From mob wife to MAGA woman: TikTok trends are losing steam
See catwalk
A decline in fashion fads conceived by TikTok creators, (think 'cowboy core,' 'office siren,' and 'coastal grandma') means consumers and retailers won't be as affected as they would have been a year or so ago, when such viral 'aesthetics' peaked on the video-sharing platform. But brands have their work cut out in responding to what's taken over since: lifestyle trends amplifying political, social and economic influences. After all, it's much harder to monetize 'recession core,' the 'MAGA woman' look and 'underconsumption.'
Super-speedy TikTok trends are best exemplified by the viral 'Mob Wife' look from early last year, characterized by big fur coats and equally voluminous hair. Retailers responded by stocking more animal print and bold lipstick. This was one of many fleeting fashions that emerged in the wake of the pandemic when TikTok really took off and dressing for short videos replaced IRL outfits.
It's not easy keeping up with so many flash-in-the-pan fads, from 'tomato girl' to 'pilates princess,' particularly as the economy darkens. Fatigue has set in, and consumers are now prioritizing their personal style over every new 'core' and trend. That's trickier for brands to be part of, but they are tapping in — for example, through bag charms, which fashion and luxury has embraced, and Labubu dolls, playing into the need to express one's identity through customization.
TikTok and Pinterest, the photo-pinning app, are also making valiant attempts to continue to shape fashion. 'Castlecore' and 'Medievalcore' are among the few aesthetics to break through recently, though they reflect the broader 'pop girl' phenomenon in culture, as they're inspired by singer Chappell Roan's adoption of chain mail and headwear.
(They also demonstrate, as Kayla Marci, who writes the Haute Garbage Substack, told me, that Gen Z's nostalgia has cycled through recent decades and is reaching ever further back.)
Yet of the more than 100 micro-trends tracked by market-intelligence company Trendalytics across social media, online search and e-commerce, 60% are declining while only 20% are gaining traction. Even though US users still spend more time per day on TikTok than Instagram, Facebook and Snapchat, according to Sensor Tower, the moment when the platform became the epicenter of trend forecasting, with users naming new aesthetics at a frenetic pace, has passed. We haven't really had a fashion narrative that's broken into the mainstream since Mob Wife.
There is one notable exception: the 'recession core' trend, which includes making your own beauty products and finding hair styles that need little maintenance. TikTok posts featuring 'recession core' are increasing by over 3,000% week on week, and average views of tagged videos are up about 1,000% week on week, according to Trendalytics. This reflects the current obsession across society and finance with spotting recession indicators, from sardine-themed fashion (because the fish are cheap and filling) to longer hemlines (said to fall in tough times).
There are few, if any, actual products referencing the trend, underlining the challenges for brands of such online conversations coalescing around broader cultural, economic and political themes. These are far more difficult for retailers to navigate than having the right width of jean leg or latest fruit print dress.
Take Boom Boom, at the other extreme from 'recession core,' which emphasizes '80s-inspired excess, perhaps reflecting the Trump era's embrace of money and power. The catwalks for fall featured fur, big shoulders, and at Prada SpA's MiuMiu even exaggerated bras. While the minimalism of the past couple of years has been good for some luxury houses, such as Brunello Cucinelli SpA, Prada and LVMH 's Loro Piana, for others, such as Kering SA's Gucci, it has been a disaster. Many companies would love to see a return to logos and more ostentatious dressing. But whether they would fully embrace conspicuous consumption — against the current backdrop of tariff-driven anxiety — is another matter.
Even more daunting are politically driven movements, beginning with Trad Wife, which espoused traditionally female roles, and morphing into the more overt MAGA Woman look, characterized by sheath dresses, high heels, flowing tresses and plumped-up lips. Creator Suzanne Lambert took this even further, parodying so-called 'Republican Beauty,' for too pale concealer and clumpy mascara, racking up 6.4 million TikTok views in the process. Few brands have weighed in, despite the potential to sell products.
The Mar-a-Lago Face has probably peaked, but given the fracturing of society, it may not be the last divisive trend to emerge. That presents a dilemma for companies. Yet Cassandra Napoli, head of marketing and events at trend forecaster WGSN, told me that consumers are increasingly prioritizing 'ethics over aesthetics,' voting with their wallets and spending their time with businesses that reflect their values. 'Not getting political will not be an option,' she said, even if it was a double-edged sword.
Perhaps the narrative that's most concerning for fashion and beauty companies is that of buying less, or nothing at all. Underconsumption has been gaining ground for the past year or so, showcasing a simpler life — streamlining beauty regimes and wearing vintage clothes, for example, are in vogue right now. Brands can respond by focusing on fewer product lines, but more meaningful 'hero' items or embracing vintage in their selections.
