
Renters left stunned by sky-high monthly rent for studio flat in Glasgow
'RIDICULOUS' Renters left stunned by sky-high monthly rent for studio flat in Glasgow
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
HOUSE-HUNTERS have been left stunned after spotting the eye-watering price of a month's rent for a tiny bedsit in Glasgow's Southside.
This one-bedroom studio flat in Govanhill is just minutes from the popular Queen's Park and promises "brand new and recently modernised" living.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
The flat is situated on Dixon Avenue in the Govanhill area of Glasgow
Credit: rightmove
3
The flat boats a double bed, ensuite toilet and a four-stove hob
Credit: rightmove
3
It is newly renovated and comes with an added "all inclusive" benefit
Credit: rightmove
Marketed by London-based OpenRent, the Dixon Avenue property packs a surprising amount into a very small space.
The studio comes fully furnished with a four-hob stove and oven, an under-counter fridge, a wardrobe, and a TV mounted above a small desk.
It boasts a double ottoman bed with an orthopaedic mattress and "ample storage," along with an en-suite toilet and shower.
The fresh sage green walls and grey hardwood flooring complete the look.
Initially listed for a staggering £1,235 per month, the rent has since been reduced to £1,100.
While the listing boasts an "all-inclusive" perk with utility bills and Wi-Fi included, tenants will still need to fork out for council tax and provide a £750 deposit to secure the flat.
And the price tag on this property has sparked outrage online.
Punters took to Reddit to slam the price of the flat.
One user said: "Absolute joker of a landlord charging over a grand for this "studio".
"Glasgow rent is ridiculous and it's forcing people out of the communities they've lived in for years."
Woman's home and belongings left covered in mould as she blasts Scots council
Another added: "Heard rents were out of control but I didn't know it was this bad. I used to see Dixon avenue for like £250-400 a month. Wow, I feel sorry for people renting!"
A third wrote: "Wow, that's London prices 5 years ago."
A fourth fumed: "This is like a prison cell. Literally why would anyone work 5/7 days a week for all their savings and income to be usurped from them only to live in this room?"

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Brother and sister jailed over insider trading
A brother and sister have been sentenced to six and five years in jail respectively for insider trading and money laundering after they used his position as a Janus Henderson analyst to break the law. Redinel Korfuzi, 38, a former research analyst at the asset management firm, was accused of using confidential information to which he had access in his City job to trade using accounts held by his sister Oerta Korfuzi, 36, and two other people. Last month, the Albanian siblings were convicted of conspiracy to commit insider dealing and money laundering between December 2019 and March 2021. The Financial Conduct Authority, which prosecuted the case, said the pair had used Korfuzi's access to inside information to 'rig the system to satisfy their greed'. Sentencing them on Friday at Southwark crown court, Judge Alexander Milne said the case 'has elements akin to a Greek tragedy where an individual of some standing is brought crashing down by a fatal flaw . . . You both thought of yourselves as being too clever to be caught out.' The Korfuzis used confidential information on 13 companies including Daimler, Jet2 and THG to make close to £1 million. The insider trading took place at the London flat the siblings shared, taking advantage of working from home after pandemic lockdowns began in March 2020 to co-ordinate the scheme. They used 'short' trades, the term for betting on a share price falling, investing after Korfuzi had obtained inside information such as emails from companies gauging investor interest on plans to raise equity or to sell large blocks of shares owned by existing shareholders, the City regulator said. Korfuzi traded in the shares of those companies on a number of accounts, including those operated by his sister. The FCA detected suspicious activity and the siblings were arrested in March 2021. FCA investigators also uncovered a separate international money laundering operation. It said prosecutors were unable to identify the source of the crime from which the cash derived but the laundering involved deposits made into accounts controlled or operated by the siblings from the UK to Albania. Milne said the scam was 'not a victimless fraud' as insider trading 'diminishes public trust in the integrity of the market'. Two other defendants, Korfuzi's personal trainer Rogerio de Aquino and de Aquino's partner Dema Almeziad, whose accounts were used to execute trades, were cleared of all charges at the trial last month. Korfuzi persuaded the couple to open trading accounts when the personal trainer's business was struggling during the Covid-19 crisis. After they were acquitted last month, Almeziad's lawyer Roger Sahota said: 'There was no evidence that Ms Almeziad knew anything about insider dealing and it is wrong to expect ordinary people to understand or spot complex financial conduct that even professionals struggle with.' Janus Henderson, which manages roughly $380 billion in assets, was not involved in the criminal case or accused of any wrongdoing. The successful prosecution of the Korfuzis follows other positive results for the FCA in court recently, including the Upper Tribunal upholding its ban on Jes Staley, the former Barclays boss.


