
‘Kicked Ronit Roy, he wouldn't let me leave without Aamir Khan on Lagaan shoot', recalls Apoorva Lakhia: ‘Aamir reached 90 minutes late, wasn't angry'
In a chat shared on the YouTube channel Cyrus Says, Apoorva recalled that he had direct guidelines from Aamir that he could do anything to make things stricter. 'I told them no cars, just one bus. Everyone travels in a bus, no one gets a car. Anyone who is late for the bus, the bus will not wait for them for more than five minutes. Aamir was late on the third day. I thank god Aamir was late on the third day,' he shared.
Apoorva Lakhia said that he decided to leave Aamir Khan behind but others in the bus felt like this would result in Apoorva getting fired. 'Ronit Roy was doing security. He refused to shut the door and the entire bus was looking at me to see that what is he going to do now? Let's see how he leaves Aamir behind,' he recalled and added, 'I gave a kick to Ronit Roy and he fell outside the door. We started the bus and ran from there. The entire unit and cast was looking at me and I remember Yashpal Sharma said, 'Kal Bombay bhai (Brother, you'll be in Bombay tomorrow).' So I said, 'It's okay if that is the situation, I'll leave, at least people will remember me.'
Apoorva said that since there was no other transport available, Aamir reached the set 90 minutes later. 'He didn't say anything to me. He wasn't angry. That was his way of saying, 'good,'' he recalled. Apoorva said that on the fifth day, actor Gracy Singh was also late, and she too, was left behind.
ALSO READ | Ramayana Teaser Out: Ranbir Kapoor's first look as Ram, Yash as Ravan in mythological epic; credits are a reminder of Game of Thrones
Apoorva Lakhia shared that the scheduled that was supposed to last for almost six months, went on for almost one year, and they had to be in the desert during that time. He recalled that the film's first cut was roughly 5 hours 30 minutes as they had shot night cricket, which was later reduced to just one montage, and two innings of the match, which was all cut down.
Lagaan was one of the biggest hits of the year 2001. The film was also nominated at the Oscars in the Best Foreign Language Film category.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
India's most expensive film made at ₹835 cr, VFX & music by Oscar winners; not Kalki 2898 AD, Brahmastra, Adipurush
The budgets of Indian films are steadily rising, now rivalling those of major Hollywood productions. In fact, it's become quite common for Indian movies to cross the ₹ 100 crore mark. Taking this trend to new heights, one film has emerged as the most expensive ever made in Indian cinema, with a whopping budget of ₹ 835 crore, surpassing even big-ticket films like Kalki 2898 AD, Brahmastra, and Adipurush. The most expensive film in India is Nitesh Tiwari's magnum opus Ramayana Part 1. Ramayana is a two-part epic mythological film. It stars Ranbir Kapoor as Lord Ram, Sai Pallavi as Sita, Yash as Ravana and Ravi Dubey as Lakshman. Sunny Deol will be seen as Hanuman. Lara Dutta, Kajal Aggarwal, Rakul Preet Singh, Vivek Oberoi, Arun Govil are also a part of the film's ensemble cast. Kunal Kapoor, Arun Govil, Sheeba Chadha, and Indira Krishnan are also a part of the film. According to a report by Bollywood Hungama last year, Ramayana is being built on a budget of $100 million (around ₹ 835 crore). The film is still under production. With its over ₹ 800 crore budget, it has outpaced the production costs of big-budget films, including Kalki 2898 AD ( ₹ 600 crore), RRR and Adipurush ( ₹ 550 crore each). Brahmastra Part One which previously held the record as Bollywood's most expensive film at ₹ 375 crore, stands nowhere close to Ramayana's budget. Ramayana Part 1 is backed by Namit Malhotra, owner of the global media giant Prime Focus. He is also the CEO of DNEG, the acclaimed British-Indian VFX powerhouse known for its cutting-edge visual effects, which has of eight Academy Awards for Best Visual Effects. Ramayana's VFX work is helmed by DNEG. Besides this, Ramayana also marks the first collaboration between AR Rahman and Hans Zimmer. Hans, the two-time Oscar award winner for Best Original Score, is best known for films like The Lion King (1994), Dune (2021) and Christopher Nolan's Interstellar (2014). On Thursday, the first look of Ramayana was unveiled by the makers. The film is scheduled to be released on Diwali 2026. It will be followed by part 2.


India.com
24 minutes ago
- India.com
Who is Namit Malhotra? The brain behind Ranbir Kapoor and Yash starrer Ramayana, India's most expensive film, he has won 8...
