
US army vehicle displaying word ‘kafir' in northeast Syria seen as ‘provocation'
Middle East Eye observed the vehicle, which also displayed a Christian cross, on the morning of 31 May near the city of Hasakah, as part of a convoy of around a dozen armoured vehicles bearing the American flag. Shortly afterwards, US soldiers stopped the car carrying the MEE team and demanded they stop photographing the convoy, offering no explanation or justification.
The word "kafir" gained global notoriety through its frequent use by the Islamic State (IS) and other extremist groups during the Syrian civil war, where it was used to justify violence against those IS deemed non-believers - including Muslims who did not share their ideology.
Nevertheless, residents interpreted the display of the word "kafir" as the soldiers deliberately self-identifying as infidels, to make a statement to the local population - despite the fact that IS no longer has a presence in the region.
'It's a provocation. We have nothing to do with IS, we don't consider Americans to be kuffar [plural of kafir], and even less so the Christians who have always lived in Syria," Jihan, a 34-year-old Kurdish woman, told MEE.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
'It's so stupid that it's hard to even analyse the message behind it.'
Mohammed, 42, said, "Unfortunately, it reflects the hatred Muslims have faced from Americans since 9/11, and the way they perceive us."
US to reduce military presence
It remains unclear whether the graffiti was painted during the period when IS still controlled large parts of Syria, or, as some interviewees suggested, by young Syrians, with or without the approval of American soldiers, "just to provoke the extremists".
MEE reached out to the US administration for comment but had not received a response by the time of publication.
The graffiti echoes the controversy sparked in March by a tattoo on the bicep of US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, featuring the word "kafir" beneath a slogan associated with the Crusades. The tattoo was widely criticised as Islamophobic.
US rebuffed Israeli demands to keep more US troops in northeast Syria, sources say Read More »
On Tuesday, Thomas Barrack, the US special envoy to Syria, announced that the United States would reduce its military presence in the country, scaling down from eight bases to three, with the final goal of maintaining only one base, in the Hasakah region.
'What I can assure you is that our current Syria policy will not be close to the Syria policy of the last 100 years because none of these have worked,' Barrack said.
There are currently an estimated 2,000 American troops in Syria, deployed to support the fight against IS. That number is expected to be halved.
Residents interviewed by MEE reported that numerous US vehicles have already departed from the Deir Ezzor and Rmeilan military bases, reportedly heading towards Erbil, the capital of Iraqi Kurdistan.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arabian Post
2 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Putin Asserts Russia Fueled US Founding, Claims Historic Support
President Vladimir Putin has asserted that Russia provided crucial support to the American colonists during their fight against Great Britain, claiming it supplied weapons and financial assistance to back their independence struggle. Speaking in a phone conversation with former President Donald Trump, Putin described Russia's involvement as part of an 'actual' effort to help the fledgling United States. Putin's declaration places the spotlight on historical narratives amid intensifying geopolitical narratives. Analysts are swiftly assessing the veracity of the claim and its broader implications, while US historians emphasise that formal ties between Russia and the American colonies did not exist prior to the Revolution. No documented material support or diplomatic recognition of that era substantiate relationships between the two nations at that point. The Kremlin's narrative asserts that Russia aligned itself with the revolutionary cause by offering weapons shipments and financial support. Putin's phrasing suggested a structured engagement, though detractors argue that he misreads chronology—Russia, as an empire led by Catherine the Great, entered diplomatic relations with the United States only after the Treaty of Paris in 1783. That timing places any official Russian involvement after formal independence was already declared, challenging his claim. ADVERTISEMENT Western historians note that military aid from European powers—most notably France and Spain—was instrumental in the American victory, while Russia's role has remained nominal or symbolic at most. 'There is no credible evidence that Russia supported the revolution with arms or money during the conflict,' says one academic familiar with 18th‑century European diplomacy. Putin's remarks come amid a broader tendency to recast historical events to underpin modern foreign policy, a strategy that has been applied in other contexts such as Ukraine. Earlier statements by the Kremlin have portrayed Ukraine as historically inseparable from Russia—a narrative used to justify recent territorial actions. The present claim similarly elevates Russia's historical role in world affairs. American experts caution that shifting the origin story of US independence to include Russian intervention may serve as an effort to recalibrate the ideological balance between Moscow and Washington. 'It's propaganda aimed at repositioning Russia as an essential player in the birth of the West's oldest democracy,' says one US diplomatic historian. Fact‑checkers underline that during the American Revolution Russia maintained neutrality, engaged in diplomatic management through the League of Armed Neutrality, and did not provide weapons to the colonists. France's material and military contributions remain well‑documented, alongside loans extended by Spain, but no comparable evidence exists for Russian support at that time. In Moscow, state‑controlled media echoed Putin's framing as validation of Russia's longstanding, though subtle, influence in shaping Western institutions. Kremlin spokespeople emphasised that the president's comments were meant to underscore Russian diplomacy's historical roots. Western capitals, however, have responded with measured scepticism. The State Department declined to address the specific claims, noting that America's founding documents were produced with French assistance, whereas Russian engagement began officially only after independence. The telephonic exchange with Trump also revisited themes from Putin's televised 2024 interview, where he alleged CIA control over US elites and denounced NATO expansion. The latest narrative underscores persistent themes in Putin's foreign policy discourse: challenging Western historical narratives and asserting Russia's central role on the global stage. Observers now turn to whether this claim will surface in educational materials or diplomatic exchanges, particularly as relations between Russia and the West remain strained. Critics argue that historical distortion can inflame nationalistic sentiment and reshape political memory, while advocates for Russia's narrative maintain it is correcting incomplete historical accounts. With US political discourse increasingly sensitive to disinformation, the assertion stands to prompt fact‑based counter‑narratives. Historians focused on transatlantic studies anticipate a renewed analysis of archival records that could definitively confirm or reject any undocumented Russian involvement.


