logo
Pentagon's Pizza Index has accurately predicted 21 crises: Is WWIII next?

Pentagon's Pizza Index has accurately predicted 21 crises: Is WWIII next?

Economic Times16-06-2025

WWIII News: A quirky Cold War-era theory has resurfaced online: the 'Pentagon Pizza Index.' It links spikes in pizza orders near the Pentagon with looming global crises. Social media users, pointing to past conflicts and recent Middle East tensions, believe delivery surges signal government urgency. Analysts now use open-source tools like Google Maps to monitor pizzeria traffic near U.S. defence hubs. While not definitive, the pattern has been oddly consistent — leaving many wondering if America's next big move is hiding in plain sight, in a pizza box.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Cold war roots of the pizza theory
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
WWIII warning: What is the Pentagon Pizza Index today?
The April 2024 pizza spike
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Inside the logic: Why pizza?
World War III: Pizza as a proxy for preparedness
Official silence, public curiosity
As tensions rise in the Middle East, a curious, crowd-driven theory known as the ' Pentagon Pizza Index' has caught fire online. On June 12 and 13, users on X (formerly Twitter) reported a sudden spike in pizza deliveries near the Pentagon and Department of Defense in Washington, D.C., sparking speculation that the United States may be quietly entering crisis mode behind closed doors.The timing? Just hours before Israel reportedly struck targets in Iran in response to Tehran's earlier drone and missile attacks. And once again, pizza orders were booming.What began as a Soviet spy trick is now a digital-age memeThe idea isn't new. During the Cold War, Soviet operatives observed pizza delivery activity in Washington, believing it signalled crisis preparation inside U.S. intelligence circles. They coined it 'Pizzint' — short for pizza intelligence.This tactic entered public lore on 1 August 1990, when Frank Meeks, a Domino's franchisee in Washington, noticed a sudden surge in deliveries to CIA buildings. The next day, Iraq invaded Kuwait. Meeks later told the Los Angeles Times he saw a similar pattern in December 1998 during the impeachment hearings of President Bill Clinton.As former CNN Pentagon correspondent Wolf Blitzer once joked in 1990, 'Bottom line for journalists: Always monitor the pizzas.'A meme, an OSINT tool, or a symptom of digital-age paranoia?The modern Pentagon Pizza Index is tracked through open-source intelligence (OSINT) tools. These include Google Maps, which shows real-time restaurant activity, and social media observations. Pages like @PenPizzaReport on X have dedicated themselves to watching for abnormal patterns.On 1 June 2025, the account posted, 'With less than an hour to go before closing time, the Domino's closest to the Pentagon is experiencing unusually high footfall.'A few hours later, reports emerged of a fresh escalation between Israel and Iran. For believers in the theory, it was yet another sign that something bigger was underway.A recent example that reignited interestThe most notable recent instance occurred on 13 April 2024, the night Iran launched a massive drone and missile strike against Israel. That same evening, screenshots from delivery platforms showed pizzerias around the Pentagon, White House, and Department of Defense tagged as 'busier than usual.'Multiple Papa John's and Domino's branches reported increased orders. The correlation prompted viral memes and renewed interest in the theory.According to Euro News, a user on X posted on 13 June 2025, 'The Pentagon Pizza Index is hiking.'Food, fatigue and national securityThe concept is deceptively simple. When military staff face a national emergency, they work longer shifts and can't leave their posts. They need quick, filling food — and pizza fits the bill.Studies in behavioural psychology show that under stress, people prefer calorie-dense, familiar comfort foods. During high-alert operations, officials may work 16–20 hour days. That creates a visible consumption spike that outsiders can track.And because platforms like Google and Uber Eats share real-time data on restaurant activity, amateur analysts can monitor these patterns — no hacking required.It's not perfect, but it's consistentThe Pentagon Pizza Index isn't a foolproof system. It could easily be triggered by something mundane: a long staff meeting, a software glitch, or a nearby college football game.That's why modern OSINT analysts often cross-reference pizza spikes with other indicators — like unusual aircraft movements, ride-hailing activity, or power usage near government buildings. When multiple signs align, it suggests more than coincidence.As a senior analyst put it: 'You can't bank a war call on a pizza. But if the Pentagon's burning the midnight oil and feeding everyone, it's worth a second look.'What the US government says — and doesn't sayDespite the chatter online, the US government has made no mention of pizza deliveries as indicators of crisis.Responding to speculation about American involvement in Israel's airstrikes on Iran, Republican Senator Marco Rubio said:'We are not involved in strikes against Iran, and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region. Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defence.'Still, the Pentagon's silence on the pizza theory hasn't stopped internet users from speculating.Humour meets anxiety in the age of digital vigilanceIn an age where open-source tools let ordinary people track the movement of jets, ships, and even pizzas, the Pentagon Pizza Index sits at the bizarre intersection of humour and fear. It turns snack food into a warning system.It's also a reminder: not all intelligence requires a badge. Sometimes, the clue might be just down the road — in a Domino's queue.Whether you see it as absurd or insightful, one thing is clear: when the pizzas fly, people pay attention.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How much damage was done? Inside the strikes that shook Iran's nuclear program
How much damage was done? Inside the strikes that shook Iran's nuclear program

