Alina Habba Faces Federal Judges Over Her Job
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Alina Habba is facing federal judges on Monday in a meeting that will decide if she will step down or continue in her current role as the acting U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey.
President Donald Trump, for whom Habba previously served as personal legal counsel, announced her appointment to the role on March 24.
Habba's 120-day interim appointment is set to expire at midnight on Tuesday, July 22, 2025, unless extended by federal judges or Senate confirmation.
Newsweek contacted Habba for comment via email on Monday
Alina Habba speaks after being sworn in as interim US Attorney General for New Jersey, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, on March 28, 2025.
Alina Habba speaks after being sworn in as interim US Attorney General for New Jersey, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, on March 28, 2025.
Associated Press
Why It Matters
Alina Habba's temporary 120-day term as acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey will end if there is no confirmed extension. Federal judges are weighing whether to reappoint her or name a successor—an unresolved decision that could affect leadership, ongoing investigations, and prosecutorial direction in the state's top federal office.
What To Know
Federal judges in New Jersey are meeting Monday to consider whether to reappoint Habba or select a new acting U.S. Attorney, with no final decision yet publicly confirmed.
Habba was sued by Newark Mayor Ras Baraka for false arrest, malicious prosecution and defamation after his arrest during a protest an immigration detention center in Newark on May 9.
Habba dropped a trespassing charge against Barak that month.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has urged judges not to affirm her role. "The so-called U.S. Attorney in NJ maliciously indicted Congresswoman LaMonica McIver for doing her job. Alina Habba is a woefully unqualified political hack who has to go," he said on X on July 18. "She must be rejected by the Federal District Court judges who are considering whether to retain her."
Nonprofit advocacy organization The Article III Project filed a House ethics complaint against Jeffries, following his social media post.
What Are People Saying
The Trump administrations top civil rights lawyer, Harmeet K. Dhillon, said on Monday: "Who's delivering results for the American people? Alina Habba is doing a great job indicting criminals and putting Americans first — which begs the question when someone is doing their job so well, why would a politician pressure judges to undermine her?"
Senators Andy Kim and Cory Booker, the Democrats from New Jersey, said of Habba in a joint statement on July 2: "In her short tenure as interim US Attorney, she has degraded the office and pursued frivolous and politically motivated prosecutions. It's clear that Alina Habba does not meet the standard to serve the people of New Jersey."
Rep. Mikie Sherrill, the Democratic gubernatorial nominee who previously worked in the U.S. Attorney's Office, said Habba is unqualified for the job, and had no prosecutorial experience when Trump appointed her in an interim capacity in March, adding: "Habba has explicitly stated her goal to politicize the office where I served as a prosecutor, and as acting U.S. Attorney, she has already weaponized it against her perceived political opponents."
What Happens Next
The judicial decision is expected to later on Monday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
11 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Is Massachusetts about to legalize online casinos on your smartphone?
So who's putting this on the fast track? It's unclear who, but it will need get through House and Senate leadership. A spokesperson for Advertisement For those already in the gambling business, the stakes are high, and the politics of it all have made for strange bedfellows. On one side is homegrown sports betting behemoth DraftKings and arch rival FanDuel, which support the bills and stand to benefit by providing the digital platforms that power these games. Joining their camp: MGM Resorts International, which operates a casino in Springfield and online gaming platform BetMGM. Advertisement A DraftKings employee in the lobby of their Back Bay offices. Lane Turner/Globe Staff On the other side is Encore Boston Harbor, the Everett casino operated by Wynn Resorts, and UNITE HERE Local 26, the politically influential hospitality union with many members who work at Encore; they oppose the bills, saying online gaming would cannibalize the brick-and-mortar casino business and reduce jobs in the industry. And then there are those who are wary for fear it will create more problem gamblers by making it even easier to bet on your phone. Supporters and opponents of online casinos squared off during a DraftKings and FanDuel argued that online casinos should be legalized because there's already a robust illegal market, so why not regulate and tax it? According to the mostly on websites based outside the United States. It's the same argument that's been made to legalize sports betting in many states, including Massachusetts, ever since the Supreme Court struck down a federal ban in 2018. Since sports betting began in Massachusetts in early 2023, it has flourished here with billions of dollars wagered, generating more than $300 million in taxes and assessments, according to the Advertisement Type 'online casino in Massachusetts,' and you quickly realize how we're all one Google search away from trying our luck. Seven states, including Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Jersey, have legalized internet casino gaming, and proponents estimate that if Massachusetts levied a 20 percent tax, the state could generate $230 million to $275 million a year in new revenue. (That's the same tax rate as online-only sports betting, while land-based resort casinos are assessed at 25 percent.) And with state lawmakers facing tough budget decisions this year, David Prestwood, a government affairs manager at DraftKings, knew exactly what to tell the Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure. 