Female champagne exec ‘told she needed 'anti-seduction training for flirting with bosses' and is ‘gagging for it''
Maria Gasparovic is accusing French drinks powerhouse Moët Hennessy of sexual harassment, gender discrimination and unfair dismissal in a £1.1million lawsuit.
5
5
Gasparovic was former chief of staff to the firm's global head of distribution Jean-Marc Lacave, and was fired in June last year.
According to a Financial Times bombshell article, Gasparovic claims the comments were made by Lacave himself.
These include allegations that she missed out on a promotion because a client had described her as 'gagging for it', and that she should undergo 'anti-seduction coaching' to move up the corporate ladder.
She is seeking €1.3 million (around £1.1m) in damages and compensation through France's employment tribunal system.
Moët Hennessy — the elite drinks arm of luxury conglomerate LVMH — has strenuously denied the allegations and hit back with its own lawsuit, accusing Gasparovic of defamation after she aired the accusations on social media.
Those posts have since been taken down, and a defamation trial is reportedly set for autumn.
An LVMH spokesperson has shared with The Sun the full letter from Moët Hennessy's CEO Jean-Jacques Guiony to all members of staff.
In it, Mr Guiony addressed the recent allegations regarding the company's treatment of women and its culture.
He claims Gasparovic's contract was terminated due to her "destructive behavior", and she subsequently launched a press campaign, leading Moët Hennessy to file a libel suit.
The letter claims that Gasparovic's actions were a manipulative attempt to gain financial compensation and invoke whistleblower status after her initial strategy failed.
Mr Guiony went on to emphasise his commitment to continuing this positive cultural shift and upholding a supportive environment at Moët Hennessy.
The Sun has also asked LVMH for a comment on the matter.
In her termination letter, cited by the FT, the company claimed she impersonated a colleague on a call while on sick leave and made threats to other staff — charges she flatly denies.
Before her dismissal, Gasparovic had submitted a whistleblower report, alleging harassment and discrimination at the Paris HQ.
But according to her legal complaint, the company failed to launch a formal investigation into her claims.
The New York Post reports that Gasparovic further alleges Moët's then-CEO Philippe Schaus ordered HR to dig into her personal life, believing she was having an affair with a colleague — a claim she says was part of a broader 'boys club' atmosphere.
'Private life is protected by law in France,' she told the FT.
'Dignity matters, especially for women at work.'
The lawsuit has dragged Moët Hennessy into a bubbling scandal just as it's grappling with broader turbulence.
5
5
A dozen insiders reportedly told the FT the workplace culture had become toxic — with bullying, burnout and staff 'disappearing overnight' on sick leave.
At least 20 employees were signed off long-term in 2024 alone, according to the Daily Mail.
One anonymous source reportedly said bosses would 'scream at people like it was a fashion house in the 1990s — except we are in 2025. That behaviour is no longer acceptable.'
Several other women have reportedly left the company after facing similar treatment. At least four former female staffers accused Moët of harassment and bullying before exiting, three of whom later settled employment tribunal claims, according to the FT.
In one case, after a female employee told HR that false rumours were circulating about her sleeping with a male exec to advance her career, she was allegedly told simply to 'get used to it'.
Even Moët's former COO Mark Stead — who is reportedly in a relationship with Gasparovic — was fired shortly after accompanying her to HR meetings.
He was accused of misusing company expenses, though his supporters suspect retaliation, according to Daily Mail.
The case is expected to go before a French employment tribunal later this year.
Full message from Moët Hennessy CEO to all staff
Dear Moët Hennessy teams,
You may have seen or heard about an article published by the Financial Times regarding Moët Hennessy.
I am deeply disappointed by this not only because it harms our reputation, but above all because the allegations made are unacceptable.
I would like to share some context.
