
Hologram Doctor: Not Who I'd Like to Visit, Says Ethicist
This transcript has been edited for clarity.
Hi. I'm Art Caplan. I'm at the Division of Medical Ethics, at NYU Langone Health System in New York City.
I am not a hologram. What am I talking about? Well, a new cancer clinic in Tennessee is starting to offer to its patients a hologram doctor.
Some of you will know what this is like. It's been used now in shows and performances, like at Sphere in Las Vegas. All of a sudden, you're able to go to a show by Michael Jackson, who is long since dead, but they can project him onto the stage. This is also true for other singers, performers, or even figures from the past. They're very realistic looking, and you feel like you're in the presence of maybe someone who's still alive.
That technology is being touted as a way to improve care for people in rural areas. Many of those folks have to travel very far to get regular exams and surveillance from a doctor or a nurse. Some of them require a 3- or 4-hour drive. It's a real burden. It's hard for many of these people, some of whom are frail, older, or sick from the treatments themselves. It's hard for them to get there.
The clinic has come up with this idea to make a hologram of a generic doctor, put that doctor in a studio with good lighting and good technology, and beam it out to the homes of these patients — or let them travel somewhere where the setup is a little more friendly that is maybe not 3 hours away. Maybe they could have studios that, for many people, are only an hour away.
I see some benefit. I think doing video conferencing and that style of thing often is a little cold and distant. The lighting isn't good, and the sound may be bad. It's not a professional production, and it may not give you the nuance and the detail that you want to see if you're trying to do an exam. It's better, if you will, to have the higher-level tech.
There are issues. One, in rural areas, we don't really have great Wi-Fi service. The rates of carrying detailed signals aren't that good. I'm not sure much of this is going to make it into a rural person's home. I still see travel required, which cuts back in some ways on the attractiveness. It may be better to send the actual doctor to four or five clinics once in a while than to try and rely on the hologram doctor going out to the rural patients at locations where the signal still is not going to be that great.
I also worry that for much of this work, while you can see some things, you can't see other things. Yes, you can detect a rash, and sure, you could see certain things about certain skin cancers, but are we really ready to say that we can conduct an exam remotely on a cancer patient with complicated disease? I'm not sure.
Again, I'm no oncologist, but it makes me nervous that a thorough exam would be something you could do. In a weird way, this might work better for dermatology. It might work better for certain kinds of family medicine practice, where someone's nervous about a rash, headache, or some symptoms that you could handle remotely. This patient group strikes me as maybe more complicated.
The other problem is the legal situation is unclear. What would it mean to make an error? What would it mean to actually give bad advice or misdiagnose? Who's responsible? Who's going to be able to hold someone accountable? What if the patient really isn't comfortable and doesn't give you all the information that they might if it was face-to-face?
In person, that whole area looks murky, unresolved, and even dangerous to practice in until the rules are laid out clearly about who's responsible for what and what the standard of care is for using this kind of technology.
Are we going to see more of it in the future? I think so. Is it ready for prime time now to an underserved rural population? I'm not sure it's here yet.
We'll have to keep an eye on it. Maybe improvements will come. Maybe our infrastructure for handling Wi-Fi and this kind of thing will improve, but for now, I'm not sure that the hologram doctor is the doctor that I'd want to visit.
I'm Art Caplan, at the Division of Medical Ethics at NYU Langone Health Systems. Thanks for watching.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
16 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Hall of Fame horse trainer D. Wayne Lukas, a winner of 15 Triple Crown races, dies at 89
D. Wayne Lukas, the Hall of Famer who became one of the most accomplished trainers in the history of horse racing and a face of the sport for decades, has died. He was 89. His family said Sunday that Lukas died Saturday night at his Louisville, Kentucky, home. Lukas had been hospitalized with a severe MRSA blood infection that caused significant damage to his heart and digestive system and worsened pre-existing chronic conditions.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Blood test can detect cancer 18 months before symptoms appear
A new blood test means it is now possible to detect cancer up to 18 months before symptoms even appear. Test for Cancer has launched the HrC Genomics blood test, a non-invasive screening tool designed to spot cancer before it becomes symptomatic, reducing the need for invasive procedures like tissue biopsies. With cancer among the world's leading causes of death, early detection remains one of the most effective ways to improve outcomes. But many cancers are diagnosed too late, when treatment options are more limited and survival rates are lower. Test for Cancer says its new test can change that. By identifying specific stem cells that begin circulating when cancer is present, even before symptoms emerge, the HrC Genomics test offers a way to screen for cancer much earlier than standard approaches allow. READ MORE: Cardiologists name two foods that lower cholesterol 'just like statins' READ MORE: Neurologist says you can cut cholesterol, blood pressure and dementia risk in 20 minutes According to the organisation, these cells, known as pluripotent progenitor stem cells, can be detected in the blood as early as 12 to 18 months before any signs of illness. That early window gives patients and doctors more time to intervene and improves the chances of successful treatment. The test is available to adults of all ages and is not limited by gender or family history, making it a potentially powerful screening option for people who might not otherwise qualify for routine checks. Test for Cancer says its mission is to make early cancer detection more widely accessible, helping more people take control of their health and catch cancer before it advances.


WebMD
an hour ago
- WebMD
Dating with Bipolar Disorder
Being honest about your mental health can have a really positive impact on your life and the lives of those around you. In my personal experience, the more I've opened up about my bipolar disorder and the struggles that come with it, the better I feel. There's no denying the stigma that still exists around mental illness, but I've found that the best way to combat the related misconceptions is to talk about it. For me, this is especially true in my dating life. I can't remember a time when I haven't made some mention of mental health or my own journey with it once I began dating someone. It's not that I detail my recent hypomanic episode or list out the prescriptions I take, but I do find it helpful and pretty freeing to be transparent about my condition. Doing so gives me the opportunity to give the person I'm seeing more insight into who I am and how I experience the world, to answer questions, and connect with them on an emotional level. It also helps me to suss out how they might handle it as a potential romantic partner. I've been very lucky to have dated partners who were both empathetic and open-minded about my having bipolar disorder. Some have even intervened during an episode, a panic attack, or made sure to text me each day as a reminder to take my medication when I struggled to stay consistent. Not only did these things make me feel reassured and cared for, but they also reaffirmed to me how beneficial it is to communicate about my condition and how it is impacting me. Based on what previous partners have told me, it isn't always easy to love someone who has bipolar disorder. When I first received my diagnosis, it wasn't just my life that was changed: the community of people in my life were impacted, too. This is especially true in the case of spending time or living with a romantic partner. They often have the most intimate connection with you, meaning that they see every facet of who you are up close. Although it was hard for him to admit (and hard for me to process), an ex of mine told me that my hypomanic episodes sometimes scared him. He knew me well enough to recognize when my behavior changed because of hypomania, and while he was proactive about caring for me in those moments, it still affected him emotionally. Rather than getting defensive or taking what he said to heart, I tried to use that conversation as a learning moment. Taking responsibility for my own mental health isn't just for my own benefit. It is also necessary and the least I can do for the people who love and support me. Dating itself isn't always simple. At times, I find that I don't really even enjoy the process of meeting new people on dates. That said, if you — like me — would enjoy having a romantic partnership one day, being open about your mental health is one of the best practices that can lead to a healthy, strong relationship. There is so much strength in vulnerability, so sharing that part of your life with someone you care about is just another way to flex your emotional health 'muscle.'