41-year-old cyclist dies after accident with car in Singapore's Bugis
SINGAPORE (The Straits Times/ANN): A 41-year-old cyclist who was taken to the hospital after an accident with a car in Bugis on the morning of June 19 has died.
The Straits Times first reported about the accident on June 19. The cyclist died the next day, according to the police.
The police said they were alerted to the accident at Victoria Street towards Kallang Road at 6.30am that day.
In video footage of the accident uploaded on the SG Road Vigilante Facebook page, a cyclist can be seen riding across one side of the junction. He appears to be going against a red traffic light.
As he crosses the middle of the junction, a car comes into the frame, and the ensuing collision sends him flying off his bicycle.
The traffic light for the car changes from yellow to red just before the point of impact.
The cyclist was taken unconscious to Tan Tock Seng Hospital, where he later died, said the police and the Singapore Civil Defence Force.
A 44-year-old male car driver is assisting with police investigations. - The Straits Times/ANN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
Singapore warehouse owner and tenant sue each other over fire in 2020, judge awards landlord S$814
SINGAPORE: The owner of a Sungei Kadut warehouse that was set ablaze in May 2020 blamed its tenant for starting the fire, claiming more than S$600,000 in damages in a lawsuit. The tenant, a scrap vehicle company, countersued for unspecified losses due to the fire, alleging that the fire hose reel in the warehouse malfunctioned because the landlord had failed to properly maintain it. The High Court dismissed both sides' claims, but ordered the tenant to reimburse $814 to the landlord for stamp duty under the tenancy agreement. On July 18, Judicial Commissioner Christopher Tan issued written grounds setting out the reasons for his decision. The judge said the landlord, Feida Bus Consortium, failed to show that the tenant, Royal Autoz Exporter, had breached any terms of the tenancy agreement, except for the clause on stamp duty. Feida Bus Consortium had alleged that the fire started when the tenant's employees carried out works either on or near a car at the warehouse – a claim the tenant denied. It sued Royal Autoz Exporter for alleged breach of contract and negligence. The judge said there was insufficient evidence to establish that the tenant's employees had been working in the warehouse at the time of the fire. In rejecting the tenant's counterclaim, the judge said there was evidence that the fire hose was working at the time. In any event, he said, there was no evidence that the landlord was obliged to maintain fire-fighting equipment in the warehouse. Reports from experts, as well as SCDF, said the fire likely originated from the Chery Tiggo car, but the exact cause remains unknown. - Photo: Court documents On May 23, 2020, a total of 19 emergency vehicles and about 100 firefighters were deployed to battle the blaze at 6 Sungei Kadut Way, a Facebook post by the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) stated. The post said the SCDF was alerted to the fire at about 7pm that day; the fire was put out at 9.15pm. According to the judgment, the two-storey warehouse was divided into sections, one of which was rented out to the defendant. The landlord, which provided chartered bus services and conducted vehicle repairs, occupied one section. Another section was used as a dormitory for workers employed by the landlord and its related companies. The landlord and the defendant entered into a tenancy agreement on March 24, 2020, which stipulated a monthly rent of $15,000. Barely two weeks later, 'circuit breaker' restrictions were implemented to curb the spread of Covid-19, and no work was supposed to be carried out in workshops and factories. On May 4, 2020, a deregistered 2.4-litre Chery Tiggo car was towed into the warehouse. On May 23, 2020, two of the tenant's employees were in the warehouse when the fire broke out. The tenant claimed they were there only to move vehicles into the warehouse. At about 6.30pm, one employee spotted flames underneath the Chery's engine and used a forklift to elevate the car. A resident of the dormitory pulled a fire hose from a reel in the warehouse. The tenant claimed that no water came out of the hose, but the landlord disputed this. Flammable liquid ignited as it leaked from the car. Despite various workers fighting the flames with fire extinguishers, the fire spread, forcing them to flee the warehouse. The fire damaged the tenant's stock of vehicles and spare parts. The landlord said various parts of the warehouse's structure were damaged. The building was ordered to be closed for about 18 months for repairs. SCDF conducted investigations and issued a report