Most Economically Stable Countries In The World: UAE Tops, US Not In Top 10; Check Indias Rank
The world is going through a difficult time with many countries involved in direct or indirect war, right from Russia-Ukraine conflict to Israel-Iran-Hamas war. Amid this, their are concerns about the economic growth and stability. Economic stability reflects a country's ability to sustain growth, manage inflation, and weather global disruptions. Here are the top 10 most economically stable nations, known for their strong financial systems and resilient economies. According to US News & World Report, the UAE tops the chart and India ranks way down to 47th position. None of the Asian countries are among the top 10 while the USA is at 13th spot. Details Here: https://zeenews.india.com/photos/world/most-economically-stable-countries-in-the-world-uae-tops-us-not-in-top-10-check-indias-rank-2926801 Updated:Jul 04, 2025, 07:57 PM IST 1. United Arab Emirates (UAE)
1 / 10
The UAE boasts a diversified economy supported by oil wealth, trade, and tourism. Its GDP exceeds $500 billion, with robust infrastructure and business-friendly policies. 2. Switzerland
2 / 10
Known for its banking sector and innovation, Switzerland maintains low inflation and unemployment. Its GDP is around $900 billion, with strong export and service industries. 3. Germany
3 / 10
Europe's largest economy, Germany excels in manufacturing and exports. With a GDP of over $4.5 trillion, it's a global leader in engineering and industrial production. 4. Canada
4 / 10
Canada combines natural resources with a stable banking system and trade networks. Its GDP is approximately $2.5 trillion, supported by energy, agriculture, and services. 5. Japan
5 / 10
A technological powerhouse, Japan has the world's fourth-largest economy. Its GDP is around $4.2 trillion, driven by manufacturing, robotics, and exports. 6. Australia
6 / 10
Australia benefits from a resource-rich economy and stable governance. Its GDP is about $1.7 trillion, with key sectors including mining, finance, and education. 7. Sweden
7 / 10
Sweden balances innovation with a strong welfare system. Its $700 billion GDP is fueled by high-tech exports, clean energy, and a highly skilled workforce. 8. Denmark
8 / 10
Denmark offers a stable, open economy with strong social support systems. Its GDP stands at roughly $440 billion, driven by pharmaceuticals, shipping, and green tech. 9. Netherlands
9 / 10
A global trade hub, the Netherlands thrives on agriculture, logistics, and finance. Its GDP is around $1.2 trillion, with a highly efficient and digital economy. 10. Saudi Arabia
10 / 10
Powered by vast oil reserves, Saudi Arabia is diversifying through Vision 2030. With a GDP over $1.1 trillion, it's investing heavily in infrastructure and tourism.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
West Asia: Can IMEC do what the Abraham Accords couldn't—deliver peace?
The Israel-Iran conflict is over, at least for the time being. The war in Gaza, however, rages on. Despite frequent attempts to get the warring parties to agree to a ceasefire, it remains elusive. The Donald Trump administration, with Egypt and Qatar as key interlocutors, had recently proposed another ceasefire of 60 days. While initial reports suggested that Israel has agreed to the contours of the ceasefire, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his statements later, denied it, and Hamas is yet to take a call on it. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The positions of Israel and Hamas in it are acutely divergent. While Hamas is looking at a complete end to the war accompanied by full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, Israel is looking for the release of its hostages with no guarantees on ending the war till Hamas is totally removed from Gaza. With this being the case, an early ceasefire in Gaza looks unlikely. Meanwhile, the ceasefire between Israel and Iran has opened doors for American diplomacy in the region. Expansion of the Abraham Accords is being seen as the preferred instrument in it. There are inputs that Lebanon and Syria could be next to join the Abraham Accords now that they are effectively out of the Iranian sphere of influence. With the fall of the Assad regime in Syria, the Al Shaara-led regime has suddenly become the favourite in Washington. Ahmed Hussein al-Sharaa (previously Abu Mohammad al-Joulani with ISIS and Al-Qaeda links) was welcomed in the White House with open hands, economic sanctions on Syria are being removed, and there are economic packages being worked out to help rebuild Syria. The same is the case in Lebanon, where the government has assured the US and Israel that Hezbollah will not be allowed to regain strength in South Lebanon. Concurrently, efforts to restart the normalisation process between Israel and Saudi Arabia are being pursued. In fact, well before the Israel-Iran conflict broke out, President Trump visited Saudi Arabia and the West Asian region in May 2025 as his first visit abroad after taking over the presidency. Despite a successful visit in which a Saudi investment of almost $600 billion was promised, no headway could be made as far as normalisation of ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia is concerned, with the Gaza war and the Palestine issue remaining key sticking points. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If the normalisation with Saudi Arabia does not move forward, the entire project of Israel being mainstreamed into the West Asian region will remain an unfinished project. It may be recalled that one of the primary reasons for the outbreak of the Gaza war was the process of this normalisation which was nearing fruition in September 2023. In the last week of September 2023, Israeli Tourism Minister Haim Katz became the first Israeli minister to head an official delegation to Saudi Arabia to take part in a conference of the United Nations Tourism Organisation. He was soon followed by Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi on October 3, leading an Israeli delegation to the Universal Postal Union's 2023 Extraordinary Congress. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MbS), as well as Israel's PM Netanyahu, also spoke publicly of the deal, the contours of which indicated that Saudi Arabia would have gotten a defence pact with the US as well as a nuclear program. Israel was to offer 'assurances' to the Palestinian groups, but there would be no clear outcome on the two-state solution. If Saudi Arabia and Israel had established formal diplomatic relations without a permanent solution to the Palestine issue, it would have dealt a death blow to the struggle of the Palestinians. Before any more progress on normalisation could take place, the war broke out on October 7, triggered by the Hamas terror attack into Israel. