Threat of industrial action in secondary schools as ASTI rejects Leaving Cert reform package
ASTI members voted to reject the Senior Cycle Redevelopment – Implementation Support Measures' by 68% to 32%. The turnout was 73%.
The reforms, which are due to be implemented this September, propose allocating a minimum of 40% of Leaving Cert marks to project work or practicals across all subjects in an effort to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of student's skills.
But teachers have voiced concerns about how the moves will affect the way students are assessed and marked, especially in the context of the risk of students using artificial intelligence to complete assignments.
In a separate ballot, the union voted by 67% to 33% in favour of industrial action, 'up to and including strike action', in opposition to the accelerated implementation of the Leaving Cert reforms.
The union said the outcome points to 'a lack of confidence in the accelerated Senior Cycle Redevelopment Programme as it is currently constituted'.
ASTI General Secretary Kieran Christie said the support measures on offer 'do little to provide a Senior Cycle experience for all students that addresses the core inequalities that are in place in the second-level system'.
Advertisement
He said ASTI research published this year shows that a key concern 'is the lack of resources and capacity in schools to introduce such radical change in an effective manner', along with developments in AI and insufficient teacher training in some subject areas.
'The support package available from the Department fails to sufficiently address these concerns,' he added.
The ASTI said it will continue to be available to engage with the Minister for Education and her Department 'in relation to how these and other significant concerns can be addressed'.
In a statement, Education Minister Helen McEntee said the support measures on offer followed 'positive engagement' between the Department and the ASTI, as well as the Teachers Union of Ireland (TUI).
Last week, TUI members voted by 73% to 27% to accept the supports package. The Department said that it will seek to engage with the TUI leadership in the coming days as it proceeds to implement the support measures.
McEntee said ASTI members have committed to cooperating with Senior Cycle Redevelopment and had confirmed to Department officials that their members will teach the new and revised specifications from the next school year.
She also said that the vote 'will not affect the implementation of targeted supports for students contained in the package'.
'As I confirmed in April, the implementation of the programme will continue with the introduction of the first tranche of new and revised Leaving Certificate subjects in September 2025 as previously announced.
'The package of additional supports contains a number of significant measures aimed at supporting students directly. I am absolutely committed to delivering on those measures as we proceed with implementation of this programme.'
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Extra.ie
a day ago
- Extra.ie
Redress is essential in holding religious orders and schools to account, say abuse survivors
Survivors of child sex abuse in Irish schools have questioned the establishment of a new Commission of Investigation without an accompanying mechanism for redress. Advocacy groups warned that without redress, educational institutions and religious orders will be able to 'avoid accountability' for abuse of children and said the State inquiry 'must not become an obstacle to justice'. Education Minister Helen McEntee yesterday announced details of a Commission of Investigation into historical child sex abuse in schools across Ireland, not just those being run by religious orders. Justice Minister Helen McEntee. Pic: Eamonn Farrell/ The need for a commission was highlighted by a scoping inquiry last year, which identified some 2,395 allegations of sexual abuse in day and boarding schools run by religious orders, involving 884 alleged abusers in 308 schools across the country between 1927 and 2013. Most allegations were from the records of 42 religious orders. Ms McEntee said that institutions and religious orders will be 'held accountable' for 'awful' crimes against children and will be expected to fund any potential redress scheme. The commission – to be chaired by Judge Michael McGrath – will examine the handling of allegations, suspicions and concerns of sex abuse in schools; failure to treat concerns, causes and responsibility for such failure; failure to prevent harm; and the concealment of child sex abuse. His Hon. Mr Justice Michael McGrath. Pic: Collins Courts It will take five years to complete at a cost of tens of millions of euros. A separate body of work will be undertaken 'in tandem' with the commission's work to explore how a redress scheme could operate, with religious orders and educational institutions expected to pay any resulting compensation. 'The most appropriate thing would be for orders to come forward themselves to offer redress schemes,' Ms McEntee said. Advocacy groups One in Four and Restore Together – set up to support survivors of sexual abuse in Spiritan schools – have welcomed the establishment of the Commission of Investigation and the commitment to expand its remit to all schools, but sounded the alarm over further redress delays. Justice Minister Helen McEntee. Pic: Fran Veale While the Spiritans have already publicly committed to undertaking their own redress scheme, Restore Together said that the inquiry should not 'inadvertently shield institutions from taking immediate responsibility'. 'Justice delayed is justice denied. Redress cannot wait,' it stated. Spokesman Philip Feddis added: 'How will the Government ensure that redress – both financial and therapeutic – advances and concludes in tandem with the five-year time limit prescribed by the minister?' One in Four chief Deirdre Kenny said: 'While we appreciate this is complex, survivors have shown immense resilience and patience; therefore, we are concerned about any further delay. Delays disadvantage survivors and may allow institutions to avoid accountability and responsibility.' Jen Cummins, Social Democrats TD. Pic: File Social Democrats TD Jen Cummins said the Government must be firm when seeking compensation from religious orders. 