Woman Doesn't Want to Babysit Her Partner's Kid from a Previous Relationship — but She's Unsure If She's Right
A woman says her husband wants her to take his 9-year-old son from a previous relationship on a trip she planned for herself and her daughter
She said that she declined, as the boy often 'misbehaves'
The woman shared her story on a community forum, where the majority of Redditors said she was completely in the rightA woman says she doesn't want to watch her partner's child from a past relationship — but she's not sure if she's in the right.
The woman detailed her situation on the popular Reddit forum 'Am I the A------', a place where Reddit users can go to seek advice about interpersonal issues. In the post, the woman explained that she and her current partner share a 7-year-old daughter, and he has a 9-year-old son from a previous relationship.
The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now!
The woman said that she is a videographer, and she was planning to take her daughter with her on an upcoming work trip that happens to be at the beach. However, she said that her daughter's half-brother was dropped off at their home unexpectedly, shortly before she and her daughter were supposed to leave, and her partner was 'trying to force' her to take his son along.
'He [the son] misbehaves any time I take him anywhere, so I said no, he cannot come with me when I'm going on business to the beach,' the original poster (OP) said, adding, 'It's not a trip for fun.'
'AITA [am I the a------]?' the woman asked at the end of her post.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
The vast majority of the woman's fellow Redditors said that they thought she was absolutely not the 'a------' in the situation, especially because it's a business trip.
'NTA [not the a------]," one person said. 'You are working, and at best you can supervise your own child. Guaranteeing the safety of another child who consistently does not behave when with you is a non-negotiable.'
'NTA. It's a business trip, not a family vacation. Boundaries need to be respected,' someone else said.
Another person commented, 'NTA. The son is supposed to be spending time with his dad.'
'Take your daughter ... Have an amazing time. The father needs to step up and spend time with his son,' agreed someone else.
Read the original article on People
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What Idaho Murderer Bryan Kohberger Told Police After He Was Arrested
Originally appeared on E! Online Authorities have released chilling details about Bryan Kohberger's initial police interview. In Moscow Police Department documents submitted to court in July and obtained by E! News, Corporal Brett Payne—the lead detective in the murder investigation of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin—said Kohberger engaged in "small talk" about college sports following his arrest in December 2022. "Kohberger stated he didn't follow WSU football much but was a baseball fan," Payne, who conducted the interview with ISP Detective Sergeant Darren Gilbertson, wrote in his report. "Kohberger then asked if it was OK to engage in small talk like we were, to which we replied it was." Kohberger told authorities—who detained him at his parents' home in Pennsylvania after linking his car to the Idaho crime scene—that he had never been to the Pacific Northwest before moving to Washington State University for his PhD program, but had since formed a deep connection to the area. More from E! Online How Bryan Kohberger's Mom and Sister Reacted in Court to Idaho Murder Sentencing Brooke Hogan's Husband Addresses 'Challenging Time' After Hulk Hogan's Death Chris Martin's Ex Gwyneth Paltrow Jokes About Coldplay Scandal as New Astronomer Spokesperson 'He began to speak about the beauty of the environment and its relationship to God and a higher power,' the officer wrote. 'We spoke about this for some time and Kohberger said he was raised Christian but was always a skeptic except when confronted with the beauty of the natural world.' During the interrogation, Payne said Kohberger also spoke about being a student of criminology and "how he became interested in criminal justice." According to Payne, the WSU graduate student "stated he thought about being a police officer but did not want to make that commitment unless he was absolutely sure." "Kohberger then stated he understood why were engaging in small talk but would appreciate it if we explained to him what he was doing there," Payne's report read. "Det. Gilbertson asked Kohberger if he watched the news. Kohberger said 'I watch the news.'" Payne continued, "Det. Gilbertson then said we were there because of what happened in November jut [sic] off the University of Idaho Campus. Det. Gilberston asked Kohberger if he knew what that was to which Kohberger replied 'of course.'" Payne said Kohberger told the investigators that he "was aware of a homicide because of a WSU alert he received" following the murders. When asked if he wanted to discuss the incident, "Kohberger replied, 'Well, I think I would need a lawyer,'" according to Payne. After explaining to Kohberger that the interview would be about the killings, Payne said the then-28-year-old "sat back and said he had the utmost respect for law enforcement but stated it was a constitutional right to speak to an attorney." "Kohberger asked what specifically we wanted to talk to him about and the reason," Payne recounted. "I told Kohberger he invoked his Fifth Amendment Rights and we were not going to ask him any further questions." Per the investigator, he and Gilbertson ended the interview shortly after Kohberger "asked again for the reason he was there but added he would like to talk to an attorney." More than two years after the interrogation, Kohberger—who waived his right to a speedy trial—confessed to the killings as part of a plea deal he struck with prosecutors. At a July 23 sentencing, he received four consecutive life in prison sentences for the murders of Goncalves, Mogen, Kernodle and Chapin, who were all stabbed to death at an off-campus home in November 2022. Kohberger opted not to speak during his sentencing, prompting presiding Judge Steven Hippler to call him "worst of the worst." 'Even in pleading guilty, he has given nothing hinting at remorse or redemption, nothing suggesting a recognition, an understanding or even a regret for the pain that he has caused," the judge told the courtroom. 'Therefore, I will not attempt to speak about him further other than to simply sentencing him." For more on the investigation into Kohberger and the Idaho murders, keep reading. Who Were Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Ethan Chapin and Xana Kernodle?Were There Any Survivors?Who Is Bryan Kohberger and How Was He Found?What Was Kohberger's Initial Defense?Where Was the Trial Set?What Was the Verdict in the Trial?Did Kohberger Take a Selfie After the Murders?What Did Kohberger Google Before the Murders?Did Kohberger Confess to Killing Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Ethan Chapin and Xana Kernodle?How Long Is Kohberger's Prison Sentence? For the latest breaking news updates, click here to download the E! News App
