Editorial: Japan urged to return indigenous remains to restore dignity
The remains of 10 indigenous people that were returned to Australia had been collected by institutions including the University of Tokyo and Kyoto University. In November 2024, the former also returned the remains of 10 people to indigenous Hawaiians.
The study of indigenous remains expanded as anthropology, which explores the origins of races and ethnicities, became popular in Europe and the United States in the 19th century. Anthropology at the time classified humans based on physical characteristics, and was used to justify colonial rule on the basis of racial superiority. Remains and burial items for research were collected through methods such as robbing graves.
In the 1970s, movements seeking restoration of indigenous rights gained momentum. Reflecting on the past, laws concerning remains were established in the United States and Australia from the 1980s onward, and the return of indigenous remains became a global trend.
However, Japan's response lagged. It was revealed in 2016 that remains of Japan's indigenous Ainu people and indigenous Australians had been exchanged between researchers in both countries. Subsequently, the Australian government sought to achieve the mutual return of the remains, but the University of Tokyo's response was reportedly sluggish, as there was an opinion they could possibly be retained for research purposes.
The Japanese government was also reluctant to demand a move, stating that "the handling of remains should be left to the autonomous judgment of universities." It was not until 2023, when the Australian government formally requested their return, that the Japanese government ordered universities and museums nationwide to investigate the storage status of Australian indigenous remains.
The right of indigenous peoples to reclaim human remains was recognized in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, adopted by the U.N. General Assembly in 2007. Japan supported this declaration and should be responsible for responding sincerely to return requests.
Other remains of indigenous peoples from countries such as Indonesia are still held by Japanese universities and museums. According to sources including past diplomatic documents, there have been cases where the Japanese government has been involved in the transportation of remains from overseas.
The return of remains is a step toward restoring the dignity of indigenous peoples. Universities should independently investigate the status of remains in their custody. The government should also support these surveys and ascertain the overall situation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
2 days ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: Japan urged to return indigenous remains to restore dignity
The University of Tokyo and other institutions have returned the remains of overseas indigenous people that had been held for research purposes for about a century. Some of them were collected through inappropriate methods, and it must be said that the response has been too slow. The remains of 10 indigenous people that were returned to Australia had been collected by institutions including the University of Tokyo and Kyoto University. In November 2024, the former also returned the remains of 10 people to indigenous Hawaiians. The study of indigenous remains expanded as anthropology, which explores the origins of races and ethnicities, became popular in Europe and the United States in the 19th century. Anthropology at the time classified humans based on physical characteristics, and was used to justify colonial rule on the basis of racial superiority. Remains and burial items for research were collected through methods such as robbing graves. In the 1970s, movements seeking restoration of indigenous rights gained momentum. Reflecting on the past, laws concerning remains were established in the United States and Australia from the 1980s onward, and the return of indigenous remains became a global trend. However, Japan's response lagged. It was revealed in 2016 that remains of Japan's indigenous Ainu people and indigenous Australians had been exchanged between researchers in both countries. Subsequently, the Australian government sought to achieve the mutual return of the remains, but the University of Tokyo's response was reportedly sluggish, as there was an opinion they could possibly be retained for research purposes. The Japanese government was also reluctant to demand a move, stating that "the handling of remains should be left to the autonomous judgment of universities." It was not until 2023, when the Australian government formally requested their return, that the Japanese government ordered universities and museums nationwide to investigate the storage status of Australian indigenous remains. The right of indigenous peoples to reclaim human remains was recognized in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, adopted by the U.N. General Assembly in 2007. Japan supported this declaration and should be responsible for responding sincerely to return requests. Other remains of indigenous peoples from countries such as Indonesia are still held by Japanese universities and museums. According to sources including past diplomatic documents, there have been cases where the Japanese government has been involved in the transportation of remains from overseas. The return of remains is a step toward restoring the dignity of indigenous peoples. Universities should independently investigate the status of remains in their custody. The government should also support these surveys and ascertain the overall situation.
