Barisan-Pakatan pact to continue in Sabah polls
KUALA LUMPUR: Barisan Nasional is committed to working with Pakatan Harapan in the upcoming Sabah election, and is open to collaborating with other state-based parties, says Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi.
'BN and PH are not just a simple 'plus'; this is 'plus, plus, plus', which reflects our openness [to collaborate with Sabah parties]. Clearly, there will be no peninsula- or Sabah-based parties going it alone,' the Barisan chairman said.
This united front, he added, is crucial to ensure continuity in Sabah's development agenda should the unity government secure victory at the polls.
On another matter, party wing leaders in the unity government alliance have been urged to avoid speculating about electoral seat talks in Melaka, he said.
Such matters, said the Umno president, should be left to the discretion of each party's top leadership.
Responding to criticism directed at Umno Youth chief Datuk Dr Muhamad Akmal Saleh over the latter's seat-sharing formula for the Melaka state election, Ahmad Zahid reminded all wings not to make premature public statements based on personal interpretations.
'I advise all the wings of parties within the unity government to let these matters be determined by their respective top leaderships.
'Do not be swayed by emotions or individual analysis. Leave it to the leadership,' he told reporters at the World Trade Centre here yesterday in conjunction with Umno's 79th anniversary celebration.
Ahmad Zahid added that such issues have yet to be discussed at the coalition's senior leadership level.
'This has not even been raised in our negotiations, so it should not be turned into a political polemic. It's far too premature,' he said of the public spat about seat-sharing in the Melaka elections which only have to be called by January 2027.
Dr Muhamad Akmal had rejected a 14-14 seat-sharing formula between Barisan and Pakatan, calling it unrealistic given Barisan's dominance in the state.
Amanah Youth responded by labelling Dr Muhamad Akmal's comments as arrogant and contrary to the spirit of coalition cooperation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
27 minutes ago
- The Star
Amendments to Aboroginal Peoples Act nearing completion, says Zahid
PUTRAJAYA: The drafting of amendments to the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954, which involves matters relating to land ownership among the Orang Asli community, is now in its final stages, says Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi. "Insya-Allah, it will be finalised by September at the latest and tabled in Parliament in March 2026," said Ahmad Zahid, who is also Rural and Regional Development Minister, during the ministry's monthly assembly here Tuesday (July 1). In March, Ahmad Zahid said that the proposed amendments aim to improve several key areas affecting the Orang Asli, including land issues, infrastructure, education, housing and economic development. He said the Act is set to be amended for the first time in over 70 years, with several aspects under consideration, particularly concerning land or roaming areas, due to disputes between the Orang Asli community, private landowners and state governments. The last amendment to Act 134 was made in 1967, and the Act was reviewed in 1974. Meanwhile, Ahmad Zahid also called for the expansion of high-impact agricultural initiatives through the Agrotek Wilayah project under the Central Terengganu Development Authority (Ketengah). He said the smart farming approach for fertigation chili cultivation has the potential to increase national productivity and income levels. "So far, 16,000 polybags have been planted across 1.6ha of land by four participants. I believe, with proper guidance and appropriate technology, this project has the potential to produce 96,000kg of chili with an estimated annual revenue of RM576,000," he said. In addition, Ahmad Zahid urged Ketengah to spearhead the transformation of Kenyir Lake tourism through the Desa Kirana initiative and position it as an iconic destination contributing to the success of Visit Malaysia Year 2026. "I also want Kolej Ketengah to move beyond borders and work closely with the Majlis Amanah Rakyat (Mara) to enhance the expertise of its instructors, especially in the field of Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET), so that the quality of education and training can be raised to a higher level," he added. Ketengah, a statutory body under the Rural and Regional Development Ministry, has been in operation for 52 years and has spent RM1.7bil during that time to implement various programmes and projects aimed at regional development and improving community well-being. - Bernama
Malaysiakini
35 minutes ago
- Malaysiakini
PM chooses key people in govt, not the royals
YOURSAY | 'You either don't understand your role or you don't have the courage.' PM pushes back against lobby to extend CJ's term, calls it politicisation GP20257: Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, if you haven't figured it out yet, let me spell it out. The issue isn't that every retiring civil servant should have his/her tenure extended, but the excellent ones should, especially when there's a vacuum in key positions. There was no lack of candidates for the MACC chief or IGP posts, but they were duly filled, not according to normal promotion procedures. In Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat's case, it's very clear that a very good CJ is being bypassed, even according to normal procedures. It's not just ordinary people who are asking for her extension, but the Malaysian Bar, respected leaders, and other professionals. To us, it means; 1) Your judgment is flawed and unreliable; 2) You don't understand your role, or you don't have the courage to advise the king on your choice. It's the prime minister who chooses the key people in his or her government, not the royals, as the royals in this country, according to the Federal Constitution, do not govern. Top appointments to the government are the PM's choices. As long as the choices are made according to the constitution, the king makes the PM's choices official. That's the