Are UPS Layoffs Because of Trump's Tariffs? What We Know
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
United Parcel Service has said it will be cutting 20,000 jobs and shutting 73 buildings, as UPS highlighted the "highly uncertain" trading environment in which it is now operating.
However, the company said that the decision was driven by the increasing automation of its production facilities, as well as a decline in shipping volume due to its Amazon "glide down" plan unveiled in late January.
Newsweek has reached out to UPS via email for comment.
Why It Matters
UPS is the largest courier in the U.S. and ranks among the country's top companies by revenue, having generated $91.1 billion last year. As a major player in the global logistics industry, the company said that the administration's trade policies will demand greater adaptability and strategic oversight in the near-future, but that it remains confident in its ability to navigate the evolving conditions.
What To Know
The announcement came alongside the release of the company's first-quarter earnings. UPS saw a Consolidated Revenues of $21.5 billion, down from $21.7 billion a year prior.
In the release and subsequent earnings call, UPS executives gave several reasons for the decision to shutter 73 U.S. buildings and lay off 20,000 workers, which is in addition to the 12,000 it said it would be cutting last year.
The company said that the latest moves comprised part of its ongoing "Network Reconfiguration and Efficiency Reimagined" initiative, aimed at streamlining the business "through automation and operational sort consolidation in our U.S. Domestic network." UPS said that it expects this to result in $3.5 billion of total cost savings in 2025.
In a call following the results, Executive Vice President Nando Cesarone said that UPS plans to incorporate automation across its facilities, with 400 becoming partially or fully automated by the end of this process. This, alongside the application of artificial intelligence, will result in a "much more efficient operation with less dependency on labor," Cesarone said.
File photo: A United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS) truck is parked at a distribution center on April 4, 2025 in San Diego, California.
File photo: A United Parcel Service Inc. (UPS) truck is parked at a distribution center on April 4, 2025 in San Diego, California.Chief Financial Officer Brian Dykes added that the planned layoffs and building closures were "in line with the total Amazon volume decline."
In January, UPS announced a "glide down" plan to cut transported order volumes with the e-commerce giant "more than 50 percent by the second half of 2026." During the first quarter, Dykes said that package volume from Amazon had already declined by 16 percent, adding that this "was more than we originally planned."
However, CEO Carol Tomé added: "Sixty percent of the volume that we're gliding down is not profitable for us, and by gliding that down, we actually give ourselves financial flexibility to address other scenarios that might come our way."
While the company did not attribute the layoffs or business closures to tariffs directly, Tomé said that the need for adaptability and efficiency had been heightened by the administration's trade policies.
U.S.-China trade lines comprised around 11 percent revenue in 2024, the company said, making it the UPS's most profitable trading route. However, it expects any weakening demand due to the high tariffs on China to be "partially offset" by growth in China to non-U. S. lanes, as well as more goods being shipped to the U.S. from other countries.
What People Are Saying
UPS CFO Bryan Dykes, during Tuesday's earnings call, said: "The macro environment is highly uncertain due to changing trade policy and tariff uncertainty. As a global carrier, the eventual outcomes could result in pressure in some parts of our business and create new opportunities in others.
"We've modeled several different scenarios for how the balance of the year might play out so that we can quickly pivot, continue supporting our customers, and lean into growth."
UPS CEO Carol Tomé said that many of the company's small- and medium-sized business customers are "100 percent single-sourced from China," and that the 145-percent tariffs on Chinese goods was "causing so much uncertainty in the marketplace."
"If we go back to 2018 when China tariffs were imposed, we saw trade move, China to U.S. decline, but China the rest of the world increased, and it all leveled out and our international business actually grew," Tomé said. "So because of our integrated network and our [global] presence, we'll be able to manage through this."
The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, a labor union representing an estimated 300,000 UPS hourly workers, said in response to the layoff announcement: "United Parcel Service is contractually obligated to create 30,000 Teamsters jobs under our current national master agreement. If UPS wants to continue to downsize corporate management, the Teamsters won't stand in its way. But if the company intends to violate our contract or makes any attempt to go after hard-fought, good-paying Teamsters jobs, UPS will be in for a hell of a fight."
