Tamil Film actor Powerstar held by Delhi Police over Rs 5-cr loan fraud
Srinivasan, who had been evading trial since 2018 and was declared a 'proclaimed offender' twice, was arrested from Chennai, the Delhi Police said in a statement.
According to the statement, the actor allegedly posed as a financier and duped a Delhi-based company of Rs 5 crore promising to secure for it a Rs 1,000 crore loan.
The money was later found to have been diverted for film production and personal use.
'The accused had been absconding for several years and was finally apprehended on July 27 from Vanagaram in Chennai. He has been remanded to judicial custody," Deputy Commissioner of Police (EOW) Ravi Kumar said.
According to the complaint, a private firm was allegedly cheated by a group of persons including Henry Lalremsanga, Deepak Banga, Anil Varshney, and Ramanuja Muvvala in 2010.
'These people claimed to be expert consultants capable of securing high-value funding for hotel and corporate infrastructure projects," said the DCP.
They introduced the complainant to S Srinivasan, who introduced himself as the proprietor of a trading company and claimed he could secure the company a Rs 1,000 crore loan.
As part of the deal, the complainant paid Srinivasan Rs 5 crore, ostensibly to purchase adhesive stamps (0.5 per cent of loan amount), a standard fee in such transactions.
However, no loan materialised, and a post-dated cheque of Rs 5 crore, issued as security by Srinivasan, bounced due to insufficient funds, police said.
During investigation, the officer said, police found that on December 27, 2010, a sum of Rs 5 crore was transferred to the account of the trading company and later moved to accounts controlled by Srinivasan and his wife.
Of this money, he withdrew Rs 50 lakh and transferred the remaining amount to a joint account, from which a fixed deposit of Rs 4 crore was created.
Officials said Srinivasan failed to provide any documentation to prove that he had purchased adhesive stamps, which revealed his fraudulent intent.
'He was first arrested during the course of investigation but later released on interim bail in 2013 after assuring the court that he would repay Rs 10 crore in 15 days. However, he only deposited Rs 3.5 lakh and went underground," said the officer.
The actor was first declared a proclaimed offender in April 2016. Though re-arrested in March 2017 and granted bail in June the same year, he again absconded, leading to his being declared a PO a second time in November 2018.
In their pursuit for him, police zeroed in on his location at Golden Treasure Apartment in Vanagaram in Chennai, and arrested the 64-year-old on July 27.
Popularly known as 'Powerstar" in the Tamil film industry, Srinivasan has been associated with films as a comedian, producer, singer. He even projected himself as a politician. He holds a diploma in acupressure from a Chinese university, acquired through distance learning.
His passion for cinema led him to establish a trading company in Chennai, through which he allegedly lured businessmen with promises of large bank loans. Srinivasan has acted in several Tamil films.
Police said he is also named in six other cases in Chennai for similar offences. PTI BM VN VN
view comments
First Published:
July 30, 2025, 20:45 IST
News agency-feeds Tamil Film actor Powerstar held by Delhi Police over Rs 5-cr loan fraud
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Online bullying can be as mentally traumatic as physical violence: Delhi HC
Cyberbullying can be as mentally traumatic and scarring as physical violence, the Delhi High Court has said, while upholding the conviction of a man who sent morphed nude images and threatening messages to a minor girl studying in Class 9. The judgment, delivered on July 28 by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, stressed the devastating psychological impact of online harassment, particularly on children. (HT Archive) The court rejected his appeal against a five-year sentence, describing the case as a 'textbook example of cyberbullying.' The judgment, delivered on July 28 by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, stressed the devastating psychological impact of online harassment, particularly on children. 'What is deeply concerning is the use of technology to commit cyberbullying – an act that, while faceless and silent, can be as mentally traumatic and scarring as physical violence, especially when directed towards children. Such conduct, in the virtual world, has very real and devastating consequences in the real world,' justice Sharma said. The conviction stems from a complaint filed in September 2016 by the victim's mother. The minor girl, then in Class 9, was using a tablet for studying when she received morphed obscene images of herself along with threatening messages on WhatsApp. The sender, a man known to the family, warned her that the photos would be circulated if she didn't comply with his demands. The trial court in March last year had convicted him under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code including sexual harassment, stalking, criminial intimidation, sections 12 (sexual harassment) and 14 (using child for pornographic purposes) of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act, 2012 and section 67 (publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form) under the Information Technology Act. Challenging the verdict, the man claimed he was falsely implicated and that the case was full of contradictions. The Delhi Police, however, maintained that the evidence clearly showed he had transmitted obscene material and had criminally intimidated a minor. Justice Sharma, in her 35-page ruling, upheld the trial court's decision. She said that even the threat of circulating morphed images, without actually doing so, can cause irreparable long-term damage to a child's mental well-being and dignity. The act of morphing her face, the court added, sought to not only shame her but to coerce her by creating fear. 'A morphed image once created and circulated can have long-term consequences for a child's mental health, dignity, and reputation,' the judge observed. 'The fear of such circulation alone, even if the image is never actually published, is enough to terrorise a young mind.' The court also highlighted the urgent need to protect children in digital spaces. With growing reliance on gadgets for education, it said, the notion of child safety must extend beyond physical environments. 'This court is of the view that creating a safe environment for children cannot be restricted to physical spaces alone. The modern world demands that equal protection be extended to digital spaces, where children are now spending considerable time,' the court said.
