
'No credit or consent.' Composer says Indiana Bible College stole her song for streaming
Choral music composer Rosephanye Powell said an Indiana Bible College choir copied, altered and performed her song without permission.
Powell, a professor at Auburn University in Alabama, said Indiana Bible College's 'John 1' uses elements of her 'The Word Was God.' She and her publisher, Glendale, California-based Gentry Publications, had denied usage to the Indiana college last year, according to Powell.
The a cappella song is based on the first chapter in the Bible's Gospel of John.
Powell is well-known in the choral community.
The American Choral Directors Association honored Powell with its 2025 Raymond Brock Memorial Commission, a prestigious award. Her new work premiered at the organization's national conference this spring.
'Rosephanye Powell is one of the most important female composers of choral music in the United States today – if not the most important,' said Stephen Bock, president of Fred Bock Music Co. Inc., which owns Gentry Publications.
'The Word Was God' was her first publication and is her most iconic work, Bock said.
Powell composed the song when she and her husband, William C. Powell, now music professor and director of choral activities at Auburn, were co-conductors for the collegiate choir at Philander Smith College, an HBCU in Arkansas. The choir there in 1996 was the first to perform it.
'There is no doubt that what Indiana Bible College has done is infringe on the copyright of 'The Word Was God,' Bock said.
'This song is undeniably a derivative of my work,' she said in a May 23 Facebook post, adding that the Indiana choir made minor alterations to notes, rests and rhythms to "The Word Was God."
The bible college choir had performed an unapproved arrangement of her song in early 2024, titled 'The Word Was God,' using a band and a soloist and uploaded it to TikTok, Powell said in a May 23 Facebook post.
Indiana Bible College initially contacted Gentry Publications in January 2024, seeking permission to produce a gospel arrangement of 'The Word Was God,' but recorded the song and released a video before getting the approval from Powell and the publisher, Bock said.
Gentry Publications rejected the request and directed the choir to destroy the music and remove the video, according to Bock.
Indiana Bible College choir director Tim Hall had told Powell that, as a high school choral director, he'd performed the song years before, and in April 2024, he again requested to use the music, this time for a performance at an international music festival at the school. Powell and Gentry said no.
'And then the next thing we knew, in April of 2025, they released 'John 1,' which we feel is completely derivative of 'The Word Was God,'' Bock said. The Indiana choir was using material from 'The Word Was God,' but presenting 'John 1' as an original composition, he said.
'What came out in April of this year, 'John 1,' we contend is a slight — and by slight, I mean slight — reworking of the gospel arrangement of 'The Word Was God' that they tried to get permission for in 2024,' Bock said. 'So legally, it is a derivative of a derivative.
'What makes this egregious is the historical record of their interest in 'The Word Was God,' going back to January of 2024, and their continued insistence that it's original work when it is obvious that it is not.'
Gentry learned of the 'John 1' song a couple of days after the school's April 26 upload of a music video for the song to YouTube, and contacted the college the April 30, alleging copyright infringement.
The publisher made the copyright claim against the 'John 1' video to YouTube in mid-May, and by the morning of May 20, the platform had removed the music video, Bock said. At that point, the video had about 940,000 views, he said.
Powell, who also has taught at Philander Smith and Georgia Southern University, said Indiana Bible College is profiting from the song through sales on its website and digital platforms. "John 1" debuted on Apple Music on May 2, 2025.
Since she began sharing her story on social media last week, the school has posted that it is attempting to determine the legalities.
IndyStar has reached out to Indiana Bible College for comment, but has not received a response.
Others are reading: Why authors of 'Back Home Again' were accused of stealing from another iconic Indiana song
Hall and other credited arrangers of the unlicensed 2024 arrangement are listed as composers of 'John 1' and claim 'The Word Was God' is not part of the new work, Powell said in the May 23 Facebook post.
Hall is also associate dean of worship studies at Indiana Bible College.
'The disregard for me and my work is both unprofessional and deeply troubling. As an African American composer, I am acutely aware of our nation's history of Black artists having their musical property taken without credit or consent. That history makes Mr. Hall's actions especially egregious, given his role in guiding young singers, arrangers, and musicians,' Powell said in the post.
'What is most disheartening is that I communicated my position to Mr. Hall very politely and respectfully a year ago, making it clear why I could not approve.'
In a May 26 social media post, Powell said she felt strongly the song should not be performed with a band or soloist, as the Indiana choir had done without permission in 2024.
She intended the a cappella piece to be restricted to human voices to convey God's speaking creation.
'I wanted people to get a picture of how God's word created the world,' Powell said. 'I was trying to spread not just the message, but give them a picture of what God's voice did as he spoke. One day there's trees, then there's the sun, there's the moon, there's the stars, then there's shrubbery, there's water. A picture of the Earth is being created through voices.'
