Draft Texas congressional map pits Democratic incumbents against each other, spelling possible primary clashes
The new configuration would leave Democratic members in those regions with the uncomfortable prospect of battling each other for the dwindling seats in next year's primaries; retiring; or taking their chances in nearby GOP-leaning districts where they would face uphill battles for political survival.
For now, Texas Democrats are focused on fighting to stop the map by testifying at hearings across the state, firing up donors for a potential quorum break and taking every opportunity to blast the proposal as racist and illegal. The map, introduced by state Rep. Todd Hunter, R-Corpus Christi, is still subject to changes from the Republican majority, in addition to Democratic attempts to fight it. And if enacted, it would surely face legal challenges which could further change the makeup of districts.
But if the new lines go through for 2026, they could pit long-serving older members of the Texas delegation against younger newcomers, drudging up existing tensions in the Democratic Party over age and seniority.
In Austin, where Republicans have condensed two Democratic-held seats into one district, progressive Reps. Lloyd Doggett and Greg Casar — ideologically similar but 42 years apart in age — have both been drawn into the same seat.
In North Texas, the three Democratic incumbents in the Dallas-Fort Worth metro area would need to decide how to condense themselves into the two remaining blue-leaning districts. While the core of Rep. Jasmine Crockett's downtown Dallas district was kept largely intact in the new map, Republicans want to dismantle the suburban Dallas district of Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Farmer's Branch, pushing many of her voters into the exurban districts of her Republican neighbors. Those changes would leave Johnson with a suddenly bright red district.
Rep. Marc Veasey's nearby 33rd District, meanwhile, would remain blue but undergo a major transformation, dropping much of Fort Worth — the political base Veasey has represented since he was a state legislator in the mid-2000s — and adding parts of Johnson's current district.
And in Houston, the Democrat who emerges from the 18th Congressional District's November special election could see their time in office abruptly cut short. The 18th District has a storied history, as the first southern district to send a Black woman — the legendary Rep. Barbara Jordan — to Congress. Several prominent Black Democrats have since held the seat, including longtime Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, who died last year. The district has been vacant since March after Jackson Lee's successor, former Houston mayor Sylvester Turner, also died in office.
But with Republicans packing Democrats into three blue Houston-area seats rather than their current four, the winner in the 18th District's special election — which will decide who finishes out Turner's term — could end up in a primary a few months later against one of the more experienced incumbent Democrats or face pressure to bow out.
No Texas Democrats have announced how they would handle the musical chairs scenario the new map would trigger. But with a Dec. 11 deadline to file for next year's midterms — and pressure from donors and party leaders likely to force their hands well before then — they will have to ponder their futures quickly.
The new map could compel members to retire, change districts or run for a different office rather than face a bruising primary against a colleague.
Nearly a dozen Democrats in the Texas delegation confronted a similar range of options in 2003, when Republicans last pursued mid-decade redistricting in the state.
In the 2004 elections, none of the 10 targeted Democrats opted to run against each other in primaries. Four sought reelection in redrawn seats and lost in the general election. Another, former Rep. Chris Bell, lost the primary for his renumbered and reconfigured district to challenger Al Green, who is now being targeted himself more than 20 years later.
Additionally, two Democrats switched districts and won, including Doggett; one changed parties and won; one retired; and one held onto their same seat.
Austin
After surviving the 2004 purge and subsequent rounds of redistricting, Doggett is once again in the GOP's crosshairs.
Under the current map, Doggett holds most of the city of Austin in his 37th Congressional District, while Casar, a former Austin city council member, represents the 35th District, which stretches from southern and eastern parts of Austin down Interstate 35 to San Antonio. Casar, who is Latino, carries the heavily Black and Latino portions of both metro areas, while Doggett, who is white, represents a majority-white district.
Both men are progressives with historical ties to Austin, setting up a potentially awkward primary or talk of retirement. Doggett, 78, is an Austin institution, having represented Texas' capital city in various district configurations for 30 years in the U.S. House and in the state Senate during the 1970s and 1980s.
But Casar, thanks in part to his time on the Austin City Council, has far more ties to the proposed new 37th District than to his redrawn seat. Texas Republicans want to shift the 35th Congressional District to cover much of east San Antonio and Bexar County, while extending it into the solidly Republican outlying counties of Guadalupe, Karnes and Wilson. Less than 10% of Casar's current constituents would reside in the new 35th District, according to a Democratic analysis obtained by The Texas Tribune. Had the district existed last year, President Donald Trump would have carried it by 15 percentage points.
