Pakistan jails more than 100 members of ex-PM Imran Khan's party for 2023 riots
Fifty-eight of the defendants, who included parliamentarians and senior officials, were sentenced to 10 years in prison and the rest were given sentences ranging from one to three years, the court said.
The accused include Omar Ayub Khan and Shibli Faraz, the leaders of Khan's opposition Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party (PTI) in the lower and upper houses of parliament respectively, the court order seen by Reuters read.
"The prosecution has proved its case against the accused without a shadow of doubt," it said in announcing the sentences.
Khan, who has been in prison since 2023 facing charges of corruption, land fraud and disclosure of official secrets, is being tried separately on similar charges related to the riot.
The government accuses him and other leaders of inciting the May 9, 2023, protests, during which demonstrators attacked military and government buildings, including the army headquarters in Rawalpindi.
He denies wrongdoing and says all the cases are politically motivated as part of a military-backed crackdown to dismantle his party. The military denies it.
Khan's arrest had prompted the countrywide violent protests.
Thursday's ruling does not directly affect the incitement case against him in which prosecution is still presenting witnesses.
The PTI party said it will challenge the verdict.
The ruling is the third such mass conviction this month; Khan's party says they have included at least 14 of its parliamentarians.
They will lose their seats in parliament under Pakistani laws, which will shred Khan's opposition party's strength.
Another 77 were acquitted for lack of evidence in the latest verdict, which is linked to an attack on the office of an intelligence agency in eastern city of Faisalabad, the court said.
The party plans new protests starting on August 5, the second anniversary of Khan's jailing, to demand his release.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
2 hours ago
- Gulf Today
France expels Gaza student over anti-Semitic posts
A student from Gaza who had been studying in France on a scholarship left for Qatar on Sunday, ordered out over anti-Semitic comments found on her social media accounts, the foreign ministry said. Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot "stressed the unacceptable nature of the comments made by Ms. Nour Attaalah, a Gazan student, before she entered French territory", said the ministry statement. "Given their seriousness, Ms. Attaalah could not remain on French territory. She left France today to go to Qatar to continue her studies there," it added. The student's lawyer, Ossama Dahmane, said Attaalah had chosen to "pursue her studies in another country in a spirit of appeasement and to guarantee her security", even if "she firmly denies the accusations made against her". Freeze on all Gaza student evacuation plans The young woman, who had received a student visa and a government scholarship as part of a programme for Gazan students, had been due to join Sciences Po Lille in the fall. She arrived in France on July 11, according to a French diplomatic source. But social media posts from the past two years calling for the killing of Jews, since deleted, were discovered. That led to a judicial investigation for condoning terrorism, and an inquiry to determine why the posts had not been detected in advance. AFP was unable to confirm the screen shots attributed to her by internet users and media outlets, but Sciences Po Lille said on Wednesday that her social media comments had been confirmed, without elaborating. Dahmane, the lawyer, said the "alleged facts are largely based on shared tweets, taken out of context." Barrot said on Friday that France was freezing all its student evacuation programmes from Gaza pending the outcome of the investigation into how the posts had been missed. The foreign ministry would not say how many students have been affected, citing privacy reasons. France has allowed in several hundred students from Gaza since the start of the war between Israel and the Hamas movement. Agence France-Presse
The National
5 hours ago
- The National
Anti-tech extremism: How AI could become target of political violence
Major investment in artificial intelligence in countries around the world, along with the societal changes it causes, could lead to a surge in anti-technology extremism, an expert has warned. Author and technology researcher Mauro Lubrano said that various issues brought about by AI development, such as job losses, might prompt anarchists and eco-terrorists to increase their attempts to make their message more public. "They believe that technology is a system that is beyond reform and cannot be changed, therefore, it must be dismantled. And they believe the only way to dismantle is to try and accelerate its collapse," Mr Lubrano said on Monday during a discussion hosted by the George Washington University programme on extremism in Washington. He said the potential for AI to disrupt labour, combined with other issues such as the burden it places on energy grids and the environment, means that elements of the far left and far right might be easily co-opted by groups with an extremist anti-technology agenda. That could come in the form of violence and attacks against infrastructure, said Mr Lubrano, who wrote the book Stop the Machines: The Rise of Anti-Technology Extremism. He warned that data centres, which have