logo
The key moments from the mushroom cook murder trial

The key moments from the mushroom cook murder trial

1Newsa day ago
The key moments from Erin Patterson's triple murder trial as a jury finds her guilty of all offences.
1. Erin Patterson gives evidence and admits foraging
After weeks of prosecution evidence, she was announced as the defence's only witness in her murder trial.
She took to the witness box for eight days, including several under gruelling cross-examination by crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC. She admitted beginning mushroom foraging during Victoria's first Covid-19 lockdown in 2020.
"They tasted good and I didn't get sick," she told the jury, about preparing and eating wild fungi for the first time. Patterson said she loved her former in-laws and they were her only living family.
ADVERTISEMENT
She also claimed she'd thrown up remnants on the meal after eating it as she suffered from bulimia, and admitted to lying about owning a dehydrator and foraging to police.
1News Australia correspondent Aziz Al Sa'afin speaks to Breakfast in the wake of yesterday's verdict. (Source: Breakfast)
2. Sole lunch survivor Ian Wilkinson enters witness box
The only lunch guest to survive eating Patterson's poisoned beef Wellington, Ian was one of the first witnesses called during week two of the trial.
Ian, Simon Patterson's uncle and pastor at Korumburra Baptist Church, locked eyes with the woman who tried to kill him as he sat in the witness box and gave emotional evidence about losing his wife Heather.
He said Patterson had served himself, his wife Heather, and Don and Gail Patterson on grey dinner plates which were different to her own plate.
Ian laughed as he recalled banter at the dinner table over how Don had eaten his portion and half of his wife Gail's.
ADVERTISEMENT
3. Estranged husband Simon Patterson called as witness
Simon was the first witness called by prosecutors and he discussed their up and down relationship in the years leading up to their permanent separation in 2015.
He gave evidence for three days and explained that he did not attend the fatal lunch, although he was invited, because he felt "too uncomfortable".
Simon also became emotional as he recalled seeing his father and mother dying in their hospital beds.
"Dad was substantially worse than mum, he was really struggling ... He wasn't right inside. He was feeling pain," he said, between tears.
The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including what the jury saw at the mushroom murder trial, where house prices are climbing, and why YouTube's biggest star has business plans in NZ. (Source: 1News)
4. Medical experts explain how her lunch guests became ill, but Patterson did not
ADVERTISEMENT
Several doctors, nurses and toxicologists detailed how the four lunch guests' conditions deteriorated over several days after going to hospital with diarrhoea, vomiting and stomach pain and they tried to save their lives.
Initially, doctors and victims had assumed they all had gastro, but soon it became clear they had consumed death cap mushrooms.
Patterson, on the other hand, took herself to hospital two days after the meal and quickly discharged herself.
She returned and then was taken to a Melbourne hospital but was found to not have been poisoned.
5. Computer devices reveal death cap mushroom searches
Searches of computers, tablets and mobile phones seized from Patterson's home revealed she had navigated to science website iNaturalist in May 2022 and looked at death cap mushroom sighting post for Moorabbin, in Melbourne.
6. Patterson's angry messages over child support
ADVERTISEMENT
A child support issue between Simon and Erin started to involve his parents, Don and Gail, towards the end of 2022 - about six months before the toxic meal.
Messages sent by Patterson to her Facebook friends revealed she called Simon a "deadbeat" and said she wanted nothing to do with her parents-in-law. "This family, I swear to f*****g god," another message said.
Prosecutors said this showed how her relationship with the Patterson family had begun deteriorating.
7. Cell phone tower pings after online death cap sightings
Patterson's phone had pinged at cell towers in the Gippsland towns of Outtrim and Loch after posts on iNaturalist about death cap mushroom sightings in those areas.
Her defence argued this evidence was unreliable, but prosecutors said it showed she had gone to these areas to pick the deadly fungi.
8. Patterson's missing mobile phone
Several mobile phones were seized from Patterson's home except one, Phone A, and prosecutors told the jury they had never recovered this phone. Its sim card was swapped during a police search of her Leongatha home on August 5, 2023.
Another phone, known during the trial as Phone B, had been factory reset on the day police were at her home and again while sitting in a locker at Victoria police's homicide HQ.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mushroom murder could mean life behind bars
Mushroom murder could mean life behind bars

