logo
I asked AI to predict 2026 — here's the boldest forecasts from ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude

I asked AI to predict 2026 — here's the boldest forecasts from ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude

Tom's Guide4 days ago

We live in an era where AI models can generate art, code software and even predict protein structures. But can they predict cultural trends?
As we hurtle toward the mid-2020s, predicting what comes next feels more challenging than ever. Technology evolves at breakneck speed; cultural shifts happen overnight on social media; and entire industries reinvent themselves annually.
So I decided to turn to the experts — or at least the artificial ones. I posed the same question to ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.0 and Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Predict the biggest trends we'll see in 2026 across technology, culture, fashion, and entertainment. What's going to be in, what's going out, and why?
Their responses were fascinating, surprisingly different, and revealed just how uniquely each AI approaches predictions. Here's what they told me.
Technology was Gemini's strongest suit. It predicted that 2026 will be the year of "agentic AI" — AI systems that don't just respond to prompts but actually set goals and execute plans autonomously. Gemini also emphasized multimodal AI becoming mainstream, where your AI assistant can simultaneously analyze your screenshot, hear your voice command, and understand the context of your email.
On culture, Gemini painted a fascinating picture of contradictions. It predicted a "Dark Mode" mindset taking hold, not just in UI design but in overall aesthetics. Think moodier fashion, darker music, and social media content that pushes back against toxic positivity. Simultaneously, it forecasted a "Cosy Comeback" with people craving comfort and slow living as an antidote to hustle culture.
The AI also made a bold prediction about cultural preservation becoming trendy among young people, with brands needing to genuinely respect tradition rather than simply appropriating it for marketing.
Fashion predictions were surprisingly specific. Gemini named exact colors for Spring/Summer 2026: Transformative Teal, Electric Fuchsia, Blue Aura, Amber Haze, and Jelly Mint. It predicted that plaid would become a neutral (wear it head-to-toe, apparently) and that brown teddy coats would be everywhere.
In technology, ChatGPT made some counterintuitive predictions. While other AIs focused on AI advancement, ChatGPT predicted that "generic chatbots" would be out by 2026. The novelty of "just talking to a chatbot" will wear off unless the experience is highly personalized. It also boldly declared that "crypto-as-a-lifestyle" is over.
It also predicted the rise of "AI-native apps", applications built entirely around AI interactions rather than having AI features bolted on. It also forecasted that local AI models would boom as people grow wary of cloud data collection.
ChatGPT's cultural predictions felt the most human. It identified "digital decluttering" and "analog luxe" as major trends, predicting people will increasingly crave low-tech moments and artisanal experiences. This aligns with the growing backlash against screen time and digital overwhelm. It also predicted "AI-ethics as status" — where knowing how your AI works becomes the new social flex.
Fashion-wise, ChatGPT predicted a "color comeback" after years of washed-out minimalism, calling it "dopamine dressing 2.0." It also forecasted the rise of "post-normcore utilitywear". Perhaps fittingly, ChatGPT was the only AI to coin terms that sounded like they'd already gone viral on TikTok.
And its entertainment predictions were bold: it declared that "endless franchise reboots" would be out. Given superhero fatigue and the mixed reception of long-running franchises, this feels prescient.
Claude took the most integrated approach, emphasizing "seamless integration" over isolated trends. It predicted AI-powered AR/VR experiences that adapt to individual users, emphasizing that by 2026, these technologies would feel natural rather than a novelty. Claude came with receipts: $200.87 billion AR/VR market by 2030, adding analytical heft to its predictions.
In culture, Claude introduced the concept of "The Great Redirection", driven by elections in 64 countries with half the world's population voting in 2024-2025. This political angle was unique among the three AIs. Claude argued that all this voting would make people crave genuine, community-driven experiences over manufactured cultural trends.
Claude also forecast "The Great Unretirement" with seniors returning to work, a trend that's already emerging but could accelerate by 2026.
Fashion predictions centered on "Bio-Harmony". Claude went beyond typical trend forecasting to predict bio-engineered materials inspired by ecosystems, with garments designed as "second skins" that grow, evolve and biodegrade. By far, this was by far the most futuristic prediction across all three AIs.
It's entertainment analysis was market-focused, predicting gaming would surpass $300 billion by 2028 and that advertising-supported streaming would become the primary growth model. It provided specific revenue projections, noting ad revenue would hit $1 trillion in 2026.
This exercise revealed something fascinating about how different AI models approach uncertainty. Each seemed to default to its training strengths: Gemini acted like a data analyst, ChatGPT like a cultural critic, and Claude like a researcher trying to connect the dots
None of the AIs claimed certainty — they all acknowledged that prediction is inherently speculative. But their different approaches suggests AI prediction works best as a group project, with each model bringing its own analytical superpowers to the table.
As we head toward 2026, the truth will likely incorporate elements from all three perspectives. I thought it was really interesting that each AI's predictions revealed as much about its own "personality" as about the future itself.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Google is working on a new Gemini logo with familiar colors
Google is working on a new Gemini logo with familiar colors

