New EU-Ukraine agri trade quotas to be 'in between' current deal and wartime exemptions
The EU temporarily waived duties and quotas on agricultural products in June 2022 after Russia's full-scale invasion to help Ukraine compensate for the higher costs of its exports, after Russia threatened its traditional Black Sea shipping lanes.
Those tariff suspensions expired on Thursday. The EU and Ukraine reverted to the pre-war regime of trade quotas on Friday, while the two sides negotiate a new longer-term deal - in which Brussels is seeking to strike a balance between supporting Ukraine in its war with Russia, and heeding European farmers' concerns about cheaper Ukrainian imports.
"What will be negotiated will be something in between the quotas under the existing DCFTA and the autonomous trade measures, the volumes that have been exported there," EU agriculture commissioner Christophe Hansen said in an interview with Reuters on Thursday.
The DCFTA refers to Ukraine and the EU's pre-war trade deal. The EU's "autonomous trade measures" temporarily suspended quotas on Ukrainian imports from 2022.
Ukraine's farm minister Vitaliy Koval told Reuters this week that Kyiv was pushing for an agreement on higher quotas than it had before the war.
EU farmers have complained that large shipments of cheaper Ukrainian sugar imports under the wartime tariff exemptions have undercut local supplies. The EU triggered "emergency brakes" to re-impose quotas on products including sugar and eggs in the past year, in response to surging imports.
The EU's Ukrainian sugar imports soared to 400,000 tons in the 2022/23 season and over 500,000 tons in 2023/24, far exceeding the pre-war quota of 20,000 tons.
Hansen said the new quotas on sugar would be "significantly higher" than those under the pre-war arrangements.
"I think we can absorb a certain amount of those products," he said, while noting sensitivities around sugar, poultry and eggs.
Negotiations on the new EU-Ukraine deal started on June 2. Hansen said it was feasible a deal could be reached by summer.
"It depends now on both sides, I think technically that could be feasible," he said.
Agricultural goods accounted for about 60% of Ukraine's total exports last year, with the EU buying around 60% of those goods, worth about $15 billion.
A senior Ukrainian lawmaker said last month the loss of tariff-free access to the EU market could cost the country 3.5 billion euros ($3.99 billion) in annual revenue.
"Our solidarity with Ukraine is as firm as ever, and therefore we are very committed to deliver this agreement as quickly as possible," Hansen said.
The pre-war quota regime, which applies as of Friday, also includes lighter rules on import licenses for some goods like poultry and eggs, where instead of requiring licenses, quotas will be allocated on a first-come, first-served basis.
($1 = 0.8763 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump on Hispanic farm workers: ‘They don't get a bad back, because if they get a bad back, they die'
Donald Trump has raised eyebrows with comments he made about farm laborers during a phone interview with CNBC. The President spoke on Tuesday, 5 August 2025, explaining his belief that deported immigrant farm employees are not easy to replace with native-born workers. Farmers have been left short of staff due to the Trump administration's ICE round-ups of undocumented migrants. Trump suggested people who live 'in the inner city' are 'not doing that [farm] work' but Hispanic migrants do it 'naturally'. He then launched into a story about a conversation he had once had with a farmer. Trump says he asked, "What happens if they get a bad back?" to which the farmer allegedly responded, "They don't get a bad back, sir, because if they get a bad back, they die".
