Teacher ‘dared' girls to kiss: court
Janelle Colville Fletcher, 40, is contesting allegations that she groomed and sexually abused the underage girl some years ago and appeared again on Monday at the South Australian District Court before Judge Joanne Fuller.
The prosecution, led by Chris Allen, allege Ms Fletcher abused the girl in various locations and also that she communicated with her and another teenage girl to make them amenable to sexual activity.
Some of the alleged offending happened when the two girls and Ms Fletcher were alone together in a room, the prosecution said, with the teacher allegedly performing a lap dance on a chair.
She then allegedly 'dared' the two girls to kiss each other and asked if they would 'date' each other.
That same night, Mr Allen said, Ms Fletcher then spent time alone with one of the girls and touched her genital area.
The alleged grooming and abuse of the girl then went on for months at various locations, the prosecution said, including the home of Ms Fletcher and in Ms Fletcher's car. Janelle Fletcher is contesting the allegation that she sexually abused a teen girl. NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia
Alongside oral evidence from the alleged victims, the prosecution presented a series of texts, emails and photographs to support its case, including a photo of Ms Fletcher and the girl kissing at a cinema photo booth.
In his closing address, Mr Allen said the 'objective evidence' of the photo booth kiss showed an 'unlawful sexual act'.
He argued further that the 'sheer volume' of photos of Ms Fletcher and the girl together suggested a sexual relationship.
'They look like girlfriends (in the photographs) … in a relationship between girlfriends,' Mr Allen said.
In her testimony from last week, Ms Fletcher said the photo booth kiss was a 'pretend kiss' she did not want or mean to happen.
'It was meant to be a pretend kiss like we had done previously where our lips don't actually touch, and in that particular photo we got close and she did sort of pull me in and the photo went off, yeah,' Ms Fletcher said.
There is dispute between the defence and prosecution about the correct sequence order of photos from the booth.
The prosecution says the correct sequence runs from top to bottom in the order of one, two, three and then four.
In 'photo 4', Ms Fletcher appears happy and the prosecution argues this shows she was happy to kiss the girl and not shocked or upset by it.
Ms Fletcher and her defence team, led by Andrew Culshaw, claim that photo was taken before the kiss and should not be seen as approval of the act, with the correct sequence of photos running one, two, four and then three.
Mr Culshaw also argued the photo did not show child sexual abuse because the girl had turned 17 at the time of the photo, and so she was therefore not a child when the kiss happened.
The defence argued Ms Fletcher was also no longer in a position of authority at the time.
'What Your Honour has, in my submission, is evidence of a kiss at a time when it was legal,' Mr Culshaw said.
The prosecution also argued that a series of emotionally expressive emails from Ms Fletcher to the girl revealed the 'true nature' of the relationship between them.
In one email, Ms Fletcher told the girl 'I want something serious not something short term'.
In others, she said 'my feelings for you are not lust but love' and 'right now, we can't be open. Right now we will have to continue as we are in secret …' Ms Fletcher holds a PhD in music education. NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia
Ms Fletcher had earlier argued the emails showed non-sexual 'love' for the girl, but Mr Allen dismissed that argument on Monday as 'absurd'.
'This is not 'I love you' in some sort of Catholic way,' Mr Allen said.
Mr Culshaw, in his closing address, acknowledged under questioning from Judge Fuller that the emails appeared 'terrible' on a first or literal reading in that they seemed to suggest the pair had been in a sexual relationship.
But he argued a deeper reading of the emails fit with Ms Fletcher's testimony. She claimed last week that they were written to keep the girl happy and guide her away to a more age-appropriate relationship.
'These emails are consistent with a relatively young teacher, in her early 30s, who had got herself in too deep … and so was trying to deal with the situation and extricate herself from it,' Mr Culshaw said.
Ms Fletcher holds a PhD in music education.
She told the court that she was heterosexual and believed in the Catholic faith.
She was still legally married to a man, though the pair had separated, she told the court.
The judge-alone trial continues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
9 News
9 hours ago
- 9 News
New information emerges decades after disappearance of Beaumont children
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here More than half a century after the disappearance of the Beaumont children from Glenelg Beach, new information has surfaced, prompting renewed focus on one of Australia's most enduring mysteries. The disappearance of Jane, Arna, and Grant Beaumont on Australia Day in 1966 remains unsolved and their remains have never been recovered. A private investigator, Bill Hayes, a former South Australian Major Crime Detective, has revealed that a new witness has come forward following a recent search at a North Plympton site. The disappearance of Jane, Arna, and Grant Beaumont on Australia Day in 1966 remains unsolved. (Nine) This site was once owned by factory boss Harry Phipps, who has been a suspect in the abduction. While the dig yielded no physical evidence, it spurred a woman to share her account. The woman alleges she was abused by Phipps, an associate of her family, and that he had made claims to others about the children being buried at the old factory site. "It was extremely distressing, it still is," Hayes said. The new information, detailed in an update to a book about the Beaumont case authored by Hayes and Stuart Mullins, is considered credible by the two authors, who say the woman passed a lie detector test. Bill Hayes. (Nine) "You knew she wasn't making it up, you cannot make something up like she was telling us," Mullins said. The recent search at the North Plympton site was organised by Hayes and author Stuart Mullins. Despite previous police digs at the location in 2013 and 2018 also proving fruitless, Mullins still believes that's where the children are. "We still believe they were buried there… and it's like as Bill said, where we were digging, you could only be 30 centimetres off," he said. While further digs at the Castalloy Factory are not possible due to plans for a housing development, investigators say their search for the truth continues elsewhere. This article was produced with the assistance of 9ExPress . 9ExPress Adelaide South Australia CONTACT US Auto news: Why Australians are still driving around without insurance.
