
Wall St, EU futures slip as US trade policy bewilders
Trump on Saturday said he would impose a 30 per cent tariff on most imports from the EU and Mexico from August 1, even as they are locked in long negotiations.
The European Union said it would extend a suspension of countermeasures to U.S. tariffs until early August and continue to press for a negotiated settlement, though Germany's finance minister called for firm action if the levies went ahead.
Investors have become largely inured to Trump's chaotic policy methods and stocks eased only moderately, while the dollar gained little on the euro.
"It is hard to say whether the muted market response is best characterised by resilience or complacency," said Taylor Nugent, a senior markets economist at NAB.
"But it is difficult to price the array of headlines purportedly defining where tariffs will sit from August when negotiations are ongoing."
For now, MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan was flat, while Japan's Nikkei eased 0.3 per cent.
Chinese blue chips firmed 0.3 per cent as data showed annual export growth topped forecasts at 5.8 per cent in June, even as exports to the U.S. fell almost 10 per cent. Figures on retail sales, industrial output and gross domestic product are out on Tuesday.
European shares took the tariff threat more seriously with EUROSTOXX 50 futures down 0.6 per cent, while DAX futures lost 0.7 per cent and FTSE futures 0.1 per cent.
S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq futures both eased 0.4 per cent. Earnings season kicks off this week with the major banks leading the pack on Tuesday.
S&P companies are expected to have increased profits by 5.8 per cent from the year-earlier period, down from an expectation of a 10.2 per cent gain on April 1, according to LSEG IBES.
Analysts at BofA noted the bar was low for earnings with consensus seeing a slowdown to 4 per cent growth, from the previous quarter's 13 per cent.
"We expect a modest beat of 2 per cent, below the 3 per cent average and last quarter's 6 per cent figure, though medium-term, we are more constructive," they wrote in a note.
PRESSURING POWELL
In bond markets, Treasuries got a very marginal safety bid and 10-year yields held at 4.41 per cent. Futures for the Federal Reserve funds rate edged higher as markets priced in a little more policy easing for next year.
While Fed Chair Jerome Powell has signalled a patient outlook on cuts, Trump is piling up political pressure for more aggressive stimulus.
White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett over the weekend warned Trump might have grounds to fire Powell because of renovation cost overruns at the Fed's Washington headquarters.
Trump said on Sunday that it would be a great thing if Powell stepped down.
Figures on U.S. consumer prices for June are due on Tuesday and could finally start to show early upward pressure from tariffs, though retailers still have pre-levy inventory to draw on and some companies are absorbing the costs into margins.
The impact on supply chain costs could show in producer price and import price figures this week, while a reading on retail sales will indicate how consumers are faring.
Among currencies, the euro dipped 0.1 per cent on the tariff news to $1.1685, edging away from its recent four-year top of $1.1830. The dollar lost 0.2 per cent on the yen to 147.15 and was barely moved on its currency index at 97.882.
The dollar did gain 0.2 per cent on the Mexican peso to 18.6710, with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum confident a trade deal could be reached before the August deadline.
In commodity markets, gold picked up a modest safe-haven bid and rose 0.1 per cent to $3,359 an ounce.