That's a hard pill to swallow if you believe the whole raison d'etre of the consumer economy is to sell. Making sure stores had enough leopard print and chunky gold jewelry to meet Mob Wife's gaudy tastes feels almost quaint now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
Saatchi Gallery celebrates hip hop with joyful new photography show
From Eminem getting tattooed during his Slim Shady era to a blinged-out Mike Tyson living it up on a lavish Vegas trip, a new photography exhibition opening at London's Saatchi Gallery pays tribute to hip hop in all its vibrant forms. Having already made waves in Cologne, the Hip Hop: Living A Dream show brings together the work of three celebrated American photographers - Jamel Shabazz, Joseph Rodriguez, and Gregory Bojorquez - to offer a visual journey across the East Coast, West Coast, and beyond. The music, the fashion, the attitude, the lifestyle - it's all on display across two large spaces in the prestigious London gallery. Here we can see the culture's early roots - what began as a niche movement in 1970s New York, and has since exploded into the world's dominant genre, reshaping global music and pop culture. At the show's opening Bojorquez shared with Euronews Culture: 'I started out at underground hip hop shows - small places where I didn't need a press pass. There weren't a lot of people photographing back then, so I started getting calls from record labels, magazines, and artists themselves. I just tried to do the best job I could, every time." Reflecting on his remarkable career he added: 'These artists, now global icons, were still part of a subculture. I could hear the raw talent even then - it just took the world some time to catch up.' Bene Taschen, the gallery owner, emphasises the global impact of hip hop: 'Hip hop started over 50 years ago, and its influence is truly worldwide. It's not just music - it's fashion, lifestyle, and art. It has inspired millions, probably billions, across generations.' Walking through the exhibition, you'll see wonderfully intimate portraits of some of the most iconic figures in hip hop history - Snoop Dogg, Eminem, Jay-Z, Missy Elliott, Outkast, DMX and 50 Cent - alongside everyday fans whose passion helped make the beloved genre what it is today. And best of all, admission to the exhibition is completely free. It runs until 10 September 2025 and is well worth a visit. Check out the video above to see inside the exhibition and hear some of the incredible stories behind Gregory Bojorquez's most iconic photographs.
Fashion Network
2 days ago
- Fashion Network
Vogue US faces backlash over Guess ad featuring AI-generated model
Vogue US sparked major debate when it ran a Guess ad featuring artificial intelligence–generated visuals in its August 2025 issue. The campaign stirred widespread backlash from readers, image professionals, and content creators, who see it as a warning sign for creative industries. The double-page spread showed a blonde model with light eyes and full lips wearing a sky-blue top and a black-and-white patterned dress. Vogue included a footnote confirming the images came from AI, but readers flooded the magazine's social platforms with criticism. Social media users and TikTok creators expressed frustration with the decision, citing Vogue's legacy of groundbreaking photographers like Irving Penn, Lee Miller, and Erwin Blumenfeld. Critics argued that AI contradicted the magazine's artistic foundation. Although Vogue stated that the ad came from its advertising department, not its editorial team, many readers still saw it as a symbolic turning point. The placement raised bigger questions about the industry's reliance on human creativity. Seraphinne Vallora created the AI visuals Marketing agency Seraphinne Vallora designed the campaign. The company has promoted its synthetic models across Elle, Grazia, Harper's Bazaar, the Financial Times, and the Wall Street Journal. On Instagram, the agency showcases its AI-generated visuals and promotes its ability to replicate real-life models through digital scans. Brands like H&M have already used these AI body doubles, allowing real models to fulfill contracts without attending photo shoots. These avatars save time and reduce production costs. U.S. laws such as the 'right of publicity' protect personal features like a model's face or voice. Companies must obtain consent before using AI likenesses. But disputes still occur. Scarlett Johansson, for instance, accused OpenAI of using her voice without permission—sparking another legal controversy. Although the U.S., the UK, and the EU enforce laws to regulate AI-driven use of personal identity, industry professionals continue to raise concerns about the impact on makeup artists, stylists, photographers, and production crews. Creative professionals push back Many journalists and artists now use AI to streamline repetitive tasks, but this Guess campaign reignited fears that companies will use AI to replace—not support—creative professionals. On Newstalk Tech's TikTok account, correspondent Jess Kelly said, 'This puts people out of work. And creatively, a photoshoot isn't just about the model—it involves photographers, lighting crews, and an entire team working behind the scenes.' Governments and unions act on copyright To protect human-created work, unions and lawmakers are stepping in. The European Union adopted the AI Act in April 2024 to regulate synthetic media. This legislation, rolling out through 2027, requires companies to disclose AI-generated content, publish training datasets, and respect intellectual property—even when using open-source tools. In journalism, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) published formal recommendations in January 2025. 'AI cannot replace human journalists,' the report stated, 'and its production should not be considered journalism unless it undergoes proper human oversight.' INA, the French audiovisual institute, published a report outlining AI's risks and benefits in the newsroom. It praised AI for boosting speed, format diversity, and translation—but warned that it also encourages content standardization, audience detachment, and unchecked data mining. The authors argued that publishers risk prioritizing cost over quality. AI won't affect every media role equally Despite industry anxiety, some roles may adapt instead of disappearing. A 2025 report by consulting firm BearingPoint examined how generative AI could impact broadcast journalism jobs. The study flagged roles like documentalists, subtitlers, motion designers, editors, and translators as highly automatable. But BearingPoint identified other roles—such as reporters, web editors, data journalists, and community managers—that could shift toward supervising AI output, managing quality control, or using AI as a creative partner. In short, the firm believes that many image and information professionals can evolve with the technology rather than get replaced by it. Still, the reaction to Vogue's Guess ad shows that industry players view AI as a serious threat to creative labor. As Condé Nast navigates this backlash, it faces a critical choice: either establish clear rules for advertisers—or risk weakening the very ecosystem that defines its brand legacy.