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Spotify's price is going up again, here are 6 cheaper music streaming services
Spotify is one of the most expensive music streaming services in the world, and it's about to get even pricier. On 4 August, Spotify announced it would be increasing prices in a number of regions, though it didn't elaborate on which countries would be affected. In a blog post, Spotify said individual premium subscriptions would be going up from €10.99 per month to €11.99 per month in September, including Europe, South Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Latin America and the Pacific. If the price hike comes to the UK, Spotify subscribers could be asked to pay £12.99 per month. The streamer already increased the price of an individual subscription by £1 last year to £11.99, and raised the price of its other plans, like the family and duo subscription, by £2 per month, leaving many disgruntled users looking for cheaper alternatives to the platform. According to Reuters, despite increasing its user base and subscriber numbers, Spotify is having to pay more tax on employee salaries, which is the reason for the price hike. If you've started looking at switching away from the music platform and want to cancel your Spotify Premium membership, we've rounded up the best, cheaper Spotify alternatives to subscribe to right now. Amazon Music Unlimited is the retail giant's premium music streaming service tier. With a subscription, you can listen to more than 100 million songs ad-free, offline and with unlimited skips. You also get access to Amazon Music's HD CD-quality tracks, lossless hi-res tracks and spatial audio. At the start of the year, Amazon hiked the price of its Amazon Music Unlimited streaming service, increasing the individual membership fee to £11.99, the same price as Spotify. But – and this is a big but – its individual subscription is £1 cheaper than Spotify's if you're subscribed to Amazon Prime (£10.99, and you get access to lossless audio. If you're a Prime member and don't subscribe to Amazon Music Unlimited, you get free access to all of Amazon Music's catalogue already, but you can only listen in shuffle mode and usually have to pick songs from Amazon's all-access music playlists. If you own a Fire TV stick or an Amazon Echo smart speaker, there is also a single-device subscription available for £5.99 a month. Individual plan: £10.99 per month Student plan: £5.49 per month Family plan: £16.99 per month (up to five additional members) Free trial: A one-month free trial is offered with a paid subscription Strip out all the cat videos, low-res vlogs and memes but keep all the songs, albums, remixes, live performances and music videos, then throw in some recommended playlists. That's YouTube Music Premium in a nutshell. If you subscribe to the service, you'll be able to play music in the background whenever your phone's screen is locked or you're using a different app. It also removes the ads and enables offline play. For an extra £2 per month (£1 more than Spotify Premium) you can get full YouTube Premium, which removes ads from all YouTube videos, watch using picture-in-picture mode, and listen to YouTube videos with your screen switched off. A subscription to YouTube Music Premium is cheaper than all of Spotify's plans, with the individual plan costing £1 less, and the family plan costing £3 less. Individual plan: £10.99 per month Student plan: £5.49 per month Family plan: £16.99 per month (up to six members) Free trial: A one-month free trial for new subscribers DJ extension: £9 extra on Individual and Student plans, for mixing music with stem separation Tidal sets itself apart as a streaming service with high-fidelity sound. The brainchild of the rapper Jay-Z, it bills itself as offering lossless music that sounds the way the artists intended it, and it pays artists one of the best fees per play. The streaming service features more than 110 million tracks, exclusive releases, interviews and music videos. Tidal simplified its pricing structure in April 2024, combining its two former tiers (HiFi and HiFi Plus) into a single subscription. All users pay £10.99 per month and get access to the platform's full suite of premium features, including high-fidelity FLAC audio, Master Quality Authenticated (MQA) tracks, and immersive formats like Dolby Atmos and Sony 360 Reality Audio, making it one of the best value music streaming services around. Last year, Tidal launched the DJ Extension, which lets users mix songs and separate stems, giving them access to enhanced BPM metadata within apps like rekordbox, Serato and DJ Pro. It costs an additional £9 on top of a regular Tidal subscription. Individual plan: £10.99 per month Student plan: £5.99 per month (with the first six months free) and a free subscription to Apple TV+ Family plan: £16.99 per month (up to six members) Free trial: A one-month free trial is available for new members, and six months free with the purchase of an eligible device Apple Music is, unsurprisingly, Apple's ad-free music streaming service. It has more than 100 million tracks, over 30,000 curated playlists, live radio and original shows, concerts and exclusives. Its entire catalogue can be listened to in lossless hi-res audio, and spatial audio can be enabled on its tracks. You can download up to 100,000 songs to play offline, and you also get access to Apple Music Classical – the new classical-only service – as well as Apple Music Sing, which is Apple's karaoke mode. In October 2022, Apple increased the price of its Apple Music subscription. An individual membership currently costs £1 less than a Spotify individual membership, while the family tier is £3 cheaper. It's good to note that you do get lossless hi-res audio and spatial audio with Apple Music, and students get a subscription to Apple TV+ for free. There is, of course, the Apple One subscription, which gives you up to six Apple subscriptions for one lower monthly price, including up to 2TB of iCloud+ storage and access to Apple Music. Individual plan: £11.99 per month (£8.99 per month if paid annually) Student plan: £5.99 per month Duo plan: £15.99 per month (£14.58 per month paid annually) Family plan: £19.99 per month (£18.25 per month paid annually), up to five additional members Free trial: A one-month free trial for new users In an alternate reality, Deezer could have been the Spotify of today, having launched a year before the Swedish company and featuring the same rich library of music and features. Deezer is free if you're prepared to put up with the ads, but the good stuff is all in its premium tier. It has more than 90 million tracks, and Deezer Premium gets rid of the ads, adds offline listening and high-fidelity FLAC audio, which Spotify lacks. As well as music, there are podcasts and radio stations, personalised recommendations and a Shazam-style SongCatcher feature to help identify tracks around you. Deezer also works on smartwatches, smart speakers and car audio systems. While Deezer is as expensive as Spotify, if you pay for a full-year subscription, you'll get a 25 per cent discount, making it significantly cheaper than Spotify. SoundCloud Go plan: £5.99 per month SoundCloud Go+ plan: £10.99 per month Student plan: Go+ for £5.49 per month Free trial: 7-day trial with Go, 30-day trial with Go+ Underground music fans will be very familiar with the music distribution platform SoundCloud. Launched in 2007, SoundCloud is a music streaming service for music producers, independent up-and-coming artists, podcast producers and their listeners, hoping to discover new music. It also has a giant library of 180 million tracks, mostly uploaded directly by artists. There are two premium SoundCloud tiers. SoundCloud Go costs £5.99 per month – it gets rid of all the ads and you get unlimited offline downloads. However, Go+ costs £10.99 per month and gets you access to SoundCloud's entire library, as well as higher-quality audio. SoundCloud Go+ is still significantly cheaper than Spotify. While it doesn't have a family plan, there is a student plan for £5.49 per month. The Go+ plan also lets you listen on up to three devices at once.
