logo
Drilling for Auckland's mythical harbour crossing

Drilling for Auckland's mythical harbour crossing

Newsroom10-05-2025
Is it a Pak'nSave for yachties, or maybe a new venue for manu competitions?
The yellow platform on sticks in the Waitematā Harbour is the topic of discussion on a series of Reddit and Facebook threads.
But instead of suppling everyday bargains or a big splash, this mysterious vessel is providing information about the seabed to inform plans of a second city harbour crossing.
We've been here before. There was the Skybridge, then the Northern Pathway, and let's not forget mayoral hopeful John Tamihere's double-decker 18-lane proposal.
Yet despite the many plans, reports and debates, no government has managed to get a shovel in the ground.
So what makes it different this time?
'There's never been any substantive geo-technical drilling in the Waitematā before, so this is really the first time that we're seeing a picture of what the rock conditions are underground,' Sian France, a geologist and the investigations lead of the Waitematā Harbour Connections Alliance says.
Today The Detail gets a closer look at this jack-up barge, finding out more about the drilling process, the geological testing and how it's helping further plans for the long-awaited new crossing.
The project should take about seven months, which sounds like a long time, but Mark Ware, project director for the NZ Transport Agency, says there's a lot more to it than drilling a couple of holes.
'Each hole takes between four and five days. So you're drilling upwards of 75 metres in the marine area below the surface and 65 [metres] on land,' he says.
Ware is hoping for a decision on the crossing by mid next year.
'Depending on what that decision looks like it will then take us a number of years to finish off the designs, procure our services and contractors, so we're looking to be in the ground or under the seabed by 2029-2030,' he says.
But for this to go ahead, governments over the next couple of parliamentary terms will need to be on board. With an election happening next year and no legislation securing the plan, there is the risk that it could be scrapped in favour of a new idea.
'Hopefully we've got a strong enough case that any government coming in sees the benefit of actually undertaking the work that we're doing and building an alternative harbour crossing,' Ware says.
NZTA project director Mark Ware. Photo: Davina Zimmer
The drilling is done with a steel pipe that has industrial grade diamonds on the end of it, which cuts through the rock. Sections have to be removed 1.5 metres at a time.
Then geologists, like Georgia Woodside and Sian France, get the extracted material ready for testing.
'Often when it comes out it's got a bit of drilling fluid or a bit of clay from the hole so we wash it off so it's clear what we're looking at and then we box it up, taking great care not to break it because it can be used for different kinds of testing,' Woodside says.
That testing includes looking at the rock formation, and what it's made of.
'For example, here [Waitematā Harbour] we've got the East Coast Bays Formation, so that's saltstone and sandstone interbedded,' Woodside explains.
All of this information is logged and used to inform how the crossing will be built.
'It's all about how the ground will repond to construction activity,' France says.
'So if you pile for a bridge, if we bring a tunnel-boring machine in for a tunnel, how will the ground respond? Will it stay open by itself? Do we need additional engineering means to support it? How do we design and build it in a safe manner?' she says.
From left to right: Sam Woodford, Georgia Woodside and Sian France. Photo: Davina Zimmer
France says all this prior investigation is important to avoid later cost blowouts, because by the time shovels are in the ground it's too late.
'You've missed the opportunity to really manage cost risk and so that's a really huge part of getting Geotech investigations done upfront.
'We're trying to minimise surprises; there's a whole bunch of really good stats that come out of construction projects in the UK that essentially demonstrate that a very small percentage of overall spending on Geotech will significantly reduce the likelihood of having construction overruns.'
Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.
You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A Never-Ending Visa Queue For Refugees
A Never-Ending Visa Queue For Refugees