Fashion Network
2 days ago
- Fashion Network
Vogue US faces backlash over Guess ad featuring AI-generated model
Vogue US sparked major debate when it ran a Guess ad featuring artificial intelligence–generated visuals in its August 2025 issue. The campaign stirred widespread backlash from readers, image professionals, and content creators, who see it as a warning sign for creative industries. The double-page spread showed a blonde model with light eyes and full lips wearing a sky-blue top and a black-and-white patterned dress. Vogue included a footnote confirming the images came from AI, but readers flooded the magazine's social platforms with criticism. Social media users and TikTok creators expressed frustration with the decision, citing Vogue's legacy of groundbreaking photographers like Irving Penn, Lee Miller, and Erwin Blumenfeld. Critics argued that AI contradicted the magazine's artistic foundation. Although Vogue stated that the ad came from its advertising department, not its editorial team, many readers still saw it as a symbolic turning point. The placement raised bigger questions about the industry's reliance on human creativity. Seraphinne Vallora created the AI visuals Marketing agency Seraphinne Vallora designed the campaign. The company has promoted its synthetic models across Elle, Grazia, Harper's Bazaar, the Financial Times, and the Wall Street Journal. On Instagram, the agency showcases its AI-generated visuals and promotes its ability to replicate real-life models through digital scans. Brands like H&M have already used these AI body doubles, allowing real models to fulfill contracts without attending photo shoots. These avatars save time and reduce production costs. U.S. laws such as the 'right of publicity' protect personal features like a model's face or voice. Companies must obtain consent before using AI likenesses. But disputes still occur. Scarlett Johansson, for instance, accused OpenAI of using her voice without permission—sparking another legal controversy. Although the U.S., the UK, and the EU enforce laws to regulate AI-driven use of personal identity, industry professionals continue to raise concerns about the impact on makeup artists, stylists, photographers, and production crews. Many journalists and artists now use AI to streamline repetitive tasks, but this Guess campaign reignited fears that companies will use AI to replace—not support—creative professionals. On Newstalk Tech's TikTok account, correspondent Jess Kelly said, 'This puts people out of work. And creatively, a photoshoot isn't just about the model—it involves photographers, lighting crews, and an entire team working behind the scenes.' Governments and unions act on copyright To protect human-created work, unions and lawmakers are stepping in. The European Union adopted the AI Act in April 2024 to regulate synthetic media. This legislation, rolling out through 2027, requires companies to disclose AI-generated content, publish training datasets, and respect intellectual property—even when using open-source tools. In journalism, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) published formal recommendations in January 2025. 'AI cannot replace human journalists,' the report stated, 'and its production should not be considered journalism unless it undergoes proper human oversight.' INA, the French audiovisual institute, published a report outlining AI's risks and benefits in the newsroom. It praised AI for boosting speed, format diversity, and translation—but warned that it also encourages content standardization, audience detachment, and unchecked data mining. The authors argued that publishers risk prioritizing cost over quality. AI won't affect every media role equally Despite industry anxiety, some roles may adapt instead of disappearing. A 2025 report by consulting firm BearingPoint examined how generative AI could impact broadcast journalism jobs. The study flagged roles like documentalists, subtitlers, motion designers, editors, and translators as highly automatable. But BearingPoint identified other roles—such as reporters, web editors, data journalists, and community managers—that could shift toward supervising AI output, managing quality control, or using AI as a creative partner. In short, the firm believes that many image and information professionals can evolve with the technology rather than get replaced by it. Still, the reaction to Vogue's Guess ad shows that industry players view AI as a serious threat to creative labor. As Condé Nast navigates this backlash, it faces a critical choice: either establish clear rules for advertisers—or risk weakening the very ecosystem that defines its brand legacy.