'We cannot have a repeat of this Government going to religious orders, cap in hand, pleading for contributions – as happened, most recently, with the mother and baby home redress scheme,' Ms Cummins, education spokeswoman for her party, said. 'If religious orders are unwilling to contribute to redress, the Government must go after them with a legal team, not a begging bowl.' The Education Minister also promised that the Government will not repeat the mistakes of the Farrelly Commission of Investigation, which dragged on for years and ran over budget. 'I am confident that this can be done within a five-year time period,' Ms McEntee said. The establishment of the new Commission of Investigation comes less than three months after the publication of the final report from the beleaguered Farrelly Commission. The Farrelly probe examined the care of a young disabled woman – 'Grace' – in a foster home in the southeast of the country. The inquiry was originally meant to take place over one year. However, the publication of the final report was delayed on nine separate occasions. It will ultimately cost close to €20million and failed to make any substantive findings of abuse – despite interim reports doing so. The report was widely criticised by children's rights advocates and disability campaigners, while the entire Commission of Investigation model came under scrutiny. Taoiseach Micheál Martin said the State must evaluate 'whether there is a better way of cutting to the truth much more effectively'
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Worry about funding redress scheme for abuse in schools runs deep
Good morning. The decision by the Government to establish a commission of investigation into allegations of historical sexual abuse in schools is likely to be the easiest part of the process. A programme for government commitment, and a recommendation from the scoping inquiry into the matter, its establishment was a foregone conclusion in many ways. However, much thornier issues remain – most prominently, the issue of redress. While welcoming many aspects of the Government announcement, abuse survivors' groups expressed disappointment that the issue of redress has been delayed. Minister for Education Helen McEntee said on Tuesday that the Coalition considers 'a further phase of detailed investigation and data analysis on this issue will be essential'. McEntee made all the right noises about going after the organisations – primarily religious orders – who ran the schools. But the State's record in extracting sufficient cash from these orders to pay for historical abuse is both a sorry and a long one. Going back to last September, when the scoping inquiry report was published, senior government figures have emphasised two things consistently: Firstly, that redress must happen, and quickly – Simon Harris, taoiseach at the time, said such a scheme could not be 'parked' until the statutory inquiry was complete. But privately, the second issue they fret about is the cost. Public statements heaping pressure on orders to pay up are just that: statements. Meanwhile, the worry about the tab and its impact on the exchequer runs deep. In 2023, officials in the Department of Education outlined that a broad scheme would expose the exchequer to 'unquantifiable and potentially enormous costs'. Earlier this year, officials in the Department of Public Expenditure warned that the recommendations from the scoping inquiry have the potential to 'very significantly impact on public finances'. READ MORE There is both a political and a moral imperative behind establishing a redress scheme. But there is also a cold hard reality to funding it. For now, victims do not know what they'll get, or when, or if they'll get redress at all. There is no clear or established path to ensuring religious orders pay towards a scheme. And the State cannot confidently measure its liability, nor ignore the risk of footing the bill. The tension between these competing points is likely to increase in the years ahead. Fees conundrum The issue of how much families will have to pay for college registration fees next year continued to dominate proceedings in the Dáil yesterday and last night, culminating in a Sinn Féin motion on the topic, while students protested outside the gates of Leinster House. Read Marie O'Halloran's report here . While it lacks the heat of last week, the issue is unlikely to totally fade away any time soon. The Opposition knows the Government is in a bind on it – it cannot, by its own admission, provide a straightforward answer on the fees question without pre-empting the budget process. Meanwhile, it provides an evergreen angle of attack for the Opposition parties on the cost-of-living debate, something which they have all shifted focus towards in recent weeks. More of that this morning, with a Social Democrats motion on transparency in supermarket profits. Make no mistake about it, the budget wars are already under way. And after years of watching while government parties disbursed huge amounts of exchequer funds to voters, the Opposition will not hesitate in attacking. Best reads Ellen Coyne has the latest on medical evacuations of sick children from Gaza to Ireland. We report on Pa Daly's High Court challenge to the super juniors at Cabinet. Miriam Lord on the mileage to be had out of the student charges debate. Conor Gallagher pays a visit to the sanctioned Russian ship in Killiney Bay. Cliff Taylor on the latest twist in Trump's tariff tale and what it means for Ireland . Playbook The Dáil kicks off at 9am with topical issues, before a motion from the Social Democrats at 10am on transparency in supermarket profits. Leaders' Questions is at midday, followed by Other Members' Questions and Questions on Policy or Legislation. At lunchtime there will be statements on last month's European Council meeting, before