Scoop

time3 hours ago

  • Scoop

A Never-Ending Visa Queue For Refugees

It could take 10 years to clear a refugee visa waiting queue - but those applicants have already been waiting for seven years, and some have families in danger. When Dawt Tha Thang arrived in New Zealand in 2010, she was with her husband and five of her children. Within weeks, she gave birth to her youngest. But her eldest daughter stayed behind in Myanmar. She had just married and was pregnant. The Thangs are Christian Chins and as a minority, have faced persecution - it is how they became refugees - but over the past several years things have become even more dangerous in Myanmar. First, in 2021 there was a military coup and the country descended into civil war. Then, this March, there was an earthquake that killed thousands. "Myanmar as a whole is a pretty awful situation, with the civil war and the earthquake and forced conscription, but this is a family that ... also comes from a persecuted minority. They have been shaken down in [the capital city] Yangon, ie the army comes round and demands money or they will be sent to jail. They're moving every second or third night to stay away from the army," says Caroline Forsyth, who is friends with the family and speaks on their behalf to The Detail. Under the Refugee Family Support Category (RFSC), the Thangs can apply to bring their daughter, son-in-law and grandchildren here to join them. And the last time applications opened, they did. That was in 2017. They have been closed since then. Right now, the queue is 4190 people long, with only a few applicants coming off that list every year. But the scale of the problem is much bigger, because it does not represent all the people who have not even had a chance to apply. In today's episode of The Detail, Jay Marlowe - professor of social work at Auckland University and co-author with the Red Cross of a report on the RFSC - explains how the category works - and does not. "It's not our position that the RFSC is not working or is absolutely broken... for me fundamentally it's about ensuring that we protect what exists but also to recognise that it is under need of reform," he says. "It's not irreparably broken, but it does need reform." Under the RFSC there are two tiers. Tier One is for people who have come here as refugees who have no other adult family in the country, and Tier Two is for people who do have adult family - like the Thangs, who are a married couple and now have adult children - but have other adult family who they would like to reunite with as well. Tier One is prioritised, because people applying in that category do not have any support here. That category remains open for applications, but Tier Two has only opened for applications twice. The first time was in 2012, and the second was in 2017. Both times, it was only for a few days, and Forsyth and Marlowe say the system was inundated with applications. There are only 600 places a year open for the RFSC, and because Tier One is always open and those applications are prioritised, very few Tier Two applicants get through. This leaves people like the Thangs in a holding pattern, unsure of when - if ever - they will be able to reunite with their families. In their case, their daughter, son-in-law and grandchildren are hungry, they have lost family members to military violence, and the children can not go to school. They have attempted to escape to Thailand, where they'd be able to register as refugees, but haven't been able to. Last month, Labour MP Phil Twyford asked Associate Immigration Minister Casey Costello and General Manager, Refugee and Migrant Service Fiona Whiteridge, for an update on progress. Whiteridge said that "in order to clear that tier two queue, and it obviously is all dependent on how many more people applying to tier one, it would take us between eight to 10 years". Marlowe says there is clear research that reuniting people with their families has a broad range of benefits and the government should think about this category not just in terms of what it costs, but also what it might save in the long term. "Not only does it make sense to reunite families ... but it might even make dollars and cents. "Family reunification is often one of the most important, if not the most important, topic that people want to address." Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.

Posts by Whakatāne councillor Nandor Tānczos prompt hate crime complaint from Israel
Posts by Whakatāne councillor Nandor Tānczos prompt hate crime complaint from Israel

NZ Herald

time9 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Posts by Whakatāne councillor Nandor Tānczos prompt hate crime complaint from Israel

The prestigious prize is awarded annually to the person who has 'done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses'. Whakatāne-Ōhope ward councillor Nándor Tánczos. Tánczos said he had also posted some 'anti-genocide stuff' about the war in Gaza. The councillor regularly shares news articles, opinion pieces and his own views on the conflict via his personal Facebook page. He said he was contacted through his Facebook page by a woman in Tel Aviv who accused him of anti-Semitism and said she had two children in the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) who were good people. Tánczos responded to her, explaining that he had nothing against Jewish people, only against the current actions being taken in Gaza by the IDF. Three days later, he said he received a courtesy call from the Whakatāne police. 'The woman rang them from Tel Aviv to complain about my social media posts.' Tánczos said he was surprised to learn that opposing what he believed to be genocide, was a hate crime in her eyes. He said he was assured by the police officer who phoned him that they had looked into his online activity and informed the complainant that no crime had been committed. 'The police were great. It was just a courtesy call to let me know what had happened. 'It actually made me laugh to think that someone from Tel Aviv would go as far as reporting me to the New Zealand Police about this.' Tánczos said the experience would not stop him from expressing his opinions on Facebook. 'I don't have any hesitation in denouncing Israel's actions in Gaza. I'm not anti-Semitic.' Whakatāne police were not available to comment but a senior media adviser from police national headquarters said she did not think complaints of this type were common. - LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

Book of the day: 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America
Book of the day: 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America

NZ Herald

time15 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Book of the day: 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America

