Spain asks for break on NATO contribution: Report
Leaders in Madrid urged NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte to exempt them from a proposed defense spending goal set at 5 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) ahead of next week's summit at The Hague.
'Committing to a 5% target would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive, as it would move Spain further away from optimal spending and would hinder the EU's ongoing efforts to strengthen its security and defence ecosystem,' Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez wrote in a letter to Rutte, according to a copy reviewed by Reuters.
'It is the legitimate right of every government to decide whether or not they are willing to make those sacrifices. As a sovereign Ally, we choose not to,' he added.
Spain currently has the lowest military spending among member nations, devoting 1.3 percent of its GDP to defense spending last year, according to reports from Politico EU.
Member nations agreed to commit 2 percent of their GDP to defense spending in 2014, with the hope of ensuring NATO can sustain continued military readiness.
The Russia-Ukraine conflict has sparked concerns about the possibility of a wider war involving Europe amid Russian President Vladimir Putin's push to obtain more land. Spain said the Kremlin poses no current threat to its borders but did not oppose heightened security for other NATO member nations.
'Of course, it is not our intention to limit the spending ambitions of other allies or to obstruct the outcome of the upcoming summit,' Sánchez wrote in the letter.
Rutte has suggested that an increase in defense spending levels should ensure 3.5 percent of GDP is allocated to military expenditures, while 1.5 percent is allocated for defense-related items, such as military mobility and cybersecurity, Politico EU reported.
However, Sánchez said the policy would force Spain to purchase off-the-shelf equipment instead of cultivating its own industrial base, as recorded in his letter.
President Trump has encouraged Rutte's push for growth, citing a mounting concern about the United States's dominant support of the war in Ukraine, a nonmember nation designated as a NATO partner country.
Although his administration signed a minerals agreement with the country to recoup the financial commitment for weapons packages and the purchase of military equipment, the president has urged other nations to help back the Eastern European ally.
'I didn't see Spain's comments, I'll make sure the president sees them and I can assure you he wants to see all European countries pay their fair share and meet that 5 percent threshold,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said during Thursday's press briefing.
'It's only fair considering the American taxpayers have given a significant chunk of money to the tune of billions of dollars to support our mutual interests and our assured defense.'
The NATO summit is set to take place June 24-25 and would require all 32 member nations to approve the increase in defense spending to solidify the objective.
'The NATO Summit is coming at a very precarious moment for the transatlantic relationship, marked by uncertainty about the US commitment to Europe, a relative stalemate in peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine and ongoing tensions over transatlantic trade,' Lauren Speranza, a fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis, said in a statement.
'As the first NATO summit of President Trump's second term, I do think the meeting will offer us some insight into how the administration will approach the Alliance going forward, following some of the previous criticisms we've heard of NATO and calls for Europe to do more to take greater responsibility for its own defense.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
This Is How Chinese Automakers Game The System
Read the full story on The Auto Wire To say Chinese automakers don't play fair would be an understatement, but a recent report really blows the top off things. While it addresses one aspect of how the Middle Kingdom doesn't entirely play fair, we suspect it's just the tip of the to Reuters, which did some spelunking into Chinese government documents, plus interviewed car dealers and traders, China's automakers have been artificially inflating sales for years. The explosive report highlights how manufacturers will take brand new cars from the factory, shipping them to foreign markets as supposedly used vehicles. That sounds weird, but it's an underhanded way to inflate sales figures. Not surprisingly, those cars apparently are such garbage even Chinese consumers don't want them. Thus, they're disposed by being shipped to places like Russia, Central Asia, and the Middle East as 'zero-mileage' vehicles. There's been a price war going on in the domestic Chinese auto market, which has then spilled into other countries. Desperate, some automakers have turned to underhanded methods to show growth. But for years the Chinese auto industry looked the other way, sweeping the practice under the rug. From what we understand, there are plenty of other questionable if not downright unethical practices that are also going on in the business, with Chinese Communist Party leaders oftentimes directing such things. It's known Chinese political leaders love what's called gray zone warfare tactics. While those can take the form of fishing vessels taking over an area of the ocean or building villages in territories disputed as part of India, they can also be economic in nature. In other words, we're highly skeptical of all the praise far too many in the automotive industry have been heaping on Chinese automakers lately. With unbelievably low prices and incredible technological claims, we smell a rat, a communist one to be clear. This report from Reuters helps verify the CCP is using automakers in its gray zone aggressions against the West. Image via BYD Join our Newsletter, subscribe to our YouTube page, and follow us on Facebook.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Are Investors Undervaluing Nordex SE (ETR:NDX1) By 29%?