A 36-year-old rising star who chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus and counts Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as allies, Casar is in his second term in Congress. His old city council district — which he represented for over six years — is in the newly drawn 37th District.
Still, Doggett would enter any head-to-head matchup with a significant financial edge. He is sitting on $6.2 million in his campaign account from years of fundraising without a competitive race. Casar, by comparison, has about $450,000 on hand. Also working in Doggett's favor is that about two-thirds of his current 37th District constituents would remain within the new district lines under the proposed map.
Doggett made national headlines last year for being the first Democrat in Congress to call for then-President Joe Biden to drop out of the presidential race.
Dallas
If the new map goes through, Johnson and Veasey would have decisions to make about the new 33rd Congressional District.
Contained entirely in Dallas County, the newly proposed district is an amalgamation of the three current North Texas districts represented by Democrats. It covers nearly one-third of the same geographic area as Veasey's 33rd District and about a third of the constituency.
The GOP map-drawers also proposed moving some blue areas of Johnson's 32nd Congressional District into the 33rd, allowing them to tilt Johnson's seat to heavily favor Republicans. Under the new lines, Trump would have carried the district by 18 points in 2024, a swing of more than 40 points from Vice President Kamala Harris' 24-point winning margin in the current district.
Less than half of the current 32nd District would stay intact under the new lines; the rest of the seat would comprise red areas in northeast Dallas County and parts of Rockwall, Hunt, Rains, Wood, Camp and Upshur Counties that are currently represented by Republicans.
Neither Veasey nor Johnson's homes are in the new 33rd district, as drawn. Both have a reasonable claim to the district.
Veasey, who has been in Congress since 2015 and a fixture in North Texas politics for two decades, is a Fort Worth native who has always represented that city. The new 33rd district would not include his political base in Tarrant County.
But Veasey has long represented parts of Dallas County included in the new district. He is one of only three Black Democrats from Texas in Congress, and has been at the forefront of conversations about racial gerrymandering.
As in the district's current makeup, a majority of the new 33rd District's eligible voters would be non-white, with Hispanic residents forming a plurality of the district's citizens who are old enough to vote. White residents would make up a bigger share of the district's eligible voting population, rising from 23% to more than 35%, according to U.S. Census Bureau estimates.
Johnson is a first-year member of Congress who came from the Texas House, where she represented a district based in Dallas and its northern suburbs.
If it comes to a primary, age would not be a factor — both members are in their 50s.
Houston
The new map could create a messy logjam among Houston Democrats, who are currently down a member because of the vacancy in the solidly Democratic 18th Congressional District.
Democrats represent three other congressional seats in the Houston area: Rep. Lizzie Fletcher in the 7th District, Green in the 9th District and Rep. Sylvia Garcia in the 29th District.
All four seats were redrawn under the GOP's new proposed map, with Green's district undergoing the biggest change. Currently centered in south Houston and cities to the south in Fort Bend and Brazoria counties, the proposed 9th District contains just 2% of the land area and 3% of the people currently represented by Green.
The new district would be based in east Harris County, absorbing conservative territory from GOP districts in the Houston suburbs and exurbs and putting the seat in line to be represented by a Republican. What is now a district Harris won by 44 percentage points would become one that voted for Trump by a 15-point margin.
Fletcher's seat would still favor Democrats and contain about three-quarters of her current district. And Garcia's 29th District was drawn to be even more favorable to Democrats: While about 60% of her constituents would be moved elsewhere and the district would lose its longtime Hispanic-majority status, the 74-year-old Garcia would still live within the new lines and remain safe from Republican challengers.
Most of Green's territory, however, was redrawn into the 18th Congressional District, which several Democrats are vying to represent in its current form in a November special election. But whoever wins could be pitted against Green in the March primary — which will decide who represents the district starting in 2027 — if he opts to shift districts.
In a statement, the 77-year-old Green said he 'will be on the ballot' and would announce his plans after taking time to deliberate.
Now in his 11th two-year term, Green's de facto incumbency could be difficult for any newcomer to overcome.
The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today!