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Reeves says welfare fallout ‘damaging' and declines to rule out tax hikes
Rachel Reeves refused to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget, as she admitted the fallout over the Government's welfare Bill had been 'damaging'. The Chancellor warned there would be 'costs to what happened', as she faced questions about how she would cover a shortfall left by the Downing Street climbdown on planned cuts to disability benefits. The Government saw off the threat of a major Commons defeat over the legislation on Tuesday, after shelving plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) in the face of a backbench revolt. The original welfare proposals had been part of a package that ministers expected would save up to £5 billion a year, with economists warning that tax rises are now likely to plug a gap left by the concessions to rebels. The fallout threatens to cause lasting damage to morale in Labour ranks, with some MPs calling for a reset in relations between the parliamentary party and the leadership before fractures widen. Images of the Chancellor crying in the Commons on Wednesday also spooked the financial markets and led to questions about her future, though a Treasury spokesman said the tears were the result of a personal matter and Downing Street said she would remain in post. In an interview with the Guardian newspaper, Ms Reeves said she had never considered resigning, adding: 'I didn't work that hard to then quit.' She said she had gone to Prime Minister's Questions because she 'thought that was the right thing to do' but that 'in retrospect, I probably wished I hadn't gone in… (on) a tough day in the office'. Ms Reeves added: 'It's been damaging. 'I'm not going to deny that, but I think where we are now, with a review led by (disability minister) Stephen Timms, who is obviously incredibly respected and has a huge amount of experience, that's the route we're taking now.' Asked whether she would rule out tax rises now, she said to do so would be 'irresponsible' but warned 'there are costs to what happened' with the welfare Reeves is said to have already told ministers that the decision to water down the welfare package means taxes will rise in the autumn. The Times reported she had warned Cabinet on Tuesday that the increases in her first budget, which included a £24 billion hike to employer national insurance, were 'painful' but 'the low-hanging fruit'. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said the Government is still committed to welfare reform, but ministers will now wait for the conclusions of the Timms review before implementing changes to Pip.


BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Crying at work - career damaging or just human?
Pictures of a weepy Rachel Reeves dominated the newspaper front pages and TV news after her tearful appearance at Prime Minister's Questions earlier this markets were spooked so much by her emotional appearance that the cost of government borrowing immediately jumped and the pound took a sight of most of us crying in the workplace is unlikely to move financial markets, but does it matter if you do? Does it show weakness, or strength, or simply that you're in touch with your emotions? Anecdotally, it's not unusual to have a bit of a sniffle at work. Several people got in touch with the BBC to say they had let it all out. Clara, 48, from Lancaster, said she had become emotional when she was a young graduate getting a "blasting", and years later "in frustration". "I've also cried after receiving bad news from home and left work immediately."Emma, meanwhile, felt she had to keep her emotions under wraps because she worked in "a tough male-dominated environment" and would give herself a hard time for "showing emotion or 'weakness'."Although some research has suggested women are more likely than men to cry, plenty of men told us they had also shed tears in front of colleagues. Guy Clayton, a doctor, said he had often cried "with patients, colleagues and families over the years, when I've shared their sadness".A 38-year-old from London who works in finance said he had become emotional at work when dealing with personal issues and felt it showed "a professional dedication" to still turn up. 'Strength, not a liability' So is crying a strength or a weakness? Executive coach and success mentor Shereen Hoban says it's old-fashioned to think weeping at work is unacceptable."We've moved beyond the old-school idea that professionalism means leaving emotion at the door," she says. "In today's world, emotional intelligence is a strength, not a liability." Career coach Georgia Blackburn says it's not unusual for people at work to be upset, so firms need to know how to handle and support staff who are feeling a bit she says it will mean workers get more done."An employer that truly listens, shows compassion and understanding, is so much more likely to keep their staff motivated and happier in the long run," she says. That's been the case for Amanda in Stockport who contacted the Jeremy Vine show on BBC Radio cried at a job interview at the University of Manchester 17 years ago, just after her father had been diagnosed with got the job and is still there. "I cried every day for about nine months until my dad sadly passed away. It just made me realise what an amazing person I work for, and what an amazing place I work at, where that was OK." 'Bring back crying' Fashion designer Amy Powney was having a bit of a rough time at the end of last was having an "intense" time leaving a job, and it coincided with traumatic things happening in her who founded sustainable fashion brand Akyn earlier this year, also felt pressure to be a "poster child" for ethical fashion."My to-do list at that time was: feed the kids, pick them up from school, sort that nursery thing out, design the next collection, make sure the staff are OK, sort out that VAT return... and then save the world," she told BBC Radio 4's Woman's Hour."I went through this period of time where I just could not stop crying and I was doing it in public places, I was doing it on stage."She thinks that showing emotion at work has been "demonised" and is unapologetic about breaking down."I just think bring back the crying, bring back the emotions," she says."Women in leadership should be able to show their emotion. I think it's a superpower. I think it's a strength." Men v women, staff v bosses But not everybody thinks that way. Some people are still a teensy bit judgemental, says Ann Francke, chief executive at the Chartered Management Institute (CMI).Women who weep are seen as "too emotional" while men who mope can be shamed for being soft and vulnerable, she staff can get away with it more than their bosses, but this shouldn't necessarily be the case, she adds."When a senior leader cries, it can be seen as shocking or even inappropriate. But when handled with authenticity, it can also be powerful. It shows that leaders are human and care deeply about what they do," she says. But if you want to climb the greasy pole, it could be best to keep a stiff upper lip, at least in some organisations, says executive coach Shereen could affect your promotion prospects, she says. "Let's be honest. There's still a bias in some workplaces that sees composure as strength and emotion as instability."But she says some organisations see things differently, and value leaders who are "real, self-aware, and able to navigate complexity, including their own emotions".She adds that if you break down once at work it "won't ruin your career", and that what matters more is the bigger picture:"Your performance, your presence, and how you bounce back or move forward with intention," she says. What to do if you become tearful at work Give yourself permission to step back and take a momentYou don't need to hide your emotions, it often shows you care deeply about your job – that's not a bad thingBut you should feel supported, so maybe talk to a trusted colleague, take a short break or ask for support from your manager or HRManagers and colleagues need to acknowledge when their staff are crying – offer a tissue to them, don't pretend it's not happeningProvided by the CMI