'This money may be especially critical for Massachusetts in the face of anticipated federal funding cuts and reductions in state and local aid,' he said at last month's hearing. Online casinos may seem no different than sports betting, but their appeal runs broader and deeper than placing a bet on a baseball game. And internet gambling is far different than going to a brick-and-mortar casino, which requires getting there and interacting with staff. Online, you can gamble in your pajamas. 'There's all these friction points where the player has the chance to think twice with about placing the next bet,' said Mark Stewart, a board member of the Advertisement Stewart, who is general counsel of The Cordish Companies, a Baltimore real estate and casino developer, testified virtually at the hearing, while Encore Boston Harbor president Jenny Holaday provided written testimony opposing online gaming and warned how it could result in a 'dramatic reduction in the associated taxes that Encore pays to the Commonwealth,' a sum that has totaled nearly $1 billion since the casino opened in 2019. The owner of Encore Casino in Everett is pushing to stop a bill on Beacon Hill that would broadly legalize online gambling on slots and poker games. John Tlumacki/Globe Staff Encore employs about 3,300 workers, about a third of whom are part of Local 26. A union representative also testified against the bills, citing an independent research analysis funded by the (A It's shaping up as a test of who has more clout on Beacon Hill — Encore and its coalition of boots-on-the-ground supporters in the unions and Everett, or tech companies that have deep pockets. Brick-and-mortar casinos could get in on the game, too. The legislation sets aside licenses for the state's existing casino operators, along with four licenses for internet gaming platforms. Along with slots, they'd allow poker, blackjack, craps, and even games with a live dealer. But what about the I can't imagine state Treasurer and Lottery chair, Deb Goldberg, being happy about online casinos, which could eat into lottery profits. The lottery in fiscal 2024 netted nearly Advertisement 'If online gaming expands, we must ensure the Lottery is supported and stays competitive,' Goldberg said in a statement. 'Every dollar spent on private platforms could mean less for our cities and towns and early childhood education.' Then there are concerns about addiction, with calls to the surging since sports betting was legalized. Lia Nower, director of the Center for Gambling Studies at Rutgers University said what drives up the risk of problem gambling is giving people more options. 'There's a cumulative effect,' she said. 'The more things that you gamble on, the more often you gamble and the more venues in which you gamble, the higher your risk.' In this digital era, online casinos may feel inevitable, yet internet gambling is so new we don't really know how addictive it could be, especially among young bettors. Remember how we initially thought social media was just fun and games? Critics of online gaming say it reduces barriers to problem gambling, compared with going to a brick-and-mortar casino. Steve Helber/Associated Press Yet the pressure will be intense from a gaming industry that's keen to keep expanding online. Boston-based Why? Just follow the money, explains Nower. 'It's the cash cow for the industry,' she said. State Senator Paul Feeney — who is sponsoring the online casino legislation with state Representative Daniel Cahill — said lawmakers are well aware the need to carefully weigh all the costs and benefits, in particular the investments made by land-based casinos which he described as 'sacrosanct.' Advertisement Yet there's also an urgency with the state facing budget pressures. 'I wouldn't say that anything is on a fast track,' said Feeney. 'There's a renewed interest in looking at how we can maximize tax revenue without broad-based tax increases on residents.' We tend to give the Legislature a hard time for moving too slowly, but this time we shouldn't. At the very least, the state should conduct its own independent analysis, rather than relying on industry-funded studies to weigh the impact on existing land-based casinos and the lottery, and whether it would create a new class of problem gamblers. Online gaming is too big of a gamble to not get this right. Shirley Leung is a Business columnist. She can be reached at
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Plotting an escape from (Trump's) Alcatraz