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
New Delhi Police chief orders daily foot patrols by senior officers
On his first day in office, newly appointed Delhi Police commissioner SBK Singh directed all district deputy commissioners of police and station house officers to conduct two hours of foot patrol daily to improve police visibility in the capital city. The order was issued during a meeting with senior officers at the police headquarters on Friday. S.B.K. Singh (right) takes over as Delhi Police commissioner from Sanjay Arora at the police headquarters on Thursday (HT Photo) An officer familiar with the directive said the patrols will take place from 4.30pm to 6.30pm. 'The CP stressed that senior officers must also be seen on the ground, not just the lower ranks,' the officer said. Singh also instructed that two officials — including a woman officer — must be present at all times at the public facilitation desk in every police station. While the woman officer will attend to complaints related to women, the second official will handle cybercrime related grievances. In a bid to uphold the force's integrity, the commissioner asked assistant commissioners of police (ACPs) to keep a close watch on sub-inspectors in their jurisdictions. 'He flagged concerns over recent arrests of Delhi Police officials by the Central Bureau of Investigation on corruption charges and said ACPs must monitor investigating officers more closely, especially sub-inspectors,' said another officer present at the meeting. The commissioner further told DCPs to inspect police stations in their districts regularly, not sporadically, and to ensure proper upkeep of facilities. 'He emphasised that police stations must maintain basic infrastructure standards and that public facilitation desks should be clean, staffed and fully functional,' the officer added. Singh also reviewed the Independence Day security preparations and instructed DCPs to step up security checks in their respective areas.
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC pulls up Delhi Police for failing to trace missing Russian woman
The Supreme Court on Friday blamed the Delhi Police of sheer negligence and adopting a casual approach in tracing the missing Russian woman accused of leaving the country with her minor son in defiance of court orders. The court noted that no FIR was lodged even when the case also involves removing the child from custody of court and forging the child's Indian passport. (ANI) The apex court pulled up the police for being equally guilty of neglecting its order of May 22 by which they were directed to keep a close watch on the woman while granting her shared custody of the child. However, she left the country on July 8. Even on being told by the child's father on July 7 that the woman was missing, the court noted a 'lack of sensitivity and responsibility' on part of the police to take immediate efforts to trace her. The bench of justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said, 'The Delhi Police is equally a partner in violation of this court's child has been snatched from the custody of the Supreme Court of India. The police and ministry officials are taking it lightly, thinking that a child has been taken away by the mother in a matrimonial dispute.' The investigation report submitted by the police in court detailed how the woman, Viktoria Basu, travelled in a taxi from Delhi on July 7 and reached Bihar on July 8. The same day, she crossed over to Nepal, and remained there for four days till she boarded a flight to Sharjah on July 12 and onwards to Russia by an Air Arabia flight. The court noted that till date, no first information report (FIR) has been lodged even when the case also involves removing the child from custody of court and forging the child's Indian passport, when the original is lying deposited with the court. Indicating stern steps may follow on the next date, the bench said, 'Before we take any harsh action, the authorities are well advised to establish contact with the Indian Embassy in Russia and with Interpol and apprise this court of the process they intend to adopt for producing the child before this court.' The matter has been kept for further hearing after 10 days. The court said it had exercised its parens patriae (parent of the country) right, as nobody, neither the father nor mother of the child, was granted full custody by the May 22 order. It also questioned why police did not probe the forgery of the child's passport. Additional solicitor general (ASG) Aishwarya Bhati, representing the Centre, told the court that the police, and the ministries of external affairs and home affairs have established contact with authorities in Nepal, Sharjah and Russia through diplomatic channels to get details of the woman and the child. The court said 'this is hardly of any consequence now,' as authorities have confirmed information that she has travelled to Russia. Bhati said that there is no confirmation that she is still in Russia. The court enquired why the Indian Embassy in Russia has not been asked to verify this information using local contacts. 'Between July 7 (complaint of woman's disappearance) and July 14 (confirmation of her escape from India) what have you done? It is we who have been suggesting you to go through Nepal. What has the Delhi Police done except giving an impression they were hobnobbing. Is this not a case where the Delhi Police clearly failed in their duty?' the court asked Bhati. The ASG told the court that till July 18, even the police did not know the woman's whereabouts. The court responded: 'That is because you did not make any effort.' It also questioned why the CCTV footage outside her house from the day she was reported missing was not checked. 'There is a complete lack of sense of responsibility, sensitivity and sheer criminal negligence on part of the police,' the bench observed, adding, 'We are not going to spare the station house officer and the deputy commissioner of police (south district). They have not shown due care to implement our orders.' The incident even raised concerns over the plan of action available with the Centre on how to respond in such a situation, the court remarked. Besides the police, the MHA and MEA also submitted their reports to the court. ASG Bhati said that contact was established with the airline which Basu took from Sharjah to Russia. However, citing privacy issues, the airline authorities have not shared details. The court said it was willing to issue any orders to facilitate response from the airline. 'Even the UAE will cooperate in such matters. No airline can claim privacy in a matter where a crime has been committed,' the bench said. Basu in 2023 approached the court seeking custody of her son following a matrimonial dispute. But when several attempts of reconciliation failed, the court in May this year allowed shared custody of the minor son to the parents for three days in a week. Basu had come to India in 2019 and her visa was extended by the top court while passing the custody order.
