logo
US Senate approves divisive Trump spending bill by narrow margin

US Senate approves divisive Trump spending bill by narrow margin

Khaleej Times18 hours ago
The Republican-led US Senate approved President Donald Trump's mammoth domestic policy bill Tuesday by the narrowest of margins, despite misgivings over delivering deep welfare cuts and another $3 trillion in national debt.
Republican leaders had struggled to corral support during a record 24-hour "vote-a-rama" amendment session on the Senate floor, as Democrats offered dozens of challenges to the most divisive aspects of the package.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune was able to turn around two moderates considering siding with Democrats, to deliver a 50-50 vote, with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie.
The sprawling text now heads to the House of Representatives, where it faces unified Democratic opposition and multiple Republicans balking at slashed health care and food aid programs for poor Americans.
Trump's bill proposes a $4.5 trillion extension of his first-term tax cuts, contentiously offset with $1.2 trillion in savings mainly targeting the Medicaid health insurance programme that will strip coverage from an estimated 12 million low-income and disabled Americans.
It also rolls back billions of dollars in green energy tax credits while providing a $350 billion infusion for border security and Trump's mass migrant deportation program.
The president made clear that the goal remains to get the bill through the House in the coming days and sign it into law by Friday's July 4 Independence Day holiday, although he acknowledged that the self-imposed deadline could slip.
"It's going to get in, it's going to pass, and we're going to be very happy," he told reporters as arrived in Florida to view new migrant detention facilities.
'Bad legislation'
Polls show the bill is among the most unpopular ever considered across multiple demographic, age and income groups, and Democrats hope to leverage public anger ahead of the 2026 midterm elections when they aim to retake the House.
Backed by extensive independent analysis, they say the bill's tax cuts would disproportionately benefit the wealthy at the expense of social safety net programs for the poorest Americans.
"It's bad legislation," Arizona Senator Mark Kelly told MSNBC. "If this passes, this is a political gift for Democrats."
A handful of senators in the Republican majority had also threatened to upset the apple cart, echoing Democratic concerns that the bill would add more than $3.3 trillion to the nation's already yawning budget deficits over a decade.
The most high-profile opposition has come from outside Congress, however, in the shape of tech billionaire and estranged former Trump aide Elon Musk, who balked at the bill's debt implications and stripping of clean energy subsidies.
In a dramatic reignition of his feud with Trump, Musk vowed to launch a new political party to challenge lawmakers who campaigned on reduced federal spending only to vote for the bill.
Musk — whose businesses include rocket company and government contractor SpaceX, which has about $22 billion in federal contracts — has been campaigning against the bill since quitting as a Trump advisor in May.
A furious Trump on Tuesday said he would consider deporting Musk and ending federal funds for his companies.
"Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far," Trump posted in a retort on social media, "and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa."
Focus on House
Although the House of Representatives has already passed their own version of the bill, it will have to come back to the lower chamber for a final rubber stamp before it reaches Trump's desk.
House Republicans were watching anxiously from the sidelines to see if their Senate colleagues would adopt changes that would be hard for Speaker Mike Johnson to sell to his lawmakers.
Fiscal hawks in the lower chamber are furious at what they say is $651 billion of extra deficit spending in the Senate's tweaks.
A House vote could come as early as Wednesday but even with full attendance, House Republicans can only afford to lose three votes.
"We're going to pass this bill one way or the other," Johnson told reporters at the Capitol on Monday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ukraine left scrambling after US says halting weapons shipments
Ukraine left scrambling after US says halting weapons shipments