While the Scripture is not copyrighted, the harmonies and rhythms used in 'The Word Was God' are, Powell said.
'That, for me, is about integrity,' she said in the video. ' It is not about the money. They're the ones making the money.'
'And what's worse is this time they're saying it's an original work, which means it uses none of my work whatsoever. But this is not true. Sections of this song are my work, so it's exactly as before,' she said. 'At least before they said they were using my work, they just didn't get a license for it and didn't inform me in advance or get permission. Now they say none of it is my work.'
Many in the music community are standing up for Powell.
'This is not homage. This is THEFT. It is a violation of copyright law and a blatant disrespect of a Black female composer's intellectual property. Historically, we have seen this happen often where black artists have repeatedly had their creative works stolen, imitated, or repackaged without credit or compensation,' said Antwoin Holman, a high school choral music director in Douglasville, Georgia, on Facebook. 'This pattern of exploitation must be called out and challenged and IBC we are holding your feet to the fire.'
Powell also has the support of J. W. Pepper, the world's largest sheet music retailer.
The 149-year-old company on May 28 posted to its Facebook page, 'We stand with Rosephanye Powell. As a champion of original music, we support the artists whose work we distribute,' the company posted on May 28. ' We applaud Dr. Powell's courage in speaking out to defend her intellectual property. Creative work is not only labor—it's legacy.'
Bock said Gentry had been trying to resolve the issue privately.
On May 23, the publisher emailed Indiana Bible College a 20-page letter detailing its case for 'John 1' being derivative of 'The Word Was God.'
Bock said the school responded on May 25, saying, 'We are in the process of evaluating the extensive analysis you shared of 'John 1' relative to 'The Word Was God, and will provide a full response as soon as it is practicable.'
Gentry has had nothing directly from the school since, Bock said.
'They're supposed to be getting a response to us. I don't know what it means for timing. As of right now, the ball is in their court.'
Indiana Bible College, founded in 1981 and currently located at 1502 E. Sumner Avenue, posted to its social media accounts that it working on clearing up the matter in private.
'The release of the choral arrangement 'John 1' has been met with claims of copyright infringement," it said. "Establishing whether copyright infringement has occurred is extraordinarily fact sensitive, and parties to copyright infringement disputes frequently genuinely disagree whether the legal standard for infringement has been met. We are actively discussing the matter privately with the only party that has a legal standing to dispute the matter.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Barbenheimer's Epic Double Feature Happened 2 Years Ago, And I'm Worried I'll Never Get That Same Experience
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Back in 2023, there was a time when it felt as if all was right with the world, and that, my friends, was Barbenheimer. While the 2025 movie schedule has been filled to the brim with great releases, I really don't think we're going to get another time like this, and that worries me. It's been two years. I know, it's hard to believe it, but it has, and it honestly feels like a lifetime at this point. We have had some major releases come out since then, such as the latest Superman, which turned me into a fan. Or we could point to Wicked, which took over the world for a month or two. However, nothing has hit quite as hard as when these two films – Barbie and Oppenheimer – were released simultaneously. And honestly, I don't think we're going to get another instance like this, at least for a long time. Barbenheimer Was Perfectly Timed During The Summer I think a big reason why Barbenheimer was such a success was that both of these releases were planned at the perfect time – right in the middle of summer. I always feel that the most successful blockbusters tend to happen at this point, and it's clear both of these, by their box office amounts, did incredibly well. Barbie earned well over $1 billion, and Oppenheimer came really close to the mark, as did a rated-R movie. However, because many people had a day off or two during this time, seeing the double feature was that much easier. The Amount Of Marketing For Both Was Done Amazingly Well And Spawned An Era Unlike Any Other Another significant factor contributing to this success is that the marketing teams were on point. We all already knew Christopher Nolan's best films. We were all already aware of the pull Barbie had as a toy. However, the fact that these two were eventually marketed together as a double feature paved the way for its success. They had their marketing – it was practically pink mania for months with Barbie. However, I think it worked best when people combined the films into one prominent double feature, allowing fans to dress up for each and go out with their friends, making it a whole event rather than just an outing or a date. That's the key in marketing here. The Fanbases Somehow Collided In A Way Unlike Ever Before, And I Don't Think We'll Get That Again The beauty of this is that Barbenheimer is special. Something like this has happened before, where two totally conflicting genres released major films on the same day – The Dark Knight and Mamma Mia!, a movie I rewatch all the time – but that was never as grand an event. The same thing happened with the release of Wicked and Gladiator, and how marketing teams tried to make it the new Barbenheimer, but it just didn't work – even if both films did very well. I think Barbenheimer is a one-and-done, and that does sadden me. There was something so…magical about this time, as cheesy as that sounds. The idea of two completely different fan bases coming together to celebrate films, in two totally different styles, is something that I will always love and never forget. The hype that led up to this made it even more enjoyable, and attending the double feature with my friends and a crowd of people who just loved movies was unlike any other. Maybe one day we'll get another Barbenheimer. But you know what? I'm happy with it living in my memory, even if I feel that we're never going to get another time like this one. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Terry Bradshaw, Aaron Rodgers Do Not Agree Politically
