logo
NC voters want candidates to concede elections they lost.

NC voters want candidates to concede elections they lost.

USA Today06-02-2025
North Carolinians by a wide margin want the losers in elections to concede the race, a new poll shows. And they feel stronger in that opinion than just a few months ago, according to a YouGov poll sponsored by Catawba College and Western Carolina University.
The poll comes as Jefferson Griffin continues to legally challenge the outcome of his race for the North Carolina Supreme Court months after the Nov. 5 election. After a recount, the Republican state appeals court judge lost to Allison Riggs, the Democratic incumbent state Supreme Court associate justice, by 734 votes out of more than 5.5 million cast.
OpinionPitts: NC Supreme Court candidate Griffin has gone too far
Griffin's challenge follows a trend across the nation where some losing candidates refuse to concede that they lost. President Trump still does not accept his 2020 loss to former President Joe Biden.
North Carolina voters confident in our elections
Dr. Michael Bitzer, a political science professor at Catawba College, presented the findings during the final meeting of the cross-partisan Commission on the Future of NC Elections, of which I am a part. The meeting was held Tuesday at the Center for the Environment on the college's campus in Salisbury.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
The poll, which had 1,500 respondents, did not specifically ask about the Griffin-Riggs race but asked: 'How important do you think it is for losing candidates to publicly accept the winning candidates as legitimate?' In August, 84% of people thought this to be very or somewhat important; the figure rises to 91% in the new poll.
'It was pretty much consistent across the partisan identifications,' Bitzer said.
For Republican voters, the figure rose from 79% in August to 91% now. For Democrats, the number went from 84% to 91%.
The poll also found that North Carolina voters generally have confidence in the way the state conducts elections and feel even more confident after the election than before. The poll asked how confident voters are in the 'safety, security and integrity' of North Carolina elections, regardless of whether their candidate wins or loses.
In August, 71% said they were very or somewhat confident. In the latest poll, the number jumped to 80%.
Bitzer said the question is at the heart of what the commission has worked on for the past year-and-a-half.
But he said before he presented the findings: 'We should think about these results as being informative, not definitive. This is kind of informing us about the perspectives, particularly from August to January.'
The commission is a project of the N.C. Network for Fair, Safe & Secure Elections, a partnership between Catawba College and The Carter Center as part of its national and international efforts to nourish democracy. North Carolina is one of six states with similar Carter Center-sponsored efforts, and the spirit of the commission's work will continue with a permanent program at the college, the Center for North Carolina Politics and Public Service.
Young people's voting in 2024 in NC trailed other voters
Tuesday, commission members presented their final report on 11 different areas of the state's elections from ballot security to early voting to mail-in ballots to voting access and education.
We talked a lot about young people's voting in 2024 in North Carolina, which trailed everyone else. In the November election, just over 57% of people who are 18 to 25 voted, according to the North Carolina State Board of Elections. That figure is below those for 26-40 (61.1%), 41-65 (79%) and 66+ (83%).
Commission member suggested several reasons for younger voters' patterns: polarized party politics; a sense that voting won't change things; a preference among young people to try to effect change through means other than voting, like protests; and even despair over large-scale issues like climate change and the economic future.
'I'm hearing more and more from students, 'I don't see a system where things get done,'' he said. 'These are the children of polarized politics. When they don't see action being done, they often say, 'I will pursue other means by which to engage in my society other than the traditional political participation.'
NC commission member: STEM students aren't voting as well
Leslie Garvin, who works with college-age voters as part of her director's role with North Carolina Campus Engagement, noted, however, that for college students, voter participation in North Carolina was up.
'If you look at the data from 10, 15, 20 years ago, our highest turnout was in 2008,' she said. 'But before that, it was even lower. So, it actually, this year rebounded. In the beginning, we didn't think it was going to.'
Garvin said that while the focus is often on college-aged voters, those young people not in college are driving nonvoting patterns.
As for college students, she said their voting patterns align with specific disciplines.
'We're finding STEM students aren't voting,' she said.
She said that international students are often the most committed leaders to campuswide voting turnout efforts — even though they cannot vote in the U.S.
But: 'They care about democracy,' she said. 'So, they're mobilizing other students to vote.'
Opinion Editor Myron B. Pitts can be reached at mpitts@fayobserver.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What will Trump's new homelessness executive order mean for California?
What will Trump's new homelessness executive order mean for California?

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What will Trump's new homelessness executive order mean for California?