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In the Gaza war as well as the recent Israel-Iran conflict, Saudi Arabia had to join other Arab/Muslim nations in the region to strongly condemn Israeli strikes into Gaza as well as the unilateral strikes on June 13, violating the territorial integrity of Iran. In such a situation, it is very unlikely that Saudi Arabia will relent soon and move towards normalisation. Any major expansion of the Abraham Accords is therefore likely to remain remote in the near future except, possibly, adding Lebanon and Syria to it. What can then be the path towards peace and economic progress in the region? Can economy and connectivity work where diplomacy is currently facing headwinds? Here is where the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) comes into the picture. It may be recalled that IMEC was one of the most successful outcomes of India's G20 Summit in Delhi in September 2023. Coming as a surprise announcement at the Summit, it immediately caught the imagination of policymakers, businesses, and industry. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In its concept, it is a bold and transformative connectivity project with a vision to connect India with Europe across the deserts of the Arabian Peninsula, creating an alternate link to the Suez Canal, which has faced frequent disruptions due to conflicts in the region. It envisions a multi-modal economic corridor involving multiple businesses, integrating railways, ports, highways, energy networks, and digital infrastructure to enhance trade, investment, and connectivity across the three continents. When implemented in full, IMEC promises to unlock new opportunities for multi-dimensional trade through multi-modal transport linkages across regions that have traditionally been close trade partners. It has the potential to facilitate faster and more efficient movement of goods, bypassing existing bottlenecks, reducing shipping delays, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, and cutting costs. It also aims to secure regional supply chains, improve trade accessibility, and facilitate the economic prosperity of people and countries along the alignment of the project. One of the key and very interesting parts of the architecture unveiled at the G20 Summit was the alignment, which passes through Jordan and Israel, culminating at the port of Haifa, before its onwards sea passage to Europe. Interestingly, Egypt, which was traditionally a gateway from the region, was excluded from the original architecture despite having better-developed ports and rail infrastructure, giving a clear indication that IMEC was being seen as an instrument of economic connectivity as well as a geopolitical instrument to include Israel. However, even before it could take shape, the war in Gaza erupted, putting it on a backburner. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In recent months, however, IMEC has come alive again. Whether it was PM Modi's visit to Washington earlier in February, the AI Global Summit in France in February, or the visit of EU Commissioners to New Delhi in March, one common thread is the mention of IMEC and the commitment to see that this project is implemented at the earliest opportunity. S Jaishankar, India's External Affairs Minister, during his recent visit to Brussels in June, held extensive talks with the EU delegation. Among the talks, key points of discussion included the India-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and projects like IMEC, which can not only enhance connectivity but also unlock many other opportunities for collaboration. During recent discussions on IMEC, there is also a clear realisation that the originally proposed alignment may require a modification, and perhaps, the inclusion of Oman in the East and Egypt in the West will offer more options, which are less conflict-prone, to advance the IMEC project. In the West Asian region too, there is a strong positive outlook towards getting IMEC off the ground. India is already working bilaterally with the UAE and Saudi Arabia on coordinating many issues, like plugging the missing links and key regulatory mechanisms, which would be essential for smooth transit of goods through IMEC. The EU too has woken up to the huge promise of IMEC and has started deliberations on it. France and Italy, key signatories of IMEC from Europe, have also nominated special envoys for IMEC. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If signatory countries in the IMEC and others like Egypt, Oman, etc, do decide to move forward, it can create a huge opportunity for the three regions. India, which is seen to anchor the project, can play a very important and pivotal role in kick-starting the project. With close and strategic relationships with Israel as well as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, and the EU, India can play a key role in putting collective economic prosperity as the driving factor, putting the conflict on a backburner. Focused and collective efforts on a shared vision of enhanced trade, connectivity, green energy, and prosperity can perhaps do what diplomacy is not able to do—end the cycle of conflict in West Asia. Maybe IMEC can do what the Abraham Accords was aimed for—lasting peace in West Asia. Col Rajeev Agarwal is a West Asia expert and a Senior Research Consultant at Chintan Research Foundation, New Delhi. His X Handle is @rajeev1421. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
India must move beyond Vishwa Guru dream: Ram Madhav
BENGALURU: India must stop being passive and move beyond the dream of becoming a 'Vishwa Guru' if it wants to have a real say in shaping the future world order, author and BJP leader Dr Ram Madhav said. 'This is not the time to be lazy or just feel proud of our past. The world is changing quickly, and India needs to act fast by staying united, growing stronger economically, and leading in technology,' he said. He was speaking at a book discussion on 'The New World – 21st Century Global Order and India,' his latest book that was launched last week in Delhi. Madhav said the aim of the book was to help people understand how global power is shifting and what India should do to stay ahead. He explained that the old world order, led by Western powers, is breaking down. Today's world is not just shaped by big countries like the US and China, but also by tech experts, investors, NGOs, and even terrorist groups. 'This is not just a multipolar world — it is a heteropolar one, where many types of powers exist,' he said. He gave the example of Elon Musk, who helped Ukraine restore its communications during the Russia-Ukraine war, and Hungary's Prime Minister calling an investor the biggest threat to the country. 'This is the new reality — where individuals with money and technology can challenge even governments,' he added, pointing that in today's world, countries need advanced technology like AI, quantum computing, robotics, and biotech to stay powerful. 'In the last century, trade and economy gave countries strength. In this century, it will be deep tech,' he said. He also argued how India still lags behind in areas like semiconductor manufacturing and research. 'We are building units for 28nm chips while other companies are working on 2nm designs. This shows how far we still need to go. Even if we reach a $10 trillion economy, our per capita income will still be half of China's. We have to work much harder,' he said.