Terry Bradshaw, Aaron Rodgers Do Not Agree Politically originally appeared on The Spun. Terry Bradshaw and Aaron Rodgers have some drama brewing heading into the 2025 season. Bradshaw, a four-time Super Bowl champion, made it clear that he wasn't a big fan of Rodgers, who signed with his Pittsburgh Steelers. Bradshaw said earlier this year that he wished Rodgers would just stay in California and "chew" on some bark. "That's a joke. That to me is just a joke," Bradshaw said of Pittsburgh's interest in Rodgers on 103.7 The Buzz back in May. "What are you gonna do? Bring him in for one year, are you kidding me? "That guy needs to stay in California. Go somewhere and chew on bark and whisper to the gods out there." Rodgers, meanwhile, responded to Bradshaw at training camp over the weekend. His response was pretty classy. "I've known Terry for a long time, being a part of FOX," Rodgers said, speaking to NFL Network's Kyle Brandt. "Terry's a legend. He's an absolute legend. He won four Super Bowls. He's had a legendary career in the media. "But Terry, like a lot of people, doesn't know me. So he's got an idea of what he thinks about me based on what I've done, the documentary, what I've said, darkness retreat, whatever the hell you want to talk about." While Rodgers and Bradshaw might have a lot in common on the football field, they've said pretty different things politically over the years. Bradshaw announced that he left the Republican Party, choosing to be an independent. He criticized President Trump, too. 'I've been a Republican, but now I'm a registered independent. I don't want to alienate anyone, and the minute you say, 'I'm a Democrat' or 'I'm Republican,' you're kicking off the other side. I want the best person [in the White House], and I'll pick the one who's most like the way I feel,' he announced. Bradshaw took issue with how President Trump criticized NFL players for kneeling for the anthem. "This is America. If our country stands for anything, folks, it's freedom. People died for that freedom. I'm not sure if our President understands those rights—that every American has the right to speak out and to protest. Believe me, these athletes do love this great country of ours," Bradshaw stated. He added: "Personally, I think our President should concentrate on North Korea and healthcare rather than ripping into athletes and the NFL." Rodgers, meanwhile, has shown his support for President Trump over the years, even posting a photo of himself shaking hands with POTUS on social media. He said it was "priceless." Rodgers has said that he would like to get to know Bradshaw, so hopefully that'll happen before the 2025 NFL season. But the duo might have some disagreements in the world of politics. Terry Bradshaw, Aaron Rodgers Do Not Agree Politically first appeared on The Spun on Jul 27, 2025 This story was originally reported by The Spun on Jul 27, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Spider-Man' and 'Fantastic Four' Could Finally Team Up in New Marvel Crossover
Johnny Storm wanted it, and now Marvel fans may get it. Joseph Quinn, who plays Johnny Storm in the new Fantastic Four: First Steps movie, has expressed his desire to team up with Tom Holland's Spider-Man. During a prior interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Quinn responded to a question about the comic book friendship between Storm and Peter Parker. 'That pairing makes sense to me and I think he's brilliant and I'm up for it,' Quinn said. 'I think we'd have a laugh. I've never met Tom and I think he's brilliant; his Peter Parker is the best one ever, I think he's our best-ever Spider-Man, so why not? Let's do it, get it moving.' While Quinn's comments drew plenty of attention, Marvel president Kevin Feige's recent roundtable interview also brought mention of a potential Johnny Storm-Peter Parker collaboration. As ScreenRant revealed, Feige called it a "blue sky dream" but one that's now "in the realm of possibility." "We didn't do chemistry reads, but whenever we cast it is with that blue sky dream in mind of one day being able to do that," Feige said. "And that's a great example. That's one of the key relationships in Marvel comics is Johnny Storm and Peter Parker." "And we've never been able to come close to it before and now it is in the realm of possibility. That's exciting. That gets me up in the morning." Holland first portrayed Spider-Man in the 2016 film Captain America: Civil War. He was then featured in his own solo film, Spider-Man: Homecoming, in 2017. Holland has played the iconic superhero role in several films, including the standalone Spider-Man movies and The Avengers. While there's nothing set in stone yet, Feige's comments point to a potential Quinn and Holland pairing in a Marvel film down the line, something that comic book fans and moviegoers alike would surely love to see.'Spider-Man' and 'Fantastic Four' Could Finally Team Up in New Marvel Crossover first appeared on Men's Journal on Jul 24, 2025 Solve the daily Crossword