logo
‘Delays, breakdowns, frustration': NSW commuters left waiting at the station

‘Delays, breakdowns, frustration': NSW commuters left waiting at the station

The Guardian3 hours ago
As more families seek affordable housing outside Sydney, they are experiencing a daily stress: their bosses want them back in the office more frequently but the train services to get there are becoming more and more unreliable.
NSW has just recorded its worst year for on time running for Sydney trains, with nearly one in five running late, but the real problem is with intercity trains. Since July, one in three have failed to meet the punctuality benchmark.
'It's usually late. It's a surprise when it's on time,' says Elita Bird, who travels from Gosford. 'The slightest thing with the weather, which is increasing, it just runs late.'
'Terrible,' says Kim, who asks not to use her surname. She makes the one hour, 40 minute journey from and to Tuggerah on the Central Coast to Central station every weekday.
'They just constantly cancel, reschedule them and they're very slow because we get stuck behind the all-stations trains.'
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
It raises serious questions for the Minns Labor government as it attempts to deal with a housing crisis and skyrocketing house prices, which are sending families farther afield to find a place to live.
'If you want to take the pressure off house prices we have to make it easier for people to live outside the major cities. That means having reliable public transport,' says Dr Geoffrey Clifton, senior lecturer in transport at the University of Sydney.
The headline numbers the NSW government releases on train performance do not fully capture the agony of the state's long-distance train commuters as Sydney Trains combines the performance of the city and the intercity services.
'Whilst Sydney Trains did not reach its own 92% performance target over the past three years, in part due to protected industrial action during this period and severe weather events, on time running in 2022 was 92.1%, 95% in 2021 and 92.5% in 2020,' a spokesperson told the Guardian in an official statement.
But it is an entirely different story if the focus is on the intercity services – trains to the Central Coast, South Coast, Blue Mountains and Southern Highlands.
Those services have failed to meet the 92% benchmark – trains arriving within six minutes of their timetabled arrival during peak hours – for all seven years, where data is available.
So far, in the first three weeks of the 2025-26 financial year, just 65.2% of trains on the four main intercity lines were 'punctual'.
It was little better in the previous 2024-25 year: just 70%
Worse still, punctuality is worse when commuters are trying to get home.
In the week 30 June to 4 July 2025 just 37% of trains taking commuters home from the city were 'on time'.
In the week 19 May to 23 May, when the east coast was hit by huge rainfall, just 21% of evening peak trains were on time.
Rain leads to several problems: subsidence on to the lines, as well as crowding into middle carriages as passengers huddle under cover in the central part of platforms.
Bird says she now looks at the weather to decide whether she should commute or work from home.
'If there is rain or wind, then often there's a line down. I know what the problem is: Cockle Creek station [on the Newcastle line] just floods really easily and that then leads to delays further down the line. It doesn't feel like they are being upfront about what's going wrong,' she says.
Communication is another bugbear of commuters.
'My train stops multiple times and is often about half an hour to 40 minutes late to the final station,' says Liam, who commutes to and from Springwood in the Blue Mountains.
'There's some very quiet message. One of the days there was someone on tracks but delays are a very common occurrence.'
Clifton says Sydney Trains relies on phone calls and paper instructions to tell train drivers what to do – such as skipping stations or terminating early. Digital systems are being introduced.
The Central Coast and the Blue Mountains lines have seen a significant decline in the punctuality of their services since Labor was elected in 2023.
The Central Coast line was on time 60 to 70% during 2024-25, with some weeks as low as 35%.
On the Blue Mountains line, most weeks only 45 to 65% of trains run on time.
The South Coast line's punctuality is also deteriorating while there has been some improvement on the Southern Highlands line.
Clifton says NSW has struggled to provide a reliable service between cities partly because the lines are so complicated, with 'lots of old tunnels and bridges'.
The other part of the equation is maintenance, he says.
Sydney Trains admits maintenance backlogs are at 'a new maximum', which means temporary speed restrictions are now in place on parts of the network.
A spokesperson says the maintenance backlog built up during the industrial action from September 2024 to February 2025.
It's not the same story elsewhere. In Europe, Switzerland topped the list with 95% of its long distance trains arriving within five minutes of the timetabled time in 2024. The Netherlands was not far behind with 94%, followed by Belgium at 90%, France 89%, and Italy 80%.
Surprisingly Germany, once a poster child for train punctuality, has achieved only 54% on the same measure, with commentators saying the deterioration is due to ageing infrastructure and a lack of investment.
Sydney Trains points to the new Mariyung trains as one of the investments the Minns government has made.
'New trains can certainly help once the new fleet is introduced but the teething problems can last at least a year or so,' Clifton says.
The transport minister, John Graham, says: 'Settling the rail agreement means all energy can now be focused on reliability. We have got that message loud and clear.'
But Clifton says Graham and other members of the government should experience the train system for themselves.
'If they did, they'd see the delays, the breakdowns, the frustration… The truth is Labor thinks they can take these seats for granted.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Delays, breakdowns, frustration': NSW commuters left waiting at the station
‘Delays, breakdowns, frustration': NSW commuters left waiting at the station

