Gabbard: DOJ should investigate Obama administration for 2016 claims
July 19 (UPI) -- The Obama administration should be investigated for abuse of power to smear President Donald Trump in 2016, National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard said on Friday.
Gabbard announced the release of files and a memo related to claims of Russia's alleged attempt to disrupt the 2016 elections to help Trump win the presidency over former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
"There was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of government," Gabbard said in a news release on Friday.
"Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the president from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people," Gabbard said.
She accused the Obama administration of an "egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection of our Constitution" that "threatens the very foundation and integrity of our democratic republic."
President Barack Obama and his national security cabinet members "manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork" for falsifying claims that Russia acted to influence the election in Trump's favor and to impeach the president, according to the DNI release.
Gabbard in 2019 was a member of the Democratic Party and a representative from Hawaii who said, "I could not in good conscience vote either yes or no," during the Dec. 18, 2019, House vote to impeach Trump, according to Politico.
The DNI release says the U.S. intelligence community consistently concluded Russia likely was not trying to influence the 2016 election, and then-DNI Director James Clapper on Dec. 7, 2016, concluded "foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks" to alter the election results.
Despite evidence to the contrary, Gabbard says Obama and others tasked Clapper with creating a new intelligence community assessment that claimed Russia acted to influence the election.
Obama officials then leaked false statements claiming Russia tried to influence the election's outcome and produced a new assessment on Jan. 6, 2017, that contradicted prior assessments on the matter, according to the DNI.
Gabbard said she is forwarding relevant materials to the Department of Justice for possible legal action.
Some congressional Democrats have challenged Gabbard's announcement.
"The unanimous, bipartisan conclusion was that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump," Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., told CNN on Friday.
"This is just another example of the DNI trying to cook the books, rewrite history and erode trust in the intelligence agencies she's supposed to be leading," Warner added.
Warner is vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Ranking Member Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., said "every legitimate investigation" into the matter affirmed the findings of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment, CNN reported.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 minutes ago
- USA Today
Want to save American democracy? Let teens vote.
Across the country, a growing movement led by young people is calling for cities and states to lower the voting age to 16 in local, state and school board elections. In a moment when the foundations of American democracy are under strain, when civic trust is eroding and polarization is deepening, one powerful act of democratic innovation is hiding in plain sight. We need to lower the voting age to 16. Zohran Mamdani's recent win in the New York City Democratic primary for mayor, mainly driven by young people, provides a source of inspiration for that type of reform. So does the British government's decision to lower the voting age to 16 before the United Kingdom's next general election. Sixteen- and 17-year-olds already contribute in meaningful ways to our society. They work jobs, pay taxes and, in many cases, help support their families. They are organizers, caretakers and changemakers. Yet, despite being affected by policy decisions ranging from school funding to climate action to gun safety, they remain locked out of the most fundamental mechanism of democratic participation, the right to vote. It's time to change that. Across the country, a growing movement led by young people is calling for cities and states to lower the voting age to 16 in local, state and school board elections. At Vote16USA, we support this youth-led push to make our democracy more just, representative and resilient. When we empower youth to have a say in their communities, we fortify our democratic future. Opinion: Zohran Mamdani rallied Gen Z voters. We can't abandon him now. Research shows younger people are ready to vote Research shows that 16-year-olds are ready to vote. Studies in developmental psychology, including those published by the American Psychological Association, demonstrate that 16-year-olds possess the cognitive maturity − the 'cold cognition' − required to make informed decisions in structured settings like the voting booth. What's more, 16 and 17 are ideal ages to begin voting. At this stage in life, many young people live in stable home environments, attend