logo
3 held for cheating ATM users by offering to help

3 held for cheating ATM users by offering to help

Time of India2 days ago
New Delhi: Police arrested three men accused of cheating people on the pretext of assisting them with cash deposits and withdrawals at ATMs.
On July 15, police received a complaint about the theft of Rs 98,000.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The complainant stated that while attempting to deposit money at an ATM, the three accused convinced him to use the cash deposit machine, only to later withdraw the amount fraudulently from an ATM in Burari.
During the probe, police reviewed CCTV footage from the ATM booth and identified and apprehended one suspect, Dharmender. His accomplices, Saheb Kumar Sahni and Tuntun Mahto, were subsequently traced and arrested.
The accused confessed to frequently loitering near ATM booths to collect forgotten ATM cards. Using these cards, they would deceive victims either by exchanging cards or withdrawing cash fraudulently, police said. TNN
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sebi shares Jane Street probe details with SEC
Sebi shares Jane Street probe details with SEC

Time of India

time17 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Sebi shares Jane Street probe details with SEC

Mumbai: The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has sought details from its counterpart in India about the Jane Street probe over allegations of manipulating the derivatives market. Sebi has replied to the specific queries of the SEC , said people familiar with the development. The SEC and Sebi didn't respond to queries. "A regulator that's a signatory to the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) pact is obliged to share any info requested by any other signatory under articles 6 to 8," said Sandeep Parekh, managing partner of Finsec Law Advisors. Agencies No Legal Action from Co for Now "As both are signatories, the SEC can seek any information required and Sebi would be obliged to give it for regulatory action or investigation," Parekh said. IOSCO is a grouping of national securities regulators. "This has been used multiple times by Sebi, most notably in the UBS matter two decades ago to get information about the Swiss company from the US regulator," Parekh said. The Securities and Exchange Board of India had on July 3 imposed a trading ban on the firm in an interim, ex-parte order and directed it to return Rs 4,844 crore, quantifying this as illegal gains from market manipulation. Jane Street, which has denied any wrongdoing, deposited the entire amount stipulated by Sebi in an escrow account. Following this, Sebi lifted the trading ban on the firm, albeit with conditions, on July 21. Jane Street, which has offices in all the key financial centres of the world, uses complex algorithms developed in-house to execute high-frequency trades. It isn't challenging Sebi's findings in court for the time being. But it has told Sebi that it reserves the right to seek legal and equitable rights and remedies. 21 days to submit response The regulator has informed the trading company's law firm about the dates for hearings into the case, said one of the persons cited above. Jane Street had been given 21 days to respond to the interim findings. Its legal representatives are preparing a formal reply to the regulator, rebutting the allegations, said people with knowledge of the matter. Sebi said the NSE's Bank Nifty Index - comprising the stocks of India's top dozen lenders - had been manipulated in a complex and illegal manner, aided by the Jane Street Group's trading, financial and technological prowess. Jane Street would drive up prices with heavy buying in the morning and send them down through a selling spree later in the day, according to Sebi. It also sought to push index levels down with heavy sell orders close to the option expiry, the regulator said. This caused losses to those at the other end of the trade, mostly retail investors, it said. Sebi invoked the prohibition of unfair trade practices (PFUTP) regulations for market manipulation, which covers any act or practice. It focused on Jane Street's trading data of about 20 random days showing the highest profits.

Indian Overseas Bank's Hong Kong branch fined ₹9cr
Indian Overseas Bank's Hong Kong branch fined ₹9cr

Time of India

time40 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Indian Overseas Bank's Hong Kong branch fined ₹9cr

Indian Overseas Bank (Image only for representation) CHENNAI: The Hong Kong Monetary Authority has imposed a penalty of HK$8.5 million (Rs 9.3 crore) on Indian Overseas Bank, Hong Kong branch (IOBHK) for contraventions of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing ordinance (AMLO). It has pulled up the lender for "significant failure" to mitigate risks. Apart from IOB, the authority has levied penalties against the Bank of Communications (Hong Kong) and Bank of Communications Co. Hong Kong branch for HK$ 4 million and HK$ 3.7 million, respectively. A senior IOB official told TOI that there was no fraud or any anti-money laundering and counter-financing of terrorism violations. It pertains to issues over handling alerts generated by the software, which the bank is addressing by putting additional checks in place. "IOBHK has no history of disciplinary record regarding AMLO. It was only a matter of putting procedures in place," the official said. The development follows an investigation by the HKMA, in which the authority has charged that IOBHK has contravened three specified provisions of AMLO between May 2021 and Jan 2024. "IOBHK's management oversight of anti-money laundering and counter-financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) controls was inadequate. The senior management did not have a clear leadership role and responsibility over AML/CFT matters. They did not adequately discuss key AML/CFT control issues at relevant committee meetings and failed to appoint a competent person with sufficient AML/CFT knowledge as the Compliance Officer. As a result, the transaction alerts generated by IOBHK's transaction monitoring system were not properly followed up," the HKMA statement said. IOB in a statement to the exchange said "The bank and its branch operating at Hong Kong have taken necessary preventive actions to avoid such recurrence in future and further strengthen its internal processes in this regard. The impact of the said action on the bank is not material." Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store