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

‘Delays, breakdowns, frustration': NSW commuters left waiting at the station

As more families seek affordable housing outside Sydney, they are experiencing a daily stress: their bosses want them back in the office more frequently but the train services to get there are becoming more and more unreliable. NSW has just recorded its worst year for on time running for Sydney trains, with nearly one in five running late, but the real problem is with intercity trains. Since July, one in three have failed to meet the punctuality benchmark. 'It's usually late. It's a surprise when it's on time,' says Elita Bird, who travels from Gosford. 'The slightest thing with the weather, which is increasing, it just runs late.' 'Terrible,' says Kim, who asks not to use her surname. She makes the one hour, 40 minute journey from and to Tuggerah on the Central Coast to Central station every weekday. 'They just constantly cancel, reschedule them and they're very slow because we get stuck behind the all-stations trains.' Sign up: AU Breaking News email It raises serious questions for the Minns Labor government as it attempts to deal with a housing crisis and skyrocketing house prices, which are sending families farther afield to find a place to live. 'If you want to take the pressure off house prices we have to make it easier for people to live outside the major cities. That means having reliable public transport,' says Dr Geoffrey Clifton, senior lecturer in transport at the University of Sydney. The headline numbers the NSW government releases on train performance do not fully capture the agony of the state's long-distance train commuters as Sydney Trains combines the performance of the city and the intercity services. 'Whilst Sydney Trains did not reach its own 92% performance target over the past three years, in part due to protected industrial action during this period and severe weather events, on time running in 2022 was 92.1%, 95% in 2021 and 92.5% in 2020,' a spokesperson told the Guardian in an official statement. But it is an entirely different story if the focus is on the intercity services – trains to the Central Coast, South Coast, Blue Mountains and Southern Highlands. Those services have failed to meet the 92% benchmark – trains arriving within six minutes of their timetabled arrival during peak hours – for all seven years, where data is available. So far, in the first three weeks of the 2025-26 financial year, just 65.2% of trains on the four main intercity lines were 'punctual'. It was little better in the previous 2024-25 year: just 70% Worse still, punctuality is worse when commuters are trying to get home. In the week 30 June to 4 July 2025 just 37% of trains taking commuters home from the city were 'on time'. In the week 19 May to 23 May, when the east coast was hit by huge rainfall, just 21% of evening peak trains were on time. Rain leads to several problems: subsidence on to the lines, as well as crowding into middle carriages as passengers huddle under cover in the central part of platforms. Bird says she now looks at the weather to decide whether she should commute or work from home. 'If there is rain or wind, then often there's a line down. I know what the problem is: Cockle Creek station [on the Newcastle line] just floods really easily and that then leads to delays further down the line. It doesn't feel like they are being upfront about what's going wrong,' she says. Communication is another bugbear of commuters. 'My train stops multiple times and is often about half an hour to 40 minutes late to the final station,' says Liam, who commutes to and from Springwood in the Blue Mountains. 'There's some very quiet message. One of the days there was someone on tracks but delays are a very common occurrence.' Clifton says Sydney Trains relies on phone calls and paper instructions to tell train drivers what to do – such as skipping stations or terminating early. Digital systems are being introduced. The Central Coast and the Blue Mountains lines have seen a significant decline in the punctuality of their services since Labor was elected in 2023. The Central Coast line was on time 60 to 70% during 2024-25, with some weeks as low as 35%. On the Blue Mountains line, most weeks only 45 to 65% of trains run on time. The South Coast line's punctuality is also deteriorating while there has been some improvement on the Southern Highlands line. Clifton says NSW has struggled to provide a reliable service between cities partly because the lines are so complicated, with 'lots of old tunnels and bridges'. The other part of the equation is maintenance, he says. Sydney Trains admits maintenance backlogs are at 'a new maximum', which means temporary speed restrictions are now in place on parts of the network. A spokesperson says the maintenance backlog built up during the industrial action from September 2024 to February 2025. It's not the same story elsewhere. In Europe, Switzerland topped the list with 95% of its long distance trains arriving within five minutes of the timetabled time in 2024. The Netherlands was not far behind with 94%, followed by Belgium at 90%, France 89%, and Italy 80%. Surprisingly Germany, once a poster child for train punctuality, has achieved only 54% on the same measure, with commentators saying the deterioration is due to ageing infrastructure and a lack of investment. Sydney Trains points to the new Mariyung trains as one of the investments the Minns government has made. 'New trains can certainly help once the new fleet is introduced but the teething problems can last at least a year or so,' Clifton says. The transport minister, John Graham, says: 'Settling the rail agreement means all energy can now be focused on reliability. We have got that message loud and clear.' But Clifton says Graham and other members of the government should experience the train system for themselves. 'If they did, they'd see the delays, the breakdowns, the frustration… The truth is Labor thinks they can take these seats for granted.'