school and are surrounded by supportive adults. These conditions make them more likely to adopt voting as a habit, and the earlier the habit is formed, the more likely it is to persist. In contrast, many 18-year-olds cast their first ballots while in that destabilizing transition to college or work, often without the support systems that reinforce civic participation. We don't question the logic of teaching civics in high school, so why not allow students to practice it meaningfully by voting? Give teens voice in elections: Why we should lower the voting age to 16 for federal elections | Opinion In places where the voting age has already been lowered, like Takoma Park and Hyattsville, Maryland, 16- and 17-year-olds have voted at higher rates than older adults. Even before they can vote, young people are already leading. From organizing school walkouts for climate justice to testifying at statehouses for racial equity and mental health resources, youth are showing they have both the interest and the understanding to influence policy. Lowering the voting age gives them the recognition and the voice they deserve. US has long history of increasing voter eligibility Historically, our democracy has welcomed more eligible voters. From the expansion of suffrage to women and Black Americans to the Voting Rights Act and beyond, we have moved toward greater inclusion. Lowering the voting age continues that arc toward justice. Some worry that young people will just vote like their parents. But data from the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement show that young people are more likely to develop their own political views with influence from school, peers and independent media. As to the question about whether younger voters would participate, turnout is not about age, it's about access, support and civic culture. Opinion: Gen Z's declining patriotism worries me. Partisanship shouldn't define us. We live in a time of democratic fragility. Attacks on voting rights, polarization and institutional distrust have made it clear: democracy cannot coast on inertia. We need bold, proven interventions to restore civic faith. Lowering the voting age is just that. It doesn't require new technology or costly overhauls. It's an idea already proven in jurisdictions across the U.S. and globally, including Argentina, Austria, Brazil and parts of Germany. Momentum is growing here. In recent years Berkeley and Oakland, California, have passed measures to lower the voting age in school board elections. In 2024, Newark, New Jersey became the first city in the state to allow 16-year-olds to vote in local school board races. State legislators in New York, Minnesota, Oregon, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Mexico, Washington D.C., Maine and elsewhere have introduced legislation to follow suit. Lowering the voting age is a call to trust young people with democracy and to rebuild democracy from the ground up − for all of us. LaJuan Allen is the executive director of Vote16USA, which supports youth-led efforts to lower the voting age in local, state and federal elections.
USA Today
2 minutes ago
- USA Today
President Trump, I supported you. Release the Epstein list – or resign.
Trump has said we should stop talking about Epstein. What do you think? USA TODAY readers sound off in our Opinion Forum. President Donald Trump wants Americans to stop talking about Jeffrey Epstein. But judging from recent polling and responses from USA TODAY readers, many people aren't ready to do that. Trump and other top administration officials had played up the case of the disgraced financier who died in jail on charges of sex trafficking girls. They pumped up the idea that once Trump was elected he would let loose explosive revelations. Instead, the Justice Department and FBI closed the case. Now the president is facing blowback from many quarters, including once-loyal MAGA supporters who are expressing a sense of betrayal – and Democrats pointing to Trump's backtracking as a lack of transparency. As part of our Opinion Forum, we turned to USA TODAY readers, asking if they thought an Epstein "client list" existed – and if they thought the Trump administration had access to it, as well as what they thought of Trump's calls to move on from the Epstein affair. Read the responses below. I believe Trump administration has access to an Epstein client list I do believe a Jeffrey Epstein client list exists. And I believe the Trump administration had access to it. They can't release it because the billionaires, corporations and deep state that rule the country wouldn't allow it. I think Trump believed he couldn't be told what to do. The only thing I cared about was criminal "pedos" being brought to justice, but we know that will never happen. Epstein wasn't the only one out there doing what he was doing. Another view: I believe Trump has access to an Epstein client list. But it no longer helps him. | Opinion Forum While Trump has said repeatedly he wants people to stop talking about Epstein, he's one who used this for his campaign platform. If that's what he wants, he should've never brought it up. As for whether MAGA will split with Trump