logo
India faces a Russia dilemma

India faces a Russia dilemma

Indian Express2 days ago
India may again find itself in an uncomfortable diplomatic fix. US Senator Lindsey Graham is slated to introduce a bill that seeks to impose a 500 per cent tariff rate on American imports from countries that continue to buy products from Russia. He claims to have the support of 84 co-sponsors and the backing of the US President Donald Trump.
If passed, India's diplomacy will be put to a stress test once again. It is likely to also trigger a debate around the strategic utility of India's relationship with Russia. Even if the bill fails to sail through, Russian President Vladimir Putin's visit to India in the coming months will probably set off similar discussions.
Practitioners and strategic analysts are divided on the issue. Russophiles have argued that the India-Russia relationship is rooted in history and has stood the test of time. The genesis of this thought lies in India's experiences with the Soviet Union during the Cold War years, with the India-Pakistan war of 1971 being the watershed moment in the friendship. That event created substantial affinity towards the Soviet Union (later Russia) among the Indian public and political elite, while concurrently generating deep antipathy and cynicism towards the US-led West.
The Soviet Union also supported India through the sale of arms at a time when the West (primarily the US and the UK) would openly arm Pakistan with sophisticated and advanced weapons while turning down India's requests. Further, they argue the Soviet Union was India's sole trusted partner with a veto in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), particularly when the West raked up issues pertaining to Jammu & Kashmir. As per this school of thought, the experience of history demonstrates Russia's reliability and creates an obligation for India to support it. Russia, for them, stood with India when the latter found itself isolated by the West for most of the Cold War period.
This school also contends that India and Russia are natural partners as their core interests do not conflict. Thus, they argue that the Moscow-Delhi relationship transcends any upheavals in the global order and is critical to maintaining India's strategic autonomy. Finally, any effort towards distancing from Russia would further push it into China's orbit of influence. Per them, an isolated Russia that is more dependent on China presents a significant challenge for India.
Lately, a second strand of thought (Russoskeptics) has argued for strategic pragmatism when it comes to India's relations with Russia. It calls for a more pragmatic approach to modern-day Russia, notwithstanding the traditional and historical relationship with the Soviet Union. They endeavour to absolve India of any moral obligation by alluding to the latter's historically ambiguous and even contrary position on matters related to Indian interests vis-à-vis China.
Moreover, they highlight, and rightly so, that in the Russia-Ukraine war, Moscow is an aggressor that has violated Ukraine's territorial integrity and sovereignty in a blatant disregard for international law. And thus, Russia does not deserve India's moral support in its unjust war.
In addition, they point to the deepening strategic partnership between Russia and China as threatening India's security interests. This school also views Russia as a declining power that can do very little to augment India's comprehensive national power. On the contrary, Russia's expansionist tendencies have an adverse impact on India's relationship with the US at a time when its interests align far more closely with the West, owing to the changing geopolitical realities. This has significantly altered the cost-benefit matrix for India when it comes to its relationship with Russia.
Morals and ethics aside, there are legitimate strategic reasons, grounded in realism, to argue for either side.
The Russoskeptics point out that India's diplomatic capital is not infinite. And thus, it would not be prudent to spend it all to salvage the relationship with Russia, mainly for two reasons. Firstly, Russia continues to be the primary adversary of the US. And there is a possibility that proximity to Moscow may impede cooperation between New Delhi and Washington. Secondly, Russia may no longer be trusted as India's biggest defence and energy partner, given its massive dependence on China, economically, militarily and diplomatically.
Notwithstanding the pragmatism and realism displayed by the Russoskeptics, they must answer two critical questions: Will making an enemy out of Russia and pushing it into a possible China-Pak-Russia nexus serve India's security interests in Asia? And would New Delhi be comfortable with the idea of Moscow selling its premium weapons to Pakistan? Moscow is already flirting with Rawalpindi and testing the waters to see if Pakistan could be its new prominent military partner.
Further, while the Sino-Russian relationship stands firm, we are yet to see it adversely impact India-Russia ties in any significant way. This perhaps suggests that either the Russia-China relationship is not deep enough, or India-China relations have not strained to a point yet for Beijing to resort to coercion through Moscow.
Thus, India cannot afford to downgrade its relations with Russia yet, and it must persist with its balancing act. This would require four actions on India's part. First, conveying to their American counterparts that China should continue to remain the preeminent source of their strategic convergence. Second, while diversifying arms imports from Russia makes strategic sense, it would be imprudent to seek diversification beyond a certain limit, which makes Moscow a little insecure. India needs to find that acceptable ratio.
Third, India would need to engage China to ensure that the bilateral relations do not stoop to a point that Beijing feels the need to capitalise on Russia's dependence. Lastly, India must urge Russia not to close the door on themselves. If it wants to avoid slipping into China's sphere of influence and wants India to be on its side as a friendly centre of power, it has to allow India some space to work with. A good start for Moscow would be revisiting its Eurasia policy.
The writer is a research analyst with Takshashila's Indo-Pacific Studies programme
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Snaps At Reporter Over Jeffrey Epstein Query: ‘You Are A Waste Of Time'
Trump Snaps At Reporter Over Jeffrey Epstein Query: ‘You Are A Waste Of Time'