Oil prices held steady on speculation Trump could announce stiffer sanctions on Russia later on Monday, including levies on major customers buying Russian oil.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
34 minutes ago
- Business Times
US: Nasdaq hits new record as markets shrug off tariff talk
[NEW YORK] The Nasdaq pushed to a fresh record on Monday as markets weighed President Donald Trump's latest tariff threats and looked ahead to earnings from large banks. Major indices finished higher following a meandering session. While threats of new 30 percent tariffs against the European Union and Mexico have received plenty of attention, investors remain skeptical that Trump will enact such big levies. 'The market is betting that by August 1st these tariffs are not going to be implemented at these levels,' said Peter Cardillo of Spartan Capital Securities. 'And so the market continues to rally.' The tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index finished up 0.3 per cent at 20,640.33, its third record in four days. The broad-based S&P 500 climbed 0.1 per cent to 6,268.56, narrowly missing a record of its own, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average advanced 0.2 per cent to 44,459.65. Trump has revived his broadly directed trade offensive in the last week, targeting more than 20 countries with increased levies if they don't reach deals with Washington. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up But markets have adopted a wait-and-see perspective, viewing the statements as a bargaining tactic that will be adjusted during negotiations. Besides tariffs, markets are looking ahead to earnings from JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and other banks that will offer updates on the state of US consumers and on the health of the companies' trading and investment businesses. Markets are also awaiting US government reports on consumer pricing and retail sales for June, which will inform expectations on the likelihood and timing of Federal Reserve interest rate changes. Futures markets are betting on an interest rate cut in September. AFP
Business Times
34 minutes ago
- Business Times
Europe: Shares end lower as Trump's tariff threats keep markets on edge
EUROPEAN shares ended slightly lower on Monday, with tariff-sensitive auto stocks down after US President Donald Trump's latest threat to impose steep tariffs on the European Union, though gains in financials and healthcare kept losses in check. The pan-European Stoxx 600 index closed 0.1 per cent lower at 546.99. Most regional indexes also declined, except for the UK's FTSE 100, which rose 0.6 per cent to an all-time high. A big boost for the FTSE was AstraZeneca, which gained 2 per cent after the drugmaker said its experimental drug baxdrostat significantly lowered blood pressure in a late-stage trial of patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. Stand-out decliners in Europe were autos, with Germany's BMW, Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz all down around 2% each on the growing tariff worries. The European Union accused Washington of resisting efforts to agree a trade deal and warned of countermeasures if no deal was struck to avoid the 'absolutely unacceptable' tariffs President Donald Trump has threatened to impose from Aug 1. Trump stepped up his trade war on Saturday, saying he would impose a 30 per cent tariff on most imports from the EU next month. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'Even if 30 per cent tariffs did take effect, we doubt it would be the last word on the subject, so the market and economic reaction will likely depend on how long a full 30% tariff would be expected to last,' said Simon Wells, chief European economist at HSBC. Shares of US-exposed spirits makers Pernod Ricard and Remy Cointreau fell 1.2 per cent and 3.4 per cent, respectively. Helping limit broader losses, euro zone banks climbed 0.5 per cent, with Italian lenders Banco BPM, BPER Banca and Banca Popolare di Sondrio (BPSO) jumping in the range of 5 per cent to 6 per cent. Germany's Renk gained 4.3 per cent after brokerage Kepler Cheuvreux raised its rating on the defence contractor to 'buy' from 'hold'. At the bottom of the Stoxx stood Sweden's Lifco, slumping 9.3 per cent after the consumer goods conglomerate missed second-quarter pre-tax profit estimates. Looking ahead, European earnings season will kick off this week, with world's biggest supplier of computer chip-making equipment ASML set to report on Wednesday. In the US, top banks including JPMorgan Chase & Co, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are scheduled to report quarterly earnings throughout the week. Monthly consumer prices data out of the US, UK and the broader euro zone are also due later in the week. European bond markets saw losses on Monday with the yield on the German 30-year note hitting its highest since October 2023. REUTERS


CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Commentary: What does it matter if Singaporeans spend their CDC or SG60 vouchers on ‘frivolous' items?