in September 2023. A forensic firm engaged by the landlord's fire insurance company prepared an expert report for the trial. The tenant, represented by Palaniappan Sundararaj, engaged a fire investigation consultant as the defence expert. The judge noted that both experts, as well as SCDF, were unanimous in their view that the fire likely originated from the car. The exact cause of the fire remains unknown, said the judge. The landlord, represented by Thomas Toh, contended that the tenancy agreement prohibited the tenant from storing 'diesel' tanks in the warehouse. The judge said he saw no reason to extend this clause to tanks containing other types of fuel. The landlord also argued that by storing vehicles and a forklift on the premises, the defendant had breached a clause which stated that the warehouse was to be used for 'vehicle spare parts and body kit'. The judge said this clause did not prevent the tenant from using the warehouse for other purposes. He added that the landlord knew and consented to the tenant using the warehouse for scrapping vehicles. The landlord also argued that the tenant should have removed fuel from the vehicle before storing it in the warehouse, citing a clause that any chemical that is fire hazardous was to be stored in a safe corner. The judge disagreed that this meant the tenant was obliged to remove fuel from the vehicle. - The Straits Times/ANN
Malay Mail
8 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Pahang Sports Council urges public caution over fake Sukma apparel sold on social media
KUANTAN, July 23 — The Pahang Sports Council (MSP) has denied involvement in any sales activity, particularly concerning official Malaysia Games (SUKMA) apparel. In a statement, MSP clarified that it has never appointed any individual or company to sell official SUKMA Pahang apparel via any social media platform, including Facebook. 'We have detected several Facebook posts claiming to sell SUKMA apparel in the name of the Pahang Sports Council,' the statement said. MSP also advised the public to remain cautious and not be deceived by dubious offers, and to report any relevant information to MSP via its official phone number or email to avoid being scammed. 'All matters related to official SUKMA apparel will only be announced through MSP's official channels, including its website and verified social media accounts,' the council said. — Bernama
![[UPDATED] Police: E-commerce scams cost Malaysians RM63mil in six months](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2Fmciie_1753264737.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[UPDATED] Police: E-commerce scams cost Malaysians RM63mil in six months](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fassets%2FNST-Logo%402x.png%3Fid%3Db37a17055cb1ffea01f5&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
New Straits Times
10 hours ago
- New Straits Times
[UPDATED] Police: E-commerce scams cost Malaysians RM63mil in six months
KUALA LUMPUR: KUALA LUMPUR: E-commerce fraud continues to rise at an alarming rate, with over RM63 million in losses recorded in the first six months of 2025. Bukit Aman Commercial Crime Investigation Department (CCID) director Datuk Rusdi Mohd Isa said a total of 5,252 cases were reported between January and June this year, involving multiple digital platforms including Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, Telegram, TikTok and He said the most common modus operandi involved fake sellers offering non-existent items, which were never delivered despite payment made by victims. "Other tactics include fraudulent websites designed to appear legitimate, which are used to steal personal and financial information, as well as phishing attacks via email or messaging apps that impersonate e-commerce companies," he told reporters today. Rusdi said some scams also involve false refund claims and the use of stolen credit cards in online transactions. "E-commerce fraud cases have remained persistently high in recent years, with 9,247 cases involving RM139 million in losses in 2022, 10,372 cases involving nearly RM175 million in losses in 2023, and 7,662 cases involving RM70.8 million in losses last year. "Between January and June this year, 5,252 cases have already been reported involving RM63.9 million in losses. "We urge consumers to only perform transactions on trusted, reputable platforms, and to check reviews and ratings from previous buyers before making purchases. "Avoid sharing sensitive information such as your identification number or bank details carelessly. Use secure and traceable payment methods, and be cautious of prices that seem too good to be true," he said. Rusdi also advised the public to remain vigilant and report any suspicious online activity to the authorities to help curb this growing threat.