Economic Times

time2 hours ago

  • Economic Times

How much damage was done? Inside the strikes that shook Iran's nuclear program

The US and Israel launched major strikes on Iran's nuclear sites to slow down its bomb-making ability. Key facilities like Natanz and Fordow were hit. Some machines were destroyed, but Iran may have moved uranium in time. Damage was serious, but how much is still unclear. Iran says its program will continue anyway. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What was hit? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Signs of damage before and after Did Iran move anything before the attacks? What do US agencies say? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs The US and Israel attacked Iran's nuclear sites to stop Iran from making nuclear weapons and to damage their uranium enrichment systems. Donald Trump said the strikes 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program and set it back 'decades'.Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said the US failed to do anything important. Israeli intelligence said the damage was 'very significant'. But the US Pentagon said Iran was only set back 'a few months', according to the report by Telegraph.1. At the Natanz enrichment plant, Israel struck first and destroyed the main power station, power lines, backup generators, and fuel tanks. This made the centrifuges stop working. Satellite images showed smoke and three craters near enrichment halls, meaning deeper the US dropped 'bunker buster' bombs on Natanz, hitting underground areas. At least one 'penetration hole' was seen.2. Fordow enrichment plant, aka 'crown jewel' : The US dropped 12 giant bombs on Fordow under a mountain. They targeted ventilation shafts and centrifuge halls 80 meters deep. Bombs entered the main shaft at 1,000 ft/sec and exploded underground. Iran tried to cover the shafts with concrete, but the bombs blasted through. The actual damage is unknown because it's deep underground, as stated by Telegraph backfilled tunnels at Fordow and Isfahan before the strikes, maybe to block blasts or trap them inside. No dirt or debris was seen outside after, which may mean no tunnel IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said Fordow's centrifuges are 'no longer operational'. He said vibrations from the bombs destroyed the machines, which are very delicate. US and Israeli strikes also hit Iran's defence research HQ and University buildings in Tehran linked to nuclear work. These were linked to nuclear weapons development, as per the report by Telegraph.20 top military leaders and 14 nuclear scientists were assassinated. These people were key to building nuclear weapons. Iran replaced them quickly and stayed might have moved its uranium and equipment before the attacks. Trucks and bulldozers were seen at Fordow and Isfahan right before the US strikes. Later, Iran said it had moved the uranium to a secret place. US Vice President JD Vance said they'll work on finding and securing the uranium, as per Trump said nothing was moved, claiming it was just construction workers on site. Experts say it would have been difficult for Iran to move the uranium, but not impossible. Pickaxe Mountain, close to Natanz, might be hiding a secret underground facility — possibly deeper than one day before Israel's attack, Iran claimed it had built a new uranium enrichment site, but didn't say where it is. Experts believe more secret nuclear sites exist, as mentioned in the report by and Netanyahu want to show this as a victory to gain political support. Iran says its program is damaged but not dead — and they're still working on it. Trump claimed US intel intercepted a call where Iranians said, 'This place is gone.' Khamenei repeated that 'America failed.'US Pentagon said the strikes only delayed Iran's program by a few months. CIA is more hopeful — they say the damage was severe. Full truth will take weeks or months to know. Israel is now hunting inside Iran, even during ceasefire, for leftover nuclear US may demand that Iran give up its uranium in a future deal. Only Iran knows how much of its 400kg enriched uranium is left and where it is. Iran's parliament just suspended cooperation with the IAEA, cutting off global monitoring. Some Iranian leaders now even want to build and test a nuclear bomb. Experts say it could take Iran years to rebuild what was lost, according to Telegraph destroyed power supplies and underground tunnels at key sites like Natanz and Fordow, damaging uranium-enriching machines and slowing down Iran's nuclear think Iran moved some uranium to secret places before the strikes, but there is no clear proof, and Iran denies it.

