South Shields bus cuts leave elderly 'isolated' and 'neglected'
In May, the service was cut from a half-hour service to an hourly service, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. South Tyneside Public Transport Users' Group said some people who used the bus lived on the highest point of South Shields.The group's chair Nic Cook said: "We refuse to leave residents left isolated, their physical, emotional and mental health and wellbeing neglected. "Several residents stated that their families can no longer visit them because they cannot travel there reliably on public transport and cannot afford to pay for taxis to get there."
'Cannot cover cuts'
Resident Tom Atkinson, 81, said he had been injured in a fall as he tried to walk up a hill while carrying his shopping after missing the bus.He said: "If you miss the 12, then there are five banks you have to walk up - it is a bit too much."Stagecoach said its current hourly service was provided at its "own commercial risk" without support from the North East Combined Authority (NECA) or Nexus.It said it hoped some of the money provided by the government to improve local bus routes could be used to fund the 12 service, which runs from the town centre through Laygate, Harton, and Cleadon Park.Nexus official Helen Matthews said government funds were limited and it had to prioritise the money for areas which were at risk of having no bus services at all. She said: "The recent scale of cuts to commercial bus routes and frequencies is greater than our whole publicly funded provision can cover."Labour's North East Mayor Kim McGuinness said she felt for the residents of South Shields. "I remain very concerned the operator hasn't properly engaged with passengers - it isn't good enough and needs to change," she said.
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Britain ‘looks vulnerable' after Labour U-turns
Britain's public finances have been left 'vulnerable' by Sir Keir Starmer's about-turn on welfare cuts, the world's largest credit ratings agency has warned. S&P Global said the inability to make 'modest cuts' to the welfare budget showed Rachel Reeves faced a 'formidable political challenge' to keep spending under control. 'In our view, it remains to be seen whether the Government succeeds in following through on its wider plans for keeping public spending in check as announced in the June 2025 spending review,' the agency told clients. A failure to rein in runaway public spending could leave Britain ill-prepared for future potential financial crises. S&P warned that the Government had shown an inability to push through even the relatively 'modest' welfare cuts, meaning it had 'very limited budgetary room for manoeuvre'. The agency said high spending would also keep government borrowing costs higher for longer as the UK's credit rating would not improve until its finances were in check. It said: 'We consider the UK's fiscal position as vulnerable and one of the key constraints on our 'AA' sovereign rating. We expect that UK budgetary consolidation will remain a slow process.' Sir Keir was forced to gut planned welfare reforms to avoid an embarrassing defeat in the Commons on Tuesday. The 11th-hour climbdown means the legislation will deliver no savings and will blow a £5bn hole in Ms Reeves's budget. S&P Global said the episode had brought into question whether the Chancellor could balance the nation's books as planned. The credit ratings agency expects the UK deficit to be reduced only slightly from 5.9pc of GDP last year to 5.5pc this year. Ratings agencies are used by the world's investors to assess the creditworthiness of borrowers, including countries. The industry is dominated by just three companies, of which S&P Global is the world's biggest. As such, its verdict on Britain's finances is hugely influential. S&P's update does not suggest it is considering changing the UK's current credit rating. However, it will be seen as a warning to the Government about the urgency with which it must tackle the public finances. It comes a day after major bond investor Legal & General warned that repeated policy changes from Labour had shaken investors' faith in the Government's plans. The cost of government borrowing on Friday remained higher than before Tuesday's vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill. The yield on 10-year UK gilts – a benchmark for the cost of servicing the national debt – stood at 4.53pc, compared to 4.45pc before Tuesday's vote. Jack Meaning, an economist at Barclays, said extra spending on benefits and anticipated cuts to the growth outlook meant 'the Chancellor's fiscal rules [were] highly likely to be breached at the autumn Budget'. 'The fragility of the fiscal position has come into focus, making tax increases in the autumn almost inevitable,' he said, predicting an extension to the long freeze to income tax thresholds. Salman Ahmed, at investment giant Fidelity International, by contrast said the Chancellor may put off balancing the books in the autumn and instead hope for growth to come to the rescue.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Labour's curriculum expert says schools could be 'pushed' to teach 'diverse texts' rather than English favourites