become a symbol of economic aspirations in parts of the world, could also become a target for extremist groups. "Technology extremism is quite flexible," Mr Lubrano said, comparing it to the recent anti-vaccine movement. "There's also a Maoist interpretation of anti-technology, whereby they say, 'We need to retreat to the parts of the country' where technology is less strong, and sort of build up strength, build up momentum, and carry out an assault on the centre of technologies." He said that while researching his book, learning about the groups emerging in the anti-technology extremist movement proved difficult because of their paranoia of anything remotely mainstream, but that paradoxically, because they use technology so much, he was able to gather ample source material. "You will find their manuals online on how to take down technology and so on, and these extremists are completely aware of the irony and and they also provide justifications for it," he said. Unlike other extremist movements, Mr Lubrano warned, the increasingly quickening pace of change could give anti-technology extremism significantly more staying power. A recent poll from the Pew Research Centre showed an increasing chasm between experts and the general public in terms of enthusiasm for AI in the US. Experts surveyed by Pew Research were significantly more likely - 56 per cent compared with 17 per cent - than the average American to say that AI would have a "very or somewhat positive" impact in society over the next 20 years. Pew data also showed that 73 per cent of experts believed AI will have a positive impact on how people do their jobs, while only 23 per cent of the general public felt that way. Mr Lubrano said that while many concerns about anti-technology extremism are legitimate and worth following up, those seeking to destroy the technological world will probably fail. He said history has shown those with 'realist views' about technology, along with government interventions to regulate its impact, have always managed to succeed in winning over hearts and minds. "We cannot get rid of technology but we can revisit the way that we interact with it to promote activities that foster a more meaningful relationship with one another and with nature," he said. Mr Lubrano said there was no indication that law enforcement agencies are incapable of dealing with a rising anti-technology extremist threat. Some level of violence, he said, will always be present "given the nature of many living in a democratic society", adding that "good intelligence" and "good law enforcement" have been able to disrupt similar threats in the past.
Middle East Eye
6 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump Administration says it will withhold disaster funding to states that boycott Israel
US states and territories that boycott Israeli companies or companies operating in Israel will be denied federal funds for natural disaster preparation, Reuters reported on Monday. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) stated in a notice of funding on Friday that it was making nearly $1 billion available to states to protect themselves from natural disasters. The funding announced on Friday applies to 15 different grant programmes that protect states from natural disasters such as floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, and fires as well as terrorist attacks and cyber disruptions. FEMA has also announced an additional $2.2 bn in funding for disaster preparation since 25 July. However, Reuters said that at least $1.9 billion of this funding was conditional on states following Department of Homeland conditions laid out in April that they will not cut 'commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies or companies doing business in or with Israel' to qualify, according to 11 agency grant notices it reviewed. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters However, the ruling is seen to be largely symbolic. More than 30 US states already have laws that require 'public entities to certify they do not and will not boycott Israel', according to an essay titled 'Anti-BDS laws and the politics of political boycotts' in the University of Pennsylvania's Journal of Law and Social Change. However, in recent months, calls for boycotts of Israeli and international companies who are doing business with Israel have increased. Most recently, UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese's called for action after she published a scathing new report in which she names over 60 companies, including major technology firms like Google, Amazon and Microsoft, alleging their involvement in what she calls "the transformation of Israel's economy of occupation to an economy of genocide". Albanese was sanctioned by the US after she published the report. Political blackmail It is the latest escalation in the Trump administration making war on institutions, departments, or states that do not fall in line with its goals and priorities such as its hardline approach to immigration or issues such as climate change. For example, FEMA's statement on Friday laid out that recipients will no longer be able to spend the funds 'to house illegal immigrants at luxury hotels, fund climate change pet projects or empower radical organizations with unseemly ties that don't serve the interest of the American people'. The statement also said that recipients are required to spend 10 percent minimum on 'supporting border crisis response and enforcement'.