What Happens Next
UPS said that the layoffs would take place over the course of 2025, while the 73 buildings were scheduled for closure by June. "We are continuing to review our network and may identify additional buildings for closure," it added.
CEO Carol Tomé said UPS would not be updating its full-year outlook "given today's level of uncertainty."
"Once we are through the second quarter, we will hopefully have more clarity about tariffs and trade and the implications for demand dynamics, and we'll provide an update at that point," she added.
CFO Bryan Dykes said that international revenue is expected to fall around 2 percent from 2024, "due to lower demand-related surcharges and trade uncertainty."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Southwest Airlines Is Changing Its Baggage Policy—Here's Why
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Southwest Airlines, long praised for its "Bags Fly Free" policy, announced in March it would end free checked baggage for most travelers. The revised policy took effect on May 28, requiring the majority of passengers to pay for their first and second checked bags. CEO Bob Jordan has been explaining that the change marks a major shift as the airline seeks new revenue and a wider customer base. Why the Policy Changed Jordan described the new baggage policy as part of a broader transformation designed to meet evolving traveler expectations and improve Southwest's profitability. It is expected to net the airline $4 billion in profit. "Customers today want a lot of choice, especially coming out of the pandemic. The customer's needs and wants are just different. The move to bag fees is really about choice," Jordan said in an interview with The New York Times. Jordan added: "Change is hard, and change is emotional. The needs of customers, employees and investors don't have to be at odds." He said that the changes were not solely driven by investor pressure but reflected broader industry trends and consumer behavior—almost all other U.S. airlines and many others around the world charge for taking bags. "There is a bit of catch-up here because we're moving to that world, but in months, not a decade," he said. When asked about whether the changes reward frequent customers and potentially leave out those who don't fly Southwest as much, Jordan said the airline is "not abandoning anybody." "You are going to get great fares on Southwest Airlines, period," he continued. "My whole point is there's more coming to the strategy as we keep evolving, but it's all about staying true to who we are—best people, best hospitality, best service—while stretching the model to meet the needs of our customers." Southwest Boeing 737-800 airplane at Dallas Love Field airport (DAL) in the United States on November 9, 2022. Southwest Boeing 737-800 airplane at Dallas Love Field airport (DAL) in the United States on November 9, 2022. Boarding1Now/GETTY How Southwest Compares to Competitors Previously, Southwest was unique as the only major U.S. airline offering two free checked bags for all passengers. Now, its new policy brings it in line with competitors such as American, Delta, and United Airlines, each charging between $35 and $40 for a first checked bag and $45 to $50 for a second. A Southwest spokesperson told Newsweek: "Southwest will be charging $35 for a first checked bag and $45 for a second checked bag (weight and size limits apply) for flights booked or voluntarily changed on or after May 28." Southwest's updated policy does retain some benefits for certain travelers; Business Select flyers and Rapid Rewards A-List Preferred members may continue to check two bags for free, while A-List status holders and Southwest credit card users can check one bag at no extra cost. What Happens Next The airline is expected to continue adapting its business model, with further updates to fare classes and rewards programs on the horizon.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States Americans Moved From and To In Last 10 Years
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Tumbling birth rates and slowing immigration are making domestic migration—the movement of Americans around the country—increasingly important for states' demographic growth. And yet, no state—not even those that have traditionally attracted the highest number of newcomers—can rely on a steady flow of new residents. Recent data released by the Joint Center for Housing Studies (JCHS) of Harvard University shows how domestic migration has changed in patterns and scale in the decade between 2014 and 2024, as Americans chase better jobs, cheaper housing and a greater quality of life. Domestic Migration: Winners and Losers Back in 2014, North Dakota was the absolute winner of domestic migration across the country with a net growth rate of +13 percent, followed by Nevada (+8.5 percent), South Carolina (+8.3 percent), Florida (+7.5 percent), Colorado (+7.3 percent), Arizona and Texas (both at +6 percent), Oregon (+5.6 percent) and Idaho (+5.2 percent). These rates are proportionate to the states' population and do not refer to numeric gains. 