Khaleej Times

time10 minutes ago

  • Khaleej Times

Ukraine left scrambling after US says halting weapons shipments

Ukraine summoned a senior US diplomat on Wednesday, urging its key ally not to cut or delay critical military aid after the White House said it was halting some weapons shipments. Kyiv said it had not been told anything by the United States about the halt to aid, which could thwart its ability to fend off escalating Russian air attacks. Moscow revelled in the decision, saying it could bring the end of the war closer. Kyiv has long feared halts to US aid after Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, having criticised the tens of billions of dollars in support and weapons sent by his predecessor, Joe Biden. The US embassy's deputy chief of mission, John Ginkel, was summoned on Wednesday -- a rare diplomatic move usually reserved for foes and rivals, not vital allies -- amid uncertainty about what the cuts would mean for Kyiv. "The Ukrainian side stressed that any delay or procrastination in supporting Ukraine's defence capabilities would only encourage the aggressor to continue the war," Ukraine's foreign ministry said in a statement. The White House announced on Tuesday it was halting some key weapons shipments to Ukraine promised by the previous US administration, but did not provide details on what would be cut. Under Biden, Washington had spearheaded Western support for Ukraine, with Congress having approved more than $100 billion in aid, including $43 billion in weaponry. Trump, who has held several phone calls with Russian President Vladimir Putin and pushed the two sides into peace talks, has refused to announce new packages and Kyiv has been corralling Washington's European allies to step up support for when US deliveries end. Putin has rejected calls for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire and demanded Ukraine cede more territory if it wants Moscow to halt its invasion. Tens of thousands have been killed since February 2022 when Russia invaded, with millions forced to flee their homes and swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine destroyed. A senior Ukrainian military official raised concerns about the impact of the weapons halt to AFP. "We are now seriously dependent on American arms supplies, although Europe is doing its best, but it will be difficult for us without American ammunition," a high-ranking source in the Ukrainian military said, speaking on condition of anonymity. In Moscow, the Kremlin said reducing the flow of weapons to Kyiv will help end the conflict faster. "The fewer the number of weapons that are delivered to Ukraine, the closer the end of the special military operation," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters in response to a question by AFP, using Russia's term for its more than three-year offensive. The US decision was taken "following a DOD (Department of Defense) review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe," White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly told AFP in an email. Kyiv said it was caught off-guard by the move. "Ukraine has not received any official notifications about the suspension or revision of the delivery schedules for the agreed defence assistance," the defence ministry said. "The path to ending the war lies through consistent and joint pressure on the aggressor, as well as through continued support for Ukraine," it added. "We are clarifying the situation. I think that everything will be clarified in the coming days," presidential aide Dmytro Lytvyn told reporters. Politico and other US media reported that missiles for Patriot air defence systems, precision artillery and Hellfire missiles are among the items being held back. Last week at a Nato summit in the Netherlands, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky met with Trump, who gave no public indication he was thinking of cutting aid. "We're going to see if we can make some available," Trump said of the air defence missiles that Kyiv desperately seeks to shoot down Russian attacks. "They're very hard to get," Trump added. Russia has ramped up attacks on Ukraine in June, launching nearly twice as many missiles and over 30 per cent more drones than in May, according to an AFP analysis of Ukrainian air force data.

Trump tax-cut plan returns to US House, Republicans divided on bill
Trump tax-cut plan returns to US House, Republicans divided on bill

