper. Special judge Vishal Gogne was hearing the submissions on the point of cognisance in the National Herald case. Additional solicitor general S V Raju said a conspiracy was hatched to form Young Indian Private Limited in which the Gandhis held 76 per cent shares to usurp the assets of AJL, which took a₹90 crore loan from the All India Congress Committee (AICC) despite having assets worth in crores. Explaining the conspiracy, the ASG said, "AJL was not making profits but had assets worth ₹2,000 crore. But they were finding it difficult to manage their daily affairs. If you are doing reasonably well, you cannot say, I am in loss, etc. You have to build a facade.₹90 crore loan was taken from the AlCC. They (AJL) said we cannot repay you (AICC). Ordinarily, any prudent person would have sold their assets. (Rs) 90 crore is child's play." Raju further said, "The conspiracy was creation of Young Indian to usurp ₹2,000 crore in exchange for a ₹90 crore loan. Sonia and Rahul Gandhi wanted to take over this ₹2,000 crore company." Within six days of Rahul's appointment as the director of Young Indian, Raju said, it sent a representation to AJL to repay the loan or convert it into equity. Judge Gogne posed a question to Raju about the possibility of the AICC writing off AJL's loan, similar to public sector banks. The ASG said banks wrote off loans of defaulters in the absence of assets as collateral but in this case AJL had assets worth ₹2,000 crore which they gave away for a loan of ₹90 crore. Raju alleged that the AICC distanced itself from a direct transaction to avoid "creating ripples" and instead created Young Indian. The judge again asked Raju if it was peculiar for political parties to own a newspaper. "Political parties acquire running newspapers and channels. The main question is how can they acquire an asset for peanuts," Raju said adding that AJL was acquired by Young Indian, in which 76 per cent shares were held by Sonia and Rahul Gandhi. "Taking by the left hand and taking by the right hand. Buying and selling of shares. All bogus transactions." he added. The hearing would continue on July 3. On May 21, the ED alleged that the proceeds of crime in the case were obtained on "instructions of some senior party leaders" towards "protection, tickets to contest elections, and securing positions in the party". The ED had filed its chargesheet against Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and others under Sections 3 (money laundering) and 4 (punishment for money laundering) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The ED accuses the Gandhis, late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes aside from Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda and a private company Young Indian of conspiracy and money laundering over the fraudulent takeover of properties valued over ₹2,000 crore belonging to the AJL. The chargesheet names the Gandhis, Dudey, Pitroda, Sunil Bhandari, Young Indian, and Dotex Merchandise Private Limited.