Fired federal prosecutor claims ex-Fatburger CEO's 'smears' reached White House
The latest claim was leveled by Adam Schleifer, formerly an assistant U.S. attorney in Los Angeles, in a filing last week with the Merit Systems Protection Board, which handles wrongful termination appeals from federal workers.
Schleifer's filing called his dismissal "unlawful" and alleged it was motivated in part by his prosecution of Andrew Wiederhorn, the former chairman and chief executive of Fat Brands, which owns the Fatburger and Johnny Rockets restaurant chains.
Wiederhorn has maintained his innocence in the criminal cases, and his lawyers declined to comment on Schleifer's allegations.
Schleifer's recent filing included a one-line email in March, sent to him "on behalf of President Trump," notifying him he was being removed from his job.
Schleifer, who had publicly criticized Trump in years past when he was not employed as a prosecutor, claims he was fired for his "engagement in constitutionally protected political activity."
His firing, first reported by The Times, came an hour after right-wing activist Laura Loomer publicly called for it — a timeline Schleifer cited in his filing.
Read more: White House ordered firing of L.A. federal prosecutor on ex-Fatburger CEO case, sources say
The claim by the former prosecutor — who declined to comment when reached this week — drew a line between how the events unfolded and his work on the Wiederhorn case.
Wiederhorn was indicted last May on federal charges alleging a $47-million 'sham loan' scheme. He was also charged with illegally possessing a firearm and ammunition after being previously convicted of a felony. He has pleaded not guilty in both cases.
In his filing, Schleifer said he was fired on the basis of "smears, which originated with and were promoted by Mr. Wiederhorn, his defense team, and that of his codefendant FAT Brands, Inc."
Lawyers representing Fat Brands did not respond to a request for comment. The White House and the U.S. Department of Justice did not respond to inquiries.
Originally from Portland, Ore., Wiederhorn graduated from USC and, at age 21, founded the investment firm Wilshire Credit Corp. Billionaire philanthropist Eli Broad was one of his first financial backers, investing $300 million, according to a 2013 Times article.
In 1990, Wiederhorn moved back to Portland, where he founded investment company Fog Cutter Capital. According to The Times, Wiederhorn was worth an estimated $140 million by the late '90s.
In 2000, after Magic Johnson took an interest in Fatburger, Fog Cutter helped finance the change of ownership for the company, then bought a controlling stake three years later for $7 million.
Federal authorities began investigating Wiederhorn in the 2000s, allegedly for taking out shareholder loans without intending to repay them, according to an April government filing in the Central District of California opposing Wiederhorn's efforts to obtain evidence in the ongoing case.
The recent indictment against Wiederhorn alleged that he caused Wilshire Credit Corp. to issue him approximately $65 million in shareholder loans. Prosecutors have stated they plan to introduce evidence at trial later this year regarding those loans.
"The government investigated those loans in the early 2000s, and ultimately concluded it could not charge Mr. Wiederhorn with any crime because of overwhelming evidence he relied on at least two different tax advisors when reporting the loans on his tax returns and thus lacked the requisite intent to defraud," Wiederhorn's attorneys said in a recent pretrial motion.
Wiederhorn ultimately pleaded guilty in 2004 to charges of paying an illegal gratuity to his associate and filing a false tax return. He spent 15 months in prison and paid a $2-million fine.
The day before Wiederhorn's plea, Fog Cutter awarded him a $2-million bonus and agreed to keep paying him during his incarceration.
The arrangement prompted New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof to bestow on Wiederhorn his inaugural 'award for greed,' writing: 'I can't think of a board that has ever so disgraced the principles of corporate governance by overpaying a CEO even as he sits in prison.'
Wiederhorn previously told The Times that his attorneys had advised him that his actions were legitimate business deals.
Upon his release from prison in 2005, Wiederhorn became chief executive of Fatburger. He went on a public relations campaign to restore his and his family's reputations, including an appearance on 'Undercover Boss' at a Fatburger restaurant in Mesa, Ariz.
"I've always adamantly denied doing anything wrong intentionally,' Wiederhorn told The Times in 2017. "I'm very grateful for it. I felt like I paid the fine. I did the time. I did everything I was supposed to do to make this go away and put it behind me."
The latest federal investigation into Wiederhorn began around 2021 and involved a dawn raid on his home that December.
Based on an affidavit alleging the CEO had engaged in tax and wire fraud, authorities searched the residence and found a pistol and ammunition in his closet, according to court filings.
Wiederhorn is banned from possessing firearms because of his past conviction. At a court hearing last month, Wiederhorn's defense team told the judge the gun belonged to one of his sons.
