Do young Europeans believe in democracy?
The research gathered the opinions of 6,703 Europeans aged 16-26 years old living in Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Greece, Poland, as well as the United Kingdom.
The findings revealed that support for democracy is highest among young Germans — 71% of respondents backed it here — while Poles showed the lowest levels of support, with 48% endorsing this political system.
Even though the majority of respondents expressed support for democracy, 21% said that under certain circumstances, they would favour an authoritarian government over a democratic one.
Compared to four years ago, a rising number of young people in surveyed countries classified themselves as right of centre, with this figure rising from 14% to 19%.
"Among young people who position themselves politically right of centre and feel economically disadvantaged, support for democracy drops to just one-third," said Prof. Dr. Thorsten Faas of the Free University of Berlin, who collaborated on the study.
"These figures show that democracy is under pressure – from both outside and within."
At the other end of the political spectrum, the proportion of young people who classified themselves as left of centre also rose, particularly in Germany, France and Italy.
What do young people make of Europe and the EU?
In total, 51% of respondents backed the claim "the EU is a good idea, but it is very poorly implemented", with the most Euroscepticism on this matter stemming from young Greeks, 63% of whom agreed with the statement.
Additionally, 40% of respondents said they believed that the way in which the EU is not particularly democratic.
In terms of the EU's sphere of action, 53% argued that the EU affords too much effort to trivial matters and that instead it should focus on tackling more important issues.
These include tackling the cost of living crisis, expanding defence against external threats and building better conditions for businesses.
Despite this debate around the EU's efficiency, respondents overwhelmingly backed EU membership, with 66% agreeing that belonging to the bloc is a good thing. Meanwhile, 73% of young Brits said they backed re-joining the EU.
The survey also revealed that with time, young Europeans are becoming more critical of immigration, as 38% backed tougher immigration policies, compared to 26% in 2021.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
34 minutes ago
- Euronews
Elon Musk's X hit with complaint over use of personal data for ads
Elon Musk's social media platform X has been hit with a formal complaint because of alleged breaches of the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA): the platform appears to have used sensitive personal data for targeted advertising. The complaint is filed by nine civil society organisations including European Digital Rights (EDRi), AI Forensics and Centre for Democracy and Technology Europe (CDT). It comes after evidence compiled by AI Forensics on the basis of X's Ad Repository, found that 'major brands as well as public and financial institutions engaged in targeted online advertising', based on special categories of personal data, such as political opinions, sexual orientation, religious beliefs and health conditions. Under the DSA, which entered into force for the largest online platforms – which includes X – in late 2023, platforms are prohibited from offering targeted advertising based on profiling using these special categories of data. AI Forensics uncovered evidence, for example, that 'X allowed Total Energies, the multinational energy and petroleum company, to run ads on its platform excluding users who had engaged with keywords related to ecologist political figures,' the complaint said. In addition, fast-food chain McDonalds could run ads 'excluding X users who had engaged with keywords related to McDonalds' own trade union as well as antidepressants and suicide'. The organisations call on the national Digital Services Coordinators and the European Commission to investigate the potential breach. The Commission began an investigation into X under the DSA in December 2023. In preliminary findings published last summer, the EU executive concluded that blue checkmarks used by the platforms are deceptive and that it falls short on transparency and accountability requirements. X has had the opportunity to reply in writing. The investigation is still pending.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
What's at stake in the new EU long-term budget?
Think of any EU policy you care about or benefit from, as a citizen, politician, or stakeholder. Whether it's funding Ukraine's reconstruction, boosting the continent's competitiveness, or maintaining farm subsidies, all of it ties back to one foundational element: the EU's long-term budget. That process begins in earnest this Wednesday, when the European Commission presents its first proposal for what is known in Brussels jargon as the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), covering the period from 2028 to 2034. Behind almost every major fight in Brussels, there's a battle over money. And this is the mother of them all. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has promised a comprehensive overhaul of the EU budget to make it simpler, more effective, and better aligned with strategic priorities. Translating that ambition into actual numbers—especially when it comes to funding areas like defence, which the treaties currently prohibit—will be the start of many difficult negotiations with EU leaders and MEPs. Meanwhile, traditional programmes that may no longer be viewed as top priorities could face deep cuts, sparking fierce resistance. A masterclass in secrecy The lead-up to this MFF proposal has been marked by an extraordinary level of secrecy. Few details have leaked, most of them deliberately and only at a very final stage in the process. This cloak of confidentiality is one of the most successful examples of von der Leyen's consolidation of power and a testament to the control wielded by her powerful chief of staff, Bjoern Seibert. Commission insiders describe a system of 'compartmentalisation' akin to methods used in intelligence operations, where individuals only have access to the information strictly necessary for their tasks. Within the Commission, this has meant that discussions about the budget have taken place in isolated groups, particularly in high-level 'chef' meetings involving Commissioners' cabinets and directorate-generals. A senior EU source told Euronews that most of these discussions occurred in silos, with each group unaware of what others were working on, and especially in the dark about the figures for each fund. 