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump denies knowledge of Ghislaine Maxwell's prison transfer
President Donald Trump says he 'didn't know' that Jeffrey Epstein's ex-girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell was transferred from a federal prison in Florida to a minimum-security prison camp in Texas. Trump adds, 'it's not a very uncommon thing.'
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal appeals court sides with Texas on ID requirements for voting by mail
A federal appeals court has upheld Texas' requirement that potential voters must list their identification information in their application for a mail-in ballot. In Texas, voting by mail is only available for certain groups of people, including elderly voters and people with disabilities. Under Senate Bill 1 passed in 2021, voters must also include an ID number — such as a driver's license number — on both the vote-by-mail applications and the mail-in ballots and both numbers need to match. Opponents of the law said this provision discriminated against voters with disabilities and that it would not meaningfully cut down on voter fraud. In a Monday ruling, a panel from the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the updated requirement does not violate federal law. It also reversed a lower court's decision. 'We have no difficulty concluding that this ID number requirement fully complies with a provision of federal law known by the parties as the materiality provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act,' wrote Judge James Ho, a Trump appointee. Judge Patrick Higginbotham and Judge Don Willett, who were appointed under the Reagan and Trump administrations, respectively, joined Ho's ruling. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton lauded the ruling Tuesday. 'Voter ID is one of the most crucial tools in the battle against election fraud, and I'm pleased to see the court affirm our fundamental right to defend the integrity of our democratic process,' he said in a news release. Prior to this decision, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas had ruled in 2023 that the requirements infringed on the Civil Rights Act. Though later that year, Paxton's office was able to stop that decision from going into effect. These voter ID requirements were also the target of legal challenges from several civil rights groups, along with other provisions of SB 1. Groups that were part of this case — including the League of Women Voters of Texas, OCA-Greater Houston and Rev Up Texas — didn't immediately respond to comment requests from The Texas Tribune Tuesday. A recent study from the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law School found that the state's requirements pushed many voters whose mail ballots or vote-by-mail applications were rejected during the 2022 primary to change their method — or not vote at all. Disclosure: League of Women Voters of Texas has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase. Solve the daily Crossword

Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hochul hosts Texas lawmakers in Albany, proposes New York redistrict again to counter GOP plans to gain seats
Aug. 5—ALBANY — Gov. Kathleen C. Hochul is opening the door for New York to redraw its congressional district lines, for a third time since 2022, in a Democrat-backed bid to counter plans to add Republican seats in GOP-controlled states. In Texas, GOP lawmakers are forging ahead with a rarely done mid-decade redistricting process, done at the behest of the Trump administration. The map being put up for a vote in Texas would eliminate up to five Democratically held districts, redrawing the map to split up primarily Democratic voting precincts into new, largely Republican districts. Lawmakers were called back to Austin for a vote on the bill to advance the maps, expected to pass in the majority-Republican state legislature, but most of the state's Democratic lawmakers left the state and have denied their chambers the quorum of members necessary to conduct business. Texas Gov. Gregory W. Abbott and the state's Republican legislative leaders have moved to arrest those lawmakers and forcibly return them to the state Capitol. Six of those lawmakers came to Albany, and dozens of others have traveled to Democratically controlled states like California and Illinois. Texas state troopers lack the power to arrest the legislators outside of Texas, and while other state leaders can opt to comply with the Texas orders and arrest them themselves, that likely won't happen in a Democrat-run state. In the state Capitol on Monday, Hochul and some of her top leadership team, alongside New York Assembly Speaker Carl E. Heastie, D-Bronx, met with the six visiting Texan legislators and pledged to back up their efforts to resist the GOP redistricting effort. "These public servants are taking a stand — a strong stand — against a blatant power grab that's happening in their state as we speak," Hochul said. "And this will have implications not just in Texas, but for our entire nation and its future." Hochul said that breaking quorum is a legally valid form of resistance that does not break the law. The Texas arrest orders do not allege a specific crime, accusing the legislators of "dereliction of duty." Even after arrest, the lawmakers will only be taken to the state Capitol, and won't be incarcerated after that. Hochul said the new map being proposed in Texas presents a "radical, radical redrawing of the congressional lines that were already adopted," and said the clearly partisan focus of the plan requires a firm response