In 2023, Wiederhorn publicly announced he was stepping down as CEO, framing it as a way to "eliminate the distraction" of the ongoing federal probe. Weeks later, according to federal authorities, Wiederhorn 'removed every director other than himself' from the board of Fat Brands and 'reconstituted' a new board with directors 'under his control." The board now includes three of Wiederhorn's children.
Last year, in May, a federal grand jury indicted Wiederhorn over an alleged $47-million "sham loan" scheme, which prosecutors say dates to 2010. Authorities accused Wiederhorn of evading millions in taxes by hiding his true income.
Read more: Ex-Fatburger boss used company funds for Rolls-Royce and other luxuries in $47-million scheme, indictment says
Company money — categorized as 'shareholder loans' — was allegedly disbursed to Wiederhorn and his family 'for their personal benefit,' according to the indictment. Some of that money went toward private-jet travel, ski trips, a Rolls-Royce Phantom and other luxury automobiles, a jewelry collection and a baby grand piano, federal prosecutors say.
According to the indictment, Wiederhorn 'had no intention of repaying these sham 'loans.' '
The indictment cited a September 2020 email, in which Wiederhorn said that in addition to his disclosed annual salary of approximately $400,000, he received "$3m-4m of distributions from my company as loans, then periodically the company forgives those loans."
'Mr. Wiederhorn consulted and followed the advice of world-class professionals in all of his business dealings,' Nicola Hanna, Wiederhorn's attorney, previously told The Times. 'We look forward to making clear in court that this is an unfortunate example of government overreach — and a case with no victims, no losses and no crimes.'
Wiederhorn was allegedly assisted by the company's former chief financial officer, Rebecca D. Hershinger, and his outside accountant, William J. Amon, who were also charged in the 22-count indictment. Both have pleaded not guilty.
Fat Brands has also been charged.
Brian Hennigan, counsel for Fat Brands Inc., previously told The Times the charges were 'unprecedented, unwarranted, unsubstantiated and unjust."
Schleifer, whose father is the co-founder and chief executive of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, started with the U.S. attorney's office in 2016. He prosecuted drug trafficking and fraud cases before quitting in 2019 to run for an open congressional seat in New York's 17th District.
During his congressional bid, in which he finished second in the Democratic primary, Schleifer on social media attacked Trump's tax policies and behavior toward federal investigators.
In one 2020 tweet, Schleifer accused Trump of eroding constitutional integrity 'every day with every lie and every act of heedless, narcissistic corruption.'
In his filing last week contesting his firing, Schleifer referred to his postings on social media as "First-Amendment-protected political advocacy."
According to the filing, it was Wiederhorn's lawyer Hanna — then serving as U.S. attorney appointed by Trump — who rehired Schleifer in 2020. After his return to the federal prosecutor's office in L.A., Schleifer was assigned an ongoing investigation of Wiederhorn and others.
In the recent challenge to his firing, Schleifer accused Wiederhorn and his defense team of commissioning a tabloid news article attacking his work and urging officials to remove him from the case and his job as a prosecutor.
Schleifer also alleged in his filing a March 17 meeting held between the U.S. attorney's office and Wiederhorn's counsel, including Hanna, in which the latter allegedly "sought Mr. Schleifer's removal from the cases on the mistaken, unethical, and improper grounds that his and the Office's work on those cases reflected a 'woke,' 'DEI,' and 'Biden' bias."
Read more: Trump's axing of L.A. federal prosecutor part of broader war on perceived legal enemies
At the meeting, according to the filing, the defense team brought up Schleifer's critical comments about Trump on social media. Schleifer accused Wiederhorn and his defense team of providing those same social media posts to White House officials and other "tabloid and 'citizen' journalists."
Schleifer alleged he was removed from his position "on the basis of these smears."
Wiederhorn's securities fraud trial is scheduled for Oct. 28.
His lawyers successfully argued for a continuance in the firearms case, citing the fact that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is reviewing a ruling on gun rights for nonviolent convicted felons.
The trial is set for Jan. 20, 2026.