over this Epstein fallout – maybe some of MAGA will break with him but most will stay loyal. — Christine Luongo, Rockaway, New Jersey Mr. President, I supported you. Please release the list. Yes, I believe a Jeffrey Epstein client list exists. Court records indicate that massive amounts of information exists, documenting Epstein's (apparently shared) need and enjoyment in having predatory sex with perhaps hundreds of underage and emotionally vulnerable girls. I believe that he and others used the girls to feed their addiction to selfish, self-gratifying sex. And that he and others are on the "list." And that many, many highly visible people are on the list; it appears that the president is protecting them (and possibly himself). Because of this I think we will start to see a greater divide among his supporters. Musk proposes America Party: Do you think the US needs a third party? Tell us. | Opinion Forum I would say to the president: Despite your (more than several) less-than-likeable personality traits, we supported you because we love America and you also love America. However, we also stand for truth, justice and the American way. Please put our minds at ease and release the list. I supported you, attended many of your rallies and even greeted Kamala Harris at three of her rallies with a 6-foot Trump banner. Follow American ideals, Mr. President. Please release the list ... or resign. — Phil Parlock Sr., Huntington, West Virginia MAGA cult has been brainwashed I'm not sure if an Epstein client list exists. It's obvious they spent so much time talking about it because it fueled the conspiracy theorist-type thinking that Trump has been able to manipulate people's reality with so easily. That, and it supported a narrative that the Biden administration was withholding information that he, Trump, would release. When asked about releasing presumably hidden files such as those on President John F. Kennedy's assassination or the 9/11 attack, Trump always affirmed without hesitation that he would make them public. When asked about the Epstein files however, he seemed to always qualify their release with the condition that unnamed innocent people who he seemed to be aware were on the list could be protected. This caution can only be explained either by his knowledge that the files did in fact exist or by his awareness from personal experience that their existence was plausible. I do care about the Epstein case, and in a perfect world it should get more attention than it currently is. However, the MAGA cult has been brainwashed to automatically see the media reporting on Trump's bad behavior as evidence of Trump's righteousness. I fear more attention by the media would trigger their persecution complex and override the cognitive dissonance they feel by having their 'open book' president 'deep state' them. The Trump administration should focus on resigning and making way for competent people to lead the country. The most likely explanation for Trump saying we should stop talking about Epstein is that he did something illegal with Epstein that he knows all but his most loyal followers would condemn him for. The likelihood of this explanation is supported by Trump's resistance to releasing any such list and his attempts to explain away the files, saying things like, there are innocent people who would get hurt, they don't exist, the Clintons fabricated them, etc. In terms of whether MAGA will split with Trump over the Epstein issue, I think maybe some in the movement will break away, but most will stay loyal. — Samuel Barnes, Saint George, Utah I don't care if there's an Epstein list I don't believe any client list existed. But I also don't care. Epstein struck me as too wily to leave any kind of written record of his business, clients or victims. But MAGA folks love a conspiracy and this one has everything: salacious details, mysterious death, famous names and money. Lots of money. Epstein is dead. His empire crumbled. And Americans have far too much going on in the U.S. and in the world that requires our attention. I don't agree with Trump on much, but I certainly do when it comes to his recent repeated calls for us to stop talking about Epstein. He really needs to focus on urgent matters now – flooding in Texas and elsewhere, uncontrolled wildfires in Arizona, education and immigration battles. Then there are the international problems, many of which seem to have no easy answers. But I do think we will start to see a greater divide among his supporters. — Kathleen Bryson, Globe, Arizona
Axios
2 minutes ago
- Axios
How Trump's game-planning for the 2026 midterms
