5 WB women rescued from prostitution
"Five women from West Bengal were rescued, and five persons, including the hotel manager, staff, and a customer, were detained," he added.
Odanadi founder Stanley mentioned that prostitution was occurring on the second floor of the hotel. "They reserved the ground floor and first floor for customers. Thousands of condoms distributed by the Tamil Nadu health department were seen on the second floor. They also built a tunnel in the toilet, to hide or escape from there. A customer was hiding there during our raid," he said.
He added that he informed Nagalaxmi Choudhari, chairman of the Karnataka State Women Rights Commission, about the incident.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kim Kardashian faces lawsuit for mistakenly posting a man? Her lawyer claims that it's an attempt to cash a mistake
When the Hollywood elites were celebrating the 'wedding of the century' of Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez in Italy, Kim Kardashian, who was on the guest list, had to deal with a man suing her for mistakenly posting his photo on social media. Kim Kardashian is getting sued... According to US Weekly, the court documents filed by Kim K and her legal team claim that Ivan Cantu has no standing. The 44-year-old reality star signed the paperwork on June 26, which was a day prior to the 'Here comes the Bride!' moment. Last year, Kardashian, in all good faith, used her social media to raise awareness in an attempt to help a man from Texas, who was convicted of murder in 2001 and was sentenced to death. Similar to the man who is suing Kim right now, the convicted fellow's name was Ivan Cantu as well. Kim Kardashian's lawyer said... Kardashian's lawyer said, '[Kim] played an important role in advocating for Mr. Cantu. Over the course of approximately ten days in February 2024, [Kim] and her team posted a series of 'stories' regarding Mr. Cantu — approximately 16 in all — on [Kim's] Instagram account. Of these 16 stories, one story posted two days before Mr. Cantu's execution mistakenly used an image of the plaintiff in this action, a New York-based project manager whose name is also Ivan Cantu. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Most Women Have No Idea This Household Item Fades Dark Spots Overnight Undo ' Ivan Cantu proclaimed that because of Kim Kardashian, he has suffered PTSD, sleepless nights and emotional distress due to her posting. Whereas, the socialite argues that his claims have simply no merit. 'The mistake was discovered within hours of the posting, and the story was immediately deleted, with [Kim] swiftly issuing a public apology to [Ivan],' the lawyer continued, adding that the lawsuit is an attempt to cash the mistake. The case is still ongoing.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Friends Accused of Trading on Data for Edgar Face Widening Probe
(Bloomberg) -- The FBI had to move fast when agents learned that two men who were the focus on an insider trading investigation were about to get on a flight to Hong Kong. Before they could board the early morning June 28 flight, federal agents arrested Justin Chen, 31, and Jun Zhen, 29. Prosecutors say they pocketed at least $1 million by taking information they learned from their job at a private company that formats materials before they are submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission's Edgar filing system. At a pair of court hearings, prosecutors said that they were aware of at least four companies where the two men allegedly made trades based on non-public information. But officials were investigating whether Chen and Zhen traded in at least six more companies when they were arrested, hours before getting on the Cathay Pacific flight to Hong Kong. 'We probably wouldn't have arrested the defendants at this point as the investigation is ongoing,' Nicholas Axelrod, an assistant US attorney, said at one of the hearings. 'If not for that travel.' The arrests spotlight ongoing problems with how confidential information can be obtained by insiders before it's publicly released on the Edgar database, the SEC's online portal for more than 30 years. In 2021, the SEC brought enforcement cases against several people who they accused of hacking into third-party companies that dealt with Edgar system. Chen was an Edgar assistant manager and Zhen was a typeset assistant manager at New York-based Companies like EdgarAgents help prepare company filings before they are sent to the Edgar system and distributed to the public. Between March and June 2025, prosecutors say the two obtained material, nonpublic information ahead of announcements like mergers 'that resulted in significant increases in the share price of each company's stock.' 'This was an incredibly brazen scheme,'Axelrod told a federal magistrate in Brooklyn, New York, on Monday. 'They traded on the information and they traded aggressively.' Lawyers for both men declined to comment on the charges. Neither man has entered a plea at this point in the proceedings. Chen, who prosecutors say made $100,000 a year, had worked at the company since 2020 and had been working at firms that handled Edgar data since 2012, according to his LinkedIn profile. His sister also worked at the company. Prosecutors say that the two men had accessed proposed filings on at least four companies before the information was public; Ondas Holdings Inc., Purple Innovation Inc., Signing Day Sports Inc. and SigmaTron International Inc. In one example, prosecutors say Chen and Zhen both bought tens of thousands of shares of Ondas Holdings just before the company released an SEC 8-K form disclosing that it had entered into a strategic partnership with Palantir, a multibillion-provider of artificial intelligence service. They made about $36,749 in the 24-hour period before and after the announcement. EdgarAgents Chief Executive Officer Stephen Bonventre said the company was cooperating with the US investigation and that both men were no longer with the company. 'The alleged activities run completely counter to our company values and the integrity with which we've built our business,' he said in a statement. The SEC declined to comment on the case, though Axelrod said in court that the agency told prosecutors they detected suspicious trading in other companies, which is now part of the government's ongoing criminal investigation. At the two court hearings following their arrests, Axelrod portrayed Chen and Zhen as two men on the brink of fleeing the country who shouldn't be given bail while the case proceeds. He pointed to a text Chen sent Zhen: 'We gotta get out quick.' During the hearing on Monday, however, Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo was skeptical of Axelrod's argument that Chen's 'we gotta get out quick' message meant the two men were going to flee. Kuo said that Chen may have meant he needed to 'get out' of his trading position rather than getting out of the US. 'I read that as in a flight context,' Axelrod said. 'It's the government's concern the defendant could flee.' He cited another text from Chen to Zhen as evidence they had been planning to escape. 