
Bengaluru stampede: CAT quashes IPS officer Vikash Kumar Vikash's suspension order
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has quashed the Karnataka government 's suspension order against senior IPS officer Vikash Kumar Vikash , who faced the action in the wake of a fatal stampede here last month.The tragic incident on June 4 in front of M Chinnaswamy stadium claimed the lives of 11 people, drawing sharp criticism over the planning and crowd management Vikash had challenged the government's June 5 suspension order before the tribunal, which also included the names of then Bengaluru Police Commissioner B Dayananda and DCP Shekar H Tekkannavar.The Bengaluru bench of the tribunal comprising Justice B K Shrivastava and administrative member Santhosh Mehra, had reserved its verdict on June 24.On Tuesday, it set aside Vikash's suspension.Vikash's counsel, senior advocate Dhyan Chinappa, said, "The tribunal has allowed the petition and annulled the suspension, affirming that he is entitled to all benefits as per service rules." The CAT also noted that its findings could be extended to the cases of Dayananda and Tekkannavar, opening the door for their potential reinstatement.Following the incident, the CM announced the suspension of Commissioner of Police of Bengaluru city Dayananda, Additional Commissioner of Police Vikash Kumar Vikash, who was in charge of the stadium, Deputy Commissioner of Police of central division Shekhar H Tekkannavar, Assistant Commissioner of Police C Balakrishna, and Circle Police Inspector of the Cubbon Park Police station A K Girish.The government had suspended the three IPS officers under the All India Services (Discipline undefined while action against the ACP and PI was pursued under the Karnataka State Police (Disciplinary Proceedings) Rules, 1965.According to the suspension order, the CEO of RCB had intimated Commissioner of Police, Bengaluru City on June 3 about holding the victory parade and celebrations on June 4. However, the office of Police Commissioner failed to give a written reply to the organisers, rejecting the permission on the grounds of lack of time to prepare for such a huge event.It said the RCB and Cricket Association tweeted about the celebrations and invited the fans to Chinnaswamy stadium without going through the usual practice of issuing tickets or passes. Despite being aware of the developments and expectation of a huge turnout of cricket fans by the police, steps were not taken to either have the event organized systematically at the stadium or give adequate information to the public to take necessary precautions for their safety or provide additional Police force for appropriate crowd management.Further, the situation was not discussed with the higher-ups for necessary guidance and advice on the matter. As a result, the situation went out of control and brought a lot of misery, loss of precious life and embarrassment to the Government, it added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Print
3 hours ago
- The Print
UP: Protests and scuffles during Muharram processions; several detained, 1 injured
In Kushinagar, an Islamic flag was allegedly hoisted and slogans were raised while a Muharram procession was passing a Shiva temple, they said. People had a run-in with police in Bahraich, alleging that some officers insulted Ali Khamenei, Supreme Leader of Iran and a Shia cleric, while traders in Bareilly held a sit-in after a platform set up for a Muharram procession was allegedly vandalised. Kushinagar/Bareilly/Bahraich (UP), Jul 6 (PTI) Some people were detained and a boy was injured in incidents related to Muharram processions in Uttar Pradesh on Sunday, police said. Police said some people posted a purported video of the incident on social media, further escalating tensions. The alleged incident happened near Gulharia in the Khadda police station area in Kushinagar. Khadda Station House Officer (SHO) Harshvardhan Singh said some youths were taken into custody in connection with this incident. In Tekuatar Bazaar, an altercation over DJ music escalated to a ruckus between two groups, in which one Iklakh (8) sustained a head injury. He is currently receiving medical treatment. Ramkola SHO Anand Gupta confirmed that police have brought the situation under control and some people have been detained. Superintendent of Police Santosh Kumar Mishra said that police forces have been deployed at both locations to ensure the situation remains under control. Police in Kushinagar said they were both small disputes but adequate forces have been stationed at both places to maintain peace. A dispute erupted in Bahraich's Nanpara Kotwali area, where people participating in the Muharram procession alleged that a policeman hit a poster of Shia religious leader Khamenei with a stick and then removed it. They alleged that he called Khamenei and those at the procession 'terrorists'. Protesters briefly halted the procession but later resumed after police and other officials intervened and assured action. Police officials claimed, 'The matter has been resolved. The procession is being carried out peacefully.' In a purported video that surfaced online, people at the procession demanded the police officer's suspension. 'My leader, Khamenei sahab, was called a terrorist. Are these terrorists?' a youth said in the clip. In Bareilly, tensions rose after a platform set up near the spot where the 'taziya' is to be placed was allegedly vandalised. Angry traders shut down shops and protested on the streets. Police arrived to calm the situation and registered a case. Traders, however, sat on a sit-in, demanding the arrest of the culprits and warning they would not allow the 'taziyas' to be moved until arrests were made. Senior officials assured traders of action and arrests. 'Police registered a case and took immediate action, detaining two women and three other accused, after which the traders calmed down, ' Additional SP North Anshika Verma said. 'The incident reportedly occurred late Saturday night in Faridpur's Mohalla Sahukara, where miscreants allegedly damaged the platform and attempted to break the shutter of a shop, where the 'taziya' was to be placed,' Verma said. Some traders saw CCTVs of the alleged vandalism and the situation escalated Sunday morning. The 'taziyas' were only moved after assurances of action from senior officials, Verma added. PTI COR CDN SKY SKY This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.


Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
SC opens up staff jobs for OBC and SC/ST blocs, 'omits' EWS
Supreme Court (AI-generated image) NEW DELHI: CJI B R Gavai, second from the Dalit community to head the judiciary, has amended the Supreme Court Officers and Servant (Conditions of Service and Conduct) Rules, 1961, to provide for reservations to SCs, STs, OBCs, physically challenged, ex-servicemen and dependents of freedom fighters in direct recruitments to subordinate staff of the apex court. Rule 4A of the Act, amended and substituted on the CJI's instructions, has been gazetted through a notification issued on July 3. However, it omits reservation for candidates belonging to the economically weaker section (EWS), which was introduced by Parliament through Constitution (103rd Amendment) Act, 2019. The substituted Section 4A, as gazetted, reads: "Reservation in direct recruitment to various categories of posts specified in the Schedule, for the candidates belonging to SCs, STs, OBCs, Physically Challenged, Ex-servicemen and dependant of Freedom Fighters shall be in accordance with the Rules, orders, and Notifications issued from time to time by the Government of India in respect of posts carrying the pay scale corresponding to the pay scale prescribed for the post specified in the Schedule, subject to such modification, variation or exception as the Chief Justice may, from time to time, specify. " The 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act introduced Articles 15(6) and 16(6) to give effect to 10% reservation for EWS in govt jobs and admissions to govt and govt-aided educational institutions. It received Presidential assent on Jan 12, 2019. The constitutional validity of EWS quota was challenged in Supreme Court by more than 20 petitions, mainly on the ground that it exceeded the 50% ceiling on quota imposed by SC in its Indra Sawhney judgment in 1992. A five-judge bench led by then CJI U U Lalit on Nov 7, 2022, by three to two majority, declared that Parliament's decision to provide quota for EWS category was constitutionally valid. The majority view was shared by Justices Dinesh Maheswari, Bela M Trivedi and J B Pardiwala, while Justices Lalit and S R Bhat ruled that EWS quota was illegal. On Dec 6, 2022, NGO 'Society for the Rights of Backward Communities' filed a petition seeking review of the Nov 7 judgment. A five-judge bench led by then CJI D Y Chandrachud on May 9, 2023 dismissed the review petition, thus giving judicial impregnability to the validity of the EWS quota.


The Hindu
8 hours ago
- The Hindu
DTC building bus terminal on encroached land, says NGT
The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has recently ordered the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) to halt the construction activity at the proposed bus terminal in Najafgarh, south-west Delhi, stating that the terminal is being built on the encroached water body. The DTC was instructed to respond within two weeks. The Principal Bench of the NGT comprising Chairperson Prakash Shrivastava, Judicial Member Sudhir Agarwal and Expert Member A. Senthil Vel, said, in an order dated July 4, that the DTC has encroached the water body by constructing a bus terminal and a multi-storey commercial building on the land. The District Magistrate (South West) informed the tribunal that 'no clearance had been given' for construction on the land. In an affidavit submitted to the NGT, the DM said, 'the said land is recorded as johar (water body) and at present a bus terminal constructed on it. The water body has been encroached upon by the DTC.' The affidavit also mentioned that there was no record of any change of land use or no-objection certificate from the Forest Department, which is in violation of the Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017. The NGT also noted that no reply has been filed by the Managing Director of the DTC and granted two-week extension to file replies.