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Google is working on a new Gemini logo with familiar colors

Just when we thought Gemini couldn't be Google-fied anymore, the Mountain View, California-based company succeeded in surprising us. Soon after the tech giant began rolling out Song Search on the Android Gemini app, paired with support for Scheduled Actions, it now seems to be giving the Gemini app and its logo a more Google-esque look. The app's familiar blue and purple tone, which can be observed across instances of the Gemini branding, is in the midst of being replaced with a more colorful hue — one that looks similar to Google Assistants signature multicolored branding. Hints about the redesign were spotted in the latest Google app beta build (version beta) by the folks over at Android Authority, surfacing Google's well-known color palette across the app's UI. Old, new, old, new The change was observed in the app's splash screen, which highlights an animated red, yellow, green, and blue Gemini logo for a brief second when you open a new instance of the app. Similarly, the logo on the onboarding screen appears in the same Google-themed colors, as seen in the screenshots above. Eagle-eyed users would have also spotted the lack of blue and purple on the "Get to know Gemini, your AI assistant" text at the top. The change also makes its way to the Gemini logo that appears above the AI tool's responses. These aren't huge changes by any means, and won't change the way users utilize Gemini. However, the refresh does make the experience feel a little more aligned and consistent with Google's overall brand identity. For what it's worth, these changes were manually enabled, and they won't surface for you in the beta build of the app just yet. The changes will likely make their way out widely with a future update, which might happen around the time when Google Assistant is fully phased out later this year. Google Gemini Google LLC PRODUCTIVITY Price: Free 4.5 Download

Europe's bold AI play spells jackpot for Nvidia and AMD
Europe's bold AI play spells jackpot for Nvidia and AMD

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Europe's bold AI play spells jackpot for Nvidia and AMD

