logo
FBI Says Do Not Click Anything As Hack Attacks Strike

FBI Says Do Not Click Anything As Hack Attacks Strike

Forbes28-04-2025
Do. Not. Click.
Update, April 28, 2025: This story, originally published April 26, has been updated with news of further FBI cybersecurity warnings and alerts.
Security experts have revealed that it takes, on average, just 60 seconds from getting attacked to being hacked. Malicious actors use everything from convincingly impersonating Google in Gmail attacks, deploying infostealer malware to compromise your passwords and 2FA codes, and AI increasingly fueling the threat fire. And that's before we get to the use of dedicated smartphone farms to launch attacks against Android and iPhone users. No wonder the Federal Bureau of Investigation has reported that 859,532 complaints of internet crime in 2024 led to losses of $16 billion. 'Reporting is one of the first and most important steps in fighting crime so law enforcement can use this information to combat a variety of frauds and scams,' FBI Director, Kash Patel, said. Another way to combat the cybercrime pandemic is, as the FBI has also warned, do not click anything.
Phishing is such a hard cyber nut to crack, given that it plays on fear, urgency, and a whole bunch of other emotional levers. These communications often arrive from what appear to be legitimate sources, some impersonate big brands and manage to use their genuine domains to send the malicious emails; they can be hard to spot, and blaming victims for falling for such scams helps nobody. Especially when all it takes is one click for the barrier between your online and offline worlds to start crumbling in the worst possible way.
One-click attacks can take the form of drive-by downloads where malware is automatically downloaded onto your device as a result of visiting a compromised website. Maybe they will employ an attacker-in-the-middle process to steal your browser session cookies and, by so doing, gain ongoing access to whatever account you were accessing at the time and without knowing your 2FA codes.
'You might receive an email that appears to be from a legitimate business and is asking you to update or verify your personal information by replying to the email or visiting a website,' the FBI has warned. 'The email may be convincing enough to get you to take the action requested.' The FBI's advice for all users is simple: Don't click on anything in an unsolicited email or text message.
Of course, out here in the real-world, following that do not click advice is a lot easier said than done. Attackers are clever, they know which strings to pull and how to get you to click even when the do not click message has been rammed home. So, while 'do not click' is a great baseline message, it shouldn't be seen in isolation.
Paul Walsh, co-founder of the W3C Mobile Web Initiative in 2004 and currently CEO of MetaCert, was responsible for the creation of internet standards used to protect companies from malicious web links. The answer to the phishing problem, Walsh said, is the authentication of URLs before delivery, and not doing so represents 'the single biggest problem in cybersecurity.' That's certainly true when it comes to the average user being able to spot suspicious links. But until such a time that every carrier, every email platform, every user can employ this kind of protection by default, I'm afraid that the FBI 'do not click' warning is about as good as it gets. Ignore it at your peril or, at least, take a breath and think twice before letting your clicking finger loose on that email.
The FBI has confirmed that a $10 million bounty has been placed upon the heads of Chinese hackers, or at least is being offered for intelligence regarding specific individuals who are part of the notorious Salt Typhoon state-sponsored espionage group operating out of China. Salt Typhoon, which is also known to use a number of other aliases, including FamousSparrow, Ghost Emperor, and UNC228, has been behind a number of attacks on the U.S. such as those against the iPhones of people involved in the last presidential election campaign as well as U.S. telecommunications infrastructure.
Another cybersecurity advisory from the FBI hits rather closer to home as far as the Bureau is concerned. Attackers have been observed impersonating the FBI's own Internet Crime Complaint Center in hacking scams. The warning revealed that the FBI has seen more than 100 of these attacks already. Most often, the campaign uses people pretending to be FBI agents and claiming to have recovered funds lost during a previous incident.
And finally, another FBI alert that you really cannot afford to ignore: 10 tips to mitigate the ransomware rampage. I'd advise reading the full article to get all the FBI ransomware mitigation advice, but if you do nothing else today, then at least follow item number one on the list: Require two-factor authentication for all services where possible, but in particular for webmail such as Gmail, Outlook and others, along with virtual private networks and any accounts that can access critical systems.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

