Mercedes unveils CLA Shooting Brake EV with 473-mile range and fast charging
The second model in a completely new vehicle family built on Mercedes ' modular EV architecture, the CLA Shooting Brake boasts a claimed range of up to 473 miles in the most efficient trim – placing it among the best long-range EVs around.
A standout feature of the new platform is its 800V architecture, which enables fast DC charging that delivers 193 miles of range in just 10 minutes, with a maximum charging power of up to 320kW.
'The new CLA Shooting Brake is designed for those who appreciate the dynamism of a sporty vehicle but don't want to compromise on space and practicality in everyday life," said Mathias Geisen, board member at Mercedes-Benz. 'It combines intelligent technology and efficiency to deliver a fresh, engaging driving experience.'
Visually, the CLA Shooting Brake is identical to its saloon counterpart up to the B-pillar, featuring a low profile and a distinctive front panel with 142 individually illuminated chrome-look LED stars. Where it differs is in the extended roofline, which slopes gently towards the rear to create a more spacious interior. An optional one-piece panoramic glass roof can be specified with an illuminated 'starry sky' effect, integrating another 158 individual stars into the glass surface.
Practicality has also been improved. The boot offers a volume of 455 litres, expanding to 1,290 litres with the rear seats folded. You also get a 101 litre illuminated frunk for additional storage, while a towing capacity of up to 1,800 kilograms places it among the top haulers in this EV category.
Inside, the CLA Shooting Brake features the next generation of the MBUX infotainment system, which integrates Google Gemini and ChatGPT as its virtual assistants. The centrepiece is the optional MBUX Superscreen, which extends across the entire width of the dashboard and integrates up to three displays. Mercedes has also reintroduced physical roller and rocker switches on the new multifunction steering wheel for key functions like volume controls.
At launch, two all-electric models will be available. The rear-wheel-drive CLA 250+ Shooting Brake will have a power output of 200kW and sprints from 0 to 62mph in 6.8 seconds. The more powerful, all-wheel-drive CLA 350 4MATIC Shooting Brake produces 260kW and achieves the same sprint in five seconds. Both models use a new-generation lithium-ion battery with a usable energy content of 85kWh.
The electric drive system features what Mercedes calls a 'permanently excited' synchronous motor and a new two-speed gearbox on the rear axle, designed to provide responsive acceleration from a standstill while ensuring efficient power delivery at higher speeds for comfortable long-distance cruising. In a nod to market flexibility, Mercedes also confirmed that a 48V mild-hybrid version of the CLA Shooting Brake will be available early next year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
US moves to free up Patriot missiles for Ukraine
The Trump administration has started freeing up Patriot air defence systems to send to Ukraine, days after the US president vowed to send more weapons to Kyiv. The Pentagon has moved Germany ahead of Switzerland to receive the next Patriots, which will allow Berlin to send Ukraine the two weapons it already has, US officials told The Wall Street Journal. Switzerland had purchased five Patriot systems which were scheduled to be delivered between 2026 and 2028. It comes days after Donald Trump announced his decision reversal on supplying weapons to Ukraine, proposing a pipeline plan to sell weapons to Nato allies in Europe, who could in turn provide them to Kyiv. Mr Trump gave Vladimir Putin a deadline of 50 days to negotiate a peace deal or face 'very significant' tariffs and sanctions, including on its trading partners. The costly Patriot systems – in high demand among US allies – have proven effective at destroying Russian ballistic missiles aimed at Ukraine's cities. 'We're sending weapons to Nato, and Nato is paying for those weapons, 100 per cent,' Mr Trump said in an interview with NBC News last week. 'So what we're doing is, the weapons that are going out are going to Nato, and then Nato is going to be giving those weapons (to Ukraine), and Nato is paying for those weapons.' Mr Trump said last week the weapons were 'already being shipped', adding: 'They're coming in from Germany and then replaced by Germany, and in all cases, the United States gets paid back in full.' Germany was believed to be the nation most invested in the scheme. Friedrich Merz, its chancellor, proposed buying Patriot air defence batteries for Ukraine in a deal with the US. Some European allies had so far refrained from committing to the $10 billion (£7.5 billion)initiative, which involves countries giving up their prized systems, including the Patriot missile batteries that Kyiv has been desperately seeking. The Trump administration will manoeuvre plans for its future deliveries to prioritise the countries who sign on to send Patriots to Ukraine, a US official told the WSJ. Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, is scheduled to meet his Nato counterparts on Monday to discuss the issue. A separate meeting Wednesday involving countries that own Patriots will be chaired by Gen Alexus Grynkewich, chief of European Command. The Swiss government said the US had 'decided to reprioritise the delivery of Patriot ground-based air defence systems' as part of its effort to support Ukraine. It is now not clear when the country will receive the equipment. Kyiv has six fully operational Patriot batteries – two from the US, two from Germany, one from Romania and one jointly given by Germany and the Netherlands, according to the arms monitoring group Action on Armed Violence. During his Oval Office meeting with Mr Trump last week, Nato secretary general Mark Rutte mentioned six Nato countries – Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands and Canada – that were willing to participate in the weapons-purchasing scheme. Some had been hesitant to make a decision on whether to join the scheme without the release of key details. France had told allies it will not join the initiative, according to officials briefed on the discussions. The Italian government said it would not purchase weapons but could help with the logistics of transporting them to Ukraine, Italian media reported.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
The Reform UK proposal which could cost a million jobs
Energy minister Michael Shanks stated that Reform UK 's "war" on net zero would result in the loss of almost one million jobs, characterising their plans as "anti-jobs" and "anti-growth". Shanks's remarks follow Reform deputy leader Richard Tice 's letter to energy companies, urging them against investing in new green energy contracts and threatening to invalidate future agreements. Labour cited Confederation of British Industry figures indicating that the net zero sector currently supports 951,000 jobs across the country. Reform UK countered, arguing that current net zero policies are destroying industrial jobs, costing taxpayers billions, and contributing to high energy bills. The issue has become a key political battleground, with Labour viewing Reform as their main opponents, despite polls suggesting significant public support for net zero policies, even among Reform voters.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Notting Hill tote bag designer loses High Court copyright claim
A designer who created a Notting Hill tote bag once presented to the Princess of Wales has lost a High Court claim against two brothers she accused of copying her designs. Natasha Courtenay-Smith sued Nangialai Takanai and Ehsanullah Takanai over claims they copied her design bearing the words 'the Notting Hill shopping bag' in an attempt to pass themselves off as being part of her brand. Lawyers for Ms Courtenay-Smith told a hearing in London in April that the men's actions were 'parasitic', adding that her design had been presented to Kate on a visit to Portobello Road and had been featured in 'high-profile media publications' such as Mail Online, OK! Magazine and the Sunday Mirror. The two men, who have been selling two designs with the words 'the Notting Hill shopper bag' and 'the Camden Town shopping bag', denied copying the logo's designs and passing off, claiming that Ms Courtenay-Smith's design is 'devoid of distinctive character'. In a ruling on Friday, Francesca Kaye, sitting as a deputy High Court judge, ruled that the 'level of creative freedom' used to create Ms Courtenay-Smith's design was 'low', meaning the amount of copyright protection it could receive was 'correspondingly low'. She said: 'Given the nature of the artistic copyright work and those features that were relied on as giving rise to the copyright as setting the logo apart as a creative work, I am not satisfied that the defendants have in fact copied a substantial part of the copyright work. 'Given the low degree of creativity, the scope of the protection conferred by the copyright is correspondingly narrow, and on the basis of a qualitative assessment, I am not satisfied that these are close copies. 'The defendants are not, therefore, liable for copyright infringement by their use of the defendants' signs.' In a 53-page judgment, the judge also ruled that the trademark of Ms Courtenay-Smith's logo, which was registered in 2013, had expired and had not been infringed. At the hearing earlier this year, Joshua Marshall, for Ms Courtenay-Smith, told the court his client had been selling her 'unique' design, which has 'proven to be incredibly successful and has become iconic'. He described the two men's design as a 'sleight of hand', adding that the reason they chose the word 'shopper' instead of 'shopping' was to make it 'different enough to avoid a claim of counterfeit'. Jamie Muir Wood, for the two businessmen, said in written submissions that the average consumer 'will notice the difference between the Notting Hill word sign and the logo, namely the replacement of the word 'shopping' with 'shopper'. He said: 'Whilst there is similarity between the signs, given the differences between them and the fact that the average consumer will distinguish between them, no misrepresentation will occur. 'Accordingly, there can be no damage.'