Times staff writers Matt Hamilton and Laura J. Nelson contributed to this report.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
The aftershocks of L.A.'s summer of ICE will live on
After the 1994 Northridge earthquake, parks across the San Fernando Valley filled with families left homeless by the destruction or simply too afraid that an aftershock might pancake their home. An estimated 14,000-20,000 people lived in those tent cities, and many were Latino immigrants who had nowhere else to go. Noel Mendoza, a migrant from Nicaragua who spent two weeks camping at one park because she didn't feel safe in her crack-filled Canoga Park apartment, told The Times back then: 'I was a refugee there and now I'm a refugee here.' It's one thing to seek safety in public spaces, as one tent city dweller said, to have nothing between oneself and the stars. But what if being out in public is the thing that places you at risk? This forgotten piece of seismic history came to mind as I listened this week to experts talking about how L.A.'s summer of ICE has brought waves of emotional struggles to immigrant families. There are so many facets to the raids — the legal issues, questionable tactics, protests, economic impacts, political fallout — that the emotional fallout easily gets lost. We are now nearly two months into President Trump's immigration crackdown, which has led to more than 3,000 arrests in Southern California alone. The raids have upended countless lives. But we've reached that inevitable moment in the story when some begin to turn away. What shocked in June seems like just part of the new normal in August. It's summer. Vacations. Jeffrey Epstein, the tsunami that wasn't. Parts of Los Angeles are moving on, as we do no matter the calamity. But for those in the middle of the story, there is no escape. Just ask someone who lost their home in January. Or someone who lost a job, who had to go underground or whose loved one was deported after a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid. I attended a forum this week on mental health and the raids put together by Boyle Heights Beat, the community news site that has been aggressively covering the ICE operations with news and resource guides. Experts offered a sober window into how the raids have impacted the mental health, individually and collectively, of immigrants and their communities. Some quotes that stayed with me: The forum particularly illuminated secondary traumas, such as the burden on children who are here legally helping their parents; the new, sudden role of caregiver for people who must now look out for others whose lives are on hold; and the increased irritability, drinking and guilt that come with all this stress. The message of the experts was clear: These times require strong coping skills and a keen sense of your own limits, even if that sometimes means turning off the news and finding moments of joy amid the uncertainty. In the days after the Northridge quake, the tent cities became a source of fascination to me and so many others trying to make sense of what had just happened. I remember being deeply moved at the way large extended families set up little cul-de-sacs under the trees of a neighborhood park, taking comfort in having all their loved ones safely in one place as the earth beneath them rumbled. As someone who cowered alone each night in my tiny apartment, wondering whether that vibration was a new quake or my upstairs neighbor rewatching 'Star Wars' on his VCR, their peace brought me comfort. The camp became one symbol for some political activists who charged officials were not paying enough attention to quake victims in poorer, Latino communities. There were protests and news stories, and more aid flowed to the east Valley. Eventually even the great quake receded from the news. The aftershocks lessened. The broken freeways were repaired. The tents disappeared. Life moved on. The end remains elusive for those dealing with the ICE sweeps. And this uncertainty is why the experts urged people to pace themselves and accept what they can and cannot do. As one said, 'If you can't take care of yourself, you can't take care of other people.' A selection of the very best reads from The Times' 143-year archive. Jim Rainey, staff writerDiamy Wang, homepage internIzzy Nunes, audience internKevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newsletters How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on
Los Angeles Times
4 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Indian businesses in SoCal brace for 25% tariff hike: ‘More expensive to do business day by day'
A jar of pickled mango, a popular Indian condiment, costs $2.99 at Pioneer Cash & Carry in Artesia. But that price won't hold for long. The grocery store, nestled in the heart of Artesia's Little India, has to raise prices to keep up with its rising costs in light of President Trump's trade policy with India. Beginning Friday, there will be a 25% tariff on Indian goods. Because the two nations could not reach an agreement before Trump's deadline, the president signed an executive order Thursday night authorizing the tariffs for goods from India and several other countries to start in seven days. Several businesses that rely on imported Indian goods in the Los Angeles area told The Times they would have to raise prices to maintain operations with the steep tariff. Business owners expressed anxiety over not knowing what the next couple of weeks or months will look like for their bottom lines. Devraj Keray, the owner of Pioneer Cash & Carry, said some vendors already notified him that prices will go up 25% effective Monday. The business, which is one of the largest Indian grocery stores in California, will have to raise prices on imported Indian products. 'We'll have to pass that on to the consumer,' he said. 'There's not really any way around that.' The grocery store, which has two locations in Artesia, has been owned and operated by family since 1982. Keray said he anticipates customers will buy less, but they'll still need basic grocery items. 'People will cut back, so we'll feel a bit of a pinch,' he said. 'It's getting more and more expensive to do business day by day. It's not going to be easy for the smaller guys.' Artesia's Little India area is a cultural hub for the community, and it's one of the largest Indian enclaves in Southern California. Artesia City Councilmember Zeel Ahir said the strip of businesses along Pioneer Boulevard is the 'heart and soul' of the area for Indians. 