The head of Labour 's curriculum review has said teachers may in future be 'pushed' to teach diverse texts rather than old favourites such as An Inspector Calls. Professor Becky Francis said the classic English play, first performed in 1945, is so widely taught for English Literature GCSE because it is 'tried and tested'. She said a 'frequent issue' is getting teachers to branch out because lessons on the older, well-known texts are 'easier on the ground to replicate'. The 'drawing room' play, by J.B. Priestley, has been a go-to text for teachers for decades and is loved for its critique of Edwardian English society. However, it has fallen foul of equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) campaigners who want teenagers to study more texts by ethic minority authors. Professor Francis is chairing Labour's curriculum review, and aims to publish her full report in the autumn. Speaking at the Wellington College Festival of Education in Berkshire, she said 'challenging discrimination' is 'very important' to the review panel. She said: 'It's part of our terms of reference to ensure that every young person can see themselves within the curriculum. 'That, of course, includes ethnic diversity, but also gender, disability, and, of course, social class as well, and we take that very seriously. 'The issue is about representation. That's important for curriculum efficacy, but also receiving engagement.' She said part of the panel's discussions are about whether to 'signal' to texts that are already in the curriculum. She said exam boards are able to set diverse texts, but this sometimes does not filter down into schools choosing those ones to teach. Schools have the freedom to select which exam board they use, and within that board, which texts to be examined on. Professor Francis said: 'What I'm thinking about… is a frequent issue that we hear about in English literature around An Inspector Calls. 'Actually, in the present English curriculum, what we've heard is it's perfectly possible, from an exam board perspective, to be able to introduce more diverse texts, but often, because certain texts are so tried and tested, it's easiest on the ground to just replicate them, and carrying on doing same thing.' She joked that a 'straw poll' may show the majority of schools still teach An Inspector Calls. 'So for us, it's trying to find what is the responsibility of different agencies in this,' she said. 'And then being able to think, what is it that we want to achieve in terms of signalling or pushing particular behaviours on ground.' Professor Francis was responding to an audience comment from representatives of Advocacy Academy, a grassroots organisation in Brixton, South London which has written to her regarding the review. The group suggested 'anti-racist' materials could be embedded in the curriculum and said it was unfair that only white pupils' ancestors' achievements were 'celebrated' in schools. Professor Francis' comments come amid campaigns to 'decolonise the curriculum' amid concerns that ethnic minority children do not feel included at school. The Department for Education has been contacted for comment.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Poll: Britons deliver verdict on Starmer's first year in power
Voters have answered with a resounding 'NOTHING' when asked what has been the biggest achievement of Keir Starmer 's first year in power, a new poll shows. More in Common asked voters to offer their one or two-word responses to Labour 's best and worst actions of the party's first 12 months in power to create a word cloud. And it was pretty brutal, with most people unable to thing of anything good. More in Common's director Luke Tryl said it was 'one of the most stark word clouds we've seen - the Winter Fuel Allowance drowns everything else out'. The other major problem to stand out for voters was immigration, with more than 20,000 people already having crossed the English Channel in small boats this year, a record. Sir Keir is facing Labour dissent, economic uncertainty and spiralling conflict abroad as he marks a year in Number 10. The Prime Minister led his party back into power with more than 400 MPs on July 4 last year – clinching a majority just short of Sir Tony Blair's landslide in 1997. But with a daunting in-tray of problems including a stuttering economy, creaking public services and global volatility, his political honeymoon period was short-lived. His personal popularity is now the lowest of any British premier after their first 12 months in office, political scientist and polling guru Professor Sir John Curtice said. 'There were pretty clear potential weaknesses before they even started, and most of those weaknesses have basically just been exposed over the course of the last 12 months.' Sir John said part of the problem lay in what he described as a failure of narrative in setting out the Government's vision for change to the public. 'They're portraying themselves as a repair gang rather than the builders of a new Jerusalem. Pessimism doesn't necessarily go down very well,' he said. 'The thing with Starmer is, he's a brilliant prosecution lawyer… But prosecution lawyers present cases that have been (put together) by someone else. The problem is that as a political leader you've got to prosecute your own case. 'Maybe he needs new personnel? Either he's got to learn to do it himself or get someone in to do it for him.' That verdict was echoed by some dissenting voices within Labour ranks, where there is lingering discontent among rebels over the Government's Welfare Bill despite Number 10 offering major concessions on the legislation. The Government saw off the threat of a major Commons defeat over the legislation on Tuesday after shelving plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability benefit in England. 'I think he really needs to think about why he wants to be a Labour Prime Minister and what is it he actually cares about,' one long-serving Labour MP said. They said Tuesday had marked 'the lowest point' in Sir Keir's premiership so far and raised questions about his authority, warning that backbenchers may now feel emboldened to demand further U-turns elsewhere. Sir John said that the Government's challenges in passing legislation were unsurprising in light of the broad but fragile coalition of support on which Labour built its election victory, securing 412 seats on just 35% of the vote. That means many MPs defending narrow majorities and raises the prospect of 'a large body of people who are nervous about their political futures,' he said.