Those behind Emergency wanted to enslave judiciary: PM Modi in Mann Ki Baat
Those behind Emergency wanted to enslave judiciary: PM Modi in Mann Ki Baat

India Today

time3 hours ago

  • India Today

Those behind Emergency wanted to enslave judiciary: PM Modi in Mann Ki Baat

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday played remarks of leading anti-Emergency politicians in his monthly radio broadcast to slam the then-Congress government for atrocities on people, and said they should always be remembered as it inspires people to stay alert to keep the Constitution in his Mann Ki Baat programme, Modi said those who imposed the Emergency not only murdered the Constitution but also made the judiciary their condemnation of the Congress for the Emergency-era excesses, without naming the party or the then prime minister Indira Gandhi, came amid an ongoing bitter war of words between the ruling BJP and opposition parties, which have claimed that an undeclared Emergency prevails under the Modi , , BJP (@BJP4India) June 29, 2025 Modi said in his address that with the power of public participation, big crises can be said, "I will play an audio for you. In this audio you will get an idea of the magnitude of that crisis. How grave that crisis was."advertisementIn the audio, Morarji Desai, the prime minister after the Emergency, said the "oppression" of the Indira Gandhi regime was going on for several years but reached its peak in the last two years after the Emergency was said, "People's right to freedom was snatched away, newspapers were left without freedom. Courts were made completely powerless. And the way more than one lakh people were put in jail and then arbitrary rule continued, it is difficult to find its traces in the history of the world."Modi said in the broadcast that people were tortured on a large scale during the Emergency for the 21-month period between 1975 and 1977. There are countless examples of atrocities on people that cannot be forgotten, he also played bits of speeches of former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, and former deputy PM Jagjivan Ram related to the Fernandes was shackled, he noted and recalled that anyone could be arrested under the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA) at that were harassed and freedom of expression throttled, he of people were arrested and subjected to inhuman treatment, but it is the strength of Indians that they did now bow and accept any compromise with democracy, he finally won, the Emergency was lifted and those who imposed it lost, he that the 50th anniversary of the Emergency was commemorated recently as 'Samvidhan Hatya Diwas', he said those who fought against it must always be Emergency was imposed on June 25, 1975 by the then prime minister Indira the defeat of the Indira Gandhi government in 1977, Vajpayee said, according to the audio, "Whatever happened in the country cannot be called just an election. A peaceful revolution has taken place. The wave of people's power has thrown the killers of democracy into the dustbin of history."Modi said, "We should always remember all those people who fought the Emergency with fortitude. This inspires us to remain constantly vigilant to keep our Constitution strong and enduring."- EndsTune InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Narendra Modi

NATO's 5% pledge: Rearming the West or rebalancing the world
NATO's 5% pledge: Rearming the West or rebalancing the world

