logo
BBC faces new questions over board member Robbie Gibb's Gaza coverage influence

BBC faces new questions over board member Robbie Gibb's Gaza coverage influence

The BBC is facing new questions over the role pro-Israel board member Robbie Gibb may have played in the broadcaster's Gaza coverage, with a report in Prospect Magazine alleging he may have held discussions with the BBC's director general and chairman about the network's reporting.
Alan Rusbridger, the editor of Prospect Magazine and a former editor at the Guardian, wrote on Wednesday that the BBC had told him Gibb had not recused himself from any discussions "about the BBC's coverage of the Israel-Gaza conflict".
Rusbridger wrote that he further asked the BBC whether Gibb had any conversations about the Gaza: Doctors Under Attack documentary, and received a "somewhat cryptic response".
A BBC spokesperson reportedly said that "[Gibb] had no formal role in any of the discussions or decisions about whether the BBC should run the film - I'm afraid I have no way of knowing whether BBC board members have had discussions about various live issues affecting the BBC but as I've said before, the decisions about the film were taken by BBC News."
Rusbridger concluded that it was "reasonable to assume, I think, that Gibb may have had informal discussions."
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Middle East Eye reached out to the BBC for comment on Rusbridger's claims but did not receive a response by time of publication.
Earlier this week, more than 400 cultural figures signed a letter calling on Gibb to resign from the board over fears he is harming the broadcaster's credibility.
A range of filmmakers, actors and journalists - including Miriam Margolyes, Alexei Sayle, Juliet Stevenson, Mike Leigh and William Dalrymple - signed the letter, which raised "concerns over opaque editorial decisions and censorship at the BBC on the reporting of Israel/Palestine".
Gibb's role 'untenable'
Gibb was part of a consortium that bought out the Jewish Chronicle outlet in 2020 and still declares on the BBC website that he has a 100 percent holding of the outlet.
'[The] inconsistent manner in which guidance is applied draws into focus the role of Gibb, on the BBC Board and BBC's editorial standards committee," said the letter this week, which was signed by 111 BBC journalists.
They also referenced the BBC's decision not to air Gaza: Doctors Under Attack over alleged concerns about its impartiality.
Media figures demand resignation of pro-Israel BBC board member Robbie Gibb Read More »
"We, the undersigned BBC staff, freelancers and industry figures are extremely concerned that the BBC's reporting on Israel and Palestine continues to fall short of the standards our audiences expect," reads the letter.
"We believe the role of Robbie Gibb, both on the board, and as part of the editorial standards committee, is untenable. We call on the BBC to do better for our audiences and recommit to our values of impartiality, honesty and reporting without fear or favour."
The BBC has faced criticism from pro-Palestinian campaigners over its coverage of the war in Gaza since October 2023. They say they it has unfairly and disproportionately featured Israeli perspectives on the network.
A report released by the Centre For Media Monitoring last month said that the BBC gave Israeli deaths 33 times more coverage per fatality and ran almost equal numbers of humanising victim profiles, despite 34 times more Palestinian deaths.
Last year Rusbridger, who has previously investigated the Jewish Chronicle's ownership, called into question Gibb's position on the BBC's editorial standards committee.
'I can't see how he can possibly sit on that committee and portray himself as a beacon of impartiality, sitting in judgement on BBC journalists,' Rusbridger told LBC Radio.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UAE Foreign Minister meets Israeli opposition leader in Abu Dhabi
UAE Foreign Minister meets Israeli opposition leader in Abu Dhabi

Dubai Eye

time31 minutes ago

  • Dubai Eye

UAE Foreign Minister meets Israeli opposition leader in Abu Dhabi

His Highness Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the UAE's Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, has met with Israel's opposition leader Yair Lapid. The meeting in Abu Dhabi focused on the evolving UAE-Israel relations and key developments in the Middle East - with a focus on Gaza. Sheikh Abdullah emphasised the UAE's support for a ceasefire, the release of hostages and the safe delivery of aid to civilians. He also stressed the importance of reviving peace talks based on the two-state solution to ensure long-term regional stability. Abdullah bin Zayed meets with Yair Lapid #WamNews — WAM English (@WAMNEWS_ENG) July 4, 2025

UK High Court rejects bid to halt Palestine Action terror list ban
UK High Court rejects bid to halt Palestine Action terror list ban