Zawya

time21 minutes ago

  • Zawya

Trump tax-cut plan returns to US House, Republicans divided on bill

The debate within President Donald Trump's Republican Party over a massive tax-cut and spending bill returns to the House of Representatives on Wednesday, as party leaders try to overcome internal divisions and meet a self-imposed July 4 deadline. The Senate passed the legislation, which nonpartisan analysts say will add $3.3 trillion to the nation's debt over the next decade, by the narrowest possible margin on Tuesday after intense debate on the bill's hefty price tag and substantial cuts to the Medicaid health care program. Similar divides exist in the House, which Republicans control by a 220-212 margin and where a fractious caucus has regularly bucked its leadership in recent years -- though members have so far not rejected major Trump priorities. "The House will work quickly to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill that enacts President Trump's full America First agenda by the Fourth of July," House Speaker Mike Johnson said in a statement on Tuesday, citing the bill's extension of Trump's 2017 individual tax cuts and increased funding for the military and immigration enforcement. House Republican leaders set an initial procedural vote on the bill for 9 a.m. ET (1300 GMT). Some of the loudest Republican objections against it come from party hardliners angry that it does not sufficiently cut spending and a $5 trillion increase in the nation's debt ceiling, which lawmakers must address in the coming months or risk a devastating default on the nation's $36.2 trillion debt. "What the Senate did was unconscionable," said Representative Ralph Norman, a South Carolina Republican, one of several fiscal hawks who spoke out against the Senate bill's higher price tag, accusing the Senate of handing out "goodie bags" of spending to satisfy holdouts. Norman said he would vote against advancing the bill on Wednesday. Democrats are united in opposition to the bill, saying that its tax breaks disproportionately benefit the wealthy, while cutting services that lower- and middle-income Americans rely on. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that almost 12 million people could lose health insurance as a result of the bill. "This is the largest assault on American healthcare in history," Democratic House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters on Tuesday, pledging that his party will use "all procedural and legislative options" to try to stop - or delay - passage. The version of the bill passed by the Senate on Tuesday would add more to the debt than the version first passed by the House in May and also includes more than $900 million in cuts to the Medicaid program for low-income Americans. Those cuts also raised concerns among some House Republicans. "I will not support a final bill that eliminates vital funding our hospitals rely on," Representative David Valadao of California said before Senate passage. TIMING DIFFICULTIES But some House Republicans worried about social safety-net cuts could find solace in the Senate's last-minute decision to set aside more money for rural hospitals, funding that Representative Nick Langworthy, a New York Republican, called 'a lifeline that will be very helpful to districts like mine.' Any changes made by the House would require another Senate vote, making it all but impossible to meet the July 4 deadline. Further complicating the timeline, a wave of storms in the Washington area on Tuesday night canceled flights, and some lawmakers from both parties detailed on social media plans to drive from their home districts to the Capitol for Wednesday's expected vote. A senior White House official said on Tuesday that Trump is expected to be "deeply involved" in the whip operation this week. Trump for weeks has pushed for passage ahead of the July 4 Independence Day holiday, though he has also in recent days softened that deadline, describing it as less than critical. Any public opposition to the bill risks irking Trump, as was the case when the president slammed Senator Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican who announced his retirement after coming out in opposition to the bill. Another former Trump ally, the world's richest person Elon Musk, this week resumed an active campaign against the bill over social media, blasting its deficit-building effects. That has reignited a feud between Trump and Musk. (Reporting by Bo Erickson, Rick Cowan, and Nandita Bose; Editing by Scott Malone and Cynthia Osterman)

They tried Made in the USA - it was too expensive for their customers
They tried Made in the USA - it was too expensive for their customers

