‘Shows the mentality of BJP leaders': Karnataka MLC N Ravikumar in the dock over vulgar comments against Chief Secretary Shalini Rajneesh
While N Ravikumar made the remarks against Rajneesh during a protest in front of Vidhana Soudha Monday, a police complaint was filed on Wednesday. Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) general secretary S Manohar filed the complaint at the Vidhana Soudha Police Station, demanding legal action against him for using unparliamentary language when referring to Rajneesh.
The Congress party also said it will petition the Legislative Council Chairman, Basavaraj Horatti.
On Monday, BJP leaders, including Leader of Opposition in the Legislative Council Chalavadi Narayanaswamy, MLA Cement Manju, Ravikumar, and former MP S Muniswamy, staged a protest at Vidhana Soudha against the eviction of Dalit families living in Kadugodi, Bengaluru.
Following the protest, they were unhappy that Rajneesh was not available to receive their petition, which demanded that the eviction be stopped immediately.
In a video clip of a conversation after the protest, Narayanaswamy is seen complaining to a police officer about her absence. Muniswamy asks the official, 'Is she CS for Karnataka or only for the CM?' to which Narayanswamy intervenes to say that there was no point in blaming her. Ravikumar then makes a comment against the senior Indian Administrative Service officer.
The issue gained traction after the video clip was widely shared on social media platforms.
Karnataka Women and Child Development Minister Laxmi Hebbalkar condemned Ravikumar's remarks. 'This shows the mentality of BJP leaders. This is neither now nor surprising,' she said.
Hebbalkar said Rajneesh is a senior IAS officer, and a role model for thousands of women. 'It does not matter who the woman is. She may be an officer, Laxmi Hebbalkar, or a commoner… Who gave him the right to make such comments?' she asked.
In May this year, Ravikumar was booked by the police after he said Kalaburagi Deputy Commissioner Fouzia Taranum 'may have come from Pakistan'. The Karnataka IAS Officers' Association condemned his remarks, and demanded an unconditional apology from the BJP legislator.
Ravikumar made the remarks during a protest rally organised by the BJP at Kalaburagi on May 24. Ravikumar said the deputy commissioner's office in Kalaburagi had lost its independence, and that the DC was 'listening' to what Congress says.
'I don't know whether she comes from Pakistan or is an IAS officer here. Listening to your applause, I think she might have come from Pakistan,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not
Ogles Cites Trump's Achievements Interior Department Response to Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Live Events Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Technical and Cultural Challenges Can Mount Rushmore Have More Faces? Mount Rushmore Rock's Poor Quality Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Political Support and Resistance FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel has hogged the limelight again as a renewed political push has emerged to add a fifth face to Mount Rushmore, this time that of President Donald Trump. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) has formally requested that Interior Secretary Doug Burgum study the feasibility of the addition. However, experts and park officials continue to emphasize the structural and philosophical Ogles wrote a letter to Secretary Burgum urging the Department of the Interior to consider expanding the Mount Rushmore National Memorial. He pointed to Trump's domestic policy bill, which passed Congress on Thursday, and the administration's ongoing border security also posted his proposal on social media, writing that the monument should evolve to include recent moments in US Department of the Interior did not directly comment on the expansion proposal. A spokesperson said the agency reviews all correspondence from Congress seriously and thoroughly. The National Park Service, which manages Mount Rushmore, did not issue a fresh statement in the past, NPS officials have stressed that the rock surrounding the current sculpture is unsuitable for new acknowledged the difficulties involved in modifying Mount Rushmore. He suggested a feasibility study involving the public and experts to address technical, legal, and cultural concerns. Mount Rushmore sits on sacred Lakota Sioux land, a source of ongoing dispute with Indigenous argued that recognizing Trump's accomplishments would increase the site's importance and visitor numbers, benefitting South Dakota and local officials and geologists have repeatedly warned that the monument cannot safely accommodate another face. Maureen McGee-Ballinger of the NPS stated in 2020 that no suitable rock remains near the sculpted area.A long-standing engineering partner, RESPEC, supports this view, saying any new carving could destabilize the existing engineer Paul Nelson said removing more material could harm the support of the monument, possibly risking structural Rushmore's original sculptor, Gutzon Borglum, made several changes to his design due to the rock's poor quality. Jefferson's first face had to be blasted away and moved. Roosevelt's face was carved in a narrow space near a crack, and Lincoln's face is held by the 1990s, scientists mapped over 140 fractures across the site, showing it is already fragile. Park rangers even angled Jefferson's gaze to avoid a Ogles, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) has introduced legislation to begin carving Trump's face on the mountain. The bill has not yet received a past interviews, Trump expressed interest in being added to the monument. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem once said Trump told her it was his sculptor Borglum's granddaughter said the monument was not intended to celebrate individuals but ideals. Past suggestions to include other presidents were never acted say the rock is unstable. Carving more faces risks damage to the existing sculpture and could make the entire structure Rep. Anna Paulina Luna introduced a bill in January to carve Trump's face, but it has not advanced in Congress.