where Democrats can muster one. Redistricting efforts are state-led across the entire nation, and each state has its own approach. While some Democratic-led states keep the basic approach of letting their legislatures draw the maps themselves, others including New York, Illinois and California have adopted nonpartisan systems that assign the drawing of maps to an independent, bipartisan or nonpartisan commission. In New York, that's the Independent Redistricting Commission, formed in 2015 as a result of a state constitutional amendment agreed to by a majority of voters in 2014. The commission, with an equal panel of Republicans and Democrats, is tasked with redrawing the state legislative and congressional district lines after each 10-year federal census. Its first test was in 2021, and it failed to advance bipartisan maps for state legislature or Congress. Lawmakers redrew the maps themselves under the terms of the constitutional amendment, and those maps were tossed by the state's top court, which created the current congressional map with the help of a court-appointed "special master." The state constitution requires that district lines be drawn in a nonpartisan way, intent on keeping "communities of interest" intact and respecting the racial and ethnic makeup of the state. On Monday, Hochul said it may be time to abandon that approach and use the control the Democratic Party has in New York to secure more seats for itself in Congress. "If Republicans are willing to rewrite these rules to give themselves an advantage, then they're leaving us with no choice, we must do the same," Hochul said. "There's a phrase, 'you have to fight fire with fire.' That is a true statement of how we're feeling right now." Hochul said New York's state legislators are supportive of rethinking how they approach redistricting, evidenced by Speaker Heastie's presence. Heastie floated voting on another amendment to the state constitution, although he didn't lay out specific ideas. Hochul, responding to reporters' questions after the main event, said she would support an amendment that would disband the Independent Redistricting Commission. In New York, the state constitution can be amended two ways. One way that's rarely been used involves a once-every-20 year vote to call a constitutional convention, but the most common way requires that two separate meetings of the state legislature, with at least one election between, vote on the amendment, sending it to a popular vote the next November. If a majority of voters approve the measure, the constitution is amended. "What we're proposing that — maybe what we bring before the voters in 2027, hope not to have to use it, but sometimes the best way to get a bully to stop being a bully is to remind them that they could also be bullied," Heastie said. "So perhaps the Republican members of Congress here in New York could say to their Republican colleagues in Texas, 'hey, slow down on this because this can also affect us.'" Heastie bemoaned the New York press and popular editorial boards, which he said have urged Democrats to follow the rules. "I say to all of you, to all of the press here, your editorial boards keep asking us to 'be fair' and 'play fair' and I think that's the wrong thing to ask us to do," he said. After the meeting, New York's Republicans fired back and called the suggestion that New York should redraw its maps to respond to another state doing the same hypocritical. "Governor Hochul and Albany Democrats are once again trying to rig the redistricting process in their favor to preserve their own political power at the expense of the people," said Senate Minority Leader Robert G. Ortt II, R-North Tonawanda. "Governor Hochul has described mid-decade redistricting as 'undemocratic', yet her and other New York Democrats are willing to destroy democracy under the guise of 'saving democracy'. Voters know what this is really about — political power." In a statement from her campaign, Rep. Elise M. Stefanik, R-Schuylerville, the most senior New York GOP lawmaker, slammed the governor for pitching a plan to undo a constitutional amendment. "In her own words, Kathy Hochul is hell bent on angrily spiting the New York state constitution, the will of New York voters, good government groups and the courts by dismantling fair and legal district lines," Stefanik said in a statement. "The worst governor in America needs to be reminded that she conveniently forgot to tell the unlawful out-of-state radical Democrats at (Monday's) desperate press conference that she lost not once but twice in her efforts to illegally draw gerrymandered lines in New York to rig our Congressional elections and suppress the will of the voters." If Democrats do put up another amendment to dissolve the Independent Redistricting Commission, it could come before voters as early as 2027 — but state Democrats' recent record on voting-related amendments on the ballot hasn't been shining. In 2021, Democrats put five proposals on statewide ballots but only two passed — one related to civil courts in New York City, another on confirming a right to a clean environment. The three failed proposals were related to voting, one that would change some rules related to the Independent Redistricting Commission, one to allow for same-day voter registration and another to allow excuse-free absentee mail voting. A strong GOP counter-argument, in part led by Stefanik, and a somewhat laggardly Democratic pitch on those efforts, helped to flip the expected balance of support, and each failed proposal lost by at least 9 percentage points. Solve the daily Crossword