India.com
4 hours ago
- India.com
This deadly beast can surpass 5th-generation jets, more powerful than Rafale and F-35, has 12000 km range; it costs Rs..., it is...
The current conflicts in the ongoing Israel-Hamas, Israel-Iran, and Russia-Ukraine situations have resulted in a seismic shift to the global strategic environment. The world is increasingly divided into two opposing blocs, making it crucial for countries like India to become self-reliant in the defense sector. Therefore, self-sufficiency in the defense sector has become critical. The need to upgrade weapons systems through technology cooperation with strategic partners is needed. India and Russia have had an enduring relationship for several decades, and the Russian Federation has consistently supported India throughout its challenging periods. In this context, it is critically necessary for India to strengthen and modernize its defense capabilities. On July 4, 2025, the Deputy Chief of the Army addressed critical perspectives on many issues, while talking about Operation Sindoor, and subsequently highlighted that the whole system must be enhanced with more technology. Although the Indian Air Force's role in Operation Sindoor was pivotal, it still suffers from a fighter jet shortage. India is looking to solve this through a two-pronged approach: importing fighter jets from partner nations and increasing indigenous production of combat aircraft, in sufficient quantities to stay competitive in the region. India is on the verge of acquiring Fifth-generation Fighters and has announced the AMCA (Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft) project to produce an indigenous fifth-generation stealth aircraft. The Defence Ministry has issued a contract for developing the prototype design of this fighter, which is supported by an initial fund of ₹15,000 crore. In terms of shifting global attention, once again, the spotlight has turned to strategic bomber jets because of the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, which was used to destroy nuclear facilities in Iran by the U.S. This has also highlighted the evolution of capability with modern warfare and determination of effective offensive strike capability. A few days ago, there were reports that India is developing a bunker-busting weapon system of its own – a missile based solution. Unlike the United States and Russia, India does not have modern strategic bombers capable of delivering real deep-strike ordnance. Therefore, India has turned to missile technology, and as such, India is working on adapting the Agni-5 intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) for bunkering-busting purposes. At the same time, India is possibly intending to get one of the best global bombers in the world, Russia's Tupolev Tu-160M. This is a supersonic, variable-sweep wing heavy bomber, capable of speed, range, and nuclear missiles; the Tu-160M would elevate India's strategic strike role even further, if this deal goes ahead. The Tu-160M, also known as the 'White Swan' in Russia and 'Blackjack' by NATO forces, is one of the world's most advanced strategic bombing jet aircraft, but the war in Ukraine has slowed production, as Russia is producing this state-of-the-art supersonic aircraft from its Kazan plant. Recently, a Ukrainian attack caused damage to some bombers at a Russian airbase, and this damage greatly diminished Russian capabilities for defense production. This damage also may have impeded India's work to acquire the Tu-160M, which could have been a significant strategic leap for the Indian Air Force. Some defense observers believe that if India can acquire the Tu-160M, the strategic balance in the region would move toward India. Currently, India has multirole fighter jets including Rafale and Su-30MKI. In parallel to adding bombers, India is also seeking to add fifth generation fighters, and, focusing on its AMCA (Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft) project, which is intended to boost India's future capacities in air combat. Specifically, it is the Russian Tu-160M bomber that sets itself apart. The bomber has a combat range of 1,200 kilometers, meaning it can do this range without the need for refueling. If India manages to buy the jet, it could significantly reduce China's growing presence in the Asia-Pacific. China has its own bomber – the H-6 – but comparing China's bomber to the Tu-160M, China's H-6 is sitting down on specs and technology. The Tu-160M being in the Indian Air Force's fleet will provide India an unquestionable strategic advantage over Beijing.