Newsroom

time3 hours ago

  • Newsroom

Mushroom murder could mean life behind bars

It is the triple-murder case that captivated a global audience – a sleepy Australian town, a family Sunday lunch, and a deadly beef Wellington. Now, after a marathon two-month trial involving more than 50 witnesses, four days of closing arguments and seven days of jury deliberations, Erin Patterson has been found guilty of murdering her former in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, and family friend Heather Wilkinson during a family meal at her home in Leongatha, Victoria. All three died within days of the Sunday roast, in July 2023. Heather's husband, pastor Ian Wilkinson, survived after spending weeks in intensive care. Erin's former husband, Simon Patterson – thought to be the real target – was asked to join them for lunch but declined the invitation. In today's episode of The Detail, Australian Channel Seven's chief reporter Chris Reason, who covered the case, explains why it's attracted global attention, and gives insight into what happened inside the courtroom. 'Everyone is saying this is the biggest crime story since the Azaria Chamberlain case, back in the 1980s … but instead of going from 'a dingo took my baby', we have gone to 'a mushroom killed my in-laws'. 'It's the unique murder weapon – death cap mushrooms, what the hell, where has that come from, no one has ever heard of that before – that alone pricked ears here and internationally,' he says. 'It is something extremely unique and fascinating about the way these people died.' Since day one, Patterson, a Lego-obsessed mother-of-two, has maintained her innocence. She pleaded not guilty to multiple counts of murder and attempted murder in the small Latrobe Valley, Victoria courthouse, about two hours' drive south of Melbourne. During the trial, prosecutors said Patterson lured her guests to her home by telling them she had cancer (which was later proven by the police to be untrue). She then knowingly served them a meal laced with deadly death cap mushrooms. The dish, they say, was carefully planned – a calculated act of revenge following a breakdown in family relationships. But her defence painted a vastly different picture: a woman devastated by what she insisted was a tragic accident. They argued that Erin bought the mushrooms from an Asian grocery store, believing them to be safe, and had no idea what she was serving. Patterson took the stand during her trial and, for eight gruelling days, gave evidence. 'She said, 'Let me get on the stand, I want to explain myself',' says Reason. '[That was] a massive flag there, that raised doubt for a lot of people – what murderer would willingly put themselves through that? And that thought would have gone through the jury. 'It was a masterstroke from Erin, and from her defence. 'They put her up, and she was in the box for eight days, now eight days of constant questioning by two of the brightest minds in the legal community down here is extremely intense … and she was difficult, she was defiant, she was defensive, she was awkward in some places … she was a clinical woman, she was an argumentative woman, everyone was wrong except for her. She was cold and calculating.' It took the jury seven days to deliberate before finding her guilty. Reason says he was surprised when the verdict came back – and surprised by the verdict itself. 'At the point where we had the jury sitting into its sixth day, I suddenly started to think 'This is going to be hung, this jury is gridlocked, and this is going to be bad news for everybody concerned. 'I was surprised … for a long time this has been really one of those cases where it pulls you one way, then it pulls you the other … you genuinely think 'Hang on, she's guilty as hell', then you see some other evidence and you think the opposite, 'No, she must be innocent of these charges'. He said Patterson showed no remorse or reaction as the guilty verdicts were read out. 'Nothing, nothing, nothing, and nothing as the four guilty verdicts came down. She remained unmoved, unemotional, no response at all.' Now an inmate in Victoria's largest female prison, the seemingly everyday mum will likely be sentenced next month as a triple murderer, but she also has the option to appeal the decision. Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.