5 reasons why Google's Pixel software is better than Samsung's One UI
5 reasons why Google's Pixel software is better than Samsung's One UI

Android Authority

timean hour ago

  • Android Authority

5 reasons why Google's Pixel software is better than Samsung's One UI

Aamir Siddiqui / Android Authority Sorry, Samsung, but I've always been a Pixel fan. Although I've appreciated a Galaxy device here and there and had a soft spot for Samsung's hardware ever since I brought home the Galaxy S10 at the end of college, I've always been happiest with a Google device in my pocket. For a while, I wasn't quite sure why I felt so strongly about preferring Google's experience over Samsung's, but after a few recent updates, I've come around to a simple fact: Google's Pixel software is just so much better than One UI, and here's why. Which Android experience do you prefer? 0 votes Pixel UI NaN % One UI NaN % Give me Google's camera app any day It's no secret that I love Google's approach to image processing. If we've written about it once, we've done it a hundred times. I've hyped it up in Pixel reviews across all price points, and it's been a consistent through line ever since I upgraded to the Pixel 5. What got me in the door, though, was the fact that I never had to think twice about using Google's camera app. The Pixel camera app has been a fire-and-forget way to capture my life for as long as I can remember. Yes, long-overdue manual controls were added along the way, but they never felt quite as essential to the overall experience as Samsung's controls. See, although I'll fiddle with the manual settings on my beloved Fujifilm mirrorless cameras until I get things right, I'd much rather snap a quick photo with my phone and have it back in my pocket. I view my mirrorless options as intentional, while my phone takes on an everyday role. When that's my goal, Google's Pixel software beats Samsung's One UI any day. Google's approach to everything from panoramas to motion is more straightforward, and I know that the image I open in Photos will probably look much closer to what I had in mind. Samsung, on the other hand, tends to add motion blur when I don't want it, and its approach to astrophotography is to make me set a timer and hope for the best, which isn't my forte. I respect that Samsung probably offers a better experience for photographers who want granular control over their shots, but that's not usually me. I only need one of everything, thanks Ryan Haines / Android Authority You'll probably notice a common theme in most of the things I prefer about Google's Pixel UI over One UI: simplicity. Although smartphones are my day job, I still like to keep some of my interactions with them quick and efficient, and it's easier to do that when I only have one of each type of app. That means one email client, one cloud storage platform, and one internet browser. Unfortunately, Samsung just doesn't roll that way. Whenever I set up a new Galaxy phone, I have to stop and take stock of how much bloatware shows up by default. I have to figure out a quick way to push the included Microsoft apps off to the side, dump the extras like Facebook, and ensure that my images back up to Google Photos rather than Samsung's own Gallery. It doesn't usually take too long for me to get things the way I'd like them, but it's more of a hiccup than I've ever had with setting up a new Pixel. Whenever I set up a new Galaxy phone, I have to stop and take stock of how much bloatware shows up by default. I'd extend that simplicity to other parts of my Pixel interface, especially the app drawer. I've always found it easier to swipe up once and know that everything I've installed is perfectly alphabetized, which is much easier in Google's standard interface. Yes, you can finally flip the app drawer from horizontal to vertical on your Galaxy device, but it took far too long for Samsung to pick up what I think is an essential feature — and it took almost as long for me to figure out where that setting was hidden in the app drawer interface. Menus that don't make my head spin I have to give Samsung at least some credit for its nearly endless customization options. I love that I can swap my Galaxy launcher to something cleaner and simpler like LawnChair, which, unsurprisingly, looks and feels like Google's Pixel UI. I also have endless