Middle East Eye

time41 minutes ago

  • Middle East Eye

UK High Court rejects bid to halt Palestine Action terror list ban

The High Court in London has rejected an attempt to temporarily block the UK government's move to ban Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, following an appeal by the group's co-founder. Lawyers representing Huda Ammori, co-founder of the pro-Palestinian direct action group, appeared before the court on Friday to challenge the decision by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to proscribe the group under terrorism laws. But after the hearing. judge Mr Justice Chamberlain said: "I have concluded that the harm which would ensue if interim relief is refused but the claim later succeeds is insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order of force. 'In reaching this decision I have borne in mind my assessment of the merits of the claim at this early stage.' The ban is scheduled to take effect this weekend. A further hearing is scheduled for 21 July when thr group is expected to apply for a judicial review to overturn the ban. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Palestine Action, known for targeting companies involved in the Israeli arms trade, has denied any links to terrorism and described the government's move as politically motivated. During the hearing, lawyers for Ammori criticised the government's assessment, highlighting that plans to proscribe the group had been in place as early as March, well before last month's incident claimed by the group at RAF Brize Norton where two military planes were sprayed with red paint. "Why move to proscribe before then? They put their bodies on the line between the genocide and violations of international law and the munitions and airplanes," said Blinne Nessa Aine Ni Ghralaigh, one of Ammori's legal representatives. "The context for why the Home Secretary has proscribed Palestine Action is materially relevant - and that is the situation in Gaza. It is an annihilation, it is a genocide, according to rights groups, leading academics, scholars, and many states including Ireland." Aine Ni Ghralaigh added that the proscription could cause 'irreparable harm' to individuals and civil society groups, warning that vague and ambiguous language in the order could lead to widespread self-censorship and a broader chilling effect on protest and free expression. Friday's hearing aimed both to pause the implementation of the ban and to determine whether Palestine Action can mount a full legal challenge against the proscription order. Israel's war on Gaza: Who are Palestine Action? Read More » The government's order to proscribe the group followed a vote in Parliament on Wednesday, during which MPs approved the order. Alongside Palestine Action, the proscription order also included the Maniacs Murder Cult, a neo-Nazi group, and the Russian Imperial Movement, a white supremacist organisation. The move came after Palestine Action activists broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire last month using electric scooters and sprayed two RAF planes with red paint. Prime Minister Keir Starmer condemned the act as 'disgraceful,' while the Ministry of Defence claimed the activists caused £7 million in damages. Following the parliamentary vote, Palestine Action criticised the Home Secretary for "bundling our domestic civil disobedience protest group in with two violent neo-Nazi militias". "Many MPs told us that, as a consequence, they felt they did not have the option to vote against the measure," the group said in a statement. Ten Labour MPs, including Liverpool MP Richard Burgon, voted against the government. Burgon warned that the ban risked 'criminalising thousands of volunteers and supporters.' Outside the High Court on Friday, hundreds gathered to protest the government's designation of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. The court proceedings came a day after four activists linked to the RAF Brize Norton protest were denied bail at Westminster Magistrates' Court. The defendants - Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29; Jony Cink, 24; Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 35; and Lewie Chiaramello, 22 - were charged with conspiracy to commit criminal damage and conspiracy to enter a prohibited place for purposes prejudicial to national safety. District Judge Daniel Steinberg denied bail over concerns that the four might commit further offences if released. They are due to appear at the Central Criminal Court on 18 July for a plea hearing. During Thursday's bail hearing, several supporters were ejected from the courtroom after chanting 'Free, free Palestine' as proceedings concluded.

Palestine Action fails in court bid to stop terrorist ban
Palestine Action fails in court bid to stop terrorist ban

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Palestine Action fails in court bid to stop terrorist ban

Palestine Action failed in a bid to halt its proscription as a terrorist organisation after a legal challenge against the move. Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, brought the legal challenge against the Home Office over Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe the group under the Terrorism Act 2000. The motion could become law as early as this weekend once it has been signed off by Ms Cooper. Membership or support for the direct action group becomes a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The move was announced after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action. Police said it caused around £7 million worth of damage. The group claimed aircraft were involved in supporting Israel in its military action in Gaza via the RAF base at Akrotiri in Cyprus. At a hearing at the High Court in London on Friday, Mr Justice Chamberlain was asked to grant "interim relief" to Ms Ammori, which would have temporarily block the legislation from coming into effect at midnight on Saturday as currently planned. Raza Husain KC, representing Ms Ammori, told the court he move was an 'ill-considered' and an 'authoritarian abuse' of power. Mr Husain said: 'This is the first time in our history that a direct action civil disobedience group, which does not advocate for violence, has been sought to be proscribed as terrorists.' He said Ms Ammori 'was inspired by the long tradition of direct action in this country' and wished to take action 'to prevent harm before it happens'. The group had 'never encouraged harm to any person at all' and that its goal 'is to put ourselves in the way of the military machine'. But Mr Justice Chamberlain asked him: 'What was the point of that if not to influence the UK Government?' The judge added that the action 'was designed to influence the British Government, to stop doing what the claimant thinks they're doing from Akrotiri'. He said that an assessment on whether to ban Palestine Action under terrorist laws had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton. Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, told the High Court that Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission, a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. 'The serious issue to be tried is met in full by the adequate alternative remedy that Parliament has provided," he said. Four people - Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 - have all been charged in connection with the incident. They appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday after being charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977. They were remanded into custody and will appear at the Old Bailey on July 18. Counter Terrorism Policing South East said on Wednesday that a 41-year-old woman arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender had been released on bail until September 19, and a 23-year-old man who was arrested has been released without charge.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store