‘No shops, no schools': homes in England built without basic amenities
‘No shops, no schools': homes in England built without basic amenities

The Guardian

time12 hours ago

  • The Guardian

‘No shops, no schools': homes in England built without basic amenities

Thousands of homes across England are being built without urgently needed community infrastructure, say councillors and campaigners, leaving families without access to playgrounds, schools, shops, and even doctors. Even where provision is built, it can take years to come into use, the Guardian has been told. Just outside the village of Cressing, in Essex, sits the Paddocks, a development of 225 new homes with a fenced-off playground, surrounded with signs warning 'keep out' and 'children are not allowed to play on this site'. 'It's been three years since families moved in,' saysKevin Dale, a local campaigner. 'And houses overlook an unfinished playground.' There are no shops, he reports, no nursery, and the recently planted trees have died. At Westvale Park in Surrey, councillors took the drastic decision to put a stop order on the building of thousands of homes in order to make sure that a play area and local amenities were being provided. 'They were supposed to build shops, a community centre and playgrounds once it reached 600 homes', Richard Biggs, the council leader, says. 'But we were at over 1,000 homes and there was nothing.' Steve Chambers, whose campaign group Transport for New Homes has been sending volunteers to visit housing developments around the country for several years, says: 'We are building homes on the fringes of towns in places that have very little public transport, where teenagers have nowhere to go independently. 'Our volunteers saw developments with no corner shops or cafes, no sense of space.' In the case of the Paddocks, built by Countryside Homes, which is owned by Vistry Group, it's been a long and complex process. The project started building in 2021 but subsequently the local council, Braintree, took action against Vistry and Countryside because 'it became apparent that the development was not being built in accordance with the planning permission'. A new planning application to regularise what has been built was finally approved in March this year. The council said: '[We] are continuing to work with the developer to get the open space set out, including the play area.' As well as a closed playground, Dale points out that 'there is no shop, no nursery, no pub'. The developer, Vistry, points out that under its planning agreement it does not have to build a shop, pub or nursery. In relation to the trees that have died, it says this problem is 'common in new plantings' and will be rectified at its expense. The playground is due to open this summer, Vistry Group told the Guardian, but is closed 'until surrounding landscaping is complete … [which] is subject to discharge of a planning condition which Vistry will continue to work in partnership with Braintree [local planning authority] to conclude'. The company also points out that changes after initial permission were 'standard' and that, more broadly, it works according to the local plan. It added: '[The] local plan provides the framework for how the district will develop.' At another development nearby, Silver End, a site of 350 properties built by Redrow Homes, James Abbott, a green councillor who has sat on his local planning committee for most of the past 26 years, says that pleas for a basic space for the community were turned down by the developers, despite locals offering to put in their own labour for free. 'I asked them to give us just the shell of a building on the land that had been allocated for early years care. We had local tradespeople lined up who were offering to do the rest voluntarily; Redrow turned us down.' The developer says that a building on that spot was not in the plan: 'We purchased the site with outline planning already approved, which included £2.5m funding to support local infrastructure, but did not include a community centre. We discussed potentially amending plans with the local authority, but the decision was made to proceed with the original plans. The site has protected space left on it to build early years provision.' Planning meeting notes show that Redrow offered a community hall as part of a renegotiation of the larger section 106 agreement, which the council turned down. Where does responsibility lie for the problem? Abbott believes that developers have too much freedom. 