fun with new icon packs whenever I get tired of the default look. However, it usually takes jumping through one or two hoops too many for me to reach such a point. In some ways, Google's Pixel UI is pretty locked down by comparison, and I don't mind admitting that. I know I can't load up something like DIY Home to put apps, widgets, and random geometric shapes anywhere I want them, but I don't have the patience for that level of personalizing anyway. I'd much rather tap into one set of menus to swap out the clock on my always-on display and change the lock screen shortcuts than even think about downloading Good Lock or worrying about how my apps will show up on the cover screen of a foldable phone. Perhaps the best example of One UI making my head spin is when Samsung split its notification shade from its quick settings panel. I chose to separate them before I realized what I was doing, only to spend about half an hour looking for the correct option to reunite them — it's the pencil icon in the quick settings menu, if you were curious. Google's Pixel exclusives fit perfectly into my lifestyle Ryan Haines / Android Authority While I know that some Android fans prefer Samsung's carefully customizable extras, I've spent enough time with Google's Pixel exclusives that I'm not sure how I could ever change. I still use Now Playing just as often as I did when I first activated it on my Pixel 5, and I can't even tell you how many spam calls I've escaped with a bit of help from Call Screen. It's gotten so good that even Apple is out to copy Google's style, which is saying something. Apps like Pixel Weather and Pixel Studio are better, too, for my needs. I don't usually like to make AI-generated images out of my friends, so I'm happy to add text prompts and change art styles until Google gives me something I'm pleased with. And yes, I know that Samsung's Drawing Assist has come a long way now that it lets you enter prompts and keeps elements of your original backgrounds, but it still feels more limited for my liking. While I haven't taken a shine to more recent additions like Pixel Screenshots in exactly the same way, I like where Google's head is at. I like having the option to organize my screenshots into easily searchable collections like I can do with Nothing's Essential Space, but I also trust the setup within Google Photos because I'm more of an 'open 30 tabs' guy than a 'take 30 screenshots' guy. Samsung's one-two punch of the Now Brief and Now Bar is fine, but I use one much more than the other. I appreciate the frequent sports updates, media controls, and the status of my routines in the Now Bar, which Google has added to Android 16 as Live Updates, but I can't say I check the Now Brief more than once a day, which isn't enough for an ever-present home screen widget. A Pixel update has never left a bad taste in my mouth Ryan Haines / Android Authority No matter what Samsung does to One UI, I think the one advantage that Google will always have is faster updates. As the creator of Android, it's easier for Google to optimize its Pixel lineup, meaning that new versions like Android 15 and Android 16 can land weeks (or even months) ahead of Samsung. And, if you still doubt that, look no further than the mess that was One UI 7. If you'll recall, Samsung started its Android 15 rollout pretty quickly. Sure, a few months behind Google, but it seemed like it was getting up to speed quickly. Then, it stopped. Bugs began to appear, battery life began to tank, and users started complaining. So, Samsung went back to the drawing board to figure out what might have gone wrong. The rollout started again after a decent little delay, but it felt like the damage was mostly done. My colleague Joe Maring wrote that he wasn't sure he could easily recommend Samsung phones after the stumble, and I tended to agree with him. One advantage that Google will always have is faster updates. These days, I'd say Samsung has fixed its flawed One UI 7 update, but it's done so just in time for everyone to turn their attention to One UI 8. I'm impatiently waiting to see how it handles the stable update (we're only in the second public beta right now), and simply hoping for the best. But, even if all goes well, I'd have to imagine I'll be sticking with the Pixel 9 Pro that's already in my pocket… and already running Android 16.