Finally, after a long wait, the teaser of Nitesh Tiwari's much-awaited project Ramayana was released on July 4, 2025. With a reported budget of ₹835 crore, Ramayana is set to be one of the biggest films Bollywood has ever produced. The mythological saga features Ranbir Kapoor, Sai Pallavi, and Yash in key lead roles. While Ranbir will play Lord Ram, Sai will essay the role of Sita, and the role of Ravana will be portrayed by Yash. As the epic saga is set to hit the big screens on Diwali 2026, let's take a look at the man who is the brain behind this masterpiece. Who is Namit Malhotra, Ramayana's Producer? Namit Malhotra comes from a family of film producers and cinematographers. While Namit's father, Naresh Malhotra, was a producer, his grandfather, M. N. Malhotra, was a cinematographer. Namit completed his education in computer graphics and then started his own company called Video Workshop. His co-founders were his teachers from college. Interestingly, the editing studio they created was based out of his father's garage. The company worked on shows like Boogie Woogie, Gaatha, and also provided post-production facilities for Channel V. In 1997, Namit decided to merge Video Workshop with his father's film production and rental business, creating Prime Focus. The company initially offered technological and creative services for television shows and films before expanding into film production with projects like The Hurricane Heist and later Brahmastra Part One. In 2014, Prime Focus merged with Double Negative, a UK-based VFX studio, to form DNEG. The company specializes in visual effects and has worked on films like Blade Runner 2049, Tenet, and the two Dune films. In an interview with Hindustan Times, Namit shared his vision for Ramayana. He said, 'I'm keen to not just make India proud but excite the world about Indian storytelling and really celebrate global cinema together. It's not like we don't like Hollywood films. It's not like we don't see an Oppenheimer and have a great feeling, or a Forrest Gump, or any of these landmark films.' He further added, 'Their stories are universal. I believe this is universal, too. This is that opportunity that I believe I'm pretty fortunate to have received in my life, and I hope I can deliver.'


Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pirate Software claims being made 'the villain' boosted petition's momentum as Stop Killing Games hits 1 million signatures
(Image via YouTube/Pirate Software) The Stop Killing Games petition has now surged past a million signatures, but there's an unexpected twist. It's not just about the milestone. Jason 'Thor' Hall, popularly known as Pirate Software, the vocal critic of this moment, claims that social media backlash against him painted him as an antagonist, but truly, that turbocharged the momentum of the SKG movement. Such a counter-intuitive argument added a dramatic layer to the fight to preserve access to the purchased games. Pirate Software claims the villain narrative ignited support in the Stop Killing Games favour Pirate Software has directly countered the claims that his critical analysis video damaged the SKG petition. He presented some data and suggested that interest was already waning before he commented on the issue. He further made a striking assertion, saying the campaign gained crucial traction as supporters rallied against him. Hall bluntly stated about social media, "My videos do not seem to have had any impact on the movement at all.' 'Making me the villain did, though," he further added, suggesting that the controversy which surrounded his stance and all subsequent online firestorm that labelled him an opposition, quite seemingly unified SKG supporters. The common enemy effect, in a manner, injected fresh energy and helped propel the petition to reach its landmark of a million signatures. How did fans react to Pirate Software not being a villain narrative? The online response to Hall's claim was a whirlwind. The fans, as usual, remain divided. While some accused him of muddying up the waters, the supporters did defend him and his perspective, with a user noting that Louis disapproved of the pile-on that's against him. The others even acknowledged Pirate Software's value to developers and urged collaborations. The comment read, 'You brought up some good points, and you should work with the movement instead of against it IMO. Developers like you should have a voice in this.' It further added, "We need pple like you pirate,' showing support to Hall. A user even said that they saw many creator videos, and he was surprised how people were not able to relate to what Hall was trying to say through his video. As per the user, he was 'speaking about it as a dev from a dev PoV and simply almost no gamer could relate…' While some followers felt that Pirate Software's impact on the movement was undeniable, despite his denial, others just ignored everything with a one-word, 'Sure…' Not all stood with Pirate Software, though, and skepticism did kick in. There were direct attacks made on Pirate Software. A user on his post commented, 'Just stop man , just stop killing games.' Many X users even saw a broader human tendency here at play. As per their observation, 'People love drama and they love having a villain to hate.' While the other added, 'People just look for a scapegoat when their stupid things start failing.' The idea that Pirate Software became an unintentional catalyst resonated with many. Some even theorized that he was just a convenient target who got in the middle of the drama, due to his firm stand. As per them, people needed a bogey man and they latched on to him. Stop Killing Games is not an easy fight. Beyond all drama, there is the core aspect that was in the middle of the discussion. It's about the petition's core challenge- European Union copyright law. While many legal experts and Pirate Software pointed out that the goal of SKG is to force publishers to release tools that allow games to work offline indefinitely, their stance clashes fundamentally with the EU directives, which protect Digital Rights Management (DRM). The Information Society Direction of the EU mandates a strong legal shield against circumventing DRM, the action needed to preserve many games after they are shut down. Also, the existing EU consumer laws are focused on upfront information and product conformity at the purchase, and not perpetual service obligations. To grant SKG's demand would need a radical and legally complex overhaul of all established intellectual property and contract law hierarchies in the EU, which is far beyond what the petition could achieve alone. The reality presents many hurdles, irrespective of the signature count. It shows and proves that the fight is just far from over. For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here . Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.