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

NATO's 5% pledge: Rearming the West or rebalancing the world

In an era where geopolitical boundaries are blurred and warfare has morphed from trenches to tech, NATO 's recent commitment to invest 5% of GDP annually in defence by 2035 sends a thunderous signal—not just to adversaries, but to allies questioning the alliance's strategic relevance. The Hague Summit Declaration, adopted by 32 member states, marked a pivotal moment in transatlantic security thinking. The question now is whether this is a forward-looking strategy or a reactionary bulwark clinging to the past paradigms. At the core of the declaration lies an emphatic reaffirmation of Article 5—the principle that an attack on one NATO member is an attack on all NATO members. However, the real headline is the proposed ramp-up in defence and security-related spending: 3.5% of GDP earmarked for traditional defence infrastructure and capabilities, and an additional 1.5% for resilience, critical infrastructure protection, and innovation. This is a fundamental reset of NATO's budgetary posture, reflective of a world no longer anchored to the certainties of post-Cold War peace. The strategic rationale behind this move is evident in the literature. From Russia's protracted war in Ukraine to hybrid warfare tactics deployed through cyberattacks, misinformation campaigns, and economic coercion, the threats facing the Euro-Atlantic region are no longer just physical; they are systemic. However, the implications of NATO's new doctrine stretch far beyond Europe. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo By including Ukraine's security under the umbrella of NATO's own, the alliance is signalling that Kyiv's stability is no longer peripheral—it is central to the European defence architecture. Although the declaration stops short of directly naming Russia as an aggressor, it unequivocally categorises it as a long-term threat. The political calculus here is clear: to maintain unity among diverse member states while advancing a credible deterrent posture. However, pledging 5% of GDP—especially in times of economic uncertainty, rising public debt, and shrinking fiscal room—will not be without domestic blowback. For many European countries, where defence budgets have long played second fiddle to social spending, the pivot will require not only financial reallocation but also political will. The path to 2035 will be fraught with parliamentary debates, economic trade-offs, and inevitable scrutiny from taxpayers questioning the utility of militarisation during peacetime. Live Events That said, NATO's blueprint smartly distinguishes between "hard power" and 'soft shield' spending. By allocating up to 1.5% for cyber defense , critical infrastructure, industrial innovation, and civil preparedness, the alliance acknowledges the multidimensional nature of modern warfare. Drones, AI, satellite technologies, and quantum encryption will define future battles. This is NATO's attempt to future-proof itself. Another compelling aspect of the declaration is its call to dismantle internal defence trade barriers and catalyse transatlantic industrial cooperation. The subtext? Europe's dependence on American defence systems must evolve into a mutual technological collaboration. With U.S. domestic politics becoming increasingly isolationist and polarised, especially in light of looming electoral uncertainties, Europe has no choice but to shoulder more of the strategic burden of NATO. The timing of this declaration cannot be ignored. This occurs at a time when questions are being raised about the longevity of American leadership and the cohesion of Western alliances. Populist politics, migration crises, climate-induced conflicts, and digital disruptions are redrawing the map of security concerns. In this light, NATO's 5% commitment is as much about deterrence as it is about staying relevant. However, for all its ambition, the declaration raises a philosophical question: can militarised investment alone secure peace in a world where most battles are fought in cyberspace, legislatures, and courtrooms? While NATO shores up its arsenal, adversaries weaponize currency systems, manipulate public opinion through AI-generated propaganda, and infiltrate supply chains. In such a scenario, defence must be defined not only by missiles and manpower but also by legal resilience, technological agility, and economic fortitude. In its closing remarks, the summit's declaration looks ahead—to Türkiye in 2026 and Albania thereafter. Symbolically, this eastward shift in NATO meeting venues reflects a changing strategic frontier. The frontlines are no longer confined to the Fulda Gap but extend into the Black Sea, Indo-Pacific, and digital cloud networks connecting us all. Ultimately, NATO's 5% pledge is more than just a budgetary item. It is a test of collective resolve in a fractured global order. If implemented wisely—with strategic clarity, equitable burden-sharing, and an eye on emerging threats—it could become a blueprint for securing liberal democracies in a multipolar, volatile world. But if the focus remains confined to tanks and treaties while ignoring the algorithmic and institutional battlefields of the 21st century, NATO risks building a fortress for yesterday's war The author is Department of Commerce, Assistant Professor and Research Supervisor, St. Thomas College (Autonomous), Thrissur, Kerala

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store