Inside the mushroom trial: Death stares and cell issues
Inside the mushroom trial: Death stares and cell issues

1News

time3 hours ago

  • 1News

Inside the mushroom trial: Death stares and cell issues

Mushroom killer Erin Patterson spent the first few nights of her trial cold and sleepless inside a police cell. She had requested the trial be held in the small Victorian town of Morwell, where she was held underneath the local police station. Had the trial been conducted in Melbourne, she may have been afforded more comforts from inside Dame Phyllis Frost Centre, a maximum security women's prison, where she was driven back to every weekend over 11 weeks. On the first day of trial, Patterson's lawyers complained that she wasn't given a duvet, nor access to a computer and writing materials in her cell. Erin Patterson passes her phone to police during a search of her home in August 2023. (Source: Supreme Court of Victoria) ADVERTISEMENT "At some stage, she was given a blanket, but she spent the night cold — and awake because she was cold — and she can't operate like that," defence barrister Colin Mandy SC said on April 29. There had been "some suggestion to her that she wasn't going to get special treatment by custody officers", he said. "Someone who is in police cells for five weeks, facing a murder trial... with a massive brief of evidence, should be afforded some accommodation," he said. "Because in some ways... she requires special treatment so that we can do our job properly, so that she can provide us with proper instructions, so that she's not uncomfortable." This was among many parts of the trial that the jury was not privy to, as these conversations occurred while they were out of the room. But it can all now be revealed after Patterson was found guilty of murdering her estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail, and his aunt Heather Wilkinson, along with the attempted murder of his uncle Ian Wilkinson. Erin's Patterson's friend with the 'death stares' ADVERTISEMENT Patterson, who only had one supporter in court — her friend Ali Rose Prior. She was known among media to give death stares if you locked eyes with her. Media were limited to six seats in the regional courtroom due to the immense interest, and because members of the public couldn't watch it remotely and had to attend in person. Those seats were directly in front of Patterson in the court dock and, to catch a glimpse of her reaction during the trial, reporters had to swivel around and face her. The Victorian woman was found guilty this week of murdering three of her former in-laws and attempting to kill a fourth with a poisonous lunch. (Source: 1News) She would often turn her head on an angle and stare directly into the eyes of reporters — leaving a menacing impression. Photographers and camera operators outside the court were banned from photographing Patterson during the trial, with a prohibition on "any images of the accused which suggest, expressly or impliedly, that she is in custody". Estranged husband seeks court transcripts 'to grieve' ADVERTISEMENT One of the most bizarre moments the jury didn't see was in the early weeks of trial, when the estranged husband Simon Patterson was giving evidence. During a break on May 1, he made a "small request" of Justice Christopher Beale. "The legal process has been very difficult," he said. "I have a lot to grieve and am grieving a lot about all this stuff here, as I'm sure you can imagine. "One thing that is really difficult is not being able to follow what happens." He asked the judge if he could make available to him all of the transcripts from the trial and the pre-trial to help him "grieve the legal process". Simon had attended court when he gave evidence with a PR adviser, Jessica O'Donnell, which led to a warning from Justice Beale after the judge was told he wanted to issue a statement to media mid-trial. "Whatever his media adviser might be telling him, it seems to me the most prudent course for him is to defer any statement to the media until after the conclusion of the trial," the judge said. ADVERTISEMENT Media on notice to watch what was said With the world's attention on the trial, the Supreme Court's media team, the judge and his associates were monitoring coverage including daily podcasts, live news blogs, radio programmes, blogs and television news crosses. Justice Beale issued several warnings and referred two outlets to prosecutors for potential contempt including The Kyle and Jackie O Show on June 16. He said the radio show "shock jocks" had commented on the case while on air and used it as an example to warn others on speaking about the trial. 1News Australia correspondent Aziz Al Sa'afin speaks to Breakfast in the wake of yesterday's verdict. (Source: Breakfast) "I encourage all commentators to engage their brains before they open their mouths, as they may otherwise land themselves and their organisations in hot water," Justice Beale said. A second referral to prosecutors was made by the judge about a visiting psychologist experienced in serial killers, who spoke about the case at an event in Melbourne on May 31. ADVERTISEMENT Network Ten was warned by the judge about saying it had been "another day of damning evidence" in a news story put to air, and the women-focused website Mamamia was told to take down a problematic podcast episode and Facebook post.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store