'Changes to the planning system made under both Conservative and Labour have put developers in an extremely strong position to build houses that maximise their profits and avoid building everything else.' But in some cases the developer was not required by the local authority to supply community facilities as part of its planning permission: the economics of much-needed housing do not always allow it. And in others, applications were denied by local authorities because they did not meet the requirements, but the project was then given permission on appeal to the government. There are many developers who go over and above in making sure that they are building livable, sustainable housing spaces, and who take their responsibilities extremely seriously. On Conningbrook, near Ashford in Kent, for example, Redrow is building new wetlands to protect the local special area of conservation from nitrates. As well as the £3.5m wetlands, the 725 home site will have 11 hectares of open space, including a village green and a community building. But Chambers's organisation has also seen developments where 'vast spaces on new-build estates are given up to parking … this is the reason there is no space for anything else. In its report What is being built this year, volunteers visited 40 sites across England and fund: 'Many greenfield developments are in poor locations for sustainable transport and are car dependent.' Wherever your new home is, Chambers says, 'You should be able to go out the front door, and know that there are local amenities to walk to, and 'turn up and go' public transport. The current planning system is not delivering this vision.' Some local authorities have felt the only way to get what they need for their communities is take matters into their own hands to press developers to build what is needed for communities. At Westvale Park in Surrey, a development of 1,500 homes on what were once farmers fields near Gatwick airport, Katherine, a childminder, is pushing a toddler on the swings in the recently built playground, and has nothing but good things to say about living here. 'Oh, it's lovely, absolutely great for children, there are lots of playgrounds and it's safe. It would be nice to have a shop though. At the moment you have to drive for everything.' But if Reigate and Banstead council in Surrey hadn't stepped in, there might have been nowhere to play and no hall being built. In 2023 the council called a stop to building on the site because the developers had not built the promised playgrounds and community hall. 'There were rules about what had to be built at a certain point.' says Biggs. 'So we had to put a stop order on them and that was a difficult decision.' In doing so the council was risking the wrath of families desperate to move in and pressure from four of the biggest housebuilders in the UK. 'We had families waiting to move in so I was getting unpleasant phone calls,' Biggs adds. 'The developers weren't happy.' He says planning law must ensure vital community provision gets built along with houses: 'Developers will concentrate on building houses first. So it's important that the government recognises that we have to protect green spaces.' The consortium of builders – Crest Nicholson, Persimmon, Taylor Wimpey and A2Dominion – was served a stop notice for 'failing to deliver important community facilities to support the development and its residents in a timely manner', and last summer an agreement was reached for the developers to put a series of bonds in place, totalling about £12m, which the council held to build the facilities if they weren't finished to a new completion date. The pause was lifted on 5 July 2024; several play areas are now open on the site but there is still no shop or an NHS GP surgery that was originally planned for. A spokesperson for the consortium said: 'The final phase of the development, the Horley Neighbourhood Centre, will feature a neighbourhood hall, retail spaces, play areas and allotments. We expect to have completed all works by the end of 2026, in accordance with the revised programme timeline agreed with the council.' A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: 'We are committed to strengthening the rules on developer contributions so that developers deliver the required infrastructure faster as we build 1.5m homes through our plan for change. 'Developers are expected to provide infrastructure where this is needed to make a development acceptable, regardless of size.' But campaigners and local councillors fear that, in the government's haste to build new homes, vital provisions may be left behind. Biggs warns that further deregulation of the planning process has to leave protection for councils to hold developers to account. 'We need to keep the power to say 'stop'. If we hadn't stepped in I think we'd still be arguing now with the developers over when we were going to get these playgrounds.'

Are young women finally being spared the unique cruelty of male literary opinions?
Are young women finally being spared the unique cruelty of male literary opinions?

The Guardian

time18 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Are young women finally being spared the unique cruelty of male literary opinions?