Maria Gasparovic appears to hold considerable resentment toward Moët Hennessy, driven by personal ambition that led her to believe she could claim a position that did not exist at the time and was eventually not opened due to budgetary constraints. Her behavior, following that decision, changed drastically: she claimed to have been subject to sexist discrimination, she began making comments and sharing posts that can be construed as bullying and these were directed to employees and clients.
As a member of the Distribution Executive team she was privy to confidential information and in addition had access to personal information pertaining to colleagues, to which she did not apply the required confidentiality measures. Holding such a position she should have disclosed information regarding her personal situation and personal relations as a conflict of interest, but did not do so.
She created an environment that was destructive and Moët Hennessy had no choice but to terminate her contract even if some of the above-mentioned elements and others, like threats of blackmail, were only brought to light subsequently.
Instead of challenging her termination in court, she started a press campaign and MH had no choice but to file a libel suit based on these false allegations. In 2025, she finally challenged her termination in court and MH will strongly defend the case. Ultimately, Maria Gasparovic chose to exploit a situation that she herself created - one rooted in her personal agenda and which is now being used in an attempt to justify financial compensation. After her strategy failed, she attempted to invoke whistleblower status, again manipulating the systems that are intended to protect.
This behavior, both toward our company and certain colleagues, was clearly at adds with our values. These actions took place outside of any formal oversight and were facilitated by the complacency of a few individuals, and even to the point of intentional support from others.
Such conduct cannot be tolerated. This is the reason of her departure.
With regard to the place of women in our company, I cannot accept the attacks directed at my predecessor, Philippe Schous, whose behavior was beyond reproach in all interactions. Philippe spent considerable time embedding a vision and values that were in keeping with equity. Philippe was instrumental in appointing women to some key critical roles, that today sit at the COMEX of MH, such as the EVP of Human Resources, the President for Maison Moët, the CFO, and a new Regional President for Asia.
Since 2020, we have successfully achieved gender parity at Executive and Manager level rising from 45 to 50% in less than 5 years. He initiated a genuine cultural shift at Moët Hennessy one that has brought greater equity and diversity to our organization.
This is a commitment I fully intend to carry forward as President of Moët Hennessy.
I will never tolerate such behavior.
Like you, I believe in our core values, and I will not accept them being called into question.
Seeing these values misrepresented in the press is not only disappointing to me but I know it is also deeply unsettling for all of you who work so hard to uphold them. I share your frustration and concern that the press has failed to accurately and fairly represent events.
I understand that these accusations, along with commentary about our culture, may raise concerns.
I want to underscore that Moët Hennessy is committed to continuously upholding a positive and supportive environment for all.
Jean-Jacques Guiony,
President and CEO, Moët Hennessy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
a minute ago
- The Independent
Government could ban ‘barely legal' pornography after Bonnie Blue documentary
The new pornography taskforce will propose legislation aimed at banning a type of content produced by porn star Bonnie Blue, known as 'barely legal'. It comes after Channel 4 broadcast a documentary about the porn star, called: '1000 Men and Me: The Bonnie Blue Story', which followed her for six months. The show attracted significant criticism, with the children's commissioner for England, Dame Rachel de Souza, accusing the show of 'glamorising and normalising' extreme pornography. The documentary shows Tia Billinger – who uses the stage name Bonnie Blue – preparing to film a scene with a group of models dressed in school uniform, who acknowledge that they have been picked for the scene because they look young. 