An executive action taken by President Donald Trump on Thursday, aiming to push cities and states to remove homeless people from the streets, could make California governments' ability to secure Federal funding contingent on taking such steps and changing the state's current approach to homelessness. Trump signed an order directing Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek to reverse federal and state judicial precedents and end consent decrees that limit local and state governments' ability to move homeless people from streets and encampments into treatment centers. The move, first reported by USA TODAY, also redirects federal funds to ensure the homeless people impacted are transferred to rehabilitation, treatment, and other facilities, though it was unclear how much money would be allocated. Here's what to know about Trump's executive order on removing homeless people from the streets. More: In major decision, Supreme Court allows cities to ban homeless camps What did Trump's executive order say? Under the order ‒ which the White House has titled "Ending Crime and Disorder on America's Streets" ‒ Bondi is also required to work with the secretaries of Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development and Transportation to prioritize federal grants to states and cities that "enforce prohibitions on open illicit drug use, urban camping and loitering, and urban squatting, and track the location of sex offenders." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, in a statement to USA TODAY, said Trump is "delivering on his commitment to Make America Safe Again and end homelessness across America." "By removing vagrant criminals from our streets and redirecting resources toward substance abuse programs, the Trump Administration will ensure that Americans feel safe in their own communities and that individuals suffering from addiction or mental health struggles are able to get the help they need," Leavitt said. More: The average American is closer to being homeless than being Elon Musk What order may mean for California In recent years, California has become a national poster child for the issue of homelessness, the challenges it poses and the difficulty governments can have with meaningfully addressing it. The US Senate Housing Committee reported earlier this year that a recent homeless count found that just over 187,000 people were homeless in California. That represented a 3% increase from the year before, less than the 18% increase observed nationwide. But it was still the highest homeless population of any state and accounted for 28% of the homeless people in America, while the state makes up just 11.7% of the population. The report also said that 66% of homeless people were "unsheltered," the highest percentage in the nation. In recent years, California Gov. Gavin Newsom has made several efforts to help — and, increasingly, push — cities in the state to address issues with homelessness and people living without shelter. In 2023, the state made $1 billion in funding available through grants to communities to address homelessness. A year later, urged cities to take action to make homeless encampments illegal in their cities and take action to move people off their streets and provide them with shelter and services. Earlier this year, he released a "model ordinance" that he encouraged cities to use as a template for passing their own laws banning camping in their cities. "There's nothing compassionate about letting people die on the streets," Newsom said in a statement he issued at the time he released the model ordinance. "Local leaders asked for resources — we delivered the largest state investment in history. They asked for legal clarity — the courts delivered. Now, we're giving them a model they can put to work immediately, with urgency and with humanity, to resolve encampments and connect people to shelter, housing, and care." Trump's order pushes for many of the same approaches and aims Newsom has advocated for, while making the government's eligibility for Federal grant money contingent on communities taking steps to get people off the street and into treatment and showing success in doing so. The order says that eligibility for grants will be based on cities and states' ending "housing first" policies. Such policies emphasize an approach to addressing homelessness focused on getting unhoused people into permanent housing as a first step to successfully transitioning them out of homelessness. All California housing programs have been required to adopt a "housing-first" model since 2016, with a bill that would've ended that requirement failing to advance out of committee earlier this year. On Thursday, a spokesperson for Newsom criticized the order to KQED, saying it was based on "harmful stereotypes and ineffective policy" in comparison to Newsom's executive order on encampments that she said had been based on the law and facts. But she also said that Trump's imitation of Newsom (even poorly executed) is the highest form of flattery. Trump's action follows major Supreme Court decision on homeless camps Trump's action comes after the Supreme Court ruled in June 2024 that that people without homes can be arrested and fined for sleeping in public spaces, overturning a lower court's ruling that enforcing camping bans when shelter is lacking is cruel and unusual punishment. The 6-3 decision, split among ideological lines in the conservative-majority court, upheld a ban in Grant Pass, Oregon, prohibiting homeless residents from sleeping outdoors. Homeless residents of the southern Oregon city of 38,000 face fines starting at $250 and jail time for repeat offenses. More: Homelessness rates jumped by double digits in 2024 as Americans battled to afford housing In a statement, the National Homelessness Law Center condemned Trump's order, characterizing it as misguided at best, and counterproductive and dangerous at worst. "The safest communities are those with the most housing and resources, not those that make it a crime to be poor or sick," said Jesse Rabinowitz of the National Homelessness Law Center. 'As a licensed mental health professional, I know that forced treatment is unethical, ineffective, and illegal." "People need stable housing and access to healthcare," Rabinowitz said. Rather, Trump's actions will force more people into homelessness, divert taxpayer money away from people in need, and make it harder for local communities to solve homelessness." Across the U.S., more than 771,800 people lived without housing in 2024, according to a HUD count taken annually on a single night in January. It was the highest tally ever recorded, a 18.1% jump than in 2023, when officials counted about 650,000 people living in homeless shelters or in parks and on streets. Many cities have struggled to build more affordable housing in recent years, while some communities have pushed for harsher laws banning tents and sleeping in public spaces. More: The homeless population is increasing. Will Trump's second term make it worse? Trump has often expressed his distaste of homeless camps, singling out the removal of encampments on parks and federal land in Washington as a priority. Trump, in a 2023 campaign video, said: "We will use every tool, lever, and authority to get the homeless off our streets. We want to take care of them, but they have to be off our streets.' Other items in Trump's order include language that seeks to ensure that grants intended for substance use disorder prevention and recovery don't fund drug injection sites or illicit drug use. The order also prohibits convicted sex offenders who receive homelessness assistance from being housed with children and supports new homeless programs to exclusively house women and children. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison. Paul Albani-Burgio covers growth, development and business in the Coachella Valley. Email him at This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: How Trump homelessness order could impact California Solve the daily Crossword

California Gov. Newsom on redistricting: 'The game has changed'
California Gov. Newsom on redistricting: 'The game has changed'

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

California Gov. Newsom on redistricting: 'The game has changed'

California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday vowed to 'fight fire with fire' should Texas move ahead with redrawing congressional districts to protect the Republican majority during the midterm elections. On Saturday, the Texas Legislature is scheduled to start a series of hearings during a special legislative session ordered by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott. Among the items under consideration is whether the state should redraw its congressional districts. President Donald Trump has asked the state's Republican leaders to secure more seats for the party in the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2026 election by redrawing district lines this year. Newsom hosted six Democratic Texas state lawmakers at the governor's mansion in Sacramento Friday afternoon, including Representatives Rafael Anchía, Chris Turner, Barbara Gervin Hawkins, Ana-Maria Ramos, Ramon Romero, and Nicole Collier. Following the meeting, Newsom discussed the options he's considering to try to get California to take the same action as Texas, but for Democrats. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store