10 years later, things looked much different. In 2024, North Dakota was losing residents, with a net domestic migration rate of -0.37 percent. Oregon had also slid among the states reporting a negative rate, at -0.27 percent. Three states were still experiencing gains of over 5 percent, including Nevada (+5.3 percent), Idaho (+8.2 percent) and South Carolina (+12.5 percent). Florida and Texas, which are still some of the fastest-growing states in the country adding thousands of newcomers every year, both reported a net domestic migration rate of +2.8 percent last year. Three Southern states had joined the list of the biggest gainers, with Alabama reporting a net domestic migration increase of +5.1 percent, Tennessee of +6.7 percent and North Carolina of +7.5 percent. Numerically, Texas experienced the biggest gain, adding 85,267 new residents to its population. It was followed by North Carolina (82,288), South Carolina (68,043) and Florida (64,017). In 2014, the states hemorrhaging the most residents were Alaska (with a net domestic migration rate of -13 percent), Illinois and New York (-7.4 percent), Connecticut (-7 percent), New Mexico (-6.6 percent) and New Jersey (-6 percent). 10 years later, the biggest losers had become the states experiencing the most acute housing affordability crisis, including Hawaii (-6.5 percent), California and New York (-6.1 percent) and Alaska (-5.1 percent). Numerically, California experienced the biggest loss in the country, with 239,575 losing the state. How Has Domestic Migration Changed "The actual rate of migration across states has pretty much stayed at a pretty low level in the last several years," William Frey, a demographer and senior fellow at The Brookings Institution, told Newsweek. "It has gone down from what it was 20 years or 15 years ago, there are now fewer people moving across state lines than there were in the past. It goes up a bit, down a bit from year to year, but the general levels are sort of low." According to the latest Current Population Survey, about 8.3 percent of households (10.9 million) reported moving over the past year, a rate unchanged from a year earlier and down from 9.8 percent (12.6 million) before the pandemic, in 2019. Last year, the homeowner mobility rate dropped to an all-time low of 3.1 percent, down from 3.7 percent in 2023 and 4.3 percent in 2019—meaning that U.S. homeowners made 24 percent fewer moves last year than in 2019. What is really important, Frey said, is understanding why people move, and how that is going to change in the coming years. "People move largely because of jobs," Frey said. "North Dakota is just a little state, but it had a lot of jobs in the early 2010s. You normally wouldn't think of it as an attractive state [for movers], but it had a big domestic migration during that period." The rise of remote work during the pandemic had a huge influence on domestic migration rates across the country, allowing many Americans to relocate across state lines. Many went to states with lower taxes, cheaper housing and sunny weather, with Florida and Texas benefiting greatly from this influx of newcomers. Many relocated to smaller towns close to the metropolises where they used to work. But all that has nearly come to an end, experts say. "The strong shifts that went from New York and California to Florida and Texas and similar kinds of states have softened," Fry said, because of recent return-to-office orders by employers. These states, and many of their biggest cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York City, have not lost as many people in the last couple of years as they had during the pandemic. "There's a return to more normal migration patterns that weren't as severe as we had during those years," Frey said. People walk in Times Square, New York City on September 5, 2023. People walk in Times Square, New York City on September 5, 2023. Getty Images Fewer people are moving out of California than they were during the pandemic, for example, but many are still leaving. "Some of the basic driving forces which preexisted prior to the pandemic and more extensive remote work remain," Hans Johnson, a demographer at the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC), told Newsweek. "We've done a lot of work here at PPIC looking at why people are leaving and who's leaving [California], and the short answer is that the cost of living and especially housing are major factors," he said. "When we look at people who are leaving, we see that they tend to be lower- or middle-income and people without a college degree," Johnson explained. "And when we look at people who are moving to California, they tend to be more highly educated and earn higher incomes." Fundamentally, the Golden State continues attracting people who can afford it—while those who can't look for cheaper options elsewhere. The Growing Importance Of Domestic Migration A growing population often means a thriving economy. Domestic migrants and immigrants tend to be younger people, Frey explained, often