'The truth is: numbers will go directly to the College of Commissioners [tomorrow]. Only like three people know about them,' the source revealed. While Commission staff have been working on structure and governance issues of the funds, which couldn't prevent these from being leaked, details on actual funding levels remain tightly guarded. Two key elements The current MFF for 2021–2027 stands at €1.2 trillion, equivalent to about 1% of the EU's GDP (not including post-pandemic recovery funds). Few expect this figure to change dramatically. Instead, the focus will be on spending smarter and prioritising better. Initially, the Commission considered structuring the next MFF around three major pillars: one for national envelopes covering agriculture and cohesion funds; another for competitiveness, innovation, and strategic investment; and a third consolidating all external instruments. While insiders suggest that some adjustments have been made since then, the drive for radical simplification remains intact. 'Still, expect surprises,' one Commission source said. The current 7-year budget has already reduced the number of funding programmes from 58 to 37 in the name of streamlining. Yet the Commission still sees room for further consolidation, and one major question is how drastic this simplification will be. The other is how far the Commission can go in increasing its flexibility to reallocate funds. Today, the vast majority of the EU budget is pre-allocated to specific programmes, leaving little room for rapid response or discretionary spending. The EU does have mechanisms to address emergencies and unforeseen events, but their size is limited: around €21 billion, just a small fraction of the total MFF. The Commission cannot unilaterally shift large sums from one policy area to another without formal revisions, which require the approval of both the European Parliament and the Council. That rigidity is something the new budget proposal will try to address, as enhancing the EU's ability to course-correct in real time has become a top priority (as shown by the mid-term review of the current MFF). Funds to watch Among the most hotly debated issues will be how to fund Ukraine, how to address defence spending despite legal constraints, and whether to introduce new common debt instruments (considering the EU still has to repay its pandemic borrowing). Nordic countries, for example, have pointed out that if von der Leyen avoids debt-based solutions, some member states may push to introduce it anyway. But what will really draw attention this week are the proposed funds themselves. Leaks suggest that a new European Competitiveness Fund will consolidate into a single instrument up to 12 existing programmes, including: Horizon Europe, the EU's flagship research fund; the recently created EU4Health programme; and the LIFE programme for environmental and climate action. Another innovation appears to be something called 'National and Regional Partnerships,' a working title that has surfaced in multiple drafts, and that will be supported by a single "European Economic, Territorial, Social, Rural and Maritime Sustainable Prosperity and Security Fund." This would group together the funds under shared management, namely the agricultural subsidies and the policy to tackle the socio-economic gap between the EU's poorest and richest regions, known as cohesion. With these two funds accounting for the bulk of the EU budget, the expected merging of their structures could have profound implications—not only for governance and oversight, but also for how money is distributed across member states. A tangle of joint programmes will be replaced with 27 national plans specific to agriculture and cohesion, each reflecting EU-wide priorities while tailoring implementation locally. But this raises thorny questions about who controls the funds and how priorities are set. One thing that's likely to remain intact is the European Social Fund, which supports anti-poverty efforts and vulnerable groups. Socialists in the European Parliament claimed this as a key win in exchange for backing von der Leyen's bid for a second term—though in truth, the fund is enshrined in EU treaties and was never really in danger of being scrapped. This week's proposal is only the beginning of what promises to be a long, complex, and politically fraught negotiation process. Member states, the European Parliament (which appears sidelined in the delivery of the EU budget from some leaked drafts), and the Commission will all bring different priorities and red lines to the table. The Danish presidency of the EU Council aims to present the 'nego-box', the first compromise on the Commission's proposal, before the EU summit in December.
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Divided EU weighs action against Israel over Gaza war
The bloc's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has put forward 10 potential steps after Israel was found to have breached a cooperation deal between the two sides on human rights grounds. The measures range from suspending the entire accord or curbing trade ties to sanctioning Israeli ministers, imposing an arms embargo and halting visa-free travel. But despite growing anger over the devastation in Gaza, EU states remain divided over how to tackle Israel and diplomats say there appears to be no critical mass for any move. "I was asked to give the inventory of the options that could be taken and it's up to the member states to discuss what do we do with these options," Kallas said Monday. The tone of discussions will be shaped strongly by how Israel is implementing a promise to the EU to improve humanitarian access to Gaza. Kallas said Thursday she had struck a deal with her Israeli counterpart, Gideon Saar, to open more entry points and allow in more food. Gaza's two million residents are facing dire humanitarian conditions as Israel has severely limited aid during its devastating war with Palestinian militant group Hamas. "We see some good signs of more trucks getting in," Kallas said Monday. "But of course we know that this is not enough and we need to push more (so) that the implementation of what we have agreed also happens on the ground." At a meeting of EU and neighbouring countries in Brussels on Monday, Jordanian foreign minister Ayman Safadi said the situation in Gaza remained "catastrophic". 'No justification' Israel's Saar, speaking at the same meeting, sounded confident his country would avoid further EU action. "I'm sure not any of them will be adopted by the EU member states," said the foreign minister. "There's no justification whatsoever." While the EU appears unable for now to take any further moves against Israel, just getting to this stage has been a considerable step. The bloc only agreed to review the cooperation deal after Israel relaunched its devastating operation in Gaza following the collapse of a ceasefire in March. Until then deep divisions between countries backing Israel and those more favourable to the Palestinians had hamstrung any move. The war was sparked by Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, which led to 1,219 deaths, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Of the 251 people taken hostage by militants that day, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Hamas-run Gaza's health ministry says that at least 58,386 Palestinians, most of them civilians, have been killed in Israel's retaliatory campaign. The UN considers those figures reliable. © 2025 AFP