Japan Today
3 days ago
- Japan Today
Japan plans 'world first' deep-sea mineral extraction
The Chikyu, pictured here in 2013, will drill around the remote island of Minami Torishima Japan will from January attempt to extract rare earth minerals from the ocean floor in the deepest trial of its kind, the director of a government innovation program said Thursday. Earlier this week the country pledged to work with the United States, India and Australia to ensure a stable supply of critical minerals, as concern grows over China's dominance in resources vital to new technologies. Rare earths -- 17 metals difficult to extract from the Earth's crust -- are used in everything from electric vehicles to hard drives, wind turbines and missiles. China accounts for almost two-thirds of rare earth mining production and 92 percent of global refined output, according to the International Energy Agency. A Japanese deep-sea scientific drilling boat called the Chikyu will from January conduct a "test cruise" to retrieve ocean floor sediments that contain rare earth elements, said Shoichi Ishii, director of Japan's Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program. "The test to retrieve the sediments from 5,500 meters water depth is the first in the world," he told AFP. "Our goal... of this cruise is to test the function of all mining equipment," so the amount of sediment extracted "doesn't matter at all", Ishii added. The Chikyu will drill in Japanese economic waters around the remote island of Minami Torishima in the Pacific -- the easternmost point of Japan, also used as a military base. Japan's Nikkei business daily reported that the mission aims to extract 35 tonnes of mud from the sea floor over around three weeks. Each tonne is expected to contain around two kilograms of rare earth minerals, which are often used to make magnets that are essential in modern electronics. Deep-sea mining has become a geopolitical flashpoint, with anxiety growing over a push by US President Donald Trump to fast-track the practice in international waters. Beijing has since April required licenses to export rare earths from China, a move seen as retaliation for U.S. curbs on the import of Chinese goods. Environmental campaigners warn that deep-sea mining threatens marine ecosystems and will disrupt the sea floor. The International Seabed Authority, which has jurisdiction over the ocean floor outside national waters, is meeting later this month to discuss a global code to regulate mining in the ocean depths. © 2025 AFP
Asahi Shimbun
3 days ago
- Asahi Shimbun
New study on atomic nuclei overturns 70-year-old theory
The latest study has shown that heavy atomic nuclei are shaped like almonds. (Mutsumi Mitobe) Some atomic nuclei are not shaped like rugby balls, as a longstanding theory suggests, but are instead somewhat flattened, like almonds, according to a new study by Japanese scientists. A team from the Riken national research institute and elsewhere published this new theory recently in an international science journal. The scientists said their research results, which overturn the last 70 years of established theory on atomic nuclei shapes, could be useful for discovering new elements. The nucleus, located in the center of an atom, is composed of protons and neutrons. The shape of a nucleus is an essential characteristic that affects its stability. Research on atomic nuclei shapes began in the 1930s. At first, nuclei were assumed to be round like soccer balls. However, experimental results were found that could not be explained by spherical nuclei. During the 1950s, Aage Niels Bohr, Ben Roy Mottelson and Leo James Rainwater theorized that heavy atomic nuclei have ellipsoidal shapes—like rugby balls. This went on to become an established theory, which earned the trio the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1975. However, Takaharu Otsuka, a Riken senior visiting scientist who led the Japanese team, said he had his first doubts about the established theory 50 years ago, the same year that Bohr and others were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics. Otsuka was a graduate student of nuclear physics at the time. He said that, no matter how hard he thought, he never understood why atomic nuclei had to be shaped like rugby balls with circular sections. 'It must be like that, since everybody says so,' he said he thought at the time. But doubts lingered in his mind. Otsuka began studying the subject in earnest sometime around 2010. In the latest study, the team of Japanese scientists reworked the theory on the shapes of heavy atomic nuclei by focusing on quantum theory effects and the forces acting between protons and neutrons—neither of which were considered in the 1950s. Their study showed that an almond-like nucleus shape, with elliptical sections perpendicular to the longest axis, allows the protons and neutrons in the nucleus to be bound together more strongly, making the nucleus more stable than a rugby ball-like nucleus shape with circular sections would. Simulations using the Fugaku supercomputer also support the new theory, the physicists said. 'I want young people to cherish any doubts that they may have, because technological advances could allow those doubts to be verified one day,' said Otsuka. About 300 types of atomic nuclei are stable and found naturally on Earth. Some 3,000 more types have been found to exist when created artificially. Otsuka said he believes that more than 1,000 types of atomic nuclei likely have the deformed almond shape.