Another day, another round of goodies for AI's finest. It seems like the AI Santa isn't done stuffing Nvidia's (NVDA) and AMD's (AMD) proverbial stockings just yet. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Over the past few years, high-margin AI accelerators have been flying out the door, cementing Nvidia stock's near-monopoly while positioning AMD stock as a top contender. Many felt the boom was done, but think again as Europe flexes its muscles to push for tech independence. That means big factories, billions in chips, and Nvidia and AMD riding right at the heart of the AI cash train, as recent moves show. Image source: Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images Though often grouped together, Nvidia and AMD play two distinct roles in the AI-accelerator spectrum. When it comes to market share, Nvidia sits firmly at the top. Its powerful GPUs run nine out of 10 AI deployments (90% market share), thanks to big bets in high-performance chips and its powerhouse CUDA software playbook. Related: Veteran analyst offers eye-popping Nvidia, Microsoft stock prediction On the flip side, AMD accounts for roughly 10% to 20% of the market, up substantially from around the 5% mark last year. Nvidia's latest Blackwell GPUs are also slicing through AI workloads like a knife. Its cutting-edge new GPUs effectively slash the chips needed to train massive language models like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok. More AI Stock News: Veteran analyst issues big Broadcom call, shakes up AI stock raceVeteran analyst drops bold new call on Nvidia stockGemini, ChatGPT may lose the AI war to deep-pocketed rival Moreover, booming demand numbers suggest that Nvidia will keep riding this wave well into the next decade. Meanwhile, AMD, under Lisa Su's dynamic leadership, is refusing to sit on the sidelines. The tech giant has a two-pronged approach, targeting sharper hardware and a stronger open-source software stack. The MI300 chips kicked things off in 2023, but it's the MI350s that investors are salivating over, boosting performance by up to 35×. Also, AMD's software improvements and its move to buy ZT Systems show it's dead serious about offering full-stack AI solutions. So while Nvidia sets the bar high, AMD's pricing and open ecosystem keep the race mighty interesting. Plans for European gigafactories to crank out AI hardware are picking up in a big way. The European Commission has already received submissions calling for at least 3 million next-generation GPUs. Henna Virkkunen, in charge of tech sovereignty and security for the EU, confirmed that the region is looking to lock in those chips to build its supply-chain muscle. Currently, companies operating inside or outside Europe have pitched 76 factory projects across 16 member states at 60 sites. In March, Brussels pledged $23 billion to back four flagship AI gigafactories. The final call on plant locations is expected by year-end to substantially reduce dependence on overseas suppliers and protect Europe's chip supply from future shocks. This development puts a big spotlight on Nvidia and AMD, the two giants in the AI accelerator game. Naturally, for both chip giants, Europe's mega orders spell billions in fresh sales and tighter market control. Related: Veteran analyst drops jaw-dropping Tesla stock target Europe's big push for AI gigafactories has everything to do with taking control of its tech future. Reports suggest that the EU uses about 20% of the world's chips, while producing just 9%, leaving it exposed to supply shocks and global tensions. By locking in orders for at least 3 million next-gen GPUs, the goal is to bring more AI hardware production back home. Nvidia and AMD are front and center in this mega plan. Nvidia's CEO, Jensen Huang, is all-in on Europe, inking massive sovereign AI deals all across the region. Putting things in perspective, analysts expect the global sovereign-AI market to hit $1.5 trillion by 2030, with Europe accounting for 8% of that. AMD's Lisa Su is equally bullish. She feels the AI accelerator chip market could surge to $500 billion by 2028, on the back of European data-center expansion and massive AI rollouts. The AI-chip market is already on fire, and experts predict a massive jump from $31.6 billion in 2025 to nearly $850 billion by 2035. Related: Analyst reboots AMD stock price target on chip update The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

How Do You Teach Computer Science in the AI Era?
How Do You Teach Computer Science in the AI Era?

Miami Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

How Do You Teach Computer Science in the AI Era?