government business in the afternoon is given over to statements on the all-island strategic rail review. The Mental Health Bill goes through its report and final stages at 5.06pm, followed by the Statute Law Revision Bill going through the same process. Seanad amendments will be taken on legislation governing supports for survivors of residential institutional abuse, followed by the committee and remaining stages of the Planning and Development Bill. Seanad The Seanad sits at 10.30am for commencement matters. In the afternoon, it will take the second stage of the Defamation Bill and consider an Opposition Bill providing for paid leave following miscarriage. Government business will be given over to social welfare legislation reforming bereaved partner's pensions. There will also be statements on the Post Office network before the Seanad adjourns at 7.50pm. Committees Pre-budget submissions from NGOs are the order of the day for the social protection committee at 9.30am, while the health committee will look at legal and policy gaps in adult safeguarding following the recent RTÉ report on nursing homes. The disability matters committee will look at the delivery of disability policy, while unmanned aircraft systems are to be discussed by the transport committee – including an appearance from former Dublin GAA manager Jim Gavin, who is also chief operations officer for the Irish Aviation Authority. Minister for Higher Education James Lawless is in with his sectoral committee at 12.30pm to discuss revised estimates. Later in the afternoon, the infrastructure committee will discuss the role and remit of the Courts Service, while the agriculture committee holds a session on farm safety. Both of those are at 3.30pm. The Taoiseach is doing revised estimates for his department with the finance committee at 4pm, before a general engagement at 5pm. Peter Burke has the same job at the enterprise committee at 6.30pm, while at the same time, the foreign affairs committee continues its pre-legislative scrutiny of the Settlements Bill. Here's the full Oireachtas schedule .
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Survivors welcome commission of investigation into handling of sexual abuse in schools
Survivors' groups have welcomed a commission of investigation into the handling of sexual abuse in schools but warned that further delays to redress for victims could allow institutions to avoid accountability. The commission follows a scoping inquiry last year that detailed almost 2,400 allegations of sexual abuse across more than 300 religious-run schools. The soon-to-be-established commission will examine the handling of allegations, suspicions, and concerns of sexual abuse in all schools, including primary and post-primary. It will also examine the handling of these complaints by religious bodies and State agencies, including the Department of Education, the HSE, and An Garda Síochána. Announcing the establishment of the commission, education minister Helen McEntee vowed that the institutions and religious orders 'involved in these awful crimes' will contribute to redress. The State has a track record of failure when it comes to compelling religious orders to contribute financially towards victims. Most recently, it emerged that just two of the eight religious orders linked to mother and baby homes offered to contribute to the €800m redress scheme for survivors. Ms McEntee said more work is needed to decide how a redress scheme for victims of sexual abuse in schools is to progress. 'It's very clearly the wish of survivors but what's very clear also is that any redress scheme would be funded by the religious orders and by those who were accountable for the awful abuses which happened in our schools.' This work will continue 'in parallel' with the work of the commission and will focus on further examination of the religious orders. 'What funds they have, what assets they have, what levers may be used by government to ensure that funding is provided by those religious groups and orders,' Ms McEntee said. This is being worked on by the Attorney General. 'It is important to stress that the preferred outcome here is that religious institutions and organisations would come forward,' she added. Survivor advocacy group One in Four welcomed the move to formally approve a commission of investigation into the handling of child sexual abuse in schools across Ireland from 1927 to 2013. The scale reflects the thousands of lives affected and the deep impact on families and communities for generations, according to One in Four chief executive Deirdre Kenny. 'We recognise the complexity of the commission's work and what it represents for survivors and for Irish society,' she said. 'Examining how concerns were managed is vital for understanding past failures and building a safer, more accountable future for all children.' Concern around redress delays However, the group also expressed concerns about further delays to redress for victims. 'While we appreciate this is complex, survivors have shown immense resilience and patience. Therefore, we are concerned about any further delay. 'Delays disadvantage survivors and may allow institutions to avoid accountability and responsibility,' said Ms Kenny. The commission is set to run for the next five years, and will cost 'tens of millions', Ms McEntee said. Earlier this year, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said there is a need to 'fundamentally reflect' on costly and lengthy commissions of investigation which come up with 'deeply unsatisfactory' findings. Mr Martin was speaking after the publication of the Farrelly Commission report into the 'Grace' foster home case, which took eight years at a cost of €13.6m so far, with the final bill set to top €20m. The commission published its 2,000-page report into the case in April. The report was subsequently roundly criticised by whistleblowers, Ireland's Special Rapporteur on Child Protection, and across political parties. - If you are affected by any of the issues raised in this article, please click here for a list of support services.