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Britain urged to let hero Afghans bring their families to UK after major data leak put thousands at risk
The government has been urged to let hero Afghans granted sanctuary in Britain bring their loved ones to the UK after a major data breach put the lives of up to 100,000 people at risk from the Taliban. More than 50 refugee charities and lawyers have written to Yvette Cooper, urging her to make it easier for Afghans who were allowed to relocate to the UK due to British links to bring family members – many of whom are at risk of reprisals – with them. The pleas come after revelations of a 'catastrophic' data leak at the Ministry of Defence in February 2022, which involved the details of thousands of Afghans who said they were in danger from the Taliban and had applied for sanctuary in Britain being shared online. The dataset, inadvertently sent out by a member of the armed forces, included the personal details of applicants to the MoD's Arap resettlement scheme, which allows Afghans who supported British troops to seek sanctuary in the UK. The leak was covered up by a superinjunction, which was lifted in July after The Independent challenged the draconian legal order at the High Court. Ms Cooper has now been told the government 'has no time to waste' if it 'wants to prevent the worst possible consequences of the data leak becoming a dire reality'. Charity workers and solicitors, including from Asylum Aid and modern slavery charity Kalayaan, told Ms Cooper: 'The UK government has a moral responsibility to the Afghan people who continue to suffer, including now as a result of the data leak and have no choice but to seek safety elsewhere. 'The 2022 data breach directly exposed Afghans still in the country to a risk of reprisals they were not even aware of, and the High Court, in lifting the superinjunction, recognised that its imposition may have increased the risks these people face.' The letter continued: 'Poor decision-making could yet again have exposed Afghans to serious harm, with many of these people having clear UK family ties'. They added: 'It is essential that those who were resettled under Arap and ACRS are able to live in safety and are given a fair opportunity to reunite with their families.' Unlike asylum routes, Afghans using Arap cannot sponsor family members to come to the UK under refugee reunion rules. The same applies to those relocated under ACRS, designed to help those who supported British values, such as journalists or women's rights activists. However, some may be able to make a separate immigration application. But charities and rights groups say these family routes are very restrictive and can often involve 'extremely costly application fees and require copious, specific documentation'. Decision-makers often refuse these applications from Afghan families, leading to lengthy appeals. Lib Dem MP Wendy Chamberlain, chair of the all-parliamentary group for Afghan women, said: 'There is already anecdotal evidence of reprisals on family members by the Taliban - the Home Office has no time to waste if the government wants to prevent the worst possible consequences of the data leak becoming a dire reality. 'The Home Office desperately needs to take a pragmatic and compassionate approach to allowing Afghans resettled in the UK to be reunited safely with their families. It is clear that these schemes have been seriously mis-handled, culminating in the recent exposure of the 2022 data leak.' In one recent case highlighted by The Independent, a security guard who worked for the British embassy in Kabul for almost two decades has been unable to bring his two eldest sons to the UK. Hamidullah Fahim and his wife Zaghona were brought to Britain with two young children in December 2023, but he couldn't bring his two eldest sons, who are now in their 20s. He said that his family is struggling with being separated, saying: 'We want to do whatever we can to be reunited with them and to let the Home Office know of the injustice that has been carried out in our case'. Isaac Shaffer, at Refugee Legal Support, said it was 'critical' that the government sped up decision-making on Arap cases in light of the data breach. He explained that most of the people he was helping 'have waited over a year for a final decision on their Arap application and have remained in hiding throughout; in constant fear, and in extraordinarily precarious circumstances', adding: 'Knowledge of this data breach has only exacerbated this fear and uncertainty'. James Tullett, CEO at charity Ramfel, who helped co-ordinate the letter, said: 'The government has acknowledged that the people they have resettled need protection and yet this offer of support comes with the heavy price of separation from family. 'Allowing Afghan families to reunite won't solve all the problems associated with the data leak, but it will make a monumental difference for the affected families'.