News18

time36 minutes ago

  • News18

Trump Snaps At Reporter Over Jeffrey Epstein Query: ‘You Are A Waste Of Time'

Last Updated: Donald Trump lashed out at a reporter over questions about Jeffrey Epstein, calling it a distraction from real issues. US President Donald Trump lashed out at a reporter after being asked about the resurfacing controversy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, calling the journalist a 'waste of time" and slamming the question as a distraction from 'real issues." At a White House press conference, Donald Trump bristled when asked about renewed scrutiny over the Jeffrey Epstein case following a public spat with tech mogul Elon Musk. 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy we've been talking about for years," Donald Trump said, visibly irritated, adding, 'We have Texas and other issues, and people are still talking about this creep guy- that is unbelievable. You are a waste of time." 'I can't believe you are asking a question about him at a time like this- when we're having some of the greatest success and tragedy with what happened in Texas. It seems like a disaggregation," he added, referencing ongoing flood relief efforts in the state and his recent military initiative Operation Midnight Hammer. Donald Trump's remarks come amid fresh political friction over the Jeffrey Epstein case, fueled by a dramatic public fallout with Elon Musk, who last month accused the US President of being 'in the Epstein files". Elon Musk later walked back his claims, deleting the post and admitting he had 'gone too far." In response, Donald Trump shared a statement from David Schoen, a former Epstein attorney, asserting that the US President had never been implicated in any criminal activity. A Department of Justice memo released this week reiterated that Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide while in federal custody in 2019 and stated that no verified 'black book" of clients or credible evidence of blackmail had been uncovered. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

AI impersonator pretending to be US Secretary of State Marco Rubio targets three foreign ministers: Report
AI impersonator pretending to be US Secretary of State Marco Rubio targets three foreign ministers: Report

Mint

time37 minutes ago

  • Mint

AI impersonator pretending to be US Secretary of State Marco Rubio targets three foreign ministers: Report

An individual using an AI-generated voice to impersonate US Secretary of State Marco Rubio contacted three foreign ministers, a US governor, and a member of Congress in June, according to a diplomatic cable reviewed by Reuters. The fraudulent outreach was made via the Signal messaging app, with the impersonator leaving voicemails for at least two targets. 'The actor likely aimed to manipulate targeted individuals using AI-generated text and voice messages with the goal of gaining access to information or accounts,' the cable stated, according to the news report. The impersonator reached out in mid-June using Signal, a messaging platform. In one instance, a text message was sent to invite the recipient to continue the conversation via the app, the report stated. The cable warns that although no direct cyber threat to the State Department was identified, sensitive information could be compromised if the targeted individuals were deceived. 'There is no direct cyber threat to the department from this campaign, but information shared with a third party could be exposed if targeted individuals are compromised,' the cable reportedly warned. The diplomatic cable did not reveal the identities of the foreign ministers or US officials contacted. The State Department has launched an investigation into the matter. 'The State Department is aware of this incident and is currently investigating the matter,' a senior department official told Reuters on condition of anonymity. 'The Department takes seriously its responsibility to safeguard its information and continuously takes steps to improve the department's cybersecurity posture to prevent future incidents,' the official added. While the cable did not name a perpetrator, it referenced an earlier effort in April linked to a Russian cyber actor. That campaign involved phishing emails sent to think tanks, Eastern European dissidents, and former US officials. The attacker used fake "@ email addresses and official-looking branding from the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Technology. 'The actor demonstrated extensive knowledge of the department's naming conventions and internal documentation,' the cable noted. That phishing effort has been attributed to a hacker affiliated with Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), according to industry partners cited by the State Department. In May, the FBI issued a public service announcement warning that malicious actors were using AI-generated voices and text messages to impersonate senior government officials. The goal: to access personal accounts or solicit information or funds. The FBI declined to comment on this week's incident. 'Access to targets' accounts could be used to go after other government officials or their associates and contacts,' the May announcement warned. The cable follows a separate internal crisis last month involving former National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, who accidentally added a journalist to a group chat where military strike details on Yemen were shared. The July 3 cable urged all diplomatic and consular posts to warn external partners about fake accounts and impersonation risks.