'Give me 2 months to get as much as possible,' the text read, according to Axelrod. Chen's lawyer, Charles Millioen, sought to have his client released, arguing that since his passport had been taken, he couldn't leave the US anyway. At an initial hearing last week, Zhen's lawyer, Chris Wright, also said his client wasn't a flight risk. 'He has every reason to stay in the United States,' Wright said. 'His family is here. He's not a citizen of China, he is an American citizen.' Chen's mother wept on Monday as her son sat stoically listening to the government's allegations. She and Chen's sister, who called in for the bail hearing, agreed to post $10,000 in cash to win his release. Kuo said that Chen could be released on a $1 million bond, guaranteed by his mother and sister. 'Hopefully, that is enough to keep Mr. Chen in the district,' Kuo said. Chen was released Tuesday. Zhen, whose bail was set at $500,000, remains in custody as of Saturday morning, according to federal Bureau of Prisons records. More stories like this are available on
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Delhi court declares arms middleman Sanjay Bhandari a fugitive economic offender
New Delhi: London-based arms middleman Sanjay Bhandari, wanted in multiple cases by the Indian agencies, was declared a 'fugitive economic offender' (FEO) by a Delhi court on Saturday based on a request by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), a development which officials said will allow the federal agency to confiscate his properties anywhere in the world and bar him from filing or defending any civil proceedings in India. Sanjay Bhandari. (File Photo) The court ruled that extradition attempt of Indian agencies (for Bhandari) may have failed (a UK court earlier this year discharged him from extradition proceedings) but it doesn't make him 'angel or immune from the prosecution for the violation of Indian laws' and that FEO tag is another way of 'making one come back to India to face trial by coercing him to return by attachment, confiscation of the properties' and 'dis-entitling such fugitive economic offenders from putting forward or defending any civil claim.' Brought in by the government in 2018 to deter economic offenders from evading the process of Indian law by remaining outside the jurisdiction of Indian courts, the FEO act empowers authorities to confiscate and attach proceeds of crimes and assets when the amount involved in the case is higher than ₹100 crore. Such attachment is not linked to conviction. Deciding ED's request under FEO, filed in 2019, special judge - Sanjeev Aggarwal - at the Tis Hazari court said in his judgement on Saturday - 'this court is satisfied that Sanjay Bhandari is a fugitive economic offender under section 12(1) of Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 and is declared as such under the above provision(s) of Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018.' Asserting that Bhandari wilfully refuses to come to India to face criminal prosecution, the judge noted - 'this court is satisfied that the total value of the schedule offence is 100 crores or more i.e. the schedule to the present FEO Act which is Section 51 of the Black Money Act', which it added is a requisite condition for declaring an individual a FEO. With this order, a total of 16 people, including liquor baron Vijay Mallya and diamond trader Nirav Modi, have been declared fugitive economic offenders by different courts. Rejecting an argument of Bhandari that UK high court order makes him eligible to stay in London and therefore FEO won't apply to him, the judge Sanjeev Aggarwal said in his order on Saturday - 'The said argument is without any substance, as the extradition failure will not make any difference, as the extradition of the accused was one of the means to bring the accused to India to face trial in the said offence under Section 51 of the Black Money Act.' 'Extradition attempt may have failed, but it will not make accused angel or immune from the prosecution for the violation of Indian laws. The FEO proceedings are another way of making one come back to India to face trial by coercing him to return by attachment, confiscation of the properties of such fugitive economic offender and proceeds of crime and by dis-entitling such fugitive economic offender from putting forward or defending any civil claim. This is applicable to an individual, who has committed schedule offence or offence(s) involving an amount of ₹100 crores or more and who has absconded or refuses to come back to India to avoid criminal prosecution in India,' the court ruled, while adding that proceeds of crime in Bhandari's case are more than ₹100 crore. Bhandari's lawyer - senior advocate Maninder Singh - had argued that declaring him as fugitive economic offender entails very serious consequences including confiscation of his property and barring him from defending any civil claims, effectively amounting to economic death penalty. Dismissing this argument, the court said - 'Bhandari always has an option to return to India to get the termination of proceedings under FEO Act and to avoid adverse consequences of Section 14 of the FEO Act. Therefore, when he chooses not to return to India, he cannot take the plea of avoiding all the legal consequences including that of Section 14 of the FEO Act. In any case those who play with fire should be aware of its consequences.' According to ED and the Income Tax department, during the extradition proceedings, Bhandari had undisclosed foreign income worth ₹655 crore on which he evaded tax worth ₹196 crore. The middleman in defence deals deposited huge amounts of money in bank accounts of overseas shell companies and also invested in properties in the UAE and the UK (between 2009 and 2016). He has also been under investigation since 2019 by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on charges of corruption in a ₹2,985-crore deal in 2009 to procure 75 PC-7 trainer aircraft from Swiss plane maker Pilatus Aircraft and for allegedly laundering money for properties allegedly linked to former Congress president Sonia Gandhi's son-in-law Robert Vadra in London, in which NRI businessman C C Thampi was arrested by ED in January 2020. It has also been probing Bhandari's links with Robert Vadra, the businessman husband of Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra. He fled from India in 2016 via Nepal and an Interpol red notice was issued against him in October 2017. The Indian government sent two extradition requests against the fugitive businessman under money laundering and black money act which were certified by the then UK home secretary Priti Patel in June 2020, after which, British authorities arrested him on July 15, 2020. A court, however, released him on bail pending extradition proceedings. A Westminster court subsequently ordered his extradition to India in November 2022 but he challenged this in the high court. The UK high court, on February 28 this year, discharged him in the extradition request and an appeal filed by Indian government against it was rejected on April 4.