meaning of the king acting on the advice of the PM. It takes a PM with a backbone, not a glib mouth, to advise the king on his role. Apparently, Anwar can't do the job. Just resign and spare us this misgovernance. BobbyO: What a lame excuse. Anwar, do you think the people are fools, or do you think that power is in your hands and you will decide according to your own selfish agenda, just as you did in extending MACC Azam Baki's tenure not once but thrice? Remember, even the toughest and cruellest dictator has fallen, as they think that power is theirs to wield as they like. Remember Umno and jailed former prime minister Najib Abdul Razak. They thought that they were unbeatable as they had the finance, resources, and manpower. Look at where they stand today. Such a lame excuse, and Malaysians can very clearly see through you and your motive if you do not want to extend Tengku Maimun's tenure. Why then did you extend Azam's tenure? Is it because it worked in your favour? Was it not a political move? Why were the others due for promotion made to wait? What about the inspector-general of police and his deputy? Why was the deputy not promoted to the next level? It is so clear to see that you are frightened of promoting decent and honest civil servants. Seriously, Anwar, stop taking the people for granted. Umno did, and they lost big - four states to the opposition. What will be PKR's position at the next election? Reduced to the level below MIC and MCA? Half full Cup: Let's face it, our PM does not welcome most of the people's opinions, especially the professional group and his supporters, because he feels he is now the maharaja of the day. In fact, he has even forgotten or refused to recognise who his supporters are for the past 20 over years. The fault lies in his supporters (especially the urban citizens). If we look at what he did when he was in Umno, he was a very racist leader, hence his meteoric rise to be the deputy president of Umno. He was almost on the verge of becoming the president (prime minister). Most of his reforms at the time were very much at the expense of a certain group of people. We have been badly mistaken, or maybe we have fooled ourselves. Has DAP also taken advantage of the people's foolishness to gain power and enjoys that power now? BetterMY: Thank you for shooting yourself in the foot once again! The rakyat is fully aware of your administration's tactics of only retaining those subservient to you. Where you should have retained talent, you let them go, and where you should have dispensed with them, you gleefully retained. We will keep this in mind when voting in the 16th general election. Mind you, we're not racist to completely dispel of BN and PN, there are good administrators there too. It's just a matter of ridding BN and PN of the extremist and corrupt voices. Once that is done, we'll have a credible alternative to your incompetent administration. We have given you an opportunity, and you squandered it. We have given you that opportunity despite your entitled attitude towards the top post since 1998. Your days at the administration are numbered, and you will soon join the one-term PM list. And before any ardent and blind supporters of Pakatan Harapan jump on this, please be known that I have voted for Harapan since GE10. So my thinking is both reflective of the groundswell against Harapan and also the maturing of our electorate. The above is a selection of comments posted by Malaysiakini subscribers. Only paying subscribers can post comments. In the past year, Malaysiakinians have posted over 100,000 comments. Join the Malaysiakini community and help set the news agenda. Subscribe now. These comments are compiled to reflect the views of Malaysiakini subscribers on matters of public interest. Malaysiakini does not intend to represent these views as fact.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Academic freedom under siege
HUMANS are an incredible species, having achieved extraordinary feats, especially in the past century. We reached space just six decades after the first powered flight. Today's smartphone has thousands of times more computational power than the machine that sent a man to the moon. With techniques dating back to the 10th century, we eventually eradicated smallpox. Measles vaccination accounts for 60% of lives saved and over the past 50 years, vaccines for 14 diseases have cut infant deaths by 40% globally and over 50% in Africa. To this day, vaccination remains the only effective treatment for rabies, which has a 100% fatality rate in the unvaccinated. This progress stems from scientific and technological advancement, made possible by nations setting aside differences to pursue knowledge together. Yet, the very system behind these breakthroughs – academic freedom backed by sustained funding – is now under siege. From US funding cuts to structural constraints in Malaysia, science faces mounting political and institutional pressures. Under President Donald Trump, research funding was slashed at will – putting the global scientific community at risk and reversing years of progress. The Harvard Gazette (2025) interviewed researchers affected by the funding freeze. Some warned their work would vanish entirely without continued support, including studies on tuberculosis immunity and gut neuron ageing, with implications for neurological diseases. This affects not only research progress but also the people involved, especially emerging talents. Although the cuts mainly affect US-based universities, the impact is global. US institutions anchor countless international research efforts, especially in climate science, global health and advanced technologies. Curtailing their work may delay progress and fragment the global knowledge ecosystem. These cuts, including the US$400 million (RM1.69 billion) withdrawn from Columbia University, aim to punish institutions for their diversity, equity and inclusion programmes and positions on Palestine, where ceasefire calls are framed as support for terrorism and labelled as anti-Semitic. This politically charged culture war, driven by conservatives hostile to science that challenges their worldview, is undermining research