Carnegie Mellon University has a well-earned reputation as one of the nation's top schools for computer science. Its graduates go on to work at big tech companies, startups and research labs worldwide. Still, for all its past success, the department's faculty is planning a retreat this summer to rethink what the school should be teaching to adapt to the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence. The technology has 'really shaken computer science education,' said Thomas Cortina, a professor and an associate dean of the university's undergraduate programs. Computer science, more than any other field of study, is being challenged by generative AI. The AI technology behind chatbots such as ChatGPT, which can write essays and answer questions with humanlike fluency, is making inroads across academia. But AI is coming fastest and most forcefully to computer science, which emphasizes writing code, the language of computers. Big tech companies and startups have introduced AI assistants that can generate code and are rapidly becoming more capable. And in January, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta's CEO, predicted that AI technology would effectively match the performance of a midlevel software engineer sometime this year. Computer science programs at universities across the country are now scrambling to understand the implications of the technological transformation, grappling with what to keep teaching in the AI era. Ideas range from less emphasis on mastering programming languages to focusing on hybrid courses designed to inject computing into every profession, as educators ponder what the tech jobs of the future will look like in an AI economy. 'We're seeing the tip of the AI tsunami,' said Jeannette Wing, a computer science professor and executive vice president of research at Columbia University. Heightening the sense of urgency is a tech job market that has tightened in recent years. Computer science graduates are finding that job offers, once plentiful, are often scarce. Tech companies are relying more on AI for some aspects of coding, eliminating some entry-level work. Some educators now believe the discipline could broaden to become more like a liberal arts degree, with a greater emphasis on critical thinking and communication skills. The National Science Foundation is funding a program, Level Up AI, to bring together university and community college educators and researchers to move toward a shared vision of the essentials of AI education. The 18-month project, run by the Computing Research Association, a research and education nonprofit, in partnership with New Mexico State University, is organizing conferences and roundtables and producing white papers to share resources and best practices. The NSF-backed initiative was created because of 'a sense of urgency that we need a lot more computing students -- and more people -- who know about AI in the workforce,' said Mary Lou Maher, a computer scientist and a director of the Computing Research Association. The future of computer science education, Maher said, is likely to focus less on coding and more on computational thinking and AI literacy. Computational thinking involves breaking down problems into smaller tasks, developing step-by-step solutions and using data to reach evidence-based conclusions. AI literacy is an understanding -- at varying depths for students at different levels -- of how AI works, how to use it responsibly and how it is affecting society. Nurturing informed skepticism, she said, should be a goal. At Carnegie Mellon, as faculty members prepare for their gathering, Cortina said his view was that the coursework should include instruction in the traditional basics of computing and AI principles, followed by plenty of hands-on experience designing software using the new tools. 'We think that's where it's going,' he said. 'But do we need a more profound change in the curriculum?' Currently, individual computer science professors choose whether to allow students to use AI. Last year, Carnegie Mellon endorsed using AI for introductory courses. Initially, Cortina said, many students regarded AI as a 'magic bullet' to quickly complete homework assignments that involved writing programs. 'But they didn't understand half of what the code was,' he said, leading many to realize the value of knowing how to write and debug code themselves. 'The students are resetting.' That's true for many computer science students embracing the new AI tools, with some reservations. They say they use AI for building initial prototype programs, for checking for errors in code and as a digital tutor to answer questions. But they are reluctant to rely on it too much, fearing it dulls their computing acumen. Many students say they send out 100 to 200 applications for summer internships and first jobs. Connor Drake, who will be a senior next fall at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, counts himself lucky, having scored an interview after submitting only 30 applications. He was offered a job as a cybersecurity intern this summer for Duke Energy, a large utility company, in Charlotte. 'A computer science degree used to be a golden ticket to the promised land of jobs,' Drake, 22, said. 'That's no longer the case.' Drake's personal AI-defense strategy is to expand his skill set. In addition to his computer science major, he has minored in political science with a specialty in security and intelligence studies -- a field where his expertise in cybersecurity could well be applied. He is president of a university cybersecurity club and has served in student government. Drake, like other computer science students, has been forced to adjust to an increasingly tough tech job market. Several factors, labor experts say, are at work. Big tech companies, in particular, have curbed their hiring for the past few years, a sharp pullback from the pandemic-era boom years. The exception is the hectic recruiting of a relatively small number of the most coveted AI experts, who are being offered lucrative pay packages. But most technology workers do not work for tech companies. Overall employment for workers in tech occupations had generally held up until recently -- down 6% since February, according to government statistics. Employers have sent a sharper signal with a significant pullback in tech job listings. In the past three years, there has been a 65% drop from companies seeking workers with two years of experience or less, according to an analysis by CompTIA, a technology research and education organization. The decline in listings for tech workers with all levels of experience is down 58%. 'We're mainly seeing a postpandemic unwinding of hiring and the impact of the current economic uncertainty,' said Tim Herbert, chief research officer at CompTIA. 'We don't really have a clear AI effect yet.' While the road ahead for computer science education may be uncertain, the market for AI-assisted software is poised for growth, experts say. AI is a productivity tool, and every new wave of computing -- the personal computer, the internet, the smartphone -- has increased the demand for software and for programmers. This time, they say, the result may be a burst of technology democratization as chatbot-style tools are used by people in fields from medicine to marketing to create their own programs, tailored for their industry, fed by industry-specific data sets. 'The growth in software engineering jobs may decline, but the total number of people involved in programming will increase,' said Alex Aiken, a professor of computer science at Stanford University. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store