Perth Now
11 hours ago
- Perth Now
Bombshell $2.3m lawsuit hits popular premier
Former Labor parliamentarian Annabel Digance has dropped a bombshell $2.3m lawsuit on South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas, claiming he orchestrated a 'malicious prosecution' against her. The lawsuit, filed with the SA Supreme Court, alleges Mr Malinauskas conspired with the SA Police to prosecute Mrs Digance in order to crush her political future and prevent a parliamentary inquiry she supported on alleged bullying in the Labor Party. The police arrested and charged Mr and Mrs Digance for blackmail in April 2021 for alleged conduct against Mr Malinauskas. The conduct centred on secret recordings between Mr Malinauskas and Mr Digance in February 2020 and Mr and Mrs Digance in March 2020. The blackmail charge was dropped in 2023 after the Digances agreed to refrain from any further contact with Mr Malinauskas. The claim, submitted by Carroll and O'Dea Solicitors, states the arrest and prosecution caused Mrs Digance 'injury, loss, damage and harm'. Premier Peter Malinauskas will fight the lawsuit from Mrs Digance in the South Australian Supreme Court. NewsWire / David Beach Credit: NewsWire 'The circumstances giving rise to the causes of action immediately caused the cancellation of Mrs Digance's employment, permanently damaged Mrs Digance's prospects of further employment, required Mrs Digance to incur substantial legal expenses in defending herself against the prosecution and required Mrs Digance to incur medical expenses,' the claim states. The lawsuit is directed against both the premier and the South Australian police. 'The members of SA Police conducting the arrest, the search and seizure, the detention, the first bail decision and pursuing the malicious prosecution knew each action was unnecessary, unjustified, unlawful,' the claim states. Mrs Digance is asking for $2.3m in damages. In separate defence claims, both Mr Malinauskas and the SA Police and Prosecution deny Mrs Digance is entitled to the relief claimed and request the court dismiss her suit and cover costs of the proceedings. Mr Malinauskas' defence statement flatly denies allegations that he 'requested' the police pursue a prosecution or that he was acting to suppress the parliamentary inquiry. Annabel Digance wants $2.3m in damages from Mr Malinauskas and the South Australian Police. Supplied Credit: NCA NewsWire 'The first respondent (Malinauskas) admits only that on or about April 9, 2021, he contacted SA Police and told them that if SA Police were of the view that a prosecution of the applicant (Digance) and or her husband was justified, he would co-operate to the extent necessary in that prosecution whenever it was to occur,' the defence claim states. The claim submitted on behalf of the SA Police also rejects Mrs Digance's assertions. 'The investigation undertaken by SAPOL into the blackmail offence was appropriate,' the claim states. The blackmail offence was laid based on information available to SAPOL including the complaint made by the first respondent, the recorded conversations … and other witness and documentary evidence obtained by SAPOL during the course of its investigation. 'The sole purpose for initiating and maintaining the blackmail offence was the proper invocation of the criminal law.' The matter will be heard at the South Australian Supreme Court on Wednesday.
Perth Now
11 hours ago
- Perth Now
AFL great accused of assaulting woman
AFL great Nicky Winmar has appeared in court after he was charged over the alleged assault of a woman. Neil Elvis 'Nicky' Winmar, 59, beamed into the Melbourne Magistrates' Court on Tuesday charged with two counts of assault and one count of choking, strangling or suffocating a person without lawful excuse. According to charge sheets released by the court, police allege the incident occurred on July 18. The two-time All Australian footballer appeared wearing a blue jumper and glasses and spoke only to confirm he could see and hear the court. His lawyer, Tessa Theocharous, told the court Mr Winmar was on bail for the allegations, with the matter listed for a bail review. Mr Winmar has not been required to enter pleas. Jake Nowakowski Credit: News Corp Australia Ms Theocharous said the Court Integrated Services Program had provided an 'update letter' to the court and requested the case be adjourned to allow her client to 'fully engage in case management'. 'He has only fairly recently been placed on the (bail) program,' she said. 'There is a further appointment today at court, Your Honour, so that a more fulsome plan can be prepared and Mr Winmar can engage with that.' An application to revoke Mr Winmar's bail was withdrawn by Victoria Police and his bail was extended until his next court date on August 28. The AFL Hall of Fame inductee had a twelve-season career with St Kilda between 1987 and 1998, twice winning the club's best and fairest award. The Indigenous footballer's iconic stand against racist abuse during the 1993 season was immortalised in bronze outside Optus Stadium in Perth six years ago. The Western Australian lifted his jumper and pointed at his torso, declaring 'I'm black and I'm proud' after receiving abuse from Collingwood fans at Victoria Park.