Victory: Donald Trump saw his rival Kamala Harris as a chance to play the race card. Photos / Supplied / Getty Images Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Book of the day: 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America Victory: Donald Trump saw his rival Kamala Harris as a chance to play the race card. Photos / Supplied / Getty Images The opening scene: Donald Trump triumphant, basking at his Florida pleasure palace Mar-a-Lago early this year. 'We've had everybody here,' says the President-elect. 'We've had Google, we've had Facebook, we've had Bill Gates, we had Tim Cook, Apple – we've had all of them.' The business titans bring seven-figure cheques to pay for his inauguration. Trump says he always asks his admirers, 'Would you have been here if I lost? … They know the answer is no, but they don't really want to say it. And it would be no if I were them, too.' This is the story of how the United States reached that moment, starting from a point in 2022 when it wasn't even certain that Trump would run again. And yes, you know that story already, but the authors – three past or present Washington Post reporters – flesh it out with a wealth of you-are-there detail, delivered with admirable balance. And, they say, 2024's result was far from inevitable. On the Democratic side, a clutch of contenders were planning to kick off their presidential campaigns in late 2022. 'No one outside Biden's inner circle seriously believed he would run. He would be 82 by the end of his first term, and 86 by the end of a second.' Meanwhile, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis was being touted as the Maga movement's shining hope – a lot like Trump, only more disciplined. But, 'Joe Biden decided to run for re-election by not deciding. He told aides: 'I'm running until I tell you I'm not.' And he never told them he wasn't.' And Trump's resolve had been stiffened by the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago, hunting for classified documents. DeSantis was left in the dust after a series of Trump campaign attacks, including a social media post suggesting he had been guilty of grooming teenage girls; no one said anything about playing fair. Biden soldiered on, sheltered from reality by his loyal, well-paid courtiers, convinced that he alone could defeat Trump as he had before. When a Democratic congressman dares suggest voters are losing faith, Biden is furious: 'I don't want to hear that crap,' he shouts. That was during an excruciating Zoom call, with the president mumbling and rambling, sometimes incoherently, as the assembled lawmakers exchanged incredulous messages. 'This is worse than the debate,' texts one, referring to Biden's disastrous performance when he went one on one against Trump. Biden's team came up with a list of elder-appropriate rules: check for trip hazards and make him wear sneakers – let's avoid any slip-ups being caught on camera – use the short staircase when boarding Air Force One, be sure he gets lots of sleep, stick to the teleprompter. But the gaffes kept coming, from introducing Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy as 'President Putin', to saying 'Vice President Trump' when Biden meant 'Vice President Harris'. By the time dismal polling and rising Democratic Party panic finally persuaded Biden to give up, there were only two months left before early voting started, and 107 days until polling day. Biden's withdrawal put Trump in a foul mood. 'I have to win two races,' he said. 'It's not fair. I thought it was over.' Still, it meant he could now play the race card against the new candidate Kamala Harris: 'I didn't know she was black until a number of years go, when she happened to turn black …' Trump rallies now featured images of turban-wearing men burning an American flag, labelled, 'meet your new neighbours if Kamala wins'. Neither side comes out of this well. Trump is foul-mouthed, emotionally volatile, out for vengeance and always on the make. Once, he asked oil company executives to give him US$1 billion because he'd be good for their industry. The Democrats, on the other hand, are out of touch with voters and disorganised. Trump has a way of turning adversity to his advantage. Being shot in the ear is God's way of sending a supportive message, apparently. Even the infamous mugshot was a vote-winning opportunity. He'd carefully practised his facial expression and: 'The photo came out with Trump's signature scowl. He and his advisers thought he'd nailed it.' Harris, meanwhile, was good on the stumps, a magnet for big crowds, but weighed down by her association with Biden. Moreover, her people never quite worked out what her message was, or how to get it across. Among other weaknesses, the Harris campaign underestimated the power of YouTube influencers, a mistake Trump didn't make. Back to the start: January at Mar-a-Lago. That same day, Trump had to appear in a New York court by video link, having been found guilty of paying hush money to a porn star. But now, the judge imposed no penalty. 'It's over,' said Trump. 'No fine. No penalty. No this. It's actually just a total win.' 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America, by Josh Dawsey, Tyler Pager and Isaac Arnsdorf (Hutchinson Heinemann, $40), is out now.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store