FATF report flags misuse of digital platforms in terror attacks
FATF report flags misuse of digital platforms in terror attacks

Hindustan Times

time43 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

FATF report flags misuse of digital platforms in terror attacks

NEW DELHI: The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) on Tuesday warned about the use of e-commerce platforms and virtual private networks (VPNs) by terrorists to procure explosives or arrange funds, citing the example of the February 2019 Pulwama suicide bombing and April 2022 Gorakhnath temple terror attack. A flag with the logo of the Financial Action Task Force, FATF, waves in the wind next to the German national falg during a meeting of the task force at the Congress Center in Berlin, Germany.(AP) In its latest report titled 'Comprehensive update on terrorist financing risks', the multilateral financial watchdog said it has received inputs from delegations and publicly available sources regarding state sponsorship of terrorism, including by groups designated by the United Nations. The FATF didn't specifically name any country. However, India has repeatedly asserted at international forums that Pakistan openly supports UN-listed terror groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM). Citing the 2019 Pulwama suicide attack that killed 40 Indian troopers as a case study for misuse of e-commerce platforms for terror financing, the report said: 'Investigations revealed the cross-border management of a large quantity of explosives into India. Notably, a key component of the improvised explosive device used in the attack - aluminium powder - was procured through the EPOM [e-commerce platform and online marketplace] Amazon. This material was used to enhance the impact of the blast.' To be sure, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) had said in its Pulwama attack charge sheet that one of the accused, Waiz-ul-Islam, a resident of Srinagar, had helped the main planner Umar Farooq in procuring explosives from Amazon. Forty Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) personnel were killed in the terror attack on February 14, 2019, triggering the Indian Air Force (IAF)'s air strike on a JeM terror camp deep inside Pakistan 12 days later. This resulted in a dogfight between combat jets of the two nations on February 27. 'The possibility that States may choose to provide financial or other forms of support to organisations that engage in terrorist acts is a longstanding terror financing threat to international peace and security, as well as to the stability of regional financial and political systems,' the report said. 'Moreover, it undermines the effectiveness of FATF activities that are intended to support governments in adopting best practices to detect, deter and otherwise disrupt terror financing,' it said, adding that support by states was provided in the form of direct financial support, logistical and material support, of the provision of training. On the use of online payment service and VPNs by terrorists, the FATF report referred to the April 3, 2022 attack on security personnel at Gorakhnath temple by an Islamic State-inspired terrorist, Murtaza Abbasi. 'The financial investigation revealed that individual A transferred INR 669,841 (USD 7,685) via PayPal to foreign countries in support of ISIL, using international third party transactions and using VPN services to obscure the IP address,' the report said. 'The forensic report revealed that the accused had been using a VPN for calling, chatting, and downloading to evade detection. Further financial scrutiny uncovered that the accused had made a payment to a VPN provider through his bank account to secure these services,' the report said. 'A comprehensive analysis of the accused's PayPal transactions, obtained via email, indicated that approximately forty-four international third-party transactions totaling ₹669,841 (approximately USD 7,736) had been made to foreign accounts. Additionally, the accused received funds from a foreign account through PayPal. The investigation also uncovered that the accused had sent money to multiple individuals identified as ISIL followers in the foreign jurisdictions to support terror activities,' it said. The global watchdog had last month condemned the April 22 Pahalgam attack, saying it could not have occurred without money and means to move funds between terrorist supporters, which Indian officials described as an important first direct statement by the FATF. 'Terrorist attacks kill, maim and inspire fear around the world. The FATF notes with grave concern and condemns the brutal terrorist attack in Pahalgam on 22 April 2025. This, and other recent attacks, could not occur without money and the means to move funds between terrorist supporters,' the statement by FATF said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store