Gen X, millennial and gen Z men are reading less than boomers and older generations in Australia, and there's only one good thing about it. Thirsty, bookish young women might now be spared the niche heterofatalist torture of a sexual objective frustrated by the obstacle of male literary opinion. Oh, what a second-by-second social negotiation it was; if she hadn't read the enthused-about text, would her desired object find her vapid and shallow? If she had read it, she was in even more trouble: would his interest be piqued or levelled dare she confess she found Stranger in a Strange Land a meandering journey? Would she argue Fight Club beat you around the head with its message? Would the young woman really have to listen to him read out bits from And the Ass Saw the Angel before his pants removal? I'm grateful, at least, that the latest generation of girls who bear the heterosexual burden are unlikely to experience the unique cruelty of collective, instant male disinterest after blurting out 'Goldberry is a completely unnecessary character!' amid casual Lord of the Rings chat at the pub. But I am sad that, if figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and discussed by the ABC last week are to be believed, the steps of this complex, sometimes ugly, sometimes exhilarating dance may be becoming the stuff of anthropological archives rather than an ongoing scene of potential frisson. The ABS data does exclude reading for study or any online reading – including news – so it's possible younger men are indulging in the written word in other areas. Oh, boys; with the passage of time, have your forsaken your Goldberry … or have you forgotten her entirely? It's even sadder news that reading is down across the board. Among Australian senior school students, according to Australia Reads, 29% of them did not reportedly read a physical book last year. It's not an Australian problem. In the 1970s, 60% of American year 12 students read daily. By 2016, it was 16%. Obviously, screens, the internet, binge TV replacing long-form narrative consumption habits and the – yes, again – handheld doom machines are accessories to their cultural decline. Johann Hari's excellent book Stolen Focus explains in detail how technology has 'hacked' our attention spans for short-form, immediate interruption, with the result of rewiring our brains against the concentration required to immerse in a book. In case you can't find the time, energy or quietude to read it, Hari also explains that overwork, chronic stress, ultra-processed foods, poor sleep and environmental stressors are compounding the problem. Neuroscientists agree: Prof Maryanne Wolf has warned that reduced practice in sustained reading may not only weaken the brain's capacity to manage complex texts, but might also denude critical thinking, empathy and cognitive depth. This is where the gendered division of the world's remaining novel readers may be most painfully felt. Anna Burkey, from the book industry initiative Australia Reads, told the ABC that studies have shown parents read less to their male children than female ones, reinforcing an unconscious pattern that puts crucial developmental tools further away from boys who need them. As educators, male literary identity Brandon Jack and the Tough Guy book club movement strategise how to reverse the damage of gender-holing literary curiosity and get books back into boys' hands, the rest of us must grapple with the emotional world the present reading divide has contributed to creating. It's a gendered empathy deficit. Not only does it facilitate social carelessness and cruelty, but it is socially isolating. And it is leaving men and boys lonely and socially isolated at disproportional rates compared with women and girls. Nearly 43% of Australian men report loneliness, a recent survey shows, with 16% experiencing severe loneliness. I can't help but recall advice my mother gave me growing up as an only child with working parents: 'You'll never feel alone if you make friends with books.' I didn't, because I did. Humans invented storytelling in order to provide lessons in survival: we faced this, we dealt with it this way, this is the result, for good or ill. Sure, we can get stories from screens, but as that market has widened it's also flattened; a 'new literalism' of storytelling on screens has emerged of such comprehensive over-explication that there are few imaginative demands placed on viewers at all. It's from the imaginative, interpretative effort of reading stories from text that our brains wire a broader, personally felt social understanding, which provide us strategies for forming connections, maintaining relationships, overcoming restrictive and uncomfortable social roles, and being able to negotiate systems of help and of care. The same social psychologist who tracked the decline in reading among American teenagers published data from her 40-year longitudinal study identifying a maturity regression among today's western young people. They're having less sex, fewer dates, less civic participation and drinking less, meaning that 18-year-olds are more like how 15-year-olds used to be 40 years ago. Other scholars confirm; the rising generations have become more risk-averse. I've argued that the omnipresent social surveillance of mobile phone technology may be a reason … but one wonders if it's partially because they're consuming less vicarious experience from books to construct informed risk matrices around what they're likely to encounter. There are always social and emotional risks in the dance of sexual attraction. But sometimes, ah – mutual book-learnin' left boys and girls with some stories to tell. Van Badham is a Guardian Australia columnist.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store