President Trump is already fixated behind the scenes on next year's midterm elections for the House and Senate — unleashing his billion-dollar political operation and personally burrowing into the minutiae of races. Why it matters: Now that his "big beautiful bill" has passed Congress, Trump's ability to accomplish more big things there — and avoid impeachment — hinges on keeping the GOP's razor-thin majorities in both chambers of Congress in his last two years in office. Zoom in: Even with all that's swirling around Trump — foreign conflicts, deportations, tariffs, the Jeffrey Epstein fallout — he's micro-level focused on 2026 races. One example: Trump's been particularly locked in on the already messy GOP Senate primary in Texas, where polls indicate Sen. John Cornyn is trailing scandal-plagued state Attorney General Ken Paxton, a longtime Trump loyalist. After Paxton's wife announced she was filing for divorce, White House insiders say, Trump — who hasn't endorsed in the race — was aware of it within an hour. He's been asking others about its political impact. Here's how Trump's team is laying the groundwork for 2026: 1. Money muscle Trump's biggest asset could be his enormously well-heeled political operation, for which he continues to aggressively raise money. Trump has told congressional Republicans he plans to spend heavily on their races. He's also planning to headline a big Republican National Committee fundraiser in D.C. this fall. Trump political lieutenants James Blair and Tony Fabrizio are slated to appear at an upcoming donor retreat to be held by House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). Trump's operation will soon set up fundraising vehicles for candidates in several high-profile races to allow the Trump team to quickly raise money for them. 2. Recruit aggressively The White House is seeking candidates to run in several key races. Trump himself is expected to get involved if an on-the-fence prospect needs a push. Trump aides currently are trying to land a recruit in the race for New Hampshire's vacant Senate seat, for example. White House political director Matt Brasseaux has been attending House candidate recruitment meetings being organized by Georgia Rep. Brian Jack, a former Trump aide. 3. Early redistricting Trump is pushing for Texas Republicans to redraw the state's House districts five years early to create more GOP-friendly seats. That could net as many as five new GOP-held seats and dilute Democrats' voting power — but it carries risks. It almost certainly would face court challenges, and some Republicans worry that some of the party's incumbents could be endangered by shifting GOP voters to districts now represented by Democrats. It also could lead blue states to try the same thing to favor Democrats. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened as much in that state. Democrats already outnumber Republicans in California's House delegation, 43-9. Trump urged members of Texas' congressional delegation to get on board with his plan during a call this week, and his team is eyeing other states for possible redistricting. 4. Keep selling Trump's big bill The White House is drawing up plans to spend the next year-plus selling Trump's domestic policy mega-bill to voters. That won't be easy: Polls indicate the measure — which includes tax cuts and a range of cuts to social programs — isn't popular. Trump and his cabinet members plan to travel to battleground areas to promote provisions of the bill Trump's team sees as politically palatable. Last week, Vice President Vance touted the bill in eastern Pennsylvania. Fabrizio spoke to a small group of House Republicans a few days ago to offer guidance on messaging, and Blair recently addressed a Senate GOP lunch with Trump pollster David Lee. The White House is planning an August retreat for congressional staffers to discuss how to promote the bill. 5. Stave off retirements Trump is trying to use his political sway to persuade battleground Republicans from vacating their seats. Trump this month helped get Iowa Rep. Zach Nunn to seek reelection to his competitive district, rather than run for governor. The White House also is trying to keep Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst from retiring. Ernst drew fire — and a Democratic opponent — recently when she told a group of constituents, "We all are going to die," in response to concerns about Medicaid cuts in Trump's megabill. But top Republicans worry her retirement would complicate their prospects of keeping the Republican-friendly seat. 6. Endorse — and attack — in primaries Trump plans to use his dominance over the GOP to shape primaries — either to ensure the party nominates who he sees as the most electable candidates for the general election, or to punish Republicans who've crossed him. He's endorsed more than a dozen House Republicans from swing seats to try to protect them from costly primary challenges, and is expected to endorse more. He recently met with Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp to discuss the state's Senate primary for the seat now held by Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff. The White House is eager to avoid a bloody primary and is determining how to engage, similar to its wait-and-see posture in the Texas Senate primary. Trump's political operation has run a pair of ads targeting Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, who was one of two House Republicans to vote against the megabill. What they're saying: " The president understands that good politics makes even better policy and has embarked on ... a multidimensional effort aimed at expanding the House and Senate majorities," said Chris LaCivita, a senior Trump political adviser.