'It provides a sense of warmth and a homely feeling to know that the goods that were available in India for some immigrants are available here as well,' said Ahir, who has lived in the area for all her life. India 'is our friend,' Trump said on his Truth Social platform announcing the taxes, but its tariffs on U.S. products 'are far too high.' Trump's announcement of a 25% tariff on Indian goods on Wednesday came after a universal baseline tariff of 10% on imports from all foreign countries has already been in place for months. Indian goods exports to the U.S. totaled more than $87 billion in 2024, according to the Office of the United States Trade Representative. The trade deficit with India was $45.7 billion last year, up more than 5% from 2023. Pharmaceuticals, jewelry, textiles, spices and food products are among the common imports. The Trump administration maintains that tariffs will 'strengthen the international economic position' of the United States and protect American workers. In addition to the 25% tariff on its products exported to the U.S., India is also facing an unspecified penalty for buying Russian oil. 'I don't care what India does with Russia,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Thursday. 'They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care.' Negotiations between the two countries continue, but local businesses are still scrambling to cope with the change in operations. Beyond Artesia, which is in southeast Los Angeles County, the city of Los Angeles has several Indian grocery stores, apparel stores and other businesses that depend on Indian imports. Dalbir Singh Ghotra, the owner of Kavita Grocery in the Palms neighborhood, said the tariff would 'spell disaster for small businesses like us.' After running the grocery store for the past three decades and keeping doors open through tough economic periods, Ghotra said he's already seen sales drop recently as customers have tightened their belts amid growing economic uncertainty. Just down the road at Bollywood Styles, a clothing and accessory store, owner Sneh Prasad said recent sales have dipped to the lowest levels she's recorded in roughly 18 years, she said. With the vast majority of her inventory imported from India, Prasad is concerned about what lies ahead. 'Businesses have already become harder for mom-and-pop stores like us,' she said. 'If the import prices go up, I do not know how we will survive since sales may fall drastically.' Many business owners said they have already seen foot traffic and sales slow down this summer. Some believe the downturn could be because customers are afraid of possible immigration raids targeting businesses that attract primarily immigrant customers. 'Ninety-nine percent of our customer base is Asian, from the Indian subcontinent, and [some] are not sure if they would even be able to live here,' said Krutika Pranav, the manager at Highglow Jewelers in Artesia. 'All of that adds to the fear, and we've seen a tremendous slowdown because of that. The tariffs will make it even worse.' Prashant 'Peter' Patel, the president of the Indian American Business Assn. and Chamber, which is based in Florida but has ties to small businesses across the country, said Indian business leaders have a general sense of anxiety. He remains hopeful that the two countries' leaders will reach a resolution soon. 'This is the time for diplomacy and pragmatism,' he said. 'Our goal is not to politicize this issue, but to represent the voice of those working hard every day to grow businesses that serve, employ and uplift communities.' Others were not as optimistic. 'It's like a chess game, to see who makes the first move,' said Keray, the owner of Pioneer Cash & Carry. 'It's just a matter of how far it goes before the consumer is the one that becomes a victim of all this.'
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Aggressive' river otters spark lawsuit from Washington mother
PORTLAND, Ore. () — A Washington mother is suing a Seattle-area port nearly a year after a river otter attacked her toddler. The woman filed the complaint against the Port of Bremerton in Kitsap County Superior Court on July 25. Court records show that she and her daughter, who was two years old at the time of the attack, live on a sailboat in the port-operated Bremerton Marina. Senate confirms Joe Kent, ex-Washington candidate with extremist ties, to lead counterterrorism unit on the incident in September 2024. On Sept. 12, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife revealed an otter had pulled the child into the water as she walked along the dock with their mom. According to the agency, the child eventually resurfaced after being pulled under water. WDFW said the otter bit the mother as she lifted her child from the water. The toddler was later treated at a Silverdale hospital, for the scratches and bites they had sustained on their head, face and legs. The mother also claimed they had to receive rabies vaccinations, and her daughter still faces 'nightmares and behavioral aggression.' Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now The complaint alleges many of the on-site security cameras 'are inoperative at any given time,' while the plaintiff pays the port a monthly service fee of about $125. 'Prior to the attack, the Port of Bremerton had actual and repeated notice of otter activity on and around E Dock and had received complaints about their aggressive nature,' Attorney Christopher Froines wrote. 'Tenants and staff had lodged multiple complaints with the Port about aggressive otter behavior, including otters defecating on docks, damaging marina property, living on several abandoned or derelict boats, being aggressive toward marina tenants and posing a risk to public safety.' Froines also alleged another resident of the Bremerton Marina repeatedly complained to staff about related issues, such as an 'otter-infested and foul' boat and otters that created safety hazards by 'dragging 'fish guts and feces all over the docks.'' Oregon Bureau of Land Management timber sales made more than $13.5M in revenue in July But the lawsuit accuses management of failing to minimize 'wild animal activity.' Defendants are being sued for negligence, gross negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress, among other claims. KOIN 6 has reached out to the port for comment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