including a majority of people in their 20s and early 30s, "so domestic migration tends to make those states younger," he said. This offers a lifeline to a state's job market and social security net at a time when the U.S. population, nationwide, is aging, with experts talking of a "Silver Tsunami" hitting the country once Baby Boomers reach retirement age. Young people, additionally, make states more racially diverse. "The younger part of our population is much more racially diverse than the older part of the population, so when you attract a lot of domestic migrants, you're getting not just young white people but young Latino people, young Asian people, African-American people," Frey said. "It helps to make the state attractive to a broad array of people in terms of their racial and ethnic backgrounds." As birth rates fall and immigration slow downs, partially in response to the Trump administration's mass deportation efforts, domestic migration could soften the blow for the states who would benefit the most from it. "If immigration goes down again, because of policies here that have been instituted, there may be a bigger demand for domestic migrants in some of the places that have more opportunities," Frey said. "But it's hard to know now. To me, that is kind of a wild card in all of this."
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
The Dollar Is Sinking: Here's Why
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. dollar is tumbling as President Donald Trump's economic agenda—at the executive and legislative level—takes full shape. Economists told Newsweek this could advance Trump's goal of promoting American goods in foreign markets and strengthening exports, but warn that a weakened dollar comes with significant downsides, including the jeopardization of its status as the world's reserve currency. The U.S. Dollar Index—which tracks its value relative to a basket of major foreign currencies—has declined by more than 10 percent over the past six months. This marks the steepest first-half slump, and the worst beginning for a presidential term, since its creation in 1973. Achieving this milestone comes amid a period of flux for the U.S. economy. On Friday, Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which had been narrowly passed by the Republican-controlled House of Representatives the day before. The sweeping budget reconciliation package contains new spending measures and an extension of Trump's 2017 tax cuts, which, together, budget watchdogs believe could inflate the nation's already-sizable national deficit. President Donald Trump, joined by Republican lawmakers, signs the One, Big Beautiful Bill Act into law during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House on July 4, 2025... President Donald Trump, joined by Republican lawmakers, signs the One, Big Beautiful Bill Act into law during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House on July 4, 2025 in Washington, DC. MoreThis week will also see the expiry of the 90-day pause placed on Trump's reciprocal tariffs in April. While a handful of countries have secured trade deals, the president has suggested that nations who were unable to do so during the three-month window could be subject to even higher rates than those announced on "Liberation Day." Experts who spoke to Newsweek emphasized a confluence of these economic factors, and their combined impact on America's fiscal outlook, in the dollar's recent decline. "The dollar is depreciating because global investors are less confident in the United States providing stable policies geared toward macroeconomic growth and a strong financial system," said Ryan Monarch, a professor of economics at Syracuse University. "Recent policies such as extremely high tariffs, increased government debt, and worries about inflation have all contributed to the falling dollar." Monarch, a former principal economist at the Federal Reserve Board of Governors' International Finance Division, added that the prospect of the central bank lowering interest rates to stimulate economic growth prospects, "has led to weaker demand for dollar-denominated assets, and thus further dollar depreciation." Ryan Sweet, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, similarly noted that investors were "reassessing the outlook for the US economy" as a result of the tariffs. "Tariffs will slow the U.S. economy and reduce the expected return on investment for investors, pushing some away from the dollar," he told Newsweek. Last month, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) cut its growth outlook for the U.S. economy to 1.6 percent from 2.2 percent in March; it said this reflected the "substantial increase" in import taxes, as well as "high economic policy uncertainty," declines in net immigration and reductions to the federal workforce. "The strength of any currency depends on people's willingness to hold it, and the world now is skeptical of the future of the U.S., especially with the passage of the budget bill," said Peter Simon, a professor at Northeastern University's Department of Economics. "So people around the world are selling their dollars for other currencies: euro, pound sterling, yen, and yuan for more stability." Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty What Are the Consequences of a Falling Dollar? A sharp decline in a currency's relative value carries with it a host of economic effects. These impacts are especially pronounced for the dollar, given its status as the world's primary reserve currency and the trillions held in dollar-denominated assets abroad. For Americans at home, a weakened dollar can increase the cost of imports, resulting in price inflation and the erosion of consumers' purchasing power. A declining dollar also makes it more expensive for Americans to travel abroad, where their dollars will translate into smaller sums of the local currency. "A depreciation in the U.S. dollar is inflationary as it will, over time, increase nonfuel import prices," Sweet said. "The depreciation in the dollar increases the risks that tariffs boost consumer prices more than anticipated this summer and into the fall." A falling dollar would also damage the national balance sheet of those countries who hoard stockpile it in reserves, while hurting foreign investors holding dollar-denominated assets such as Treasury bonds. However, it could make America a more affordable, and attractive, location for international tourists. Sweet added that a declining dollar can also prove a "tail wind" for exporters, by making their goods more affordable in the global market. This dual impact on imports and exports—reducing one while boosting the other—appears to align with one of Trump's stated tariff purposes: the reduction of trade deficits. His tariff announcements and their impact on the currency even led to speculation that deliberately "crashing" the dollar was a purposeful choice by the administration. Many in Trump's cabinet have previously expressed concern over the implications of an overly strong dollar, and skepticism regarding its status as the world's reserve currency. Vice President JD Vance, while still serving as an Ohio senator in 2023, said that the dollar's strength and centrality arguably represented "a massive subsidy to American consumers but a massive tax on American producers," given this resulted in floods of "mostly useless imports." Stephen Miran—now chair of Trump's Council of Economic Advisers—wrote in November that trade imbalances and the handicaps faced by domestic industry were rooted in "persistent dollar overvaluation." In April, Miran said that a strong dollar had placed "undue burdens on our firms and workers, making their products and labor uncompetitive on the global stage." However, others within his administration, notably Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, have voiced their support for a strong dollar policy and safeguarding its dominant global position. Trump has consistently expressed similar support. In nominating the Treasury secretary in November, the president-elect said Bessent would help him "fortify our position as the World's leading economy, center of innovation and entrepreneurialism, destination for capital, while always, and without question, maintaining the U.S. Dollar as the reserve currency of the world." Amid talk of the BRICS economic alliance considering introducing an alternative reserve currency, the president also threatened each of the members with "100-percent tariffs" should they moved forward with this plan. However, Monarch said that the dollar's 2025 decline could make such a change more likely. "In the long run, the weakening dollar and less desire to hold U.S.-backed assets may strengthen efforts to design an international reserve system that is not just tied to the U.S. currency, but to other currencies around the world, including the Chinese renminbi," he added. Simon added that, while no single national currency has the power and geopolitical backing to lead to full de-dollarization, "a reserve currency basket" made up of several could rival its dominance in the future. The French Institute for International and Strategic Affairs (IRIS) found that the dollar still accounts for roughly 60 percent of global foreign exchange reserves, compared with around 20 percent for the euro, 5 percent for the Japanese yen, 4 percent for the pound, and only 2 to 3 percent for the yuan. Regardless of its longer-term fate, experts said that the dollar will continue to feel downward pressure in 2025 and beyond. Sweet said he expects the dollar to "stabilize in the second half of this year but resume its depreciation next year," given America's weakened growth outlook and persistent "fiscal sustainability concerns." Monarch added that none of the factors that has contributed to its decline shows signs of reversing in the near future. He said: "Trade deals to potentially lower tariffs have been delayed or underwhelming, recent fiscal policy moves appear likely to add significantly to U.S. government debt, and the effects of already-imposed tariffs on inflation are still uncertain."