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Nationalism card at play, parties follow BJP lead in backing Diljit Dosanjh
Jalandhar: After BJP leaders openly backed Punjabi singer and actor Diljit Dosanjh , under fire for his film "Sardar Ji 3" starring Pakistani actress Hania Aamir, leaders of other parties from Punjab have also voiced support for him. Initially, leaders from parties other than the BJP appeared hesitant to publicly support Dosanjh, arguably Punjab's most prominent singer since Sidhu Moose Wala, as the "nationalism card", especially the Pakistan angle post-Pahalgam terror attack, was played against him. BJP national spokesperson R P Singh was the first to defend Dosanjh, posting his support late at night on May 27. Singh, who described Dosanjh as "a national asset and a global ambassador of Indian culture", received both praise and criticism for his stance. On June 28, Punjab BJP leader and prominent Punjabi film actor Hobby Dhaliwal held a press conference at the Punjab BJP state office to express solidarity with him. On Wednesday, former BJP MP Hans Raj Hans, an accomplished and prominent Punjabi singer, also expressed solidarity with Diljit. After BJP took the lead, Punjab Congress and AAP leaders also spoke up in his support. Leader of opposition Partap Singh Bajwa, MLAs Sukhpal Singh Khaira, and MP Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa expressed solidarity with Dosanjh on their social media accounts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is your tinnitus getting worse? Do this immediately (Watch) Hearing Magazine Undo Randhawa on Thursday said that he was being targeted due to his Sikh and Punjabi identity. Among AAP leaders, Sonia Mann was an early supporter, speaking up around the same time as BJP leaders. Then Rajya Sabha MP Vikramjit Singh Sahney and Punjab speaker Kultar Singh Sandhwan were the prominent leaders who spoke up. Shiromani Akali Dal discussed the issue in the party's core committee meeting on June 30 and expressed solidarity with the singer. The party held that Dosanjh was being unfairly targeted and called for an end to the "politics of hate". MSID:: 122231938 413 |
Indian Express
41 minutes ago
- Indian Express
JPNIC project handed over to LDA, panel for its management dissolved by UP govt
The Uttar Pradesh Cabinet on Thursday decided to transfer the Jayaprakash Narayan International Centre (JPNIC) project to the Lucknow Development Authority (LDA). The centre, a dream project of Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav, was announced in 2013 when he was the chief minister. The work on the project came to a halt after the BJP came to power in 2017. In recent years, Akhilesh Yadav has held demonstrations on several occasions outside the centre and even attempted to enter it, demanding the completion of the project. The Cabinet on Thursday also dissolved the society set up by the previous SP government for the management of the centre. The government claimed that the decision was taken to ensure 'transparent, efficient, and public-oriented utilisation of the project'. 'The LDA will now oversee the completion, operation, and maintenance of the centre. The LDA has been granted full authority to run the project through private participation, define operational procedures and terms, terminate the society's memberships, and carry out other related tasks,' an official said. As part of the decision, the Rs 821.74 crore released by the state government so far for the project will be treated as a loan transferred to the LDA, which it will have to repay in over 30 years. 'This arrangement ensures financial sustainability in managing and operating the project, while making the facility available for public use,' the official added. The JPNIC project, when announced, aimed to envision the development of a 'modern, world-class centre' in Lucknow. Spread over 18.6 acres, the project included a state-level auditorium, a convention centre, a world-class sports complex, and multi-purpose sports courts. The centre was set to have a multi-level parking facility for 750 four-wheelers. All the amenities were planned to be open to the public. After coming to power in 2017, the BJP government ordered a probe into alleged irregularities in the project and halted its construction. A CAG report reportedly revealed serious violations such as work awarded without tenders and unexplained cost escalations. Despite spending over Rs 860 crore, the project remained incomplete, the government alleged. According to the BJP government, after the project was announced by the then SP government in 2013, the LDA had pegged the construction cost for the centre at Rs 421.93 crore. The expenditure cost committee then reduced the estimate to Rs 265.58 crore. However, the projected cost was increased to Rs 615.44 crore in 2015 and to Rs 757.68 crore the same year, the BJP government stated. The cost was revised third time in 2016 to Rs 821.74 crore, it added. The LDA has now been authorised to bring in private partners for project operations under a revenue-sharing or lease model through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process. 'This will not only ensure the completion of remaining work but also provide for long-term maintenance and operation without additional government expenditure. The model is designed to make the project self-sustaining and beneficial to the public,' the official said. The centre will now be operated by the LDA following the model of the Indira Gandhi Pratishthan. 'It is expected to emerge as a major cultural, sports, and convention hub not just for Lucknow but for all of Uttar Pradesh. This effort marks a constructive step in reviving the project and putting it to use,' the official said.