The projected fair value for Nordex is €24.72 based on 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity Nordex is estimated to be 29% undervalued based on current share price of €17.49 Analyst price target for NDX1 is €19.11 which is 23% below our fair value estimate Today we'll do a simple run through of a valuation method used to estimate the attractiveness of Nordex SE (ETR:NDX1) as an investment opportunity by estimating the company's future cash flows and discounting them to their present value. The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model is the tool we will apply to do this. Before you think you won't be able to understand it, just read on! It's actually much less complex than you'd imagine. We would caution that there are many ways of valuing a company and, like the DCF, each technique has advantages and disadvantages in certain scenarios. For those who are keen learners of equity analysis, the Simply Wall St analysis model here may be something of interest to you. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. We use what is known as a 2-stage model, which simply means we have two different periods of growth rates for the company's cash flows. Generally the first stage is higher growth, and the second stage is a lower growth phase. To begin with, we have to get estimates of the next ten years of cash flows. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years. Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, so we need to discount the sum of these future cash flows to arrive at a present value estimate: 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Levered FCF (€, Millions) €97.4m €217.4m €303.3m €304.0m €321.0m €333.5m €343.8m €352.6m €360.2m €367.1m Growth Rate Estimate Source Analyst x4 Analyst x5 Analyst x4 Analyst x2 Analyst x1 Est @ 3.89% Est @ 3.10% Est @ 2.55% Est @ 2.17% Est @ 1.90% Present Value (€, Millions) Discounted @ 6.5% €91.4 €192 €251 €236 €234 €228 €221 €213 €204 €195 ("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = €2.1b The second stage is also known as Terminal Value, this is the business's cash flow after the first stage. The Gordon Growth formula is used to calculate Terminal Value at a future annual growth rate equal to the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield of 1.3%. We discount the terminal cash flows to today's value at a cost of equity of 6.5%. Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2034 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = €367m× (1 + 1.3%) ÷ (6.5%– 1.3%) = €7.1b Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= €7.1b÷ ( 1 + 6.5%)10= €3.8b The total value is the sum of cash flows for the next ten years plus the discounted terminal value, which results in the Total Equity Value, which in this case is €5.8b. To get the intrinsic value per share, we divide this by the total number of shares outstanding. Compared to the current share price of €17.5, the company appears a touch undervalued at a 29% discount to where the stock price trades currently. Remember though, that this is just an approximate valuation, and like any complex formula - garbage in, garbage out. The calculation above is very dependent on two assumptions. The first is the discount rate and the other is the cash flows. You don't have to agree with these inputs, I recommend redoing the calculations yourself and playing with them. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at Nordex as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 6.5%, which is based on a levered beta of 1.210. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business. See our latest analysis for Nordex Strength Debt is well covered by cash flow. Weakness Interest payments on debt are not well covered. Opportunity Annual earnings are forecast to grow faster than the German market. Trading below our estimate of fair value by more than 20%. Threat Annual revenue is forecast to grow slower than the German market. Whilst important, the DCF calculation ideally won't be the sole piece of analysis you scrutinize for a company. The DCF model is not a perfect stock valuation tool. Instead the best use for a DCF model is to test certain assumptions and theories to see if they would lead to the company being undervalued or overvalued. For instance, if the terminal value growth rate is adjusted slightly, it can dramatically alter the overall result. Can we work out why the company is trading at a discount to intrinsic value? For Nordex, we've compiled three relevant aspects you should further examine: Risks: We feel that you should assess the 1 warning sign for Nordex we've flagged before making an investment in the company. Future Earnings: How does NDX1's growth rate compare to its peers and the wider market? Dig deeper into the analyst consensus number for the upcoming years by interacting with our free analyst growth expectation chart. Other High Quality Alternatives: Do you like a good all-rounder? Explore our interactive list of high quality stocks to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing! PS. The Simply Wall St app conducts a discounted cash flow valuation for every stock on the XTRA every day. If you want to find the calculation for other stocks just search here. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Ukraine says Russia launched the biggest aerial attack since start of the war
Russia launched its biggest aerial attack against Ukraine overnight, a Ukrainian official said Sunday, part of an escalating bombing campaign that has further dashed hopes for a breakthrough in efforts to end the 3-year-old war. Russia fired a total of 537 aerial weapons at Ukraine, including 477 drones and decoys and 60 missiles, Ukraine's air force said. Of these, 249 were shot down and 226 were lost, likely having been electronically jammed. Advertisement 3 A Russian drone hit a residential building in Odesa, Ukraine overnight. Ukrainian State Emergency Service/AFP via Getty Images Yuriy Ihnat, head of communications for Ukraine's air force, told the Associated Press that the overnight onslaught was 'the most massive air strike' on the country, taking into account both drones and various types of missiles. The attack targeted regions across Ukraine, including western Ukraine, far from the frontline. Advertisement Poland and allied countries scrambled aircraft to ensure the safety of Polish airspace, the Polish air force said Sunday. Kherson regional Gov. Oleksandr Prokudin said one person died in a drone strike. Six people were wounded in Cherkasy, including a child, according to regional Gov. Ihor Taburets. 3 Ukrainian firefighters worked to put out the flames caused by a Russian drone in the town of Smila. via REUTERS Advertisement In the Lviv region in the far west of Ukraine, a large-scale fire broke out at an industrial facility in the city of Drohobych following a drone attack that also forced parts of the city to lose power. The fresh attacks follow Russian President Vladimir Putin's saying Friday that Moscow is ready for a fresh round of direct peace talks in Istanbul. 3 Russia is accused of firing 537 aerial weapons at Ukraine in the latest attack. via REUTERS However, the war shows no signs of abating as US-led international peace efforts have so far produced no breakthrough. Advertisement Two recent rounds of talks between the Russian and Ukrainian delegations in Istanbul were brief and yielded no progress on reaching a settlement. Long-range drone strikes have been a hallmark of the war, now in its fourth year. The race by both sides to develop increasingly sophisticated and deadlier drones has turned the conflict into a testing ground for new weaponry.