There was a time, not long ago, when Republicans and Democrats actually got along. They considered members of the other party adversaries, not enemies and, after sparring during the day over policy disagreements, they'd often hang out together, even become friends. When I read that Attorney General Pam Bondi and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum were visiting Alcatraz last week, hailing it as the site of a new federal prison, I remembered my own friendship as a Democrat with the late Tony Blankley, then one of the Republican Party's brightest stars. Born a Brit, Blankley came to the U.S. and became a force in American politics: deputy attorney general of California; speechwriter for President Reagan; staffer for Rep. Bobbi Fiedler (R-Calif.); and press secretary to House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.). He loved working for Gingrich, Blankley once told me, because he was such a policy geek. He'd come in every morning, Blankley related, with at least ten new ideas he'd thought of in the shower. But only one or two of them, Blankley quickly admitted, might be viable. The rest, he'd tell the Speaker, weren't even worth considering. That's one of the most important functions of any political staffer: the willingness to tell your boss he's dead wrong. It's too bad there's nobody like that around Donald Trump. He's filled his Cabinet and White House staff with nothing but loyalists who ask, 'How high?' when he says 'Jump.' Apparently, there's nobody willing to tell him the truth. Like the truth about Trump's plan — reportedly hatched after watching a rerun of Clint Eastwood's film 'Escape from Alcatraz' — to restore Alcatraz as a maximum security federal prison. It has to be the dumbest of all the dumb ideas Trump has ever proposed as president. But, rather than tell Trump he's wrong, Bondi and Burgum, like the sycophants they are, went out to Alcatraz on July 17, trying to sell his plan. They're wasting their time. It's never going to happen. Alcatraz was shut down as a federal prison in 1963, sixty-two years ago, for good reason. Because of constant exposure to salt spray, its walls were literally falling apart and in need of support. The island had no running water and no sewer system. All food and water had to be brought in by boat every day, and trash and human waste taken out. A 1959 report indicated the prison was three times more expensive to run than the average American prison and far too expensive to maintain. At first, the Bureau of Prisons tried to make improvements, then gave it up as a lost cause. I've been there recently. It's in even worse shape today. In fact, the existing structures are beyond repair. Engineers agree that the only way to recreate a prison on the island would be to raze all existing buildings and build a new prison from scratch. According to administration officials, as Axios scooped last week, that project would cost $2 billion, take years to complete, and they'd still have to bring in food and water every day and take out the waste. No matter how badly Trump would like to see it happen, $2 billion's a lot of money to spend for a prison we don't need. In fact, 84 new federal prisons have been built since 1963, making a total of 120 facilities today. All of which have plenty of room because America's prison population is rapidly declining. According to The Atlantic, from a peak of 1.6 million inmates in 2009, the prison population declined to 1.2 million in 2023 and is expected to sink to 600,000 by 2026. Those are the facts, which everybody seems to know except Donald Trump. But, surely, the facts about Alcatraz should be enough for Burgum, Bondi or chief of staff Susie Wiles to tell the president: 'This is a dumb idea. It's too expensive, it'll take too long, and we don't need it.' And, while they're at it, maybe they could talk Trump out of a few other dumb ideas, like buying Greenland, revoking Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship or forcing the Washington Commanders to change their name back to 'Redskins.'
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Rahm Emanuel on ‘blinded' Hunter Biden criticism: ‘I think we're giving this more time than it's due'
Former U.S. Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel, who is considering a 2028 presidential run, brushed off criticism from former President Biden's son, Hunter, who accused Emanuel of walking away from the party's values. Emanuel responded on Monday to a clip of the younger Biden's remarks during an interview on SiriusXM's 'The Megyn Kelly Show,' saying he's 'got empathy' for him, but doesn't take the criticism too seriously. 'I think we're giving this more time than it's due,' he said. 'That's my own view. A little empathetic, you have a son who's blinded by his own love for, in effect, and loyalty for his father, and I get that, but not the first phone call I'm going to make for a strategery.' Earlier Monday, Hunter Biden paraphrased remarks from 'Rahm f—ing Emanuel' in an interview with journalist and YouTube personality Andrew Callaghan. 'We got to understand that these people are really mad, and we got to appeal to these white voters,' Biden said. He then responded to the sentiment. 'Rahm, the only people that f—ing appeal to those f—ing white voters was Joe Biden,' he replied. '81 years old and he got 81 million votes… not because he appeased their f—ing Trumpian sense but because he challenged it, and he said, 'You can be an 81-year-old Catholic from f—ing Scranton that doesn't understand it but still has empathy for transgender people and immigrants.'' Emanuel has served in a multitude of political positions — from Chicago mayor to former President Obama's White House chief of staff, to senior adviser to former President Clinton to chair of the House Democrats' campaign arm, among others. He has indicated his interest in launching a 2028 presidential run and has begun to position himself to the right of some progressive members of his party. In the same interview, Emanuel told Kelly that he does not think a man can 'become a woman,' breaking with his party on the issue of transgender rights.