Dubai Eye
4 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
UAE government strategic plan 2031 to focus on leveraging AI
Dubai Media Office The UAE will focus on leveraging AI to "streamline processes and improve management of resources" in a move to switch to "a new chapter in shaping a smarter, faster and more efficient government". Unveiling the UAE Federal Government Strategic Plan 2031 on Sunday, His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President and Prime Minister of the UAE and the Ruler of Dubai, highlighted that it's time to change the tools of governance. Sheikh Mohammed pointed out that "in the past, success was measured by the strength of regulations, the size of teams, and the complexity of procedures". However, that has changed. "Today, success means making things easier and faster — delivering seamless services and using resources wisely in a complex world.," Sheikh Mohammed wrote in his social media post. "Tools may change, and goals may shift, but one thing stays the same: our commitment to excellence in serving the people of the UAE," he added. .@HHShkMohd :We're proud to launch the UAE Federal Government Strategic Plan 2031 — a new chapter in shaping a smarter, faster, and more efficient government. This phase focuses on using AI to streamline processes and improve how we manage resources across the federal… — Dubai Media Office (@DXBMediaOffice) July 6, 2025


Dubai Eye
4 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
Musk announces forming of 'America Party' in further break from Trump
The dispute between US President Donald Trump and his main campaign financier Elon Musk has taken another fractious turn when the billionaire announced the formation of a new political party, saying Trump's "big, beautiful" tax bill would bankrupt America. A day after asking his followers on his X platform whether a new US political party should be created, Musk declared in a post on Saturday that "Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom. "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!" he wrote. The announcement from Musk comes after Trump signed his self-styled "big, beautiful" tax-cut and spending bill into law on Friday, which Musk fiercely opposed. Musk, who became the word's richest man thanks to his Tesla car company and his SpaceX satellite firm, spent hundreds of millions on Trump's re-election and led the Department of Government Efficiency from the start of the president's second term aimed at slashing government spending. The first sign of investor dissatisfaction with Musk's announcement followed later in the day. Investment firm Azoria Partners will postpone the listing of a Tesla exchange-traded fund, Azoria CEO James Fishback said in a post on X. Fishback is asking Tesla's board to clarify Musk's political ambitions and said the new party undermines the confidence shareholders had that he would be focusing more on the company after leaving government service in May. Musk said previously that he would start a new political party and spend money to unseat lawmakers who supported the bill. Trump earlier this week threatened to cut off the billions of dollars in subsidies that Musk's companies receive from the federal government. Republicans have expressed concern that Musk's on-again, off-again feud with Trump could hurt their chances to protect their majority in the 2026 midterm congressional elections. Asked on X what was the one thing that made him go from loving Trump to attacking him, Musk said: "Increasing the deficit from an already insane $2T under Biden to $2.5T. This will bankrupt the country." There was no immediate comment from Trump or the White House on Musk's announcement. The feud with Trump, often described as one between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful, has led to several precipitous falls in Tesla's share price. The stock soared after Trump's November reelection and hit a high of more than $488 in December, before losing more than half of its value in April and closing last week out at $315.35. Despite Musk's deep pockets, breaking the Republican-Democratic duopoly will be a tall order, given that it has dominated American political life for more than 160 years, while Trump's approval ratings in polls in his second term have generally held firm above 40 per cent despite often divisive policies.