Jan. 6 Rioter Gets Life In Prison For FBI Assassination Plot: What To Know
Jan. 6 Rioter Gets Life In Prison For FBI Assassination Plot: What To Know

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Jan. 6 Rioter Gets Life In Prison For FBI Assassination Plot: What To Know

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A January 6 rioter who was pardoned by President Donald Trump has been sentenced to life in prison for conspiring to kill the FBI agents and other law enforcement officers who investigated his involvement in the riot. Edward Kelley, 36, was found guilty in November 2024 and sentenced on July 2 for his charges of conspiracy to murder federal employees, solicitation to commit a crime of violence, and influencing a federal official by threat. Kelley had attempted to argue that his presidential pardon also covered his November conviction, as it was related to January 6, but was unsuccessful. Edward Kelley pictured at the January 6 riots in images provided by the FBI. Edward Kelley pictured at the January 6 riots in images provided by the FBI. FBI Why It Matters President Trump's pardons of the January 6 rioters were unpopular among Democrats and some Republican leaders, as they involved some individuals who had violently assaulted police officers. Kelley is one of several January 6 rioters already back in prison following their pardon following investigations into other crimes or prior convictions, which were not removed by the presidential pardon. What To Know The Tennessee native was found guilty of creating a "kill list" of law enforcement officers who had been involved in his arrest. His partner in the planned attacks, a man named Austin Carter, who also pleaded guilty, told the court they had arranged to attack the agents at public locations such as cinemas and in their own homes. The prosecution provided audio recordings of Kelley to the court, which show him saying, "You don't have time to train or coordinate, but every hit has to hurt," and "Every hit has to hurt." Another recording showed Kelley saying that he planned to "take out their offices." These recordings were taken by "Witness 1," whom the prosecution relied on for information per court filings. Carter told the court he and Kelley were planning on staging the attacks with car bombs and drones. The full list of officers on their "kill list" included employees from the FBI, the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, the Tennessee Highway Patrol, the Maryville Police Department, the Blount County Sheriff's Office, and the Clinton Police Department. The prosecution described Kelley as "remorseless," saying in his sentencing memorandum: "Edward Kelley is remorseless and has shown neither a capacity nor desire to rehabilitate. On the contrary, Kelley not only believes the actions for which he was convicted were justified but that his duty as a self-styled "patriot" compelled him to target East Tennessee law enforcement for assassination." Kelley had been charged prior to his pardon with assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers; civil disorder, destruction of government property; engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or grounds; and several other counts related to his actions on January 6. Images of Edward Kelley at the January 6 riot, as captured by the FBI. Images of Edward Kelley at the January 6 riot, as captured by the FBI. FBI What People Are Saying Edward Kelley in a recorded call by "Witness 1": "I just sent Austin [Carter] a message, here's your course of action: if I'm extradited to D.C. or you don't hear about my status within 24 or 48 hours of my, if they are coming to arrest me again, start it. You guys are taking them out at their office. What you and Austin [Carter] need to do is recruit as many as you can, call [UI] who you need to, and you're going to attack their office. If the same thing happens to any of you guys, I'm doing the same thing, OK?...Once you guys have enough don't have time to train or coordinate, but every hit has to hurt, every hit has to hurt." Mark Brown, Kelley's attorney, wrote to the court: "Although Kelley has been convicted of serious offenses, no individual was directly threatened with harm or violence by Kelley, and no one was injured. Kelley does not deserve the same sentence as an actual "terrorist" who injured or killed hundreds or thousands of [American] citizens." Prosecuting lawyers told the court: "Carter's testimony was unequivocal — he had no doubts that, had he and Kelley not been arrested, the law enforcement personnel included on Kelley's list would have been murdered." What Happens Next Kelley's appeal was denied by the court, meaning this is his final verdict. His co-conspirator, Austin Carter, is set to receive his sentence in August

Google rolls out its new Veo 3 video generation model globally
Google rolls out its new Veo 3 video generation model globally

TechCrunch

timean hour ago

  • TechCrunch

Google rolls out its new Veo 3 video generation model globally

In Brief Google on Thursday said it has begun rolling out its Veo 3 video generation model to Gemini users in more than 159 countries. Video generation via the new model is available only to paying subscribers of Google's AI Pro plan, and is capped at 3 videos per day. Veo 3, which Google showed off in May, lets users to generate videos up to 8 seconds long using text prompts. Google's Josh Woodward has said that the company is working on adding image-to-video generation capabilities to Gemini.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store