SINGAPORE: From this month, Singaporeans can start claiming their SG60 vouchers. Each adult citizen will receive S$600 in vouchers, while those aged 60 and above can claim S$800. This comes on top of S$800 in Community Development Council (CDC) vouchers which were given to each household earlier this year. Retailers have lost no time in offering discounts and promotions to entice Singaporeans to spend their vouchers on their products and services. However, a newspaper article published in May suggesting fun ways to make use of CDC vouchers – such as on dance apparel and craft workshops - prompted a flurry of online responses from netizens who felt that spending the vouchers on 'frivolous' items went against the stated intent of the vouchers, namely to help Singaporeans with the cost of living. IS THE ANGST JUSTIFIED? The truth is that while the vouchers are a lifeline for some households and individuals struggling with high living costs, they are for others no more than extra pocket money or even spare change. So is the angst over how the vouchers are spent justified? There are those who feel that SG60 vouchers should be distinguished from CDC vouchers in that the former are a celebratory gift while the latter are aimed at easing hardship. Others are not bothered about how vouchers – whether CDC or SG60 – are used. Their view is that once public money passes into private hands, people should be free to do whatever they want with it. After all, whether the vouchers are used to buy bread or a fancy meal, the spending will ultimately benefit businesses and boost the economy. Some have asked: Could the government have ringfenced the use of the vouchers to daily necessities? It is hard to draw a clear line between essential and discretionary expenditure. Moreover, money is fungible – saving on any kind of purchase frees up financial resources for spending on other items. There is a strong consensus among economists that giving assistance in cash or near-cash does more to improve consumer welfare than support that comes with conditions or restrictions because it offers recipients greater freedom of choice. DIFFERING SOCIAL BENEFIT PARADIGMS The crux of the issue may lie in differing concepts of what is prudent use of government money. On the one hand, there are Singaporeans who prefer not to receive cash handouts or vouchers as they feel that such support ought to be chanelled to the lower-income. This group is more likely to take umbrage at the use of vouchers for non-essential purchases. Targeting government support at those who need it most is still the approach adopted for most forms of social support in Singapore. These include means-tested housing and healthcare subsidies, as well as permanent social transfers such as the Workfare Income Supplement, Silver Support and the Goods and Services Tax Voucher. This paradigm of social support contrasts with models of universal welfare where social support is seen as a citizenship right. The latter, however, necessitates high taxes to enable extensive redistribution. In Singapore, the government's priority is to keep taxes on the middle class low in order to encourage work and enterprise. Under what is known as a 'progressive' system of taxes and benefits, the rich bear a larger burden of taxes, while those with lower income receive more in social transfers or benefits. Consistent with this approach, the Ministry of Finance estimates that the bottom 20 per cent of households by income receives around S$4 in benefits for every dollar of tax paid, while the top 20 per cent receive just S$0.30 for every tax dollar. On the other hand, there are Singaporean who feel that all citizens who contribute to the state's coffers should be entitled to a range of benefits, and not just limited to public goods such as national security or infrastructure. Some may feel aggrieved if they are excluded from certain benefits on account of their income or wealth, particularly if they are contributing a significant amount in taxes. Like wealthy donors at a charity dinner who take pleasure in good food and a door gift, these high-income earners derive satisfaction from receiving vouchers and other Budget goodies, even if these offset only a small fraction of what they pay in taxes. AN INJECTION OF UNIVERSALISM Singapore's approach towards social benefits is in fact evolving. More recently, the COVID-19 pandemic saw the government disburse a 'solidarity payment' of S$600 to all adult Singaporeans in recognition of the broad impact of the pandemic on the population, with additional support given to seniors and families with children. Rebates on utilities and service and conservancy charges, however, were tiered according to Housing and Development Board (HDB) flat type. Those who lost jobs or saw a significant fall in income could apply for further financial help through the COVID-19 Support Grant or COVID-19 Recovery Grant. Taken together, Singapore's COVID-19 support can be seen as a form of 'progressive universalism' – where everyone receives some benefits, but those with greater needs receive more. Following the pandemic, supply chain disruptions saw inflation shoot up across the world, including in Singapore. The government responded with a series of payouts to all Singaporeans in the form of CDC vouchers – the vouchers having the dual aim of providing cost of living support while giving heartland merchants a leg-up. Notwithstanding these examples of universal benefits, most social support is still means-tested or tiered according to income or home value. There are advantages to having a mix of benefits – some universal and others means-tested with differing qualifying income thresholds. This approach avoids a 'cliff effect' where benefits drop off suddenly when one's income crosses a particular threshold, which could discourage career and income advancement. Some elements of universality also make for greater inclusivity and sense of solidarity among citizens. A MIDDLE WAY? As inflation has receded from the post-pandemic highs, we may see fewer CDC vouchers disbursed in future. But for this year at least, vouchers are very much a part of the conversation. Singaporeans who have no need for this support can easily donate unused vouchers to their preferred Institutions of Public Character via the CDC voucher website; they will even qualify for a 250 per cent tax deduction. For those who are still in two minds on how government vouchers ought to be spent, perhaps a good strategy would be to set aside a portion of the vouchers to give away, and then spend the rest on whatever you wish with a clear conscience.