that could benefit humanity. And when academic freedom erodes, society will pay the price. Instead of fostering an inclusive, knowledge-based future, the Trump administration is pulling funding from research on climate change, equitable society and women in society. This ideological censorship threatens entire fields, with women's health being just one stark example of the consequences. Because women were long excluded from clinical trials, critical conditions such as heart attacks are often presented differently and go unrecognised, even by trained doctors. Pregnant women remain excluded from many studies today, leaving gaps in treatment safety and efficacy. Without inclusive, well-funded and politically independent research, these blind spots will persist, with serious consequences for public health. Can the global research community fill the vacuum left by what was once the world's leading funder? The challenge highlights just how deeply global science has relied on US institutions and why countries like Malaysia must now accelerate efforts to build their own research capabilities: financially, structurally and in terms of talent. This includes tackling brain drain. As highlighted by Emir Research, misalignment between higher education, industry demand and research incentives have driven skilled Malaysians abroad, weakening our innovation ecosystem just as global research and development (R&D) leadership shifts. Emir Research has previously noted that shifting global push-and-pull dynamics are prompting Chinese nationals to return home. While US hostility towards certain sciences has played a role, equally important are China's rising R&D investments and reforms aimed at attracting and retaining talent. While the US rolls back funding for climate and green energy research, China is accelerating – most notably with the world's first operational thorium-based nuclear reactor, offering more abundant fuel and lower proliferation risks. Despite concerns over human rights and transparency, China's sustained R&D drive stands in stark contrast to recent US trends. Meanwhile, the European Union has allocated €500 million to draw global scientific talent – signalling a broader recalibration of research leadership. In this fluid and opportune moment, Malaysia must not be left behind. This recalibration is about more than funding or geography; it is about values, structures and priorities. To stay competitive, we must urgently recalibrate our ecosystem. This demands stronger government commitment and a serious rethink of how academic institutions are governed and how academic freedom is upheld. Yet, it is never simple. According to Da (2022), 'academic freedom' is among the most misunderstood concepts in academia. And in Malaysia, it has clearly been curtailed. On the surface, Malaysian public universities have gained more autonomy compared to before, with our top university – Universiti Malaya – aiming to further reduce government reliance and become fully independent in governance, admissions, finance and academics. While this addresses part of the equation, academic freedom involves far more. Da systematically identified three key impediments to academic freedom: the Statutory Bodies (Discipline and Surcharge) Act (Act 605), weak institutional autonomy and external interference. UM's efforts focus on institutional autonomy, which is commendable but not enough. The government must do more to ensure academic staff have the support and freedom needed to achieve meaningful outcomes. Instead of restricting discourse through cautious regulation or indirect pressure, the government and universities should foster open and critical engagement. This will uphold academic freedom and nurture the analytical mindset essential for innovation and nation-building. The best way to cultivate future research talents is to let students question, think and discuss – not reduce them to passive memorisation in lecture halls. However, academic freedom alone is not enough. Without a system that turns investment into real-world results, research risks becoming a numbers game. This is why Emir Research has long advocated institutionalising the input-output-outcome-impact framework across Malaysia's R&D and policy ecosystem to ensure funding and talent lead to measurable innovation and societal impact. Research strategy must go beyond volume metrics and track commercialisation, policy relevance and public value. In October 2025, the Science, Technology and Innovation Ministry projected Malaysia's gross domestic expenditure on R&D to reach 2.5% in 2025 and 3.5% by 2030. Yet, Govindaraju et al (2020) found that while additional funding boosts publications and patents, overall efficiency remains weak due to poor innovation and value creation. Non-research universities often chase revenue, whereas research universities focus on low-hanging fruits to justify funding and meet performance metrics. This may help explain why Malaysia ranks among the top countries for academic paper retractions, suggesting that institutional pressure to publish – regardless of quality – could be distorting academic priorities. Academic integrity aside, these inefficiencies raise a fundamental issue: if Malaysia aims to join the ranks of innovation-driven nations, our research must serve society, not just institutional metrics. Crucially, a world-class research system cannot stand on a weak educational base. As stressed by Emir Research, any serious innovation agenda requires overhauling how we teach, assess and prepare future researchers. The system must equip students with not just technical skills but also critical thinking, multilingual fluency and interdisciplinary agility – the foundations of innovation in the 21st century. We cannot repeat the mistakes that triggered this global shift – cuts to funding, attacks on scientific integrity and the erosion of academic freedom. Nor can we continue business as usual amid shifting global dynamics. To thrive in this new landscape, Malaysia must recalibrate urgently and deliberately. We need a research system grounded in freedom, impact and structural integrity. This is not just a scientific imperative; it is a national one.