Zawya

time21 minutes ago

  • Zawya

They tried Made in the USA - it was too expensive for their customers

When Plufl co-founders Yuki Kinoshita and Noah Silverman pitched their "dog beds for humans" prototype to Shark Tank in 2022, they envisioned making the plush, snuggly, memory foam beds in China and selling them at retail in the U.S. for $299. Mark Cuban and Lori Greiner invested $200,000 jointly for 20% of the company, which went on to make over $1 million in sales in 2023, selling beds on Amazon and their own website. After U.S. President Donald Trump slapped a 145% tariff on items imported from China in April, Kinoshita and Silverman sprung into action, investigating if retailers would be interested in selling a U.S. made version of their human dog beds. The retail price might go higher, but they thought a "made-in-the-USA" label might be an attractive selling point and help ease some U.S. retailers' concerns about the impact of China tariffs. Silverman and Kinoshita had previously toured a factory in Las Vegas that could make the memory foam beds for $150 per unit compared to the $100 overall cost to make the beds in China. But that $150 manufacturing cost didn't include the faux fur lining for the cover, which would still need to be imported from China—adding another $100 per unit. They pitched a sub-$500 made-in-the-USA version to Costco , which it turned down, saying it couldn't stock the product this year and might revisit the idea next year. Costco did not respond to a request for comment. The duo behind Plufl are among tens of thousands of American small and midsize manufacturers facing the choice between paying steep tariffs on Chinese imports or taking on significantly higher domestic production costs. Even those willing to pay more to make goods in the U.S. are confronting another reality: retailers set prices for consumers and have been largely unwilling to budge in the face of tariffs. On June 11, when Trump announced a deal to lower tariffs on Chinese goods to 55%, Kinoshita and Silverman decided to stay the course manufacturing their human dog beds in China and maintain the $299 retail price. "We're absorbing costs in a number of ways, such as finding shipping efficiencies by shrinking the box down more and also taking some hit on our margin," Kinoshita said. White House spokesperson Kush Desai said the Trump administration remains committed to reviving U.S. manufacturing, citing provisions in the Big, Beautiful Bill, which passed on Tuesday with a slim majority in the Senate, such as allowing businesses to fully expense equipment investments. "These complementary policies will turbocharge growth and drive investment throughout the supply chain,' he said in an emailed statement. DRINKING MARGINS Similarly, Aisha Chottani, another 'Shark Tank' veteran, found that tariffs threaten her ability to sell her products in grocery stores. Chottani, CEO-founder of Moment, makes her healthy, stress-reducing carbonated beverages in Wisconsin, but her packager, CanWorks imports pre-formed aluminum from China, and is thus subject to aluminum tariffs which raised the price of cans from by 20%. When Chottani tried to pass on the 4 cents in additional costs to Albertsons, which carries her $3.99 'Strawberry Rose' beverage at about 30 locations in Texas and New Mexico, her answer was swift. "Albertsons refused any price increases," she said and suggested she either keep the same price or leave. Albertsons did not respond to a request for comment. In February, she launched Moment beverages in Sprout Farmers Markets across the U.S., but was forced to do so with higher-priced cans. "There wasn't enough time to shift production to factories in Vietnam or other places," she said. For now, Chottani is keeping her wholesale price the same even as her costs have gone up. She's raising additional cash from investors and looking to cut costs. "Even in the short term a 20% price hike is huge and is going to wipe out all your cash," she said. BABY TARIFFS It's not just startups that are struggling. Bugaboo, the Netherlands-based maker of expensive baby gear, owns its own factory in China and would seem to be well-prepared to weather tariffs. The company's popular "Fox 5" stroller, which retails for about $1,500 in the U.S., is made at its factory in Xiamen, China, where 97% of strollers and car seats imported to the U.S. are made, according to ImportGenius, which tracks U.S. import, export records and shipping manifests. But when Trump's tariffs hit, Bugaboo started to reevaluate that strategy. The company had begun studying moving production to other countries in Asia to have more regional production flexibility as well as the U.S., but any move would be years away. It took Bugaboo a number of years to establish its Xiamen operations. If it had to build a similar setup in the United States, it would take the same time. "Even if we start now, it would take several years to set up operations," said Chief Commercial Officer for North America, Jeanelle Teves. The U.S. currently lacks a specialized manufacturing footprint for baby strollers that requires advanced tooling, high-grade materials, and a skilled labor force. "It's not just about assembling parts; it's about engineering performance and safety," she said. In the meantime, Bugaboo decided to pass some of those costs onto customers, raising prices $50 to $300 on several products including high chairs, play pens, and a new version the Fox 5 stroller on May 20. 'The increases do not fully offset the tariff, and Bugaboo is continuing to absorb part of the cost in order to minimize the impact on American families and retailers,' Teves said. TAKING NOTES Pensacola, Florida-based Simplified, maker of high-end notebooks, cards and stationery, can make a day planner complete with a hard cover, gold corners, foil and color printing for about $12 in Shenzhen, China, where many U.S.-bound paper products are made. After the tariffs hit and small businesses began feeling the pain, CEO-founder Emily Ley said many people asked why she didn't just move her manufacturing to the U.S. 'The United States simply does not have the infrastructure," said Ley. The problem? Producing the same planner in the U.S. would cost $38 - and that's with lower-quality materials. Ley said she keeps her manufacturing costs at 25% of the $64 retail price of the planners. She said she can't pass on the cost of tariffs, because then her planners would cost $100. 'People aren't gonna pay $100 for a paper planner, nor should they,' said Ley, who has filed a lawsuit against Trump alleging that his use of emergency powers to enact tariffs was illegal. In the meantime, Ley is absorbing the cost and continuing manufacturing in China, which means cutting back on other areas like investing in growth, jobs, salaries and advertising. "You know, we're all encouraged to pursue the American dream and create businesses,' Ley said. 'The tariffs at any level are truly punitive. It seems kind of counterproductive to the whole point of this whole thing.' (Reporting by Siddharth Cavale in New York; Editing by Lisa Jucca and Michael Learmonth)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store