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
To former prosecutors, DOJ interview with Ghislaine Maxwell looked unorthodox
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met for a second day with convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, without offering more than a broad rationale for his hours of questioning. Multiple former federal prosecutors told CBS News they were bewildered by his decision to launch into such talks and described the unfolding events as both unorthodox and concerning. "She's somebody who has been sentenced by a court to 20 years in prison, and she is likely also desperate to get out from under that sentence," said Elizabeth Oyer, a former Justice Department pardon attorney and federal public defender. "It's hard to really believe that the Justice Department would rely on anything that she might have to say." Oyer suggested that Maxwell was speaking with Blanche "in the hope that she might be able to cut a deal that will benefit her, and that raises fundamental questions about the credibility of any information she could possibly provide." Maxwell's defense lawyer, David Markus, said after the meeting that she answered everything asked of her "and she didn't hold anything back." Asked whether Maxwell is seeking a pardon, Markus said, "We haven't spoken to the president or anybody about a pardon just yet," adding, "We hope he exercises that power in the right and just way." "It's unprecedented for the deputy attorney general to be directly involved in interviewing someone who's been convicted of a crime and may be interested in cooperating to get leniency," one former senior Justice Department official told CBS News on the condition he not be identified. "It strikes me simply as an effort to address a political concern, which is not what the Justice Department does." Blanche is a senior Justice Department official who previously served as a personal attorney to President Trump. He is also a former federal prosecutor for the Southern District of New York. He announced his decision to travel to Florida to meet with Maxwell after days of public attention swirled around the administration's mixed messaging about the possible release of files on Jeffrey Epstein, who died in jail in 2019 as he was awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Maxwell was convicted in 2021 for her role in the trafficking ring. Several aspects of the Blanche decision appear to break with longstanding Justice Department practices. Among the most concerning, former officials said, is having Blanche conduct the interviews, rather than the line prosecutors who helped win a conviction in the Maxwell case, and who are continuing to combat her efforts to appeal the outcome. Adding to the complication is that the prosecutor who led the Maxwell case, Maurene Comey, was fired by the Trump administration a week ago. One former prosecutor said a key reason for having a line prosecutor handle such an interview is their comprehensive knowledge of both Maxwell and the facts of the case against her. Otherwise, this attorney said, it could be very hard to determine whether Maxwell is being truthful — especially since there were already past questions about her willingness to be fully candid about the misconduct that led to her arrest, and Epstein's. "The best way to determine that is to ask questions you already know the answers to," the former prosecutor said. "Todd Blanche is in no position to assess the truth if he doesn't know all the facts." Because Blanche's meetings were occurring behind closed doors, it is unclear if he was accompanied by other Justice Department officials or FBI agents. The Justice Department has not responded to a request for comment. Experts told CBS News that meetings of this nature almost always include an FBI agent who can memorialize the discussion in formal interview notes that could later have evidentiary value, if needed. "If Blanche was meeting with Maxwell alone, that's obscene malpractice," another former federal prosecutor, who had decades of experience, told CBS News. "He can't testify and become a witness, nor can he write a report of their meeting." Prosecutors are not permitted to write up interview reports and are not sworn law enforcement officers with training to document an interview of this kind. "It would be a mess," the former official said. "The first rule of a meeting with a witness is to have an agent present." As another former prosecutor put it: "This is not typical." "It's not the most effective way" to work if the goal is to gather additional evidence or identify potential targets for future prosecution, this person said. Mr. Trump has never been accused of misconduct in connection with Epstein's criminal activity, and he has consistently said he cut ties with Epstein before Epstein's first arrest in 2006 for his conduct with underage girls. Mr. Trump has sought to push past the crush of attention on the topic, even referring to it as "the Jeffrey Epstein hoax." Blanche explained his decision to meet with Maxwell by saying he would "pursue justice wherever the facts may lead." "If Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say," Blanche said. Like Oyer, many former federal prosecutors saw the meeting as a political move intended to dampen growing mistrust about the decision not to make public the files connected with Epstein's case. Multiple former prosecutors spoke with CBS News about the matter, but asked not to be identified because they feared retribution against them or their current employers. Johnson says Jeffrey Epstein files controversy is not a hoax Idaho murders documents released after Bryan Kohberger is sentenced to life in prison How Canine Companions service dogs help with tasks; Chase from "Paw Patrol" joins CBS News Solve the daily Crossword
New York Times
42 minutes ago
- New York Times
Corrections: July 26, 2025
An obituary on Wednesday about the singer Ozzy Osbourne misstated the location of an incident that led to his being banned from performing in San Antonio. It happened at the Alamo Cenotaph, a memorial just outside the walls of the Alamo — not at the Alamo itself. The obituary also misstated the original surname of Mr. Osbourne's mother. It was Unitt, not Levy. Because of an editing error, an obituary on Monday about the Olympic runner and track coach Bill Dellinger misidentified one of the standout runners he coached. He is Matt Centrowitz, an Olympian who won four United States national championships in the 5,000-meter run from 1979 to 1982, not his son, Matthew Centrowitz Jr., who won the gold medal in the 1,500 meters at the 2016 Olympics in Rio de Janeiro. Errors are corrected during the press run whenever possible, so some errors noted here may not have appeared in all editions. To contact the newsroom regarding correction requests, please email nytnews@ To share feedback, please visit Comments on opinion articles may be emailed to letters@ For newspaper delivery questions: 1-800-NYTIMES (1-800-698-4637) or email customercare@