'This content is pushing at the boundaries. We will be trying to address the 'barely legal' aspect legislatively', Baroness Bertin told The Guardian. She said she plans to raise amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill once Parliament returns from its summer recess to make it illegal for online platforms to host content that could encourage child sexual abuse. This would include content filmed by adults dressed up as children. Bonnie Blue became famous after initially filming sexual content with young male students, who she dubbed 'barely legal'. She later gained notoriety after filming stunts, including one which saw her have sex with more than 1,000 men in a 24-hour period. Under rules that came into effect on July 25 as part of the Online Safety Act, online platforms including social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. The act also gave Ofcom the responsibility to monitor whether sites are protecting viewers from illegal material including child sexual abuse or extreme content such as portrayals of rape, bestiality and necrophilia. But currently, adults role-playing as children in pornography is not prohibited online. The Channel 4 documentary, which showed pixellated clips of Bonnie Blue having sex with more than 1,000 men, faced condemnation for failing to challenge her enough, with advertisers pulling support for the programme. Card payment business Visa, juice maker Cawston Press and vodka brand Smirnoff all had ads which appeared online during the show, but they later told Channel 4 that they no longer wanted their products promoted during the programme as it did not align with their advertising guidelines or values. Dame Rachel said: 'For years we have been fighting to protect our children from the kind of degrading, violent sex that exists freely on their social media feeds. This documentary risks taking us a step back by glamorising, even normalising, the things young people tell me are frightening, confusing and damaging to their relationships.' Baroness Bertin added: 'Channel 4 showed a surprising lack of judgment in showing such explicit sex scenes. More widely the glamorisation and normalisation of content creators like Bonnie Blue does undoubtedly have an effect. In my opinion, this is a direction of travel that is not particularly helpful for society nor is it prudish to call it out as such.' A Channel 4 spokesperson said: 'The film looks at how Bonnie Blue has gained worldwide attention and earned millions of pounds in the last year, exploring changing attitudes to sex, success, porn and feminism in an ever-evolving online world. 'Director Victoria Silver puts a number of challenges to Bonnie throughout the documentary on the example she sets and how she is perceived, and the film clearly lays bare the tactics and strategies she uses, with the audience purposefully left to form their own opinions.'
Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
Labour is 'tinkering around the edges' with its £100m plans to crackdown on small boat migrant crossings, Tories warn
Labour has been accused of 'tinkering around the edges' with its plans to crackdown on small boat crossings. The Home Office has announced measures to get tough on smuggling gangs, despite more than 25,000 illegal arrivals so far this year – but the Tories branded them 'a series of gimmicks'. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper this weekend unveiled plans to introduce sentences of up to five years in prison for anyone who advertises small boat crossings or fake passports on social media. She said she would introduce a fast-track scheme to tackle the asylum backlog, with a new law to overhaul the appeals system, in a bid to get decisions on cases within weeks. And today, the Home Office has announced £100 million of extra funding to support the pilot of the new 'one in, one out' returns agreement between the UK and France. It will also pay for up to 300 more National Crime Agency officers and new technology and equipment to step up intelligence gathering on smuggling gangs. And there will be more overtime for immigration compliance and enforcement teams as well as funding for interventions in transit countries. The deal, agreed last month, means the UK will be able to send migrants back to France in exchange for asylum seekers with links to Britain. But Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp criticised the announcements. He told the Daily Mail last night: 'This weak Labour Government has come up with a series of gimmicks to grab headlines instead of fixing the issue. 'Tinkering around the edges which will make no real difference. 'There have been more than 25,000 illegal crossings so far this year, making it the worst year in history. 'Labour has failed and their laughable claim to smash the gangs lies in tatters. They have no serious plan, just excuses, while ruthless criminal gangs flood our borders with illegal immigrants.' A No 10 source hit back: 'The Tories focused on headlines and gimmickry, we're focused on what works. 'Through our returns deal with France, investment in a border security and speeding up returns, we're making steady progress.' Public anger over small boat crossings has focused on the issue of taxpayer-funded migrant hotels, which have been the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks including in London, Newcastle and Epping in Essex. Conservative shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick warned that 'the public's patience with the asylum hotels and with the whole issue of illegal migration has snapped'. In response, Dame Angela Eagle promised that the Government was 'doing the detailed work' to crack down on small boat crossings. Asked on Sky News what her message was to protesters, Dame Angela said: 'Anger doesn't get you anywhere. 'What we have to do is recognise the values we have in this country, the rule of law we have in this country, the work we're doing with the police to protect people. 'We will close asylum hotels by the end of the Parliament. We'll do it faster if we can.' Dame Angela also said: 'We are doing all we can to deal with the challenges that the police are facing on the streets to make sure that women and girls are safe, and in fact, that everybody is safe on our streets.' She had earlier told Times Radio: 'Those who are worried and demonstrating have an absolute right to do that, so long as they do it peacefully. 'People don't have a right to then have a pop at the police, which has been happening in some isolated cases outside hotels.' Referring to plans to let police seize devices from people suspected of facilitating people smuggling, Dame Angela said the Government does not 'want absolutely every phone'. She told Times Radio: 'But we do want the phones of the people that we think are organising and facilitating, and this extra money will enable us to do much quicker analytics of the phones that we seize. 'But of course, we've got to get the Border Security Bill on the statute book to give us those extra powers.' The Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill has cleared the Commons but must undergo further scrutiny in the Lords before it becomes law. Turning to social media creators who advertise illegal routes into the UK, Dame Angela said: 'We will stop anyone who comes to the UK where we've got evidence, and what happens is that the people smugglers are getting people to say how safe the journeys were and do adverts once they're in the UK. 'We will stop that, and we will also deal with other jurisdictions and ask them to help us deal with this as well, we could certainly do that in the EU with our colleagues in Germany, in France.' Where there is 'evidence that legal routes to visas are being misused', the Government will 'tighten up the rules to stop that abuse happening', the minister added. The National Crime Agency has 91 ongoing investigations into people smuggling networks affecting the UK, the agency's director general of operations Rob Jones said. But speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Mr Jenrick said: 'The public's patience with the asylum hotels and with the whole issue of illegal migration has snapped. 'This is an issue that is beyond party politics. 'It is causing immense harm to communities, and people's lives are being wrecked as a result of it, and we simply have to fix it. 'I respect those people who are peacefully protesting outside hotels this weekend, I understand why they feel so concerned. 'They're seeing their communities damaged, and I'm afraid there is increasing evidence of a serious link between illegal migration, migration generally, and crime, particularly sexual crime, against women and girls.'
Telegraph
2 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Kurdish migrant claiming asylum over ‘affair with uncle's wife'
An Iraqi Kurd who arrived in Britain on a small boat claimed asylum because he had an affair with his uncle's wife. The unnamed man, named only as BQ, claimed that he would be killed by his uncle if he returned home and also feared that he would be 'targeted' by his wife's family. BQ claimed that the affair began in February 2018 and he was caught in 2019, before he fled to his sister's house and then left Iraq. He was taken to the Turkish border and then travelled through Europe before he entered the UK by boat in December 2020. He claimed asylum on December 10 2020 but his claim was refused three years later. BQ appealed that decision at the first-tier tribunal, where a judge rejected his claims based on inconsistencies between his asylum screening interview and his later, substantive asylum interview. In his appeal witness statement, BQ said: 'I would go to see [my aunt] around once a week when my uncle was not home, due to his job he would be away from home for days at a time... and as my family were aware of my uncle's wife's situation, and as we were related, no one questioned if I was seen at my uncle's house. Regardless, we were careful not to be seen.' He has appealed the decision to the Upper tribunal on five grounds and said he refutes the judge's claims that he gave inconsistent answers about relationship status and held this against his credibility. Upper tribunal Judge Mark Blundell agreed the judge made errors on all five grounds, and the matter will be heard again at the first-tier tribunal for a rehearing. Mr Blundell said: 'The common law principle of fairness requires the tribunal to consider with care the extent to which reliance can properly be placed on the answers given by the applicant in his screening interview.' Andrew Deakin, the deputy judge of the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum chamber, said: 'In light of the number and significance of the errors identified, I cannot be confident that the judge would have reached the same conclusion even if he had not erred in the ways identified above. I accordingly